Cisco WAN :: 1800 Router SNR At 3db?
Sep 19, 2012Cisco 1800 router SNR at 3db
View 3 RepliesCisco 1800 router SNR at 3db
View 3 RepliesMy boss want me to configure a cisco router 1800 series to an IP VPN, but I don't know how to configure a router with an IP VPN...
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have an existing 1800 router that is using NAT and VPN to HQ. I now have a new ISP provider and so now i need to chane the Fastethernet1 IP address. I know how to do that but what else do I need to change to make everything continue to work?
View 10 Replies View RelatedHow can I use a 1800 router as a firewall. I want also the router be able to make VPN.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI don't know much about routers, but lately I've been playing around with router configuration and getting better but I am kind of stuck now.
The scenario is this.
I have 3 ip net from the ISP:
178.249.51.0/255.255.255.248 Gateway 178.249.51.1
178.249.51.8/255.255.255.248 Gateway 178.249.51.9
178.249.51.16/255.255.255.248 Gateway 178.249.51.17
[Code]....
I am also wondering - when we get more public IP net from the ISP, is this the correct way to do it?
load balancing and automatic failover between two isp
View 13 Replies View RelatedWhat commands do I need to enter to correctly authenticate with my DSL PPPOE provider? I need to have the ID and Password entered into the router.
View 19 Replies View RelatedI'm troubleshooting an issue with a new site-to-site vpn setup between 1800 series routers. The tunnel is up but not encrypting traffic on one router, when IP CEF is disabled traffic is encrypted and decrypted!
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have the following network connected and configured to a single Cisco 1800 router.
VLAN 2 (10.1.20.0/24)
|
int vlan2, ip address 10.1.20.1
|
Cisco 1800 ----- int fa0, public ip address ---- Internet
|
int vlan3, ip address 10.1.30.1
|
VLAN 3 (10.1.30.0/24)
VLAN 2 is server vlan with a webserver.
VLAN 3 is clients.
NAT configuration:
VLAN 2 and VLAN 3 is using NAT to access the internet, and both is configured as inside interfaces.fa0 is configured as outside interface. Now I don't know if this is about NAT, but I've tried several things without luck.
Problem:
A client in VLAN 3 tries to access a domain on the webserver in VLAN 2.It starts by sending a DNS query to a DNS server located at the ISP, and gets the ip address for the domain, which is of course a public ip address. Then nothing happens because the client tries to access the domain on the webserver using the public ip address, and the webserver have a local ip address 10.1.20.20 which is on the local LAN (VLAN 2).
I've tried NAT because I have to change the destination ip address, but I can't seem to get it right.
I will have this one router. Its f0/0 will be for the Internet connection with bandwidth of 30Mbps. Its f0/1 will be connected to a switch for internal networks. This link will be separated to 3 VLANs for 3 internal networks. I'm wondering if there is a way to gurantee 10Mbps for each VLAN but allow use up to 30Mbps when another two VLANs are not using any Internet bandwidth? I only worry about download bandwidth from internet.The 3 internal networks will all have public IPs and they belong to their own subnets. There won't be NAT/PAT.
View 18 Replies View RelatedI have been given a task, where I need to create a failover setup from a 1800 Cisco router to a LAN network 2 hobs away (see topology).The reason I have been given this task is because the wireless links are not so realiably, but necessary.I'm thinking of doing this failover task with IP SLA on the routers fiber 1 and fiber 2 link, so when/if one off the links goes down, it instantly chooses the other link.I have also been thinking about implementing STP instead, and replace the router with a switch, but i'm not sure exactly how to implement it. Unfortunately I'm not able to test anything, as we are still waiting for the fiber lines, but I want to be prepared as much as possible.
View 5 Replies View RelatedLeased line is between dammam to dubai and the dammam office is getting internet from dubai.The ip address of Dammam office is class A (Public IP) x.x.x.x and for dubai it is y.y.y.y which we are using as proxy for accessing internet.I purchase the local DSL direct line connection through cable from Local Provider and this ip address range is 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.1.254.Is it possible to use the DSL line as failover, so if one line goes down the user should remove proxy and can use local internet.The router which is using is cisco 1800.
I believe that failover is possible, 100%, but would like to know how I can do it and requesting for sharing more inputs about failover in this case.
I have configured PBR on my 1800 series router, it is working perfect. Now I am changing my router from 1800 to 2901 router with the same config, so the PBR stop working and I am not getting hits in the second WAN interface. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedCurrently I have a 4510-48g HP3COM switch as a core switch for my 4 VLAN network (which I hope to send back cause it doesn't do what I wanted it to do... PBR, which is what I need to route specific VLAN's to specific interfaces on the sonicwall,.. cause sonicwall dont understand trunk or spanning tree,. meh!) This may not happen so I've dug out an old CISCO 1800 sdsl router that has 1 FE0 port and 8 other ports, FE 1-8.
The first thing I need to do is get everything to talk to each other. So I plugged the switch into it via its configured trunk port, and configured 4 sub interfaces on the router 1800 and all seemed happy as larry and working. The problem I have is I dont seem to be able to create sub interfaces on the other ports!?
[Code]...
We have 2.5 Mbps connection from an ISP at our branch routers (1800 series)with single physical link terminated on FE0 but have two subinterfaces with separate subnets.
I have applied the following policy-map outbount under physical Interface FastEthernet 0. Show poliocymap output is as follows
Policy Map QoS-OUT
Class Email
priority 512 (kbps)
Class SQL
priority 512 (kbps)
Class File-Copy
police cir 1024000 bc 32000
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
Class CCTV
police cir 384000 bc 12000
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
But it seems that sometimes( not all the time ) the CCTV traffic seems to exceed the 384k and chokes the entire link(2.5 mbps).
I apologize in advance if this is a novice inquiry, but our company just switched from Point-to-Point T1's to Metro Ethernet.
On one point-to-point, from our main office to one of our high profile locations, we had two bonded T1's. Now this site has a 3 Mbps Metro-E link, but it's being over-saturated. I don't know what type of QOS implementation our T1 provider had, but it prevented flooding. Now, I'm getting horrendous latency as the office peak hours approach since there is no QOS on the mesh by our Metro-E providers.
Ultimately, my question is: what's the best way to set a Fast Ethernet port on a Cisco 1800 series router to limit all bandwidth to 3 Mbps? At the moment, I don't have a preference in which traffic takes priority. I tried the rate-limit command, along with a speed calculator I found online, but that slowed the network down immensely.
I am new user of cisco router i can access the hardware and login in the account but the problem is if i use the command "enable" asking for a password, old I.T. personnel who setup this router already resign.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently formatted the flash drive of an 1800 router and replaced it with an updated image. However, the new features within the new image aren't reflected in the router. I believe that this is because a reboot would be required for the updates in the new image to be reflected in the router i.e. the image needs to be added to the system. How to get the image to the system without a reboot and if by doing so I would get all the new features from the image.For example, the show version below shows the old image in the system as [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have strange problem with 1800 router , I can't see any debug messaging , the ping from PC to this router is Ok , but no icmp debug appears , even I enable "debug ip icmp " the version of router is : C181X Software (C181X-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(6)T6
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have two 1800 routers running VRRP. Also I have two sub interface configured on both router and both router connected to swith through thunk link. My goal is to limit inbound traffic to 3Mbps for both VLANs on router's inside interface which is connected to switch.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have an ethernet port on Cisco router 1800 connected to the ADSL modem. The router does ip nat translation, but users complained it is slow when they access to internet. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedIm getting really poor performance on my 1841, my intial thoughts was a duplex mismatch however although im getting a few CRC errors (root cause unknown at this point) not enough to suggest that the this is the issue.
Heres the config:
Building configuration.Current configuration : 5274 bytesLast configuration change at 20:31:01 PCTime Sun Dec 18 2011 by admin_xversion 15.1no service padservice tcp-keepalives-inservice tcp-keepalives-outservice timestamps debug datetime msec localtime show-timezoneservice timestamps log datetime msec localtime show-timezoneservice password-encryptionservice sequence-numbers!hostname xxxxxx!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!security authentication failure rate 10 log
I was traying to make a site to site VPN between a cisco 1800 router and cisco asa 5510. But it was impossible to get it. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedImagine organization has about 300 partners. Currently data center has 100 Cisco 1800 routers to accept P2P connections for each partner.
Now organization proposal is:
- Use MPLS and use an extranet network. Advertise a certain unique route to each partner..
- Grant unique VPN ID for each partner and VRF Lite at the data center. Then bring each partner with separate tagged VLAN to the data center via MPLS.
Can VRF Lite scale to more than 300+ partners OK?
I have a client that has 6 public IP addresses. He needs to use 3 of them. One for workstations which is currently working fine. It is using the default gateway IP. One for a email/web server which has a statis NAT and is also working fine. But we need an additional NAT but it is for 3 servers that all need to go out as the smae public IP. I am not sure and been unsuccessful getting those to go out as the same IP. I either cannot get them to exit the same IP or it breaks the workstation NAT.
Workstations would be 10.0.0.100 - 200 going oput the FE1 interface or I think x.x.94.122
Email would be 10.0.0.5 going out the statis NAT of x.x.94.123
I then need 10.0.0.2 - 4 to go out x.x.94.124
I removed some ACLs and IP info for security. Attached is the current config.
interface FastEthernet0
description $ETH-WAN$$FW_OUTSIDE$
ip address x.x.4.240 255.255.255.0
[Code]....
My team already bought one 1800 Series router. And they setted some passwor.
Right now i am not able to login. I know the cisco password recovery method to reset the password.
Instead of password recovery method i want to try with total factory default setting.
is there is any method to do factory default without login
I have a cisco 1801 router that is not prompting for enable password.After loging into router thru telnet it puts direct into privelege mode without promting for enable password.Here is the configuration:
User Access Verification
Username: adminPassword:xxxxx#sh runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 2132 bytes!version 12.4service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecservice password-encryption!hostname xxxxxx!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!enable password 7 022F0A5D0208063555692B!no aaa new-model!!dot11 syslog!!ip cefno ip dhcp use vrf connectedip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.10!ip dhcp pool LAN import all network 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 192.168.0.1!!!multilink bundle-name authenticated!!username admin privilege 15 password 7 112017031E1C02181Dusername user privilege 3 password 7 091D1C5A100B111B05051033!!archivelog config hidekeys!!!!!interface ATM0no ip addressno atm ilmi-keepalivepvc xxxxx
[code].....
I am trying not to run before i can walk,.. so first thing I'm trying to do is ping out to a DNS server in the internet: 212.135.1.36 from my internal network.
- If I put a default gateway on my router, and set to 172.16.32.254 (Firewall Vlan100 interface) and ping,.. it works fine from my router.
- If put a default gateway on my switch below the router as 172.16.32.252 (VLAN100 interface of the router) and ping from the switch it doesnt work.
I assume its getting to the switch as I can ping the 172.16.32.252 from the switch so the router is dropping the packets... my question is why!?
Once this bit works,.. the intention is to route any external bound traffic that comes from VLAN100 to 172.16.32.254, external bound traffice from VLAN200 to 172.16.64.254 etc etc
[Code] .....
We are going to purchase a Device , thte sites and also VPN server for remote access ( EzVPN), Should we use ASA or should we use Cisco 1800 series router with security software. The main purpose of this device is to terminate all VPN connections ( Site-to-site) and remote access.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI ahve a requirement to configure static crypto for 1800 site and I need to configure on two sepaarte interfacs at spoke site which means I need to configure 1800*2 = 3600 peers at central site. The challenge I have is due to load balancing , the traffic dynamic crypto can not be used since traffic may be initiated from Dc on other link which may get dropped incase not encrypted.
View 5 Replies View RelatedSite A, site B, site C, site D is connected using leased line each other. We are using Cisco 1800, 2800 and 2900. Each site also have Internet connection using ADSL connected to firewall, we are using pix 501 and ASA 5510.My question is, can i use the existing ADSL line to be use as a backup line if the leased line is down on any of the site??
And i want it to trigger itself, once the leased line is down, the firewall UP the backup line? something like that..
I have recently bought two 1800 cisco routers and have tried to connect them over wan serial link, but I am having problems when trying to access resources on the other side. I am a newbie to cisco and I wonder if the problem is with the configuration or the new routers or the serial link between the sites. Below is the show-running config results I have done on both routers; I can ping the serial interfaces from both sides and remotely, but I can't ping hosts or FE from other side.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 1800 ISR router running IOS 12.4(22)T5.Clientless SSL VN is configured and working, and has three bookmarks.When logged into Clientless SSL VPN and displaying the portal page in IE-8, the bookmarks are visible and functioning as expected.When logged into Cleintless SSL VPN and displaying the portal page in FireFox-14 or Chrome-21, the bookmarks are not visible.The window for the bookmarks is displayed, but the content (file tree) is not.
View 1 Replies View Related