Establish A Simple LDP Targeted Session Between 2 Indirectly Connected Routers?
Nov 19, 2012
I'm practicing MPLS and wanna establish a simple LDP targeted session between 2 indirectly connected routers. when establishing this session with loopback IP address of routers, the session is established, but when I tested this session with another router's fast0/0 that is MPLS enabled, the session did not established. I wonder, if a targeted LDP session, needs to be established between 2 IPs that are selected as LDP IDs of respective routers. I made routers to use their fast0/0 IP addresses as LDP ID and the session was established.
i'm having a problem establishing a pppoe session with a 1812 router. i've tried everything i could find online, even contacted the isp (all they said was that the modem should be in bridge mode, which it is).
I am trying to diable aggressive mode, for security reasons. I have a Cisco 3825 running c3825-advsecurityk9-mz.124-24.T2.bin. When I disable aggressive mode with ROUTER(config)#crypto isakmp aggressive-mode disable , I am unable to connect. The syslog message displayed is > %CRYPTO-5-IKMP_AG_MODE_DISABLED: Unable to initiate or respond to Aggressive Mode while disabled and the client error is Reason 412: The remote peer is no longer responding.
I just got a new rv120w and want to set it up, like my old router. I have a webserver that people around the world, should be able to visit, but I can't figure whats wrong. You can see my settings in port forwarding here.
I have three routers and 2 ISPs but I'd like to focus for now on a configuration with only one ISP provider. Here is my environment:
Netgear Cable (CBVG834G) wireless routerON the cable router are connected multimedia type equipments (TV/ IP set top box/ IP amp ) located on the family room DHCP ON (because I can't get internet connectivity when I assigned Fix IP address I come to that later) IP Adress:192.168.1.2 DHCP range:192.168.1.10/ 19 Reserved IP : 1292.168.1.10 for the Dlink 4 DEV a connected D-LINK ( DIR-855) wireless router.mainly PCs, NAS (x2) located on the first floor. DHCP ON Lan IP Adress: 192.168.0.1 DHCP range:
192.168.0.100 / 120 WAN Ip address : 192.168.1.10 6 PCs are connected
Everything works fine from an internet connectivity standpoint:
DEVx can connect to internet fine PCx can connect to internet PCx can access DEVx
Now the issue DEVx can't access resources from PCx!
I have a RV042 and want to establish one WAN connection via PPPoE. I enter Username and Password, Keep Alive, MTU=Auto. The router does not get an IP address (0.0.0.0) and the log says: "[pppoe] sending PADI", "last message repeated 5 times". What is confusing me is that a PC connected to the RV042 (and a DSL-Router operating in Modem-Mode "PPPoE Pass-Through") can establish a PPPoE connection with the same Username and Password. Why can the PC connect via PPPoE, but the RV042 can not?
I am not able to establish a PTPP connection with my iPhone over WAN. When I am in my local Wireless LAN it works nice using the external FQDN of the RV220W. But when I test the VPN access over 3G (meaning I am coming in over the WAN port) I get and error message that the connection to the PPP server could not be established.
Some more Info
- Running latest firmware - Port 1723 is open to the Internet - ISP doesn't filter anything - No Firewall settings blocking anything at the moment - Nothing in the logs indicating what the problem is
So what needs to be done here to get it running over the WAN port and not only over the LAN ports?
I have tried to make a VPN connection between RV180W and iPad with PPTP. I have enabled the server, set the address range, added and user and enabled it.
I entered the same information into iPad but when I try to start the VPN, iPad just tried to make connection and finally fails with an error stating that PPP server cannot be reached.
I think the devices are able to make some kind of connection as if I change the gateway IP address incorrect, I get a different kind of error message. I also tried to reboot the router...
5 - Remote sites (no static IP there) 3 - Remote users (comercial) 1 - Central building (using static ip address)
Is it possible to establish a permanent vpn tunnel between each one of my remote sites to the main building, even if I have no static IP address in the remote sites?
Do you think that RV180 is the best choice to mannage vpn connection between remote sites and the central building securely and faster?
In my company we put a RV042 router to connect two links to internet, but we have problem to enter a bank. The solution they gave us was to disable encrypted session balancing but I don´t know how to do it.
I have installed a new 2901 router with the IOS version 15 code (c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-3.T.bin). I have a template config that I have created for my remote VPN routers that I have been using on 2811 routers with version 12.4 (c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T1.bin).I do have the securityk9 active on the 2901 software
Technology Package License Information for Module:'c2900' ----------------------------------------------------------------- Technology Technology-package Technology-package Current Type Next reboot ------------------------------------------------------------------ ipbase ipbasek9 Permanent ipbasek9 security securityk9 Permanent securityk9 uc None None None data None None None
Issue is when I do a "show crypto session" the GRE tunnels session status read down on the 2901 router but on the 2811 session reads up-active. Everything is working and I am routing over the GRE Tunnels.
As you can see i have problems with connecting 2 SRP521W together for an VPN tunnel. I tried as much as I can but now i dont know what to do or how and where is the mistake? the connection between these two devices was there last week, after weekend (nothing changed in configs) the connection suddenly was interrupted, without any reason or warning. another day it worked again and 20 mins later connection was dead again...and now it wont establish at all.. here are some screenshots from the vpnconfigs of my devices. one has a static IP the otherone uses FQDN. These are the IKE policies: Here the IPsec Policies: and the GRE policies:
I would like to know if there is a way to monitor which programs/processes are using my network, say if there's something in the background updating that I can close to reduce lag in games, my computer is free of viruses and most the auto updates are turned off because I update them manually, so I just would like a simple straightforward answer,what program or process is using my network?
I have a 24-hour running computer that I want to make a small and simple server for personal useim: to put some photos on the server for my target audience from China. I have a 24 hour running computer located in my small flat in China. The purpose to make this is to provide a fast speed loading for average users in China? The links for the photo should be in format
We have a standard surfboard modem and a standard wired router. I recently purchased a wifi-only tablet thinking I could connect to an ad-hoc hotspot. This however isn't the case and now I can't use my tablet at home.I'm going to buy an inexpensive wifi router and just have that dedicated for my tablet. I've read that you can connect a wifi router into a wired router, but it requires a lot of mucking about with the settings. Then I remembered the USB connections that modems and routers have.can you have one wired router connected to the modem via a standard cable and also have a wifi router connected to the same modem via a USB cable?
I know the general difference between a router and a switch, but after considerable reading I'm unable to determine if I could just use a switch for my pretty simple specific application.
Here are the two devices I need to setup on my network (connections would be wired, both devices in close proximity): (1) computer running windows2k with 100mbps ethernet card (has software firewall installed) (1) blue ray player for streaming netflix videos
Because I don't have any computers on the network communicating with each other, based on what I've read it seems possible to just connect a switch to my cable modem instead of using a router.
im using a intel mother board desktop pc and windows xp. i was tray to add external wireless modem .the modem drivers already install successfully but its not working properly it working only 1st 5 to 10 minute.my pci simple communications controller also not installed
I need to configure ADSL on my 837 Router with simple configuration. The WAN IP address is dynamic from my ISP. I checked many websites and found different configurations everywhere. I don't know which is best suited for me. I used SDM and configured ADSL. When i checked the configuration from console i found that there is atm0.2 and dialer 2 configured with my settings. I cannot understand what is the purpose of atm0.2 and dialer 2 when atm0 and dialer0 are there. Is there a doc on ADSL config on 837?
interface Ethernet0 ip tcp adjust-mss 1412 exitinterface ATM0.2 point-to-point no shutdown pvc 0/35 pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 exit exitinterface Dialer2 exitdefault interface Dialer2interface Dialer2 ip mtu 1452 no shutdown ip address negotiated dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 120 dialer fast-idle 20 ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp pap sent-username username ppp chap password 0 password exitdialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
I've been trying to set up Simple file and printer sharing between two desktops with plans to add a third, a laptop. All are running Windows XP SP3. One has XP Pro and the other has XP Home. (The laptop will be XP Pro.) All are connected wireless. They share a connection to the internet through a cable modem and a Linksys router. Each desktop has a USB wireless adapter. I set up a few folders on each to share along with a printer on the XP Home machine. Right away, the XP Home machine was able to access the folders on the XP Pro machine. Alas, not the other way round. It seems I don't have "permission to access the resource".
I have a room cut off from the wired network by concrete walls (there are windows and it's a very short distance). There is a device in that room with a wired network adapter than needs access to the network. We'd like to use a pair of WAP4410N devices to get that room on our wired network over a simple "wireless bridge."
Would the following work?
Connect one WAP4410N normally with WPA2 Personal encryption and connect it to our wired network. Enable repeating of its signal.Set up the "remote" WAP4410N in the "cut off" room. Give it the same SSID and Encryption settings. Enable "Wireless Client Repeater" mode and uncheck the box labeled "Allow wireless station to associate". . . then use its RJ45 network port to connect to the wired device in the room. My biggest concern is the part in bold. Will the network port on the "remote" repeater function like that? So that any devices (or a switch) plugged into it will then be "forwarded along the bridge" to the main/local AP and then onto our network?
I've tried setting up some simple port forwarding on my ASA, where I want to forward one port on the external interface for both UDP and TCP to the same port on an internal server.
It works fine for UDP, but all TCP packets are dropped on the outside interface, even though the configuration for UDP and TCP is basically the same! This is my config:
object network MY_SERVER host 10.10.1.4 object service TCP_MY_SERVICE
[Code].....
Port count goes up on line 2 (UDP) but never for line 1. I just see the packet denied instead. Same thing happens in the packet tracer, a packet destined for my external interface on that port for UDP is allowed and NAT'd just fine. TCP it gets dropped by the ACL on the outside interface.
I am trying to find out if its possible to use an existing CISCO 2940 Switch that we have here at our office as a hub? Im sure that borders on insane however, let me break down what we have currently and what I'd like to do.
We currently have a very nice setup here at work, with no problems whatsoever, however; we hired a new person and brought in some new printers and we are running out of wall jacks. Rather then run all new cabling and adding new outlets/faceplates etc... We were just gonna go purchase a simple Netgear 5 port switch/hub from the Local Comp store here in town. We found in our server room a what appears to fully functional and operational cisco 2940 8 Port Switch with a Gigabit port.
All IPs in the office are assigned via DHCP, so....on to the meat of my question -- I tried to plug this into our network and I can't get any connectivity out at all. All the ports light up green etc when I plug in the comps but they aren't pulling valid IPs.
I want to reset this thing and start from the ground up, I am not scared of going into the IOS and modifying what needs to be done...as long as I got a good enough walk through.
I would like to create 3 x VLANs on an SG 300-28P and have them completely isolated from each other, for example ports 1 - 12 on VLAN 1, ports 13 - 24 on VLAN 2 and ports 25 - 28 on VLAN 3. No communication between any of the VLANs.
is it possible with LMS 4.0 to do a simple reachability test for an IP address not based on device?The ip address I want to check for reacheability is not the management ip address I add in Inventory->Device Administration->Add->Device Properties->IP Address For example: I want to test the reachabilty of the IP-address 10.113.15.4, not management ip, it shall be an interface ip address.With the performance monitoring I want to test the reachability, if it fails continuously 2 times I want to get a notification with an low severity.After 6 continuously fails of the reachability test I want to get a notification with an medium severity and in the end after 12 continuously fails of the reachability test I want to get a notification with an criticaclc severity. The threshold configuration and the threshold criteria should not be the problem,the problem is where do/can I enter the corresponding ip address I want to test.
I would like to setup a simple VPN on a small network, nothing special, just to provide access to some simple resources on the network from anywhere. Since I'm not a Cisco expert, I was advised to user a 861 router, but I just can't seem to get the VPN working on this device.
I've placed the router behind a modem and did some basic configuration. Hosts who are connected to the modem (on the Vlan side) can access the internet and can setup a VPN connection to the router. A VPN connection from inside the network is worthless, but I just can't get the VPN working on the FastEthernet4 connection.
Any VPN config for a 861 router for this situation? Or how to configure this device as a VPN server?
I`m trying to get a simple VRF and routing setup going.The "routers" are Cisco C3750G-12S-E.What I want to do is separate the management network form all else.The public network is illustrated with private IP ranges, these are really public ranges.
I think the best way to solve this will be using VRF for management, and regular routing for public network, right? Putting the management network in it`s own VRF.
