Cisco VPN :: Setting Up A GRE Using IPSEC On 7604?
Jun 27, 2011To establish s secure tunnel using GRE with IPSec do I need to add a SPA-IPSEC module to my 7604 chassis?
View 1 RepliesTo establish s secure tunnel using GRE with IPSec do I need to add a SPA-IPSEC module to my 7604 chassis?
View 1 RepliesCo-worker just got a Blackberry Playbook tablet and, try as I might, we cannot get the darn thing to successfully set up a working IPSEC/L2TP vpn tunnel to our ASA 5510, which acts as a multi-purpose VPN concentrator. Any luck setting up L2TP/IPSEC VPN to ASA from Blackberry Playbook?
View 0 Replies View RelatedWe bought a RV220W in order to get a VPN in our Small Business. The RV220W will only be used to let clients connect to it and not a tunnel between another VPN box.We could use QuickVPN, but it won't be working in our case, because in order to use QuickVPN, the router wants to change its IP 10.x.y.1. Because we have multiple servers/services that are using a static IP, it would be quite painful to change the subnet. Therefore, we would like to stay on the same subnet and change it in worst case scenario only. This is why QuickVPN is not an option here.We could use SSL VPN, but most of our clients who will connect to the VPN are using Windows 7 x64. I have tried the Windows 7 x64 fix told in the latest firmware release notes, but I can't get it to work on my computer, which is a Win7 x64. It might still be broken. Many of them are not very tech-savyy, so I can't tell them to use a virtual machine to connect.We want a secure connection, therefore IPSec is better than PPTP. I've been trying to setup IPSec for the past hours but I can't get it working. At first, I wanted to use an SSL certificate, but having no luck with this, I switched to a Pre-shared Key (PSK) in order to get things simpler. Eventually I would like to use an SSL certificate, however I would like to get PSK working first to confirm that the IPSec connection is working.
I have attached with this post, screenshots of the IKE and VPN Policies. I have used the VPN Wizard in order to complete these fields. The local identifier is the WAN DynDNS FQDN. However, as for the remote FQDN, there should be none really, because clients are connecting to it, so the RV220W won't know in advance who's connecting and from where. I have read that when using the Responder type, the remote settings should not matter. Also, the PSK is 25 caracters long.After setting the RV220W up, I have set up a L2TP/IPSec VPN connection on my Windows 7. I have set up the connection to connect to the DynDNS address and set up the PSK in the Advanced settings. After I typed my IPSec username and password to connect (which was created in the IPSec users section), Windows tries to connect and times out :
Error 789 : The L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer.
At the same time on the RV220W, this error shows up in the logs :
2012-08-26 23:45:24: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Could not find configuration for 24.54.xx.xx[500]
I can't figure out what I am doing wrong. I've read the Administration manual quite a few times and it seems that I have followed everything by the book.I have tried to enable/disable my Windows firewall, but did not get any luck. The RV220W is located at a remote office, to make sure that I can connect from the outside, before you think that I'm trying to connect to the outside, from the inside I have changed few settings in the IKE policy to try to make it work. Settings such as the Exchange Mode, because I've read that the Aggressive mode had issues. At this moment, the settings are back to default, once the wizard has been run. I'm thinking about setting a PPTP to confirm that this works, then move up to IPSec PSK, then to IPSec SSL Certificate.
I'm setting up a IPSec Tunnel between 3800 and 2600 routers over the internet.
Do I need to create a tunnel interface as they suggest in this document? [URL]
I just watched a couple of you tube videos saying I don't need to do that...
setting up IPsec for a DMVPN between a 2811 and 2951s in a test lab. I have enabled IPsec on the hub (2811) but I am unable to do so on either of the 2951s. After researching, it seems that I may have the incorrect IOS for this, but I am at a loss which IOS I should be using. Currently the 2951s are on "c2951-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-2.T2.bin" and the only crypto options are(config)#crypto ?
ca Certification authority
key Long term key operations
pki Public Key components
while on the 2811 I get:
WIN-T(config)#crypto ?
ca Certification authority
call Configure Crypto Call Admission Control
ctcp Configure cTCP encapsulation
dynamic-map Specify a dynamic crypto map template
engine Enter a crypto engine configurable menu
gdoi Configure GDOI policy
[code]...
These are all hand me downs?
I'm currently setting up two VPN 3000 Concentrators at two different sites to create a IPsec LAN-to-LAN Tunnel. I have gone through all the basic configuration guides on the CISCO site, but a LAN-to-LAN session is never created. I have enabled the logs on the Concentrator and it displays no errors at all - it appears the Concentrator is not even trying to establish a IPsec LAN-to-LAN Tunnel.After running through the standard setup provided by CISCO, is there anything I need to do to make the Concentrator try to create a Tunnel, or should this be automatic once all settings are in place?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am setting up a site to site IPSec VPN between two ASAs.I want to NAT an internal host that my VPN peer's network will be connecting to. So I need to make sure the traffic coming from this internal host is NATted before it enters the VPN tunnel as "interesting traffic"
So let's say remote network 192.168.20.0 /24 is connecting through IPSec VPN tunnel with peers 65.200.1.1 and 198.14.7.10 to host 10.100.1.7 on my network.I want to NAT host 10.100.1.7 to 192.168.100.5 to the remote network connects to the 192 address, not the 10 (I am using a ASA 5505)
I want to implement QoS on our Core router but the core router makes use of GRE Tunnels to remote branch locations.so far all QoS techniques i want to use cannot be implemented using tunnel interfaces.
the core router is a cisco 7604 router with IOS version 12.2 (33)SRE while the remote locations have ISRs (2821).
Which QoS technique to use with respect to GRE Tunnels as there are times of congestion due to heavy network traffic to those remote locations.
We have a 7604 chassis with the following equipments:
1. RSP720-3C-10GE
2. 7600-SIP-400
3. SPA-1X10GE-L-V2
We would like our SPA to support XFP transceiver having part number XFP-10GZR-OC192LR.
We have a CISCO 7604 Router (GGSN) in our customer site. Since two weeks are observing high CPU utilization (even touching 100 percent). We performed a SNMP configuration on this routers 2 weeks back as well. But SNMP process is not consuming much CPU resources. The following is the output of the "show proc cpu" and "show proc cpu history.
------------------ show process cpu ------------------
CPU utilization for five seconds: 50%/15%; one minute: 49%; five minutes: 51%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
[Code]......
I have tried to reset the password for 7604 but it is not working. At the rommon mode, i input 0x2142, and then reset.
It reloads and keeps asking for password.
I have a 7604 Edge router that connects to our Data centre via Fiber.
but i keep getting input errors on the interface Gi3/5. i also found out that i cannot change the duplex settings on the edge router to auto, i only have two options of full and half and changing it has not worked either.
I have tried to use a switch in between the fiber modem and the edge router to try to manipulate the duplex settings, but when i tried it the port simply shutdown and then i have to reverse the configuration.
The software version of the router is 12.2(33)SRE3, i really need to sort this out as connection to and from the Data centre is quite slow.
what is the meaning of the following log messages on Cisco 7604 Core routers. The Core router is configured with 2 STM card configurations with Vlan assignments: [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe currently run 7206 routers with VAM cards and are able to configure the devices to perform stateful failover of tunnels from router to router. When moving to the 7604 with 15.1 IOS there are not any examples of how to set up the stateful failover of the tunnels between devices. We have the devices in the SSO mode are not able to understand how to get the redundancy between the devices functioning.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 7604 router with FWSM module in module 3.First of all the FWSM CF has been damaged, not physically. I bought the new same compact flash (size, partnumber, etc.). Downloaded the software 3.2 for FWSM, and ASDM from Cisco website. I realized that the procedure of creating new CF for FWSM is quite diffucult: creating 1-5 partitions, where 1 - is MP, and 4th - application partition. According to cisco documentation - the default boot partition is the 4th, so I partitioned from 7604 the CF into 4 partitions (partition disk1: <1-4> maximum) and copied the software and ASDM to the 4th partition (disk1:3:). Removed the CF from the router and put it into the FWSM module.
View 1 Replies View Relatedi have 2 cisco 7604 distrubution routers .Both routers are running 310 hsrp groups.
Sundenly there is hsrp flapping which causes high CPU.
What is the limitation of HSRP group on cisco 7604 router .Below is the show ver from the router
----------------- show version ------------------
Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(33)SRC2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
[Code]......
following errors message:I have a 7604 with the following IOS
Cisco IOS Software, c7600s3223_rp Software (c7600s3223_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRB5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
but for some days now I am receiving the following error:
Dec 13 09:51:37.737 CET: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-3-MISTRAL_RESET: System Controller is reset:Normal Operation continuesDec 13 15:30:17.392 CET: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-3-ERROR: Error condition detected: TM_NPP_PARITY_ERRORDec 13 15:30:17.392 CET: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-3-MISTRAL_RESET: System Controller is reset:Normal Operation continuesDec 13 21:17:24.225 CET: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-3-ERROR: Error condition detected: TM_NPP_PARITY_ERRORDec 13 21:17:24.225 CET: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-3-MISTRAL_RESET: System Controller is reset:Normal Operation continuesDec 14 04:42:03.363 CET: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-3-ERROR: Error condition detected: TM_NPP_PARITY_ERRORDec 14 04:42:03.363 CET: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-3-MISTRAL_RESET: System Controller is reset:Normal Operation continuesDec 14 06:27:10.935 CET: %SYSTEM_CONTROLLER-3-ERROR: Error condition detected: TM_NPP_PARITY_ERROR
I have router Cisco 2691 and Cisco 7604 and want to play with AutoQoS Cisco feature. But on both there is no such command But why?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two 7604 routers running IOS 12.2(33)SRB5a as ASBRs in my network. They both connect to a common AS via DS3 lines.FR01 is considered my main circuit, FR02 is the backup. But I have some heavy disk sync traffic I want to route via the backup unless that circuit is down.How could a static redistribution possibly influence all my routes ?
Here is the remote AS config on both routers. We summarize the routes and only change the redistribute metric to distinguish main from backup circuit :
[code]...
i read alot about password recovery , but when i apply it to cisco 7604 it fails ?i went to rommon mode and typed# confreg 0x2142 then i typed reset when the router startup it request a password form me ,i can enter the user mode , and when i type sh ver command i note that the config resgitser is 0x2102 , not 0x2142 !!!!
i could enter the privilage mode !!!! and seems no thing changed ! does this router has a specific password recovery procedure ? which differes than the classic procedure?
I was called into a company today to look at their Cisco 7604 router as it had stopped working. The supervisor has all it LED in orange state, there was no blinking of the lights at power on they went straight to orange. Tried removing all cards, having only supervisor card in, etc but always the orange lights.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAssuming I have the following setup: Cisco 7604 Cisco Systems Cisco 7600 4-slot Chassis System OSR-7600 Clock FRU 1 & 2WS-F6K-MSFC2A Cat6k MSFC 2A daughterboard Rev. 4.0 WS-F6K-PFC3B Policy Feature Card 3 Rev. 2.4 WS-SUP32-GE-3B 9 ports Supervisor Engine 32 8GE Rev. 4.6 WS-X6148A-GE-TX 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule Rev. 4.1WS-X6548-GE-TX SFM-capable 48 port 10/100/1000mb RJ45 Rev. 11.3 The SUP32-3c says it supports both L2VPN and L2TPv3, however the line cards are effectively 6500 line cards and I was under the impression the 6500 didn't support these.
If the supervisor supports a feature does that mean it is globally supported on a switch? Or do I need to check the compatibility of these line cards as to if they support these features?
i have the topology :=========want to mention that im using port address translation on the router & not sure if it is making a conflict .
here is the config below :
why the cache is not working ?i mean that i tried going to internet with source ips of the subnet 10.20.30 , but i seems went to internet without any precedence of cahce server
[code]...
Example config
int g2/24
service-policy output test
#and/OR
int g2/24.10
encap dot1q 10
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
service-policy output test
I am having a problem with PBR done on a 7604-S router - It seems like it is not done in harware. I have an Iperf client and an Iperf server, and would like to test the performance of 7600 router for PBR, supervisor is RSP720-3C-G and used interface card is 7600-ES20-GE3C ESM20G.
I have read numerous discussions about PBR that is supposed to happen in hardware when you use it with matching access-list and set ip next-hop.Although, when I start the iperf, the 7600 cpu is hitting the 80-90 % boundary, and transfer bandwidth can't go over 120-130 Mbit/s.The IP Policy is applied on an interface part of vrf ONE maybe this is casing the problem... ?
The diagram and configuration follows:
Configuration:
c7604#sh run
boot system flash disk0:c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE2.bin
!
ip vrf one
[Code]...
I tried any type of combination and just couldn't make it works. Only PPTP works well. Whether Apple iOS IPSec VPN is supported or not?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to establish vpn session between 2 Cisco 892/k9 routers. but when i apply the crypto map in the GRE tunnel interface this type of message apears.
NOTE: crypto map is configured on tunnel interface.
Currently only GDOI crypto map is supported on tunnel interface.
As the same crypto map is easily applied to the physical interface instead of GRE, and It works too... What causes the problem based on the Debug output and configurations which i have attached with this message.
The VPN connection seems to be etablish but I can not ping the LAN behind the router .I can see the errors with debug ipsec
88.160.250.90 CLIENT VPM >>>>>>>ROUTEUR VPN 212.94.A.B>>>>>>>>>LAN 10.100.0.182
212.94.A.B (Router with configuration IPSec VPN)
88.160.250.90 (Client VPN vpnc)
192.168.2.25 (Client VPN remote ident : tun0 )
[code]....
I'm trying to setup an IPSEC tunnel above GRE using the topology in the attached image file.However the traffic between the 2 endpoints: lo0 on R5 (10.0.5.1) and lo0 on R4 is traveling via the GRE tunnel without being encapsulated in IPSEC: I'm using 2 routing protocols:
- OSPF area 0 for the connectivity between R1,R2 and R3
- EIGRP AS 1 for the internal sites connectivity
I want to establish GRE over IPsec tunnel between four branch offices and head office. At branch offices, I have 1841 router with Advanced Security software. At head office, I have a ASA5510 7.2 as frontend with one public IP addres and 1841 router behind it in private address space. Since ASA is not supporting GRE tunnels, can ASA be endpoint for GRE over IPsec? If not, can ASA pass this tunnel to the 1841 router behind it, so 1841 would be logical tunnel endpoint? What should I pay attention? Should both ASA and every 1841 support NAT-T, or just ASA?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCan I have two IPSec tunnels over two different Internet links to two different destination?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have Cisco ASA 5505 and an internal user (behind NAT) needs to connect via VPN to an external company. I just cannot get this to work. I have enabled IPsec Pass Through from ASDM Configuration --> Firewall --> Service Policy Rules --> Edit Service Policy Rule --> Rule Actions --> tapped IPsec Pass Through I have tried to find some info from the log but all i get is this message: IP = [remote gateway ip] Invalid Packet Detected!"I cant find anything that is blocked from the log.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm setting up IPsec for a DMVPN between a 2811 and 2951s in a test lab. I have enabled IPsec on the hub (2811) but I am unable to do so on either of the 2951s. After researching, it seems that I may have the incorrect IOS for this, but I am at a loss which IOS I should be using. Currently the 2951s are on "c2951-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-2.T2.bin".
View 1 Replies View Related