Cisco Switching/Routing :: N7000 - F2 Card Handle 15000 BGP Ipv4 Route?
May 14, 2012Can a F2 card handle 15000 BGP ipv4 route?
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Layer 3 Connection Between VSS Cluster And N7000
Dec 18, 2011I need a L3 conection between a VSS Cluster and 2 Nexus 7000. Is ECMP the best solution ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: N7000 Inter-AS L3VPN Option B
Nov 29, 2012I ran into problem with design that was prepared for Catalyst 6500, but in the meantime infrastructure got upgraded to Nexus. I have two datacenters connected with 1Gbit line (point-point), both ends of this circuit are N7K. There are few segments (like LAN, DMZ, PUBLIC) in separate VRFs in each DC and intention was to carry over these segments between locations using VPNv4 exchange via BGP. Each location have its own AS number and IPv4 BGP session is running between them (for global routing table at the moment). I tried to add VPNv4 to that peering session, but got message it is not supported in NX-OS for eBGP. Tried to find some more info about such limitation, but failed.
Before I start explore other options like Option A (creating subinterfaces per VRF and running separate IPv4 BGP session in each).
Cisco Switching/Routing :: N7000 Details Of Packets Dropped By COPP Policy
Mar 13, 2012On one of our N7K, we have some packets dropped by the COPP policy in the class-default class-map. Partial results of "show policy-map interface control-plane" not so long after clearing the counters : [code]
what traffic is dropped by the policy ? Is there any logging possible ?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 How Vss Handle Loss Of Switch
Dec 11, 2012How a 6509 pair handles the loss of the other vss switch, and what happens when the other comes back on ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3750x Switch That Handle Its 24 / 48 Ports At 10 Gbps With Copper
Dec 19, 2011Is there a switch that handle its 24/48 ports at 10 Gbps with copper?. I have checked 3750 X but just handle 2 SFP with 10 Gbps.The requirement is to use this switch as CORE and connect 12 switches (access) using its uplinks at 10 Gbps with copper ( in this case 3750 X can be used).using copper at 10 Gbps the distance is still 100 m?
View 9 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3550 Ping Each Other When Configure Ipv4 On Both Vlans
Mar 5, 2013I have problem with IPV6 connectivity, i have two Cisco 3550 switch and they are connected over a trunk link. The ios is c3550- ipservicesk9-mz. 122- 44.SE6 , I have configured vlans on both switches and i numbered one vlan to vlan 91 ,they can ping each other when i configure ipv4 on both vlans so trunk link is functional, but when i m using IPV6 they can't ping each other!! they can only ping their own ip address not each other. [code]
View 11 Replies View RelatedWireless Live Streaming From 15000 Feet High?
Mar 25, 2012I'm a skydiver and since 2 years, the dropzone where I jump have been putting webcam around the area to see what's happening on the dropzone live online. I talk to them about a project and they said it would be great but I don't know how to do it or if it's even possible to do.We would like to put a wireless camera onboard one of the planes so that ppl can see what is happening up there and that would stream live directly on their website like the other cameras they have around... the thing is, we jump from 13 500 feet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3560 - Routing Enabled With / Without Default Gateway Or IP Route Command
Feb 25, 2013We have two catalyst 3560 switches running c3560-ipbasek9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin They are connected using etherchannel using gi 0/21 - 24 interfaces.
on 3560-1 switch, there isn't any ip-default gateway or ip route configured. It only have 1 interface vlan configured.
on 3560-2 switch, there is ip default gateway configured along with 1 interface vlan.
What i dont understand here is that, i can reach out to other subnets from 3560-1 switch in which the routing is not enabled?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 10.2.2.2 / Can Use Standard ACL In Route-map For BGP Fall-over
Jan 22, 2012I haven't got time to test different configurations yet. Just want to quickly ask here about the fall-over route-map configuration. I saw lots of example using pip prefix-list to specify the next-hop for tracking. Is that the only way you can do it? Can you just use a standard ACL to specify that host like permit host 10.2.2.2? ip prefix-list will do like ip prefix-list seq 5 permit 10.2.2.2/32. And you apply the prefix-list to route-map then. ACL will work?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Ip Policy Route-map On 3750g?
Nov 18, 2008I have a 3750g on which I am trying to configure the ip policy route-map command on each of the vlan interfaces. However after entering the command it does not appear. I'm not sure what to do at this point. I have changed the SDM template to routing and I am running the IPServices image.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 2800 Route Filtering
Apr 3, 2012I have a router with two interfaces what i need to filter the HTTP traffic from one interface and the rest of the traffic through the other on my cisco router 2800.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 891 Router Secondary Ip Route
May 22, 2013I have an MPLS network router(Router1) and an internet router(Internet1) at a site of mine(Site1). the MPLS router sends all unknown traffic out the internet router. Router1 is the default gateway for all hosts and directs the traffic.I also have another network at an alternate site (Site2) on the same mpls network also with an internet egress. It is composed of an MPLS router (router2) and an internet router (Internet2).I would like Router1 to send internet bound traffic out Internet2 if Internet1 is down. Basically the statement on Router1 for the unknown traffice is ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.31.1.254I have never heard of IP SLA before but it seems to be the best method for this situation.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 890C-W Cannot Route With PPPoe?
Apr 2, 2013I have a cisco 890c-w with routing and wireless，contain 8 switch ports（fastethernet 0 - 7），one 100m route port（ fastethernnet 8），one giga port gigagethernet 0
configuration pppoe，dialer1 can get WAN IP。
0-7 ports in vlan2，vlan2 config ip add 192.168.1.1
In router，ping 8.8.8.8 is ok，but ping 8.8.8.8 source 192.168.1.1 can not ok，so my pc can not go internet through 0-7 ports。
I think routing problem，but don't find reason
service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname Router!boot-start-markerboot system flash c890-universalk9-mz.151-4.M2.binwarm-rebootboot-end-marker!!enable password password!no aaa new-model!memory-size iomem 15service-module wlan-ap 0 bootimage autonomouscrypto pki token default removal timeout 0! ip source-route!ip cefip name-server 61.234.145.102ip multicast-routing no ipv6 cef!multilink bundle-name authenticatedvpdn enable!vpdn-group PPPoE!license udi pid CISCO892C-
[code]....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Route Map Counters
Mar 19, 2012We're running a simple policy map on a 3750 stack (IOS version 12.2(53)SE2), but the route-map counters do not show any matches:
NYKIRDRCX01#sh route-map
route-map remote-route, permit, sequence 51
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): remoteACL
Set clauses:
ip next-hop 192.168.101.5
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
However, I've confirmed via our netflow monitor that the traffic we're trying to send to the appropriate next hop is, indeed, getting there correctly.
I've seen issues in the past with a 3750 not reporting counters correctly.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Ip Policy Route-map On 3750
Jun 10, 2010I try to enter the command "ip policy route-map" on 3750's interface. But the command doesn't appear. Why? Whereas I see several times that this command is possible on this switch. What I have to do to enter this command?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Cannot Route Between SVIs On 3750
Nov 19, 2012I have a 3750 stack with several vlans and svi's. We have had no need to route between them until now. Here is what I have done...
Created the vlans.. vlan 1 and vlan 25
Given each vlan an ip address vlan 1 10.0.0.2 and vlan 25 is 192.168.5.250
no shut on everything
ip routing
sdm routing preferred
default route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 (isp)
If I'm on the switch I can ping anything on vlan 1 and anything on vlan 25 (the device I'm pinging on vlan25 is the svi and a dsl router 192.168.5.1) From a computer on vlan 1 I can ping the gateway/svi for vlan 1 and the svi for vlan 25 but no devices including the dsl router which pinged fine. If I put the computer on an access port for vlan 25 I can ping everything just fine on vlan 25 but not vlan 1 (gateway set correctly)
As a test I put in a static route ip route 195.113.20.11 255.255.255.255 192.168.5.1
I did a traceroute from the switch and it comes through great. I did a traceroute from the computer and it hits my gateway of 10.0.0.2 vlan 1 and stops.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3750 - Route To 2nd ISP
May 2, 2012I have Catalyst 3750. and 2 ISPs
I wanted to use, let say on port5 of Catalyst 3750 only 2nd the ISP will route to this port.
The rest is pointed to the 1st ISP.
Im thinking of using VLAN..
Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-c3750G -24T / Unable To Look Ip Policy Route-map In PBR?
Apr 22, 2012i have a Layer3 Switch Cisco WS-c3750G -24T , initially i have a IOS version c3750-Ipbase , recentely i have upgraded my IOS to c3750-Ipservices-M to enable to PBR for my network , i have created all the acl and tried to give the route-map with PBR , the command was initiallying but i am not able to see the applied route-map in my policy route , i have gone through the blog and enabled SDM prefer routing , but no luck .
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Route Maps On A 3750 Switch
Feb 16, 2012I have a 3750 switch and I am trying to configure PBR (route-maps) in it.But when I try to apply the policy to a vlan interface the policy does not show in the interface.So I can not use PBR to choose my default gateway!Question: Does PBR work in a 3750 switch? Can PBR be configured in a vlan interface? There is any problem with the IOS that I do not know?
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 7206 - PBR Not Changing Default Route
Sep 5, 2012I have a MPLS cloud in our data center. I want one network coming into our core router to have a different default route than the other networks coming in. I'm getting hits on the acl but the route isn't applied and goes to the default route that is configured in the router. I have other PBR for setting local-preferences and as-paths and they are working fine.
The router is a 7206 Version 12.4(11)T3
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.2.3.4
!
ip access-list extended 2nd_Default_Route
[Code].....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 Default Gateway Ip Route
Jan 24, 2013I have a Cisco 2960 ( WS-C2960-8TC-S) running 12.2(46)SE C2960-LANLITEK9-M image.I would like to set an ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 87.101.156.97 but the current image does not allow.Will ip default-gateway 87.101.156.97 work or do I need ip routing ?The ISP has provided a /30 address and we are using an additional /29 for our network devices. I dont think this image can be upgraded. I need to forward routes directly out to ISP. [code]
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Inside Static Route For ASA 5505
Jul 30, 2012We have two sites: 192.168.100.x and 192.168.101.x currently connected via IPsec VPN. On each end we have a Cisco ASA 5505. However, each site also has an MPLS VPN with intentions to move all traffic to this link. Will this work on the ASA? We need to make sure traffic can hit the ASA @ site A on the inside interface and trafiic will forward to the MPLS VPN router which then handles the traffic. Too, will it cause any problems in bi-directional flow between the two sites?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: How To Configure Route Between Two Subnets On 2960-S
Jun 21, 2012configuring a working route between two subnets (172.28.0.0/16 and 192.168.0.0/24) on a Cisco Catalyst 2960-S.
Problem: The subnet 172.28.0.0/16 is on VLAN 40 and the clients on this subnet have to access a preconfigured device with an ip in 192.168.0.0/24 subnet. The configuration of this device cannot be changed.
I have an Cisco 2960-S Lan Base (c2960s-universalk9-tar.150-1.SE3) switch [URL] that I would like to use to solve this problem.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: C3750G-16 - No Route To Specific Subnet
Feb 9, 2012I have Catalyst C3750G switch
with configured route to subnet 192.168.201.0/24
ip routing
ip route 192.168.201.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.160.13
192.168.160.13 is accessible
[Code].....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: IP SLA On 3750 Default Route Failover
Jul 27, 2010IP SLA configuration fails over but cannot ping the 4.2.2.2 via Site B. Here is the output on Cisco 3750...
SW2#show runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 2901 bytes!version 12.2no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname SW2!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!!!no aaa
[Code].....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3550 OSPF Default Route
Aug 19, 2012I'm working on a little OSPF setup in my lab and having a problem pinging out to the internet.I have a setup with (3) 3550's running ip routing. I'm configuring OSPF but I can't ping the internet from any L3 switch except the switch with the actual uplink to the internet.[code] From SW2 and SW3, I can ping SW1 on all IPs (192.168.1.90, 10.10.10.1, 10.10.10.5) but I can't ping 192.168.1.1 which is my gateway to the internet.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 887 - Add Static Route Through Another Host Within Same Vlan
May 29, 2012this is router 887, its vlan is 192.168.3.1/24. If I'd like to add a static route via different host within same vlan, rather than the router, like:
ip route 192.168.100.0/24 192.168.3.6
How can we achieve it? I tried adding it directly and failed:
(config)#ip route 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.6
%Invalid next hop address (it's this router)
Cisco Switching/Routing :: ASA 5505 - Port 80 Route Between Vlans
Apr 14, 2013I have 2 Vlans with seperate networks and want to create a route between one server in vlan 465 to another server in vlan 436 via port 80.Vlan 465 has a ASA 5505 inside that IP address 89.254.12.35 will be initiating the connection to address 10.200.1.213.
-Vlan 465: server address 10.200.1.213
-Vlan 436: server address 89.254.12.35
However for extended security I would like to restrict the firewall opening to an IP to IP opening.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4507 Not Able To Route Multiple Ip Ranges
Apr 24, 2012I have this cisco 4507 switch that I need to configure multiple ip ranges on. The problem is that I can only configure two ip ranges on it, one ip range on the management vlan and the other ip range on vlan 2. After I have configured these 2 vlans with different ip ranges, I can route between then and get them to talk to each other, but that is all I can do. If I add another vlan with a different IP range I cannot see it from the switch or get any of the otehr ip ranges to see it.
I am doing something dumb because this is a layer 4 device so it should be able to route the ip ranges. I have tried everything just cannot get it to work. I have assigned the IP range directly to the port number and directly to the vlans. Just wont work.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: ASA5505 / Route External IP To Internal IP
Mar 20, 2013I have an internal DVR system that I am trying to share to the outside world. We recently put in an ASA5505 and I am having trouble getting the settings correct.I want to use an external IP to access the DVR system from anywhere and have my ASA5505 redirect the traffic to the internal IP address. I assume I need to use a NAT and a route policy however can not figure out how it would be.
View 11 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: ASR 1001 - Trace Route / HSRP / VRF
Mar 24, 2013when i make a trace route on an ASR 1001 router to 172.23.30.7 I get the following output:
VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
1 192.168.99.192 0 msec
192.168.99.191 1 msec
192.168.99.192 0 msec
2 172.23.30.243 1 msec 1 msec 1 msec
3 172.23.30.7 1 msec 1 msec 1 msec
Is there a loop between 192.168.99.191 and .192 (this are two routers with hsrp .190) or is this normal behavior when using trace route on an asr 1001?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stack And Route-Maps?
Feb 6, 2013I have a Cisco 3750 stack with 5 members.
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------
1 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
2 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
* 3 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
4 52 WS-C3750G-48TS 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
5 52 WS-C3750G-48TS 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
I have recently set the sdm prefer template to routing to allow route-maps and rebooted the stack:
3750GCORE#show sdm preferThe current template is "desktop routing" template.The selected template optimizes the resources inthe switch to support this level of features for8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.
number of unicast mac addresses: 3K number of IPv4 IGMP groups + multicast routes: 1K number of IPv4 unicast routes: 11K number of directly-connected IPv4 hosts: 3K number of indirect IPv4 routes: 8K number of IPv4 policy based routing aces: 0.5K number of IPv4/MAC qos aces: 0.5K number of IPv4/MAC security aces: 1K
I still cannot apply a route map to a vlan interface however:
I have preconfigured the route map as per below to take traffic from one particular client and pass it to the inside interface of our ASA firewall:(yes i know 192.9.0.0 is a public network, its an inherited problem that is in process of being remedied!)
ip access-list extended TEST
permit ip host 192.9.216.234 any
permit icmp host 192.9.216.234 any
permit tcp host 192.9.216.234 any
route-map TEST_MAP permit 9
match ip address TEST
set ip default next-hop 192.9.201.10
When i do the following I get this error from debug:
3750GCORE#config t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
3750GCORE(config)#int vlan 216
3750GCORE(config-if)#ip policy route-map TEST_MAP
3750GCORE(config-if)#
007804: Feb 8 03:16:55: %PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTED_RMAP: Route-map TEST_MAP not supported for Policy-Based Routing
when I show the running config, the route-map is not there.3750GCORE#show running-config int vlan 216Building configuration...Current configuration : 205 bytes!interface Vlan216
no ip redirectsip directed-broadcast 101end
why TEST_MAP is not supported?