Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1721 WIC-4ESW Cannot Get BVI To Work
Mar 11, 2012
I started to set up a 1721 router with WIC-4ESW. This is on an internal network, so only looking to just do routing from FA/0's interface to the networks attached to ports on the WIC. I first assigned just VLANs to 2 of the ports and this did not work. So I did some reading up and decided to use bridge groups. Except I still can not access the interfaces on the WIC. And by that I mean on the router itself I can not ping the ip assigned to the BVI.
I have another 1721 w/4 port that long ago I seem to remember simply assigning VLANs to the interfaces and I was able to communicate between the networks without issue (or maybe I just don't rememer that well). Thing is I should be able to at least ping the internal interfaces shouldn't I (assuming the status is up). I don't know why BVI2 and 3 are listed as down, nor do I seem to know how to bring these up.
This is what ip int br gives me:
1721#sh ip int br
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
BVI2 192.168.101.1 YES manual down down
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 22, 2012
I am working on a backup system for my WAN. Verizon quoted the HWIC-3G-CDMA-V to work with my Cisco 1721 router. I have a bunch on these routers on a shelf and thought I would use them for the 3G network. Looking at the Cisco web site it does not list the 1721 as being able to work with this HWIC. I thought it might not be listed as the 1700 series are End of life. Whether it will work?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2013
I am using a bunch of Cisco 1721 routers for my T1 lines. We recently purchased Digi cell modems as a backup for the T1. On configuring vrrp to work on both devices I discovered that IOS 12.3(6c) does not support the "vrrp track" feature. After reviewing the Cisco Feature Navigator I could not see an IOS that will support the vrrp object tracking. Is that correct? The routers have T1 WIC's installed. If it does work what is the latest IOS that will work on this end of life product?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2011
I have a 2811 ISR, a lab unit with almost nothing yet configured other than some IP networks on serial and FE interfaces to ping to other lab routers. And I have one HWIC-4ESW installed, and I amrunning IOS 15.2.I want to set the card as a single routable interface and just have the ports act like switch ports, which I imagine is the default design of these cardsI work a lot with Cisco 891 ISRs so figured it's the same here, assign an IP to interface Vlan1 and all is well. That was wrong, obviously more config is required.It seems there are a lot of differing answers out there, so far none what worked for me. The best looking one I could find said to assign an IP to the Vlan 1 interface, then go to each of the four FE interfaces on the switch module.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2012
Maybe this was listed in the release notes for the product and I missed it, but can this item support Etherchannel in a 2801 router? I installed the module into the router and the router recognizes the module. I can configure the ports as access or trunk ports, but I am unable to configure the channel-protocol or the channel-group for the Etherchannel. The IOS on the router is 15.1 M with the upgraded Bootloader version 12.3.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2012
We have been facing a problem at my company ! We have a Cisco Router 1921 with one HWIC-4ESW in trunking with a RuggedCom switch RSG2100.When I use the GigabitEthernet port to make a trunk, I create 2 sub-interfaces (one for each Vlan) and configure the Port on Switch as Trunk, the inter-VLan routing works with no problem.But now I need to use this configuration using the HWIC-4ESW on Router, and I can't do this work. I try creat interface Vlan for each vlan, and try creating the VLans at Router Vlans database, but no way. At router I enter in interface and try to do the switchport trunk command to add a Vlan, but doesn't work.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2012
Does Cisco 1921-SEC/K9 support HWIC-4ESW ? I require 4 x 10/100 Ethernet ports
If yes how many ? are there any drawbacks if i use this module instead of a switch?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2012
We have cisco 2911/k9 we fixed 2 HWIC-4ESW crds in 2911. I create 4 vlan i have assigned 1 HWIC-4ESW all vlans are working fine
when i configure 5 th vlan it assigned second HWIC-4ESW 1 port but interface status showing up. i connected one system to that port i try
to ping that port that port notable to pinging is there any activation for that second HWIC-4ESW.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2012
We have two cards HWIC-4ESW on router 3845 but we need that the two cards 8 ports conected betwen, if a pc on port 1 can ping a pc conected on port 8 on second card. tis comunication can,t doing a pc on port 1 can,t conected a pc on port 8.
the configuration is the folowing
interface FastEthernet0/0/0
switchport access vlan 100
speed 100
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2012
I put a second HWIC-4ES in a 3825 router and it does not work, only work the first card that is inserted, I use the slot 0 for it, the 0/0 and 1/0 work with serial card only if I put the HWIC-4ESW in this slots the router does not work, only work in 0/2 and 0/3 but only one, I need to know if there is a command to active it because the data sheet in CISCO indicate that this model of router support 2 HWIC-4ESW. url...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2012
Any configuration guide for EHWIC-4ESW card. Also the difference in configuration between EHWIC-4ESWG and HWIC-4ESW if any?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2013
router 1721 with one wic-1adsl ,i have adsl conection with irb static ip. the router connect with mannaged switch through a trunk port. the switch has 2 vlans one for the static IPs and the other for private lan. i need the private lan to be able to go to internet. vlan2 can go to internet because it has the same subnet with provider but vlan 1 canot go internet, so how i can make all vlans go internet(the router has only 1 fastethernet port)
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2011
I have a 1721 router installed with both an adsl wic and a 4 port switch wic card. My setup is as follows:
pc connected to port 3 (mode access on vlan 20) on the 4 port switch wic (installed in 1721 router)port 4 is configured as trunk (encap dot1q) and connected to fasethernet 0 (inbuild of 1721)fastethernet 0 configured with no ip address?
created sub-interface fastethernet 0.20 with encapsulation dot1q on vlan 20?ip address of sub interface 0.20 is 192.168.20.240?pc nic ip address is 192.168.20.245 however cannot ping 20.240?I want to use only this router with its switch wic for vlans and internet?
View 20 Replies
View Related
Sep 14, 2012
I have set up a couple of vlans on a cisco 1721 router 4esw card using the vlan database and assigning an ip address of 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x for each vlan interface.Strangely enough connected computers can talk to the other vlan and I have not set any subinterfaces on the etherner0 (layer 3) and not even connected a cable.Is there any reason why this should happen since they should not talk to eachother being on seperate vlans.Doing a tracert shows that first the vlan ip address is hit and then straight to the target pc in the other vlan?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2011
Long time since I have had to configure a router and have a small project
Here is what I have in a simple diagram:
PC(static IP)--to--Switch--to--(Ethernet0 int, WIC0)1721 router(FastEthernet0 int, built-in)--to--Switch--to--PC(DHCP)
I need static IP PC to be able to ping the DHCP client. Static IP units 10.1.1.x/16, DHCP clients 10.1.3.x/16.
I have found these overlap and thus give errors and will even shutdown the interface if I enable certain things like routing or bridging.
So I gather I need to change one interface IP range, which would be the DHCP side, I need to stay 10.1.1.x/16 for static side.
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2012
I can ping [URL], from the router but not from a client attached to the router dhcp interface(10.1.3.1). When I turn on ip routing I cannot ping at all. Here is the config I have now that can ping the internet from the router.
sh runBuilding configuration... Current configuration : 1191 bytes!! No configuration change since last restart!version 12.3no service timestamps debug uptimeservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname
[code]....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2012
enable dot1q encapsulation on two ethernet ports on a 1721 router. I am able to configure it on the built in fastethernet port, but not on any interface provided by a WIC-1ENET or a WIC-4ESW. I have an application that requires two physical ethernet ports that support dot1q encapsulation.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 1, 2013
I have a Cisco 1721 router with an ADSL wic. I have followed guides on the Cisco website so that I can connect the router to my home adsl connection. The router connects to my broadband provider and sucesfully obtains an IP address along with Dynamically assigned DNS servers. I am able to ping google.co.uk from the router but not from clients attached via DHCP.
I have noticed that if I ping the IP address of google.co.uk from a client it resolves but it will not resolve the name. This would lead me to believe that the problem lies with DNS resolution/forwarding but I do not know how to investigate further.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 15, 2012
I would like to know can we configure vlans with cisco 1721 Modular Router? Is it Possible to configure lan environment with the vlans configured in 1721 router without a managed switch?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2012
My company just assumed management of a remote entity. The network has several misconfigurations and I need to make some network modifications from my office w/o losing access or incurring lengthy outage to the clients. The network consists of 1721 router and three 2960 switches.
- I only have access to the router from the Internet. I telnet off the router to the 3 switches.
The site uses a single class C 192.168.1.0 / 24. The router is running RIPv2 even though this is the only network. The prior network person (contractor) set up separate native vlans on each switch and all the ports are defined as Native trunk and access are defined to the VLAN interface assigned to the switch. So of course the logs are flooded with Native VLAN mismatch, Each 2960 switch is a VTP server but has no VTP domain.
basic network layout:
Internet => Eth [Cisco 1721] => Fa 0 192.168.1.254 ==> [SW1]
[SW1]
interface Vlan1
no ip address
no ip route-cache!interface Vlan220ip address 192.168.1.219 255.255.255.0no ip route-cache
[code]....
!interface GigabitEthernet0/1description SW2 Gi0/1switchport access vlan 204switchport trunk native vlan 204!interface GigabitEthernet0/2switchport access vlan 204switchport trunk native vlan 204!interface Vlan1no ip addressno ip route-cache!interface Vlan204ip address 192.168.1.224 255.255.255.0no ip route-cache Normally, I would assign the current 192.168.1.254 to a subinterface to Router Fe 0/0 but with each switch having its own native VLAN I am afraid I will lose connectivity to the downstream switches -- my only access is telnet off the Cisco1721 Router.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2012
Second laptop attached to cisco 10mb port with an IP address of 10.18.158.200 and the cisco interface 10.18.158.254.Okay, here is what is happening and I cannot work it out.If I ping, from Laptop 1 to the cisco subinterface on 192.168.94.253 it is succesful. If I ping from the 1721 to Laptop 1 it is successful. I see the VPN come up and the rulebase on the junipers show the traffic flowing across (ICMP).If I ping, from the 10.18.158.254 interface via telnet on the 1721, I can ping all the way through to 192.168.194.254, which is the gateway for Laptop 1.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2012
I have recently split the voice vlan (10) from the data network (1), and am wondering why my catalysts and router do not require an interface Vlan10 statement. In the past I used OpenBSD boxes to do the routing, and I first needed to configure vlan 10 on the interface before I could get inter-vlan communication to work. With these Cisco devices it works, and I am wondering if it is because of VTP, for the fact that the ports maybe just pass all traffic, or is there some other explanation? Below is the setup, and firmware is up-to-date on all of the devices.
When I plug a phone into the POE SGE, the phone turns on, obtains an address on the proper subnet, and conversations are clear (whereas without the ip nat inside on the new subnet the calls had a lot of static). Possibly the reason that it works is because the phones properly create the tcp/ip packet, and it hops over the trunks and creates the states so that traffic routes back properly. I will install wireshark to see exactly what is going on, but is there a simple explanation that I am overlooking?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2012
The N2K data sheet says that it doesn't, but I want to confirm that it isn't old information. How to have this working and what versions are you using?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2013
scenario A
A site .
PBX --->
Data ---> other brand router ----> 3750X ---> wan
[Code]....
How to know whether QoS work on the 3750X or not ? Is it correct about the config in scenario A ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 19, 2012
I wonder if Cisco 1000BASE-T SFP can work with CAT-6 cable. I believe it can. But in the Cisco datasheet, it only mentions that “The 1000BASE-T SFP operates on standard Category 5 unshielded twisted pair copper cabling of up to 100m (328 ft) link length”.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2012
Recently I'm working with my client to setup their network and he want me to limit user access internet bandwidth to 2 Mbps and the topology show below.Users ---> Switch ---> NAT Router ---> (int gi1/0/24 - qos apply) Edge Switch ---> INTERNET ROUTER (12Mbps) --->> INTERNET,This is my configuration, but it doesn't work, the end user still able to get more than 2Mbps internet speed.Access-list 100 permit ip any any dscp default,class-map match-all QoS_Floor_Limit, match access-group 100.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2011
will the AIM-COMPR2-V2 will work with the 2621xm
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2013
I created the configuration below to limit the bandwidth, but doesn't work
Qos - 3750
!
mls qosmls qos map policed-dscp 10 to 8!class-map match-all Testmatch access-group name ACL!policy-map QOSdescription Limit 10M set ip dscp af11 police
[Code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2013
I have switch Cisco 3560 and I would like to filter multicast traffic. Short explanation. This are multicast addresses from provider on VLAN 888 :
I expect that streams from acl Streamfrom888 will be dropped and the rest of streams will be forwarded. Unfortunately traffic from all streams passs through.how to configure VACL or where in my configuration is mistake?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2012
I have a 2960G that I keep on the bench as a work switch. I assigned an IP address to it. The techs have had trouble imaging workstations using GHOST. Do any config changes need to be made to enable multicast to work? Everything is in VLAN1 at this point and the GHOST server is also the DHCP server.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2012
Just I have upgraded some 2960S to IOS 15.0(2)SE from a IOS 15.0(1)SE3 and the catalyst don't switch any IPv6 traffic. Don't work any RA and also don't work any unicast IPv6 traffic from any interface. I can see some references to IPv6 changes in the FHS (First Hop Security) in the Release Notes, but no any reference to changes in the configuration.
The switches don't have any IPv6 specific configuration and the sdm is the default templata. Returning to 15.0(1)SE3 everything work ok.
On Catalyst 2960, and 3560E this IOS version seem to work fine with IPv6.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2013
I have PC_A and PC_B connected to the same switch, and are put in the same vlan. PC_A is the master (source) and PC_B is the destination (client). IGMP Snooping is enabled by default.
Is there any reason why this should fail? There is no RP or any interface with PIM enabled. Its a flat network with a source and client in the same vlan...
IH-3750-LOADTEST-101#show ip igmp snooping vlan 724
Global IGMP Snooping configuration:
-------------------------------------------
IGMP snooping : Enabled
[Code].....
View 19 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2013
I have C3750X with C3KX-NM-10G, and have-T SFP in slot 3 ( means it is not in SFP+ slot ).I need to set speed&duplex hard to 100/Full, but if I do the link goes down. I have the same settings on the other side, only IOS version is different.I tried other speeds - 10 and 1000, but no one works with Full. When I change duplex to Auto it works fine.The reason why I am doing this on C3KX-NM-10G is because I need to use NetFlow and cannot use the chassis' copper port. At the moment the ports are connected through a copper patch cord, but in full production there will be a radio link in between that requires 100M/Full to be set hard.I am trying to search for any document that would describe this limitation, but cannot find any. Also port capabilities do not indicate duplex could not be set to full:
show interfaces g1/1/3 capabilities
GigabitEthernet1/1/3
Model: WS-C3750X-48P
Type: 10/100/1000BaseTX SFP
Speed: 10,100,1000,10000,auto
Duplex: half,full,auto
Trunk encap. type: 802.1Q,ISL
[code]....
View 5 Replies
View Related
