I ahve a requirement to configure static crypto for 1800 site and I need to configure on two sepaarte interfacs at spoke site which means I need to configure 1800*2 = 3600 peers at central site. The challenge I have is due to load balancing , the traffic dynamic crypto can not be used since traffic may be initiated from Dc on other link which may get dropped incase not encrypted.
We have 6 WAN routers connected through ISP MPLS cloud , we need to implement GET VPN between these WAN routers.We have 2 Key servers (1800 routers) , and the WAN routers will act as Group Members (6 GMs)
The attached configuration files are for working configuration for typical GETVPN (crypto map applied on WAN interface)
In Key server configuration , the crypto isakmp command is using the WAN interface IP address of each WAN router (172.16.x.x) , and since that the KS routers are connected to local backbone (VSS) , they should be able to reach 172.16.X.X , and therefore the subnet 172.16.X.X is advertised to the local network (check GM configuration file under eigrp - redist connected )
This is what our customer want to avoid ! they do not want 172.16.X.X to be advertised to the local network .I know It is possible in GETVPN configuration to configure ,the crypto isakmp command to use loopback address's of the WAN routers instead of the WAN IP , but in this case the crypto map must be applied to the loopback address , and this requires all traffic to be encrypted and decrypted to go through the loopback interfaces on all WAN routers .
i was wondering what is the best solution for this case , I though to use the below config on the GM's
We have two Cisco ASA 5510 Firewalls at one site, and two non-Cisco firewalls at another. Both firewall pairs are configured for high availability (Active-Passive), and both have redundant links to the Internet via routers running HSRP. In the event that one of the Internet routers were to fail, we require the VPN to dynamically move from using the old path via the failed router to using the new router with minimal downtime.
I have been looking at using VPN load balancing to achieve this but the only configuration example I can find is for Cisco VPN Client url... Is it possible to define a static crypto map with the VIP of the load balanced group as the peer IP? So in the non-Cisco devices I will define the VIP of the load balanced group?
I have aaa new model configured on a number of isr's(1800, 1900, 2900, 3800 etc). When i have aaa configured, the telnet logins use that authentication and not the password in the line vty portion. Is this by design. would disabling aaa enable both telnet and aaa authentications, essentially making it a dual login.
I am new user of cisco router i can access the hardware and login in the account but the problem is if i use the command "enable" asking for a password, old I.T. personnel who setup this router already resign.
I try to setup a ASA5510, but without success. Actually, I have Cisco1800(192.168.96.1/21) from my ISP connected to a Cisco 3825 (via port with IP 192.168.96.2) all is working good. Now I want to insert a asa firewall between ISP router and 3825.
For that, I tried a more simple config : ISProuter (192.168.96.1/21) ---- ASA outside port(192.168.96.2/255.255.255.248) ASA INSIDE port (192.168.100.1/255.255.255.0) --- a pc with IP 192.168.100.2, netsmask 255.255.255.0, gateway 192.168.100.1 From my ASA, I can ping 192.168.96.1. but a "ping INSIDE 192.168.96.1" fail from py pc, can ping 192.168.100.1, but not 192.168.96.1 Here, my ASA config :
ASA Version 7.0(8)host name cisco asa enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted password 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted names dns-guard ! interface Ethernet0/0 shutdown no nameif no security-level no ip address [code]....
We are replacing our EOL Watchguard X1000 Firewall(s) with Cisco ASA 5510 unit - ASA Version 8.4(3). Following is the static NAT I have build and the corresponding access list.
access-list FW2Outside_access_in extended permit tcp any object BW_XSP1_Public object-group DM_INLINE_TCP_1
Unable to access the server on the inside interface via the public NAT address. Can you point me in the right direction as to what I might be missing to make this work?
I'm having some issues configuring NAT statements on my ASA5505 which has recently been upgraded to 8.41.
I have a single dynamic IP on the outside interface of the ASA and would like all internal hosts to NAT/PAT to it. In addition, I would like to have several ports 'forwarded' to internal hosts, one of which is TCP/4343. With the current configuration all hosts are NATing to the external interface properly but the service running on TCP/4343 is not accessible from the outside. See command output below:
"sh run object" output: object network DrJones host 10.81.220.90object network LAN-10.81.220.0 subnet 10.81.220.0 255.255.255.0 "sh run nat" output: object network DrJones nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 4343 4343object network LAN-10.81.220.0 nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface "sh run access-list" output: access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip 10.81.220.0 255.255.255.0 anyaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any echo-replyaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside eq 4343
I'm connected through a simple non-configurable switch to a 172.20.0.0. 255.255.0.0 network, with a gateway of 172.20.2.2.
When i use DHCP, i am able to connect to the web.
When i change my ip address to a static address (with an available ip address and correct subnet mask and default gateway) i am unable to connect to the web.
Newly acquired DIR-615 E3 with F/W vers. 5.10. Router configured with IPv4 static address for WAN works fine. As soon as I configure the WAN IPv6 with a static IP address also, the configuration for the IPv4 static IP is corrupted. Other combinations of (WAN config) using static for either IPv4 or IPv6 with DHCP or other seem to work. Just appears to have conflict with two WAN static IP configurations.
We have 2 sites with 2 internet connections at each site. All are SRP527w routers. 1 is for internet and 1 is for a site to site VPN as,Currently we are using Static Routes on the PC's so they can access each server no matter what site they are at. I have looked at using the Static Routes section on the SRP's but cannot get it to work.
Purchased the RVS4000 in 11/2012 to work behind a NVG512 in (pass thru mode). I'm running firmware version V2.0.2.7. For whatever reason once or twice a month I lose access to the internet. Sometimes it's AT&T fault but other times my RVS4000 dosen't behave well. I finally took screen shots of every screen I configured in the RVS4000 to make it work in my environment. Last night we lost internet access again. Before unplugging everything I looked in the RVS4000 and found that my WAN setup had reverted back to a default Automatic Configuration - DHCP instead of the Static IP that I had previously saved.
It seems that my RVS4000 is losing just that WAN setting (port forwarding and Static IP Mapping data and VPN client data is still intact.
I have a router manufactured by AirTies,the model is Air 4450.This has the capability of being an Access Point in a current network, which is how I want to use it. (Introducing it into my current Sky Broadband network with a Sagem F@ST 2504N router).However, I cannot access the configuration page whatsoever.The manual states the default IP address of the router is 192.168.2.254, so I have set my laptop to a static IP of 192.168.2.100 and patched into LAN port #1 on the rear of the Airties 4450, powered on the unit and cannot access the router at all.I have held down the reset button several times to no avail.how I can configure this unit ?
I'm experimenting a strage issue with some AP1142 that prefer getting new IP from DHCP server rather than using the static ip already configured.
I've got more than a hundred of 1142 APs already conected to a 5508, all with static IP, all working fine for about a year.
As i installed 30 more AP, i enabled a dhcp scope on the controller to give IP to the new APs and when the new aps got registered i changed the configuration to static IP.
The problem comes when some of the older AP than have already static ip are gettig ip from dhcp scope.
If i look at my WCS, it reports that this APS are getting DHCP IP because they cannot reach the controller with their static ip. As this is impossible, because the static ip and the dhcp enable scope are in the same subnet in a layer 2 configuration and with the same gateway. (e.g: old AP 10.10.2.10/16; new AP(dhcp 10.10.3.10-50) 10.10.3.15/16; gw 10.10.254.1)
The problem comes when i disable the dhcp scope, all the older aps that got dchp ip from the wlc scope instead of using their staic configured ip are deregistered. If i reset every ap manually, from the swithc disabling PoE, they start to use the static ip and everything comes fine.
This is happening with about ten of fifteen APs from the 100 installed, that is the strange thing because this seem to be very random as the failing APs are installed in different building and connected to different switches.
As now i have disabled dhcp scope and all APs (old and new) have static ip everything is ok, but i will have to add some more APs shortly and every time i enable the dhcp scope on the wlc
I am able to create above smartport macro on Catalyst 3760 & 6500, but not on 2960 & 3750 (see below):switch(config)#macro ? auto Macro autoexecution settings global Enter global macro configuration
I have this situation, I need to establish an IP sec communication to another site but I need to identify all my packets sent, as a different networks as my local one. for example: my local network is 10.5.0.0/24 and I need to sent packets as 10.6.0.0/24. I suppose that I need to do Nat with this IPs. But in this router Nat is already applied to outbound traffic to Internet. How can I apply this NAT to crypto map only?
My router is a Cisco 877 with 12.4 IOS an this is the relevant configuration, crypto map vpn it´s used to sent traffic to second site.
I'm trying to get several VPN tunnels up. It seems that only 1 map can be assigned to the WAN interface (fa4). Is this true or is there an 'extended' map like ACLs?
I have to connect one of our it labors with some ec2 instances in amazon vpc. I downloaded a configuration file from amazon which starts with the command
crypto isakmp policy 200
My router tells me that he does not know crypto isakmp.
I searched on the internet and found that i have to install a specific license, but unfortunately i cannot find which license i have to install.
The show license command show following licenses
AdvIpServices active AdvSecurity active advsecurity_npe, ios-ips-update, waas_Express no state displayed ssl_vpn active but eula not accepted
I found that i can accept the eula license with license boot module c880-data technology-package SSL_VPN command
But this command is also not available on my device. getting the crypto isakmp command working?
i have Cisco 1941 router with following IOS image:Cisco IOS Software, C1900 Software (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0(1)M5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) below mentioned commands are not working :
I have a Cisco 881 ISR (CISCO881-SEC-K9) and have the advanced security license installed and enabled/active and in use (see screenshot). However, the isakmp crypto module is not available.
I have applied a crypto map (fo ipsec vpn) on the dialer interface (for PPoE connection) in Cisco 2800; every time when the router restarts the crypto map is removed from the dialer interface even though i save the configuration every tim when i apply the map on the interface. Is there any way that the crypto map remains there on the dialer interface after the restart of router.
In a basic VPN l2l scenario using ezVPN, server behind NAT device, client using 3G. What would be the reason to have in the output of the show crypto ipsec sa, a current peer different from remote crypto endpoint on the server ?
In my test lab , I have a CISCO 1841 with a AIM-VPN/BPII-PLUS board , everything was working fine , until I would like to see the difference with and without the accelerator.Sins the moment that the IOS told me that he will change to SW accelerator instead of HW accelerator , I can not make it work anymore.I have a copy of the full working configuration before I did this , I have put it back on my router but still NO VPN. [code]
I am trying to configure Crypto PKI in ciscio 2911, Once i configured the root certificate for the router , i can see the validity date wrongly but the same certificate is fine in the other devices . [code]e when i am trying to configure the local certificate.
New to the forum and not much Cisco IOS experience let alone on the security side of things. I know how to navigate the IOS and can do basic switching and routing just fine. My company currently has a DMVPN setup w/ about 10 tunnels going back to the hub. We have 4 more sites they want me to setup and I keep getting stuck at the crypto maps. I have been reading about VPN's, DMVPN's , etc. for days now but can't find any examples of how we are configured. The priority of our crypto maps start at 65536 and go up. Default max is 65335 from what I have read, and I cannot assign a priority that high statically. [code]
I have a ASA 5510 that has something weird going on I have just added a base config where you can access on a inside interface but for some strange reason after I disconnect i have to ping inside interface first before I can connect via telnet or SSH and then regenerate therecrypto key