Cisco WAN :: Changing Router From 1800 To 2901 With Same Config
Dec 22, 2010
I have configured PBR on my 1800 series router, it is working perfect. Now I am changing my router from 1800 to 2901 router with the same config, so the PBR stop working and I am not getting hits in the second WAN interface. [code]
I'm sure this is simple to resolve. I just bought a new Cisco 2901 ISR Router. How do I configure the Cisco 2901 ISR Router for Zone Firewall? The "zone" command is not recognized and does not show up in the "?" list in config or user modes -
If i connected the latop to brand new out of the box ASA 5505 through consloe cable and i have a config file on this laptop from other ASA5505, is there anyway i can upload that config file into startup-config of this new ASA5505 through console cable, without using TFTP or FTP?
I have an existing 1800 router that is using NAT and VPN to HQ. I now have a new ISP provider and so now i need to chane the Fastethernet1 IP address. I know how to do that but what else do I need to change to make everything continue to work?
I'm troubleshooting an issue with a new site-to-site vpn setup between 1800 series routers. The tunnel is up but not encrypting traffic on one router, when IP CEF is disabled traffic is encrypted and decrypted!
I have the following network connected and configured to a single Cisco 1800 router.
VLAN 2 (10.1.20.0/24) | int vlan2, ip address 10.1.20.1 | Cisco 1800 ----- int fa0, public ip address ---- Internet | int vlan3, ip address 10.1.30.1 | VLAN 3 (10.1.30.0/24)
VLAN 2 is server vlan with a webserver. VLAN 3 is clients.
NAT configuration: VLAN 2 and VLAN 3 is using NAT to access the internet, and both is configured as inside interfaces.fa0 is configured as outside interface. Now I don't know if this is about NAT, but I've tried several things without luck.
Problem: A client in VLAN 3 tries to access a domain on the webserver in VLAN 2.It starts by sending a DNS query to a DNS server located at the ISP, and gets the ip address for the domain, which is of course a public ip address. Then nothing happens because the client tries to access the domain on the webserver using the public ip address, and the webserver have a local ip address 10.1.20.20 which is on the local LAN (VLAN 2).
I've tried NAT because I have to change the destination ip address, but I can't seem to get it right.
I will have this one router. Its f0/0 will be for the Internet connection with bandwidth of 30Mbps. Its f0/1 will be connected to a switch for internal networks. This link will be separated to 3 VLANs for 3 internal networks. I'm wondering if there is a way to gurantee 10Mbps for each VLAN but allow use up to 30Mbps when another two VLANs are not using any Internet bandwidth? I only worry about download bandwidth from internet.The 3 internal networks will all have public IPs and they belong to their own subnets. There won't be NAT/PAT.
I have been given a task, where I need to create a failover setup from a 1800 Cisco router to a LAN network 2 hobs away (see topology).The reason I have been given this task is because the wireless links are not so realiably, but necessary.I'm thinking of doing this failover task with IP SLA on the routers fiber 1 and fiber 2 link, so when/if one off the links goes down, it instantly chooses the other link.I have also been thinking about implementing STP instead, and replace the router with a switch, but i'm not sure exactly how to implement it. Unfortunately I'm not able to test anything, as we are still waiting for the fiber lines, but I want to be prepared as much as possible.
Leased line is between dammam to dubai and the dammam office is getting internet from dubai.The ip address of Dammam office is class A (Public IP) x.x.x.x and for dubai it is y.y.y.y which we are using as proxy for accessing internet.I purchase the local DSL direct line connection through cable from Local Provider and this ip address range is 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.1.254.Is it possible to use the DSL line as failover, so if one line goes down the user should remove proxy and can use local internet.The router which is using is cisco 1800.
I believe that failover is possible, 100%, but would like to know how I can do it and requesting for sharing more inputs about failover in this case.
Currently I have a 4510-48g HP3COM switch as a core switch for my 4 VLAN network (which I hope to send back cause it doesn't do what I wanted it to do... PBR, which is what I need to route specific VLAN's to specific interfaces on the sonicwall,.. cause sonicwall dont understand trunk or spanning tree,. meh!) This may not happen so I've dug out an old CISCO 1800 sdsl router that has 1 FE0 port and 8 other ports, FE 1-8.
The first thing I need to do is get everything to talk to each other. So I plugged the switch into it via its configured trunk port, and configured 4 sub interfaces on the router 1800 and all seemed happy as larry and working. The problem I have is I dont seem to be able to create sub interfaces on the other ports!?
We have 2.5 Mbps connection from an ISP at our branch routers (1800 series)with single physical link terminated on FE0 but have two subinterfaces with separate subnets.
I have applied the following policy-map outbount under physical Interface FastEthernet 0. Show poliocymap output is as follows
Policy Map QoS-OUT Class Email priority 512 (kbps) Class SQL priority 512 (kbps) Class File-Copy police cir 1024000 bc 32000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop Class CCTV police cir 384000 bc 12000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
But it seems that sometimes( not all the time ) the CCTV traffic seems to exceed the 384k and chokes the entire link(2.5 mbps).
I apologize in advance if this is a novice inquiry, but our company just switched from Point-to-Point T1's to Metro Ethernet.
On one point-to-point, from our main office to one of our high profile locations, we had two bonded T1's. Now this site has a 3 Mbps Metro-E link, but it's being over-saturated. I don't know what type of QOS implementation our T1 provider had, but it prevented flooding. Now, I'm getting horrendous latency as the office peak hours approach since there is no QOS on the mesh by our Metro-E providers.
Ultimately, my question is: what's the best way to set a Fast Ethernet port on a Cisco 1800 series router to limit all bandwidth to 3 Mbps? At the moment, I don't have a preference in which traffic takes priority. I tried the rate-limit command, along with a speed calculator I found online, but that slowed the network down immensely.
I am new user of cisco router i can access the hardware and login in the account but the problem is if i use the command "enable" asking for a password, old I.T. personnel who setup this router already resign.
I recently formatted the flash drive of an 1800 router and replaced it with an updated image. However, the new features within the new image aren't reflected in the router. I believe that this is because a reboot would be required for the updates in the new image to be reflected in the router i.e. the image needs to be added to the system. How to get the image to the system without a reboot and if by doing so I would get all the new features from the image.For example, the show version below shows the old image in the system as [code]
I have strange problem with 1800 router , I can't see any debug messaging , the ping from PC to this router is Ok , but no icmp debug appears , even I enable "debug ip icmp " the version of router is : C181X Software (C181X-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(6)T6
I have two 1800 routers running VRRP. Also I have two sub interface configured on both router and both router connected to swith through thunk link. My goal is to limit inbound traffic to 3Mbps for both VLANs on router's inside interface which is connected to switch.
Im getting really poor performance on my 1841, my intial thoughts was a duplex mismatch however although im getting a few CRC errors (root cause unknown at this point) not enough to suggest that the this is the issue.
Heres the config:
Building configuration.Current configuration : 5274 bytesLast configuration change at 20:31:01 PCTime Sun Dec 18 2011 by admin_xversion 15.1no service padservice tcp-keepalives-inservice tcp-keepalives-outservice timestamps debug datetime msec localtime show-timezoneservice timestamps log datetime msec localtime show-timezoneservice password-encryptionservice sequence-numbers!hostname xxxxxx!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!security authentication failure rate 10 log
I have one router 1841 in which i configured PBR for internet traffic from LAN. I hv two ISPs few server are configured for ISP1 and few for ISP2.I planned to shift my existing setup at 2901 G2 router. when I am configuring the same config on this router so traffic is passing through only from one ISP not from other, if I troubleshoot so I see that the interface which is connected with ISP2 is not getting any input/output packet.
Config is here: ========== interface FastEthernet0/0 description ****** ISP2 ****** ip address 203.xx.xx.110 255.255.255.248
I have a 2901 ISR G2 router, with IOS 15.0.1M3 , this router is not working with static NATing, I have tried to configure this router with one internet link and make few static translations with it. But this configuration is perfectly working with 1841 ISR router.
I'm trying to run the ISM-VPN-29 in a 2901 router. Cisco says that the SECK9 and HSECK9 licenses are needed to operate this ISM. However, they also say that the HSECK9 license is not available on the 2901. I'm running the SECK9 license but it's still not working.
This link, table 5 states that the HSECK9 feature license is for 2921 and 2951 only:[URL]This link states that it is a requirement to run the card, and also that the card works on the 2901:[URL]
I have a 2901 router and I would like to enable the following feature router mobile. [code] I used c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.151-3.T1.bin on a 2811 and this worked without any problem.Is there a possibility that there is some kind of license associated with this feature on a 2901?
I have a 2901K ISR router IOS Version 15.0(1r)M12 and I will be using this as a internet router, The WAN interface will get dynamic IP from the ISP, so I need to configure PPOE. I am referring the following link for setting up PPOE. [URL] However I am unable to define PPOE protocol as shown below
INTERNETRTR(config)#!!!!! Configure Router as PPPoE Client to the ISP INTERNETRTR(config)#vpdn enable INTERNETRTR(config)#vpdn-group 1 INTERNETRTR(config-vpdn)#request-dialin INTERNETRTR(config-vpdn-req-in)#protocol ? l2tp Use L2TP INTERNETRTR(config-vpdn-req-in)#
Any link for setting up PPOE on 2901 series router.
I am attempting to configure a Cisco 2901 router using IOS 15 to properly perform NAT/PAT translation between LAN and the internet connection. I've configured DHCP pool for the local interface (GigabitEthernet0/1), which works properly. The WAN interface (GigabitEthernet0/0) is configured to obtain its own IP by DHCP from the ISP. I can work on the LAN computers and I can access the internet directly from the router (using, for example, telnet and router's ping commands). The problem is, NAT does not work properly and connection from the LAN interface does not reach the WAN interface.
Trying to setup a DMVPN on out existing equipment that is currently running all point to point vpn connections. basicly its not working. my best guess is something with the config is interfering but i'm not sure the remote router (881) is always comming back with MM_NO_STATE and the main router(2901) is either MM_NO_STATE or MM_SETUP.
I added the config for the 881, 2901 and a debug crypto isakmp and debug crypto ipsec from both routers. I have verified the Keys are correct and it is not blocking port 500. if i issue a sh crypto isakmp policy they are the same on both routers. if you need me to post anything else i will, one note i removed the configs that were part of the point to point tunnls on the 2901 router.