enable dot1q encapsulation on two ethernet ports on a 1721 router. I am able to configure it on the built in fastethernet port, but not on any interface provided by a WIC-1ENET or a WIC-4ESW. I have an application that requires two physical ethernet ports that support dot1q encapsulation.
View 4 RepliesI have a Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e UNIVERSAL-M), Version 03.02.00.XO RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2). So I just wanted to verify that the switch only does dot1q encapsulation because the switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q command does not work.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm setting up a new 4900m running cat4500e-ipbase-mz.122-53.SG5.bin. I'm attempting to create Port-Channels as a Trunk for uplink to a 4503 running cat4500-ipbase-mz.122-37.SG1.bin.When I attempt the command "switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q" it errors out.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure a 4507 R chassis with Dual SUP but i cannot see teh switchpot mode trunk encapsulation dot1q?
I have typed:
interface GigabitEthernet5/1
description DOWNLINK toxxxxxx
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 11 mode on
!
I have have searched all other commands and sub-commands but could only find dot1q-tunnel which I beleive is for QINQ or some QoS featues and lot for L2 encapsulations?
the puzzling is:
XXX-Core4507#sh int gi5/1 trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Gi5/1 off 802.1q notrnk-bndl 1
(Po11)
when I connect the dostribution switch a 3507 to this int gi 5/1, both interfaces do come up?
I am trying to config a 2620 Cisco router to perform subintreface (F0/0.1) for Vlan Trunk Protocol, however when I try to configure the encapsulation dot1q, I continue to receive error massage with ^ symbol below the 'c' See below, the platform version is a 12.3(26) which should be acceptable to perform an (encapsulation dot1q). The Ethernet is a fast-Ethernet 10/100 port. I also try the ISL, I receive the same massage.
Router#config t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
Router(config)#int f0/0
[Code]....
Long time since I have had to configure a router and have a small project
Here is what I have in a simple diagram:
PC(static IP)--to--Switch--to--(Ethernet0 int, WIC0)1721 router(FastEthernet0 int, built-in)--to--Switch--to--PC(DHCP)
I need static IP PC to be able to ping the DHCP client. Static IP units 10.1.1.x/16, DHCP clients 10.1.3.x/16.
I have found these overlap and thus give errors and will even shutdown the interface if I enable certain things like routing or bridging.
So I gather I need to change one interface IP range, which would be the DHCP side, I need to stay 10.1.1.x/16 for static side.
I am working on a backup system for my WAN. Verizon quoted the HWIC-3G-CDMA-V to work with my Cisco 1721 router. I have a bunch on these routers on a shelf and thought I would use them for the 3G network. Looking at the Cisco web site it does not list the 1721 as being able to work with this HWIC. I thought it might not be listed as the 1700 series are End of life. Whether it will work?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI would like to know can we configure vlans with cisco 1721 Modular Router? Is it Possible to configure lan environment with the vlans configured in 1721 router without a managed switch?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am using a bunch of Cisco 1721 routers for my T1 lines. We recently purchased Digi cell modems as a backup for the T1. On configuring vrrp to work on both devices I discovered that IOS 12.3(6c) does not support the "vrrp track" feature. After reviewing the Cisco Feature Navigator I could not see an IOS that will support the vrrp object tracking. Is that correct? The routers have T1 WIC's installed. If it does work what is the latest IOS that will work on this end of life product?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to do dot1q-tunneling on the new Cisco Calalyst 2960 Compact series switches? I know that the 3560 series support it, but im unable to find any information about the 2960C series, personally i doubt it as the standard 2960 series don't support it.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi'm desperately trying to get LACP working over a dot1q Tunnel. The "Service Provider" Switches are two 4506-E Switches with SUP7-E connected via a 10G Link, running on cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.03.00.SG.151-1.SG
sample config:
dot1q tag vlan native
interface GigabitEthernet3/1
switchport access vlan 2001
[Code].....
If you have a router with multiple direct vanilla FE (non trunked) interfaces on a switch trying to send QOS tagged packets to a wifi bridge several switches away does the trunking in the switched infrastructure mess with the qos tags if no qos is configured on the switches.
Does it depend on the switch? We have new 2960's running 12.2 and a few older 2950's running 12.1
In fact i receive traffic on a one client per vlan basis (traffic is PPPoE), i receive all this traffic on a router, collecting all these vlan on a bridge where the pppoe packets are treated.When I use a transeiver to convert operator fiber arrival to my router copper media interface, i have no problem....
When I use dot1q-tunnel to make the same on my 3750, packets seems to be corrupted.I get PPPoE timeouts and packet loss, not regulary, totally stochastic...
I made dozen of tests and different settings, without success I first thougt of MTU issues. [code] I made tests with system MTU and/or system jumbo MTU above 1500, without success.I didn't found any known caveats on 3750 running Version 12.2(25r)SEE4 related to dot1q-tunnel.
Example config
int g2/24
service-policy output test
#and/OR
int g2/24.10
encap dot1q 10
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
service-policy output test
router 1721 with one wic-1adsl ,i have adsl conection with irb static ip. the router connect with mannaged switch through a trunk port. the switch has 2 vlans one for the static IPs and the other for private lan. i need the private lan to be able to go to internet. vlan2 can go to internet because it has the same subnet with provider but vlan 1 canot go internet, so how i can make all vlans go internet(the router has only 1 fastethernet port)
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a 1721 router installed with both an adsl wic and a 4 port switch wic card. My setup is as follows:
pc connected to port 3 (mode access on vlan 20) on the 4 port switch wic (installed in 1721 router)port 4 is configured as trunk (encap dot1q) and connected to fasethernet 0 (inbuild of 1721)fastethernet 0 configured with no ip address?
created sub-interface fastethernet 0.20 with encapsulation dot1q on vlan 20?ip address of sub interface 0.20 is 192.168.20.240?pc nic ip address is 192.168.20.245 however cannot ping 20.240?I want to use only this router with its switch wic for vlans and internet?
I started to set up a 1721 router with WIC-4ESW. This is on an internal network, so only looking to just do routing from FA/0's interface to the networks attached to ports on the WIC. I first assigned just VLANs to 2 of the ports and this did not work. So I did some reading up and decided to use bridge groups. Except I still can not access the interfaces on the WIC. And by that I mean on the router itself I can not ping the ip assigned to the BVI.
I have another 1721 w/4 port that long ago I seem to remember simply assigning VLANs to the interfaces and I was able to communicate between the networks without issue (or maybe I just don't rememer that well). Thing is I should be able to at least ping the internal interfaces shouldn't I (assuming the status is up). I don't know why BVI2 and 3 are listed as down, nor do I seem to know how to bring these up.
This is what ip int br gives me:
1721#sh ip int br
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
BVI2 192.168.101.1 YES manual down down
[Code]....
I have set up a couple of vlans on a cisco 1721 router 4esw card using the vlan database and assigning an ip address of 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x for each vlan interface.Strangely enough connected computers can talk to the other vlan and I have not set any subinterfaces on the etherner0 (layer 3) and not even connected a cable.Is there any reason why this should happen since they should not talk to eachother being on seperate vlans.Doing a tracert shows that first the vlan ip address is hit and then straight to the target pc in the other vlan?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI can ping [URL], from the router but not from a client attached to the router dhcp interface(10.1.3.1). When I turn on ip routing I cannot ping at all. Here is the config I have now that can ping the internet from the router.
sh runBuilding configuration... Current configuration : 1191 bytes!! No configuration change since last restart!version 12.3no service timestamps debug uptimeservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname
[code]....
I have a Cisco 1721 router with an ADSL wic. I have followed guides on the Cisco website so that I can connect the router to my home adsl connection. The router connects to my broadband provider and sucesfully obtains an IP address along with Dynamically assigned DNS servers. I am able to ping google.co.uk from the router but not from clients attached via DHCP.
I have noticed that if I ping the IP address of google.co.uk from a client it resolves but it will not resolve the name. This would lead me to believe that the problem lies with DNS resolution/forwarding but I do not know how to investigate further.
My company just assumed management of a remote entity. The network has several misconfigurations and I need to make some network modifications from my office w/o losing access or incurring lengthy outage to the clients. The network consists of 1721 router and three 2960 switches.
- I only have access to the router from the Internet. I telnet off the router to the 3 switches.
The site uses a single class C 192.168.1.0 / 24. The router is running RIPv2 even though this is the only network. The prior network person (contractor) set up separate native vlans on each switch and all the ports are defined as Native trunk and access are defined to the VLAN interface assigned to the switch. So of course the logs are flooded with Native VLAN mismatch, Each 2960 switch is a VTP server but has no VTP domain.
basic network layout:
Internet => Eth [Cisco 1721] => Fa 0 192.168.1.254 ==> [SW1]
[SW1]
interface Vlan1
no ip address
no ip route-cache!interface Vlan220ip address 192.168.1.219 255.255.255.0no ip route-cache
[code]....
!interface GigabitEthernet0/1description SW2 Gi0/1switchport access vlan 204switchport trunk native vlan 204!interface GigabitEthernet0/2switchport access vlan 204switchport trunk native vlan 204!interface Vlan1no ip addressno ip route-cache!interface Vlan204ip address 192.168.1.224 255.255.255.0no ip route-cache Normally, I would assign the current 192.168.1.254 to a subinterface to Router Fe 0/0 but with each switch having its own native VLAN I am afraid I will lose connectivity to the downstream switches -- my only access is telnet off the Cisco1721 Router.
encapsulation of routing protocols. Where exactly in the OSI, or TCP/IP for that matter, model does the data of the routing protocol fit into ? Is it encapsulated inside the transport layer segment payload ? So far from the I've gathered, that's where it should fit.
#####@@@@$$$$routing/procotocol/and/data/etc#####
#-Data link header and trailer
@-Network layer header
$-Transport layer header.
I am trying to setup a cisco 2600 router that will be used to connect to a Qwest internet T1. I will have a Cisco ASA firewall behind the router so that I can build a site to site VPN tunnel. Qwest requires PPP encapsulation. The Lan side network is 10.2.0.0/16. Qwest gave me their serial IP address and my serial ip address which was I used to configure the route. The ethernet interface was configured for the local Lan side subnet and i natted both the inside and outside interface of the router. I am not sure if this is correct. How do I configure the router so that I can use one of the available public IP Addresses as the outside interface of the ASA?
Here is the config of the router:
version 12.2no parser cacheno service single-slot-reload-enableservice timestamps debug uptimeservice timestamps log uptimeno service password-encryption!hostname cedar!logging rate-limit console 10 except errorsenable secret 5 xxxxxxxxxxenable password xxxxxx!ip subnet-zeroip audit notify logip audit po max-events 100no ip dhcp-client network-discoverycall rsvp-syncinterface FastEthernet0/0description Lan Interfaceip address 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.0ip nat insideno ip route-cacheno ip mroute-cachespeed autofull-duplexno mop enabled!interface Serial0/0ip address 65.121.x.x 255.255.255.252ip nat outsideencapsulation pppfair-queueservice-module t1 clock source internalservice-module t1 timeslots 1-24!ip nat inside source list 1 interface Serial0/0 overloadip classlessip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 65.121.x.x (qwest serial IP address)ip http serverip http authentication local!access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0
Second laptop attached to cisco 10mb port with an IP address of 10.18.158.200 and the cisco interface 10.18.158.254.Okay, here is what is happening and I cannot work it out.If I ping, from Laptop 1 to the cisco subinterface on 192.168.94.253 it is succesful. If I ping from the 1721 to Laptop 1 it is successful. I see the VPN come up and the rulebase on the junipers show the traffic flowing across (ICMP).If I ping, from the 10.18.158.254 interface via telnet on the 1721, I can ping all the way through to 192.168.194.254, which is the gateway for Laptop 1.
View 1 Replies View Relatedconfiguring VPN in my cisco 1721 router to connect in vpn client
I have the public IPs.
I am going to configure ospf on cisco 1721 router but when I give command
conf t
router ospf 116
it does not show (config-router)
I am attaching sh run and sh version herewith attachment
I have a 1721 router with 3 equal routes to 0.0.0.0, using CEF for load balancing with universal load balancing algorithm. It doesn`t NAT, just routing. I wonder which is the maximum capacity of the router, since it should support up to 40000 connections to different destination IP. Is the limit set by the router resources (CPU, memory, ...) or a maximum limit of entries in the table FIB / RIB?
View 7 Replies View RelatedTrying to work out if I can setup a VLAN interface on a 1721 router.The only interfaces that are listed are the Ethernet (W1-ENET) and the Fast Ethernet interface.I'm still super new to all of this and learn how to change IOS via rommon and TFTP after realizing I had an IOS too large for the memory?
View 3 Replies View RelatedMonday, I had a cisco 1750 router in place suddenly stop communicating to a Larscom ISP owned unit. Since then I have sent two replacement 1721 routers with WIC-1ENET cards. I have used the original straight thru cable to connect the 10baset port on the Larscom to my E0 on the WIC-1ENET. No link lights on either. I have also tried a known working straight thru cable and a crossover cable. No link lights.
I can take a crossover cable from a pc and ping the E0 port without issue. The ISP is telling me it is an issue with my equipment.
I am in the process of configuring two vpn tunnels on one interface of cisco router series 1721. Any link or document with more information?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have the Cisco series “Cisco 1700” routers operational at my client site, These router suddenly get reboot with 1 or 2 hrs gap. See the below errors which has been captured in router logs:
============================================================
00:00:09: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console
00:00:11: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted --
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-Y-M), Version 12.2(16.1)T, MAINTENANCE INTERIM S
OFTWARE
TAC Support: [URL]
[code]....
I managed to setup a 1721 router as a vpn server connecting to it using a cisco vpn client however altough I am obtaining an ip address as defined in the dhcp pool I am unable to communicate with both the remote network and also I have no internet as soon as I connect.
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to set up a vpn tunnel on a 1721 router that uses the following ios:
c1700-y7-mz.124-13b.bin
I thought I had read somewhere that tunnels were not supported on the 1700s but wanted to make sure. If they are I would like to know if they are supported in the above ios.