I have c3725 router that have two WAN interfaces, both of which I want to serve VPN clients. However, I have only one default route, say for WAN1, so how can I accept client requests on WAN2.
ps: I use vpdn and pptp, and I'm a newbie to Cisco router and IOS.
I am trying to build a new network from scratch, I have the WLC 5508 w/ Aironet 3600e APs connected to my Netgear Smart Switches and a Linksys RV082 router that I'm using as my DHCP server with several VLANs for several stuff on my Switches.
I have 2 questions:
1. Can I have 5 Interfaces configured on 5 different VLANs, each SSID on each a different Port:
Port 1: Controller management only=> 192.168.x.x /24
Port 2: SSID 1: WiFi Internal=> 172.16.x.x/12 (Radius Auth with no sharing)
Port 3: SSID 2: WiFi Internal w/ sharing=> 192.168.x.x/24 (Radius Auth with sharing)
Port 4 :SSID 3: WiFi Guest=> 10.0.x.x/8 (Web Auth)
Port 5: SSID 4: WiFi IT=> 192.168.x.x/24 ( Radius or certificate Auth with access to the controller management interface)
2. How can I use the Controller as the DHCP server for all the WiFi traffic, and how should that be configured to work with my other DHCP server?
I have an ASA connected to 2 ISPs.I am using object tracking for the default route so only 1 path is used at a time. I have a L2L VPN setup going out interface A. I would like to configure a 2nd VPN going out interface B with identical parameters.
(ASA software 8.2)
crypto map PATH_A 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap
crypto map PATH_A 1 set peer 10.1.1.1
crypto map PATH_A 1 set transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA
crypto map PATH_A 1 set security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto map PATH_A 1 set security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
crypto map PATH_A 1 set reverse-route
[code]....
I have two routers that have problems with the fans. It is a c3725 and c3845 (Fan 3). I would like to know/confirm what are the products of these fans:
c3845: CISCO3845FANASSY= Cisco 3845 Fan Assembly and Bezel
c3725: CK-3725-FAN (external product)
In c3845 can be exchanged only the Fan 3?
In c3725 the CK-3725-FAN work?
If I have a PI 1.2 system that has multiple interfaces configured I can upgrade to PI 1.3 and both interfaces remain and I can see both under the admin webpage under appliance interfaces. But if I do a fresh install of PI 1.3 I can only configure one interface. The commands fail from the cli to configure anything but gigabitethernet 0. Are multiple interfaces not supported in PI?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHaving upgraded to 8.3 from 8.2 I and read much about the differences , it seems that 8.3 deals with NAT in a much more managed method.However I am confused on how one would NAT a network object to multiple interfaces? i.e I know you can specficy a NAT adddress within the network object howeveer this only allows you to specific a single IP address.What if I want to talk accross multiple interfaces how would I specify this?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe have an ASA 5510 firewall. There are 4 ports on it configured as 2 outside, one inside, and one DMZ. We have two cable modems attached to the outside ports. Our plan is to have the "inside" port directed to one outside port/cable modem, and the DMZ port directed to the other outside port/cable modem.
We have been able to get the "inside-to-outside" setup to work but not the "DMZ-to-outside" setup (at least at the same time).First off, is this possible? If so, what are we likely missing - some way to have a second default route for the DMZ?(My manager is the "Cisco person" here, not me, so I may not have enough info.
I am trying to enable a second WAN interface on our ASA.the end goal is to move all internet traffic to the new connection, but first i want to test it working.I have setup my computer as an object in the ASDM and the interface is configured correctly (same settings on a different router and that was working)I setup a route with a lower metric ( 1 lower than the default route which routes everything through current main internet interface) to route traffic from my computer out through the new interface but i am still connected on the old interface.I duplicated some of th NAT rules (but i would have thought if these werent working then i would have no internet connection anyway)
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am trying not to run before i can walk,.. so first thing I'm trying to do is ping out to a DNS server in the internet: 212.135.1.36 from my internal network.
- If I put a default gateway on my router, and set to 172.16.32.254 (Firewall Vlan100 interface) and ping,.. it works fine from my router.
- If put a default gateway on my switch below the router as 172.16.32.252 (VLAN100 interface of the router) and ping from the switch it doesnt work.
I assume its getting to the switch as I can ping the 172.16.32.252 from the switch so the router is dropping the packets... my question is why!?
Once this bit works,.. the intention is to route any external bound traffic that comes from VLAN100 to 172.16.32.254, external bound traffice from VLAN200 to 172.16.64.254 etc etc
[Code] .....
we use LMS 3.2 in our network. We have a couple of 6509-V-E Switches with mutiple interfaces (VLAN interfaces and Layer 3 interfaces) The problem is, campus manager discovers the switch by a interface randomly...one time its a lay3 Interface and another one its a vlan interface which none of them are in DNS hence no name resolution can be made.
Is there a way to "tell" CM to us for instance the VLAN Management IP of the switch?
I have 2 routers ( Cisco 3845's) both running identical IOS's. Each router has identical 5 networks on it with one network each being different.I have HSRP set up on the identical 5 networks.Your standard Fail over senario.ON one of the routers one network is not seeing the other router in the same network, Will not Ping or traceroute.And HSRP stopped working ( both were thinking they were active. which of course brought the network to a halt. Non of the interfaces has any ACL on them, They are plugged into a Brand new Cisco 3560v2 switch. I have switches out the cables to eliminate that as an issues.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 5508-WLC appliance and configured multiple ap-manager interfaces to balance the join request from LAPs and the load.I went to console port from some LAPs and saw that there was that balance among multiple ap manager interfaces (Dynamic AP Management Interfaces). Then we torn down one of the ap manager interfaces and confirmed that the LAPs were moved to next ap manager interface automatically.But the question here is, how can I verify which ap-manager interface was used for a LAP from the WLC via GUI or CLI ?? or how can I see the amount of APs joined using that ap manager interface from WLC ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to lab something up and I believe I am doing something incorrectly. My management VLAN works fine, the AP on port 7 finds the controller fine, but my VLAN 80 doesn't seem to be mapped to port 2. I mapped a test WLAN to the VLAN, and setup a DHCP scope, and a client can get on the WLAN, acquire an IP address, etc. I thought I coudl then map that VLAN (80) to port 2 and have it go out a cable modem. Doesn't seem to be working that way, however.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5505 running 8.2(1), that is configured with three interfaces as follows:
Inside (security 100) 10.0.0.0 /24
Inside 2 (security 100) 192.168.0.0 /24
Outside (security 0) internet
Inside is connected to my internal network, inside 2 is connected to the network of a sister organization, outside is outside.
I'd like to be able to route between from inside to inside 2, and have NAT translate me to inside2's address.
I have inter-interface traffic configured, and when I use a NAT exemption, I can route fine. But the resources on network 2 must see my request as coming from the inside2 interface IP.
This is for an ASA 5505 with the base license...I have a situation where I will not have one interface in my outside VLAN, but instead I want to have interfaces 1-7 in my outside VLAN and interface0/0 in my inside VLAN.
Is this supported with the Base license, and if so how would I do this? Do I still just need to assign one IP address to the outside VLAN?
Or will I need to upgrade to the Security Plus license and put each interface in a separate outside VLAN, so in essence I would have 7 outside VLANs each with the same security level (0)?
My situation is that I have several partner networks that i want to "aggregate" thru my one ASA 5505. So each outside interface represents a separate partner (outside) network, each of which I want to get to from my inside network. Hence the many outside to one inside.
I have a virtualization server with 4 network interfaces and connected it to a SAN. There are few virtual machines which writes data to the SAN.
I want to connect to the SAN with multiple interfaces to speed up the network.
Is it possible to send data on multiple interfaces? How can I configure it?
Computers are connected to san through switch.
SAN: Equallogic PS 4100 E
Switch: Dell Power Connect
Computer: Dell T610
OS: Centos 5
Virtualization: Kvm
NIC: 8
I am not sure about network card brand now.
I am having big problems trying to get what should be a rather simple configuration to work.I have a Cisco 2901 Router and have setup Zone Based Firewall on this.Traffic from the 192.168.223.x network does not pass through to the 192.168.1.x network.my traffic appears to disappear down the big bucket...Interesting I can ping machine on 192.168.223.0/24 network from the 192.168.1.0/24,So the static routes setup on the router on the 192.168.1.0/24 appear to be routing ok.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've got a question concerning the configuration of multiple AP manager interfaces on -for example- a cisco WLC 2504. I've read the configuration guide but I'm not sure whether this is the way the protocol works. Say I want to distribute AP's (and traffic) across various AP Manager interfaces on the WLC. I would configure the following:
Create one management interface (which will automatically also be an AP-Manager interface)Configure 1 (or more) Seperate ap-manager interfaces, assign them to a port number, and select "Enable dynamic AP Management". VLAN ID's will be the same.Create a WLAN and configure it's interface to "management" Is it correct if I state that the LWAPP protocol takes care of the discovery from the Access Point and sends information about the available AP-manager interfaces back to the AP and the AP knows which ap-manager interfaces are available, connecting to the least loaded one?
I've been trying to figure this one out for quite a while. I currently have 2 inside interfaces (data, phone) and I am moving to 3 inside interfaces (servers, workstations, phones). I have not been able to get any traffic between the interfaces. With the current setup it was not a major problem. With the new setup it will be a major problem.
Below is a sanitized version of the config.
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname BOB
[Code].....
Due to special circumstances we have 2 ISP links on an ASA5510. I am trying to terminate some L2L VPN tunnels on one link and others on the second ISP Link, eg below:
LOCAL FIREWALL
crypto map outside-map_isp1 20 match address VPN_ACL_Acrypto map outside-map_isp1 20 set peer 1.1.1.1crypto map outside-map_isp1 20 set transform-set TS-Generic
crypto map outside-map_isp2 30 match address VPN_ACL_Bcrypto map outside-map_isp2 30 set peer 3.3.3.3crypto map outside-map_isp2 30 set transform-set TS-Generic
crypto map outside-map-isp1 interface ISP_1crypto map outside-map-isp2 interface ISP_2
crypto isakmp enable ISP_1crypto isakmp enable ISP_2
route ISP_1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.254route ISP_2 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.254
Establising the VPN tunnels in either direction when using ISP_1 works fine establishing in either direction from remote access users and multiple L2L tunnels (only showing one for example).
On ISP_2
1. Peer 3.3.3.3 device establishes a VPN tunnel, but the return traffic does NOT get back to devices on 3.3.3.3 tunnel.
2. The local firewall does NOT establish a VPN tunnel going to 3.3.3.3
It would seem to indicate that the problems lies with this multihomed firewall not directing the traffic correctly to either return down and establised VPN tunnel (point1) or to intiate a tunnel if none exists (point 2).
Reconfiguring the VPN tunnel peer for 3.3.3.3 to be on ISP_1 of the local firewall, all springs into life! There are sufficient license etc...
The PC I'm using right now was built almost six years ago (ASUS A8N-SLI Premium), but it has dual Gbit NICs. My home file server was built four years ago using an entry level server board (Tyan S5211G2NR) and it also has two Gbit NICs.
I never quite understood how to take advantage of the multiple network interfaces. Can it be done through a standard unmanaged Gbit switch?
I'm building a new desktop, probably using the ASUS P8Z77-V mobo, which has just one NIC.
I am wondering if xconnect L2TPV3 feature could be done on multiple SVI interfaces on 871 router and 2911 router with built in 8 port switch?Like I need to extend two ethernet interfaces and can I use two SVIs on router built-in switch module on each side?
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have a question about multiple TACACS Groups. I want to archive the following:
A Cisco 888 is managed by me and a Provider Support Team. Since we both want to access our own TACACS Server, i want to create two TACACS Groups. Is it possible to me, to bind a Tacacs Group to one Interface, and the second TACACS Group to another ? Means that our stuff is connecting to the LAN Interface FastEthernet0 that is applied to the SVI in V LAN 1.
The service technicians from the Provider are connecting to the external Interface or through a possible Lo. (another IP). I do not want to mix our 2 TACACS+ Server and theirs together in one Group. So have anybody tried this before ?
I put multiple rservers in multiple server farms?
So for example rserver1 and rserver2 are put in serverfarm production1 and are in use with particular sticky and load balancing settings.
Can I then create serverfarm test_production and put both rserver1 and rserver2 in it? Then play around with the sticky and load balancing settings as a test without affecting the production serverfarm.
Do i need to create 2 objects for nating a server to 2 different interfaces?That is an inside server published in two different dmzsAutomatic migration to 8.3 creates 2 objects (one for each nat)Can I do the same with only one object? like this or I need an object for each nat?
object network server
host 192.168.128.10
nat (inside,dmz) static 172.24.1.10
nat (inside,dmzguests) static 10.10.0.10
We'll be implementing Cisco NAC guest server for Guest Wireless users, ( Model #3310), the question is do we need to configure separate physical interface for User authentication requests( from Wireless ) and a separate Interface for Guest server to talk to AD for SSO?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 2821 router at headquarters with 3 DSL WICs and Static IP's. There are 14 remote sites. All sites are equipped with 876 ADSL Routers and Static IP. I also have an application server at headquarters. Is it possible to split my VPN's in two groups each containing seven sites, one for the first DSL line and the second for the second DSL line. I am planning to use the third DSL line for internet surfing.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a job with a budget-limited client who has three Cisco RV042 dual-WAN routers. They had hoped to establish rather seamless *inbound* service, which doesn't seem to be the real purpose for these units, they appear to be designed for bandwidth aggregation and/or rather seamless *outbound* service.Since they have three of these routers, and three broadband connections (two different 5 IP blocks at one ISP, one 5 IP block at a second ISP) I am toying with the idea of using one router per broadband, and configuring each router for One-to-One NAT, dispensing with the dual-WAN redundancy feature.Each router will come from a different public subnet, yet have a one-to-one NAT to the *same* internal server, for instance:
Router 1 - 74.92.X.X ---> NAT ---> 192.168.1.100
Router 2 - 67.78.X.X ---> NAT ---> 192.168.1.100
Router 3 - 97.76.X.X ---> NAT ---> 192.168.1.100
The routers will be configured on the same subnet internally. 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.2, and 192.168.1.3 respectively. I'll use weighted multiple default gateways on the server's IP configuration, to establish their default and failover gateways.My question is, does configuring multiple routers for one-to-one NAT to the *same* server cause any conflict or failure? You know, of the "sorry bub that private interface is already sucked up by router 1 and I can't do this" nature?
How to configure DHCP server if i have 2 vlans. I know how to configure rest of the network, just i don't know server.I use packet tracer and i attached file with my network. PC1 is on VLAN1 and PC2 is on VLAN2.I want ip addresses in vlan1 to be from 192.168.1.2 and in vlan2 from 192.168.2.2. I would like to do it just like in the designed network, without router.
View 5 Replies View Relatedwe need to implement a scalable solution where we can provide for each customer it's own public IP so that they can access some content restricted by IP range.the solution consists of a proxy software that will "listen" to multiple IP's, then reroute the HTTP requests and rewrite the URL's to a different format.Anyways, we came to the conclusion that what we need is the following:
- broadband line with a pool of 8 IP's
- a router that can support multiple IP's
- a server
what kind of router or device is required for this kind of configuration. basically the network diagram will be like this:
Internet ----> broadband -------> cable modem ------ > multiple static IP router -------> server NIC
we should be able to add the same above combination once we run out of IP's, another broadband line, another device and server ...
I just want to keep one PC as a server and one switch connect to it (For LAN). I want to connect multiple client/screen to that server, so I can use single servers for multiple screen/client.(Client machine will not have any CPU, they will utilize servers memory.)
View 1 Replies View Related We have setup a new internal web server so now we have two internal web server and both or hosting sites on port 80. Currently we have port 80 forwarding to one of the web servers and users are able to hit it from the outside.
Is there any way to configure the RV042 to route web traffic to the correct web server by using the site name or dns? If a user puts in the address{URL}, be routed to one web server but if they put in {URL}, be routed to our second web server. I've checked with our vendors and the both web servers applications need to run on port 80. If we have forwarding setup on the RV042 to forward port 80 to web1 then users can't access web2 from the outside?
My friends and I want to set up a better Teamspeak 3 server but Don't want to spend the money to rent one. We currently have a friend who runs the server on his computer but it is unreliable. We are wondering if we could have multiple computers support one server. So that if one computer fails the server would still get supported by other computers that are supporting the server. Also what would be some recommended hardware stats to run this server.
So I'm asking, can we have multiple computers support a single Teamspeak 3 server?