Cisco WAN :: 1812 - Unable To Establish PPPoE Session
Sep 29, 2011
i'm having a problem establishing a pppoe session with a 1812 router. i've tried everything i could find online, even contacted the isp (all they said was that the modem should be in bridge mode, which it is).
I am trying to diable aggressive mode, for security reasons. I have a Cisco 3825 running c3825-advsecurityk9-mz.124-24.T2.bin. When I disable aggressive mode with ROUTER(config)#crypto isakmp aggressive-mode disable , I am unable to connect. The syslog message displayed is > %CRYPTO-5-IKMP_AG_MODE_DISABLED: Unable to initiate or respond to Aggressive Mode while disabled and the client error is Reason 412: The remote peer is no longer responding.
I have a RV042 and want to establish one WAN connection via PPPoE. I enter Username and Password, Keep Alive, MTU=Auto. The router does not get an IP address (0.0.0.0) and the log says: "[pppoe] sending PADI", "last message repeated 5 times". What is confusing me is that a PC connected to the RV042 (and a DSL-Router operating in Modem-Mode "PPPoE Pass-Through") can establish a PPPoE connection with the same Username and Password. Why can the PC connect via PPPoE, but the RV042 can not?
I'm practicing MPLS and wanna establish a simple LDP targeted session between 2 indirectly connected routers. when establishing this session with loopback IP address of routers, the session is established, but when I tested this session with another router's fast0/0 that is MPLS enabled, the session did not established. I wonder, if a targeted LDP session, needs to be established between 2 IPs that are selected as LDP IDs of respective routers. I made routers to use their fast0/0 IP addresses as LDP ID and the session was established.
How can i determine the current PPPoE session duration on ASA 5500 Systems? If i use the different CLI commands like "show vpdn session state / show vpdn session pppoe state" the output says:
State: SESSION_UP Last Chg: 593595 secs.
The ISP is forcing a reconnect every 86400 seconds, so the value can't be the actual duration of the pppoe session. Does it only indicate the link duration to the attached modem or interface state? Is the only way to detect interruptions of the pppoe session with debug and syslog?
I have installed and setup cisco anyconnect on a win2008 server. It is able to authenticate successfully but upon trying to establish the vpn connection to the asa5520, it shows "unable to establish vpn". Other servers and pc from the same remote site is able to establish the vpn.
We have ASA5510 with version 7.x and asdm 5.X, i upgraded it to 8.3 and asdm 6.2, and i got vpn peers 250 and 2 ssl.when i try to connect through client software , i can see in the logs UDP 500 port is created as shown below.Mar 31 2011 23:54:40 302015 94.97.180.0 57013 x.x.x.x 500 Built inbound UDP connection 56694 for outside:94.97.180.0/57013 (94.97.180.0/57013) to identity:x.x.x.x/500 (x.x.x.x/500) no other things are going on , and i get error as shown below.
Secure VPN Connection terminated Locally by the client Reason 412: Remote peer is no longer Responding Connection terminated on.
i am suspecting it is VPN-3DES-AES activation key issue.when i go to Remote Access VPN ---Advanced---SSL Seetings--From Left Encryption Panel Available Algorithems i have DES-SHA1 when i try to drag it tto Right panel of Active algorithems it gives me error *** below [ERROR] sl encryption rc4-sha1 des-sha1 The 3DES/AES algorithms require a VPN-3DES-AES activation key and currently in right panel of Active Algorithms i have only RC4-SHA1,
I have tried to make a VPN connection between RV180W and iPad with PPTP. I have enabled the server, set the address range, added and user and enabled it.
I entered the same information into iPad but when I try to start the VPN, iPad just tried to make connection and finally fails with an error stating that PPP server cannot be reached.
I think the devices are able to make some kind of connection as if I change the gateway IP address incorrect, I get a different kind of error message. I also tried to reboot the router...
We have two sites, Site-A with a ASA 5520 (Remote Access IPSEC VPN server) at one end and a new ASA 5515-X at Site-B. Users at Site-B are unable to establish a VPN connection to Site-A via Cisco VPN client from behind the new ASA 5515-X. They see the following error:
"Secure VPN Connection terminated locally by the client. Reason 412: The remote peer is no longer responding.
They are able to access the same from home or elsewhere so I believe there is nothing wrong with Site-A ASA vpn config which we have been using for a while now. The new 5515-X (version 8.6) has a very basic config with all outbound traffic allowed. I'm pasting the config below. Do I need to enable/allow anything for it to work?
CISCOASA# sh run: Saved:ASA Version 8.4(3)!hostname CISCOASAenable password xxxxxxxxxxxx encryptedpasswd xxxxxxxxxxxxxx encryptednames!interface Ethernet0/0 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.248!interface Ethernet0/1 nameif backup security-level 0 ip address
I have a sky router (Netgear DG834GT), which i have connected a secound router to which is a D link DIR-615 (with DD wrt firmware D4).I can get access to the sky router remotely without any issues even when changing the port number. its the Dlink router i cannot get access to remotely (within the network i can by typing in the dlink's ip address and works). Main router Sky router IP is 192.168.0.1 - Currently the port number is 8081.Secondary router Dlink IP is 192.168.0.2 (Static ip) - currently the port number is 8080.I have tried to configure the ports but it just dont want to open. Ive tried to open the ports on main netgear and tried all the option my dlink for port forwarding. i must be missing something fundametal here.
I have to unplug/replug my router powercord connection every time i want to use my laptop to access the internet. i have reinstalled the software disc that came with my router. i have have comcast check my modem-
Just doing some basic testing before we replace our ancient PIX 515E with a new 5512. I have a mini lab set up following the diagram below, although I am unable to telnet through to the mail server's netcat listener on port 25 TCP. I can ping all the way outbound from 192.168.101.1 to 10.0.0.2, and the 10.0.0.2 machine shows it is translated properly to 200.225.117.1.
NAT and access rules are as follows:
object network mail host 192.168.101.1 description Mail relay access-list inbound extended permit ip any host 200.225.117.1
[code]....
EDIT: Somehow the new global access rule is involved. When adding a permit any any in there I can get to the mail server no problem. When I remove it but leave in my permit ip any any on the outside interface, I am denied?
I've had a DIR-615 rev b for a while and have had it set up with PPPoE sign on. The DSL modem I am using is a Motorola 2210 setup in bridge mode. All was working well. I recently switched over to dry loop AT&T dsl from AT&T dsl over a voice line.After the switch, I am unable to sign on via PPPoE using the dir-615. If I bypass the router, I am able to gain internet access via modem PPPoE sign on. I've also switched modems (Actiontec DT701D) with the same results. What has changed that would prevent the router from PPPoE sign on? I've verified that all settings on the router were the same before and after the dry loop change (including password).
Purchased E2500 1 week ago. I do not have a problem communicating with the router itself (either hard wired or wireless) but I have been unable to establish a usable internet connection from the router.I live in building that is wired by Restech Services - Ethernet jack in wall - no modem. Connection works just fine if I bypass router and connect directly to PC (windows XP SP3 desktop or windows 7 laptop.),Very difficult to establish any internet connection at all. I have to renew IP address many times or go through re-boot sequence multiple times. Once I get a connection it is unusable. If I attempt to ping a URL (either from PC or from router admin page) it is unable to resolve host. If I ping an IP directly (either from PC or router administrator page) I typically get 60 to 80% packet loss. As noted, if I bypass router and make internet connection directly to PC - no problems - no packet loss.Used Cisco Connect software to set up. On advice of ISP changed MTU from 1500 to 1300. Also registered MAC id with ISP and changed from cloning PC MAC to using the router MAC. Downloaded and installed latest firmware version. Did factory reset and re-configured the whole thing. Double checked and swapped wiring.
I have 100+ 3750's that are running various IOS, some stacked and some not, and all seem to have the same problem.If I attempt to paste a configuration into the terminal session I get booted after about 10 to 15 lines. This happens when using SSH and Telnet. Telnet will go a little further before I'm booted. After I'm booted it sometimes takes a minute before I can log back into the switch. Any issues pasting configs into a 3750 via a VTY session?
IP routing is disabled on the 3750 (it's acting solely as a switch) IP routing is enabled with an EIGRP process running on the 3550 router that has the network for the 3005 broadcasting.
I can ping the vpn 3005 concentrator from a telnet session in the 3550 but not from the 3750.I can ping between the 3750 and the 3550 vlan management interfaces. Visually speaking it's like this
I know this because I tracerout to the 3005 from the 3750 and it resolved the default gateway configured for the 3550 properly but then started timing out.
The 3750 is trunked to the 3550.
3750 is vtp client mode 3550 is vtp server mode
I'm wondering if there's a layer 2 issue involved here as it is a VTP domain and maybe it's not returning properly.
i want to configure a new cisco 1812.what i want is : we have 5 external ip addresses from our ISP.we want that the FE0 ( wan port ) can route all those ip addresses.so when we put a firewall on port number 8 with 1 of the 5 external ip addresses we have internet.and when we put a firewall with another external ip adres on port 4 we have internet.
I have Cisco 1812 connected to ISP's router Cisco 870. Both routers have switch module and when I'm connected with PC to 870 I can connect via VPN to remote location.When I'm connected to 1812 remote VPN doesn't work.Client computers are connected to 1812 and they can surf on internet just fine.
I need to change the source IP of a packet for one of my NAT's.I currently have an Cisco 1812.I have an PPPoE connection as Dialer 0.I have another VLAN that is connected to an Netscreen SSG5 VPN gateway via another Cisco switch.I have a vlan trunk between the switch and the 1812. What I would like to achive is the following :-For any traffic going to the following three ranges make it apear as if it was coming from the VLAN50 address [code]I can ping my netscreen on 10.27.30.255 fine from the Cisco 1812. But any other PC fails, as for some reasion the traffic has a source of my Dialer 0 interface.How can I write a nat to change the source just for the tree destitnations ?
I have a Cisco 1812 with IOS 12.4(15)T17.I would like to perform pppoe dialing using this device to my ISP. My ISP is using VLAN id 500 for Internet. I configure like below but seem unsuccessful. From the console, I can't even ping to internet.ip nat inside source route-map nonat interface Dialer1 overload.
I am trying to get this VPN Client (5.0.07.0410) to connect to the remote LAN behind the cisco 1812. Here is my config. I am able to get everything connected and IP assigned to the client and can even ping local LAN and Internet but can't ping to the remote LAN behind the 1812. I feel it's a routing issue or an ACL issue.SHUMAMKERRTR>enPassword:SHUMAMKERRTR#sh runBuilding configuration...
At the moment I am trying to connect to a DHCP ISP, but the connection only last for 10-15mins and then it will automatically disconnected. Every time I reset the WAN port , service back to normal for another 10-15 mins ><
we are trying to configure PPPOA over Ethernet on Cisco 1812 Router, we have 2 ethernet ports and no ATM ports, hence PPPOA must be applied at a global setting.
I have 5 cisco 1812 routers that i set up in a hub-spoke dmvpn configuration between 5 sites. All routers have a secondary internet connection . Could i set up a second tunnel interface on each router to create a backup dmvpn that will use this secondary internet connection? i use EIGRP for routing.
I am using Cisco 1812 as EZVPN server. I want to use Active directory for VPN user authentication. I am trying from couple of days but no success.With ASA, i am able to authenticate against AD, but not with IOS router. Below are my configurationsIf kerberos authentication is not possible, I would like to know the possibility of using AD as ACS external database. I am running both AD and ACS in the same server. If i can integrate AD with ACS, i can use TACACS or RADIUS for the authentication.
I just upgraded a 1812w from 15.1 to 15.2 and did NOT change any configs/passwords or anything else. My WiFi Clients are not able to associate any more. Failure is:
Sep 20 13:59:19.384: %DOT11-7-AUTH_FAILED: Station 0001.0203.0405 Authentication failed
I can't find either a WLAN-configuration guide for 15.2.
We are trying to get a video conference system (POLYCOM) up running. Thrue a Cisco 1812 router with Firewall feature set.
I Have heard in the past that there should be issues with Polycom and Cisco, but have actually never seen it.I can establish a video call from inside the 1812 to outside.
But when I try from outside to the public ip adress there is nattet to, then it reach the video system and die straight after, so there is never any video session set up.
I have tried to remove everything regarding firewall feature and passing true, so the only thing the 1812 should do is NAT. And still the same.
I can not see anything in the log on the router from the ACL's where I permittet everything, other then it connect on the port TCP 1720, as it should. This is the software I'm running on the router:
When I search Google, it look like there is a lot issues with Cisco and Polycom, but I have not found any concret solution. Other then I should use a ADSL line with a public IP address. As we probably is going to do.