I finally can upgrade my 1841 routes from 12.4 to the latest 15.1 IOS. Any info about upgrade path , do I need to modify config file and provide me with upgrade instruction link or something like that ?
View 2 RepliesAny good link that explains the NX-OS upgrade path? I am trying to go from 5.0(2a) to 5.2x.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhere can I find information regarding the details and upgrade path for the 2821 Intergrated services router. We are looking to upgrade from 12.4 (c2800nmc-spservicesk9-mz.12.4xxx.bin) to 15.1. Is their a spefici location to look for in the download or IOS area for upgrade paths?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe are planning to upgrade our controller 5508 from 7.0.116.0 to 7.1.91.0. Is this directly possible or i have to put some other image before directly upgrading it?
View 7 Replies View Relatedwhat the upgrade path is for 5505 ASA . I have one which is version 7.2 and need to upgrade it to 8.4(5). I have read that it needs to upgraded btwn major release versions.Not sure if I need to upgrade from 7.2 - 8.0 , then form 8.0 - 8.2, then from 8.2 - 8.3 and finally 8.3 to 8.4 or can I just upgrade from 7.2 - 8.2 and then from 8.2 - 8.4 .Also what is the minimum memory requirements for vers 8.4 .my ASA running on vers 7.2 currently has 256Mb Memory and I will be upgrading this to 512MB before I do the upgrade the image above?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI would like to perform nondisruptive upgrades on two Cisco Nexus 5010s that currently run NX-OS version 4.1(3)N2(1) to Release 5.1(3)N2(1a). Is this possible? Or, do I need to upgrade to Release 5.0(2)N1(1) first?
View 3 Replies View Relatedhave just set up a WLC 4402 as a Guest WLAN controller on the DMZ of our network. I have successfully managed to get our internal controllers to connect to it, with the exception of 1. it says the control path is up but the data path is down. the other 14 controllers worked fine, and in testing the last one was OK but it is now not working properly. the 2 controllers can ping each other but just won't create the data tunnel. there is a firewall in the middle but that has been set up to allow traffic between the 2 groups of controllers to be unrestricted.
the internal controllers are 4404's and all controllers are running the same version of code. 5.1.151.0.
I have recently started a new job where the IOS on the 1841 routers is version 12.4. These are from 2006 mainly, probably when the routers were bought.should I upgrade to 15.0? Mainly just to plug security holes that cisco have found?
View 8 Replies View RelatedUpgrading the memory on an 1841. After inserting a 256MB/PC133/SDRAM/DIMM it would not post during the boot, hangs.If i take out the chip it works fine.The on-board memory is 128, so the 256 is the max it would take to a total of 384. According to the documentation this should work.The memory chip is a Transcend chip, basically Samsung.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have 1841 router (Cisco IOS Software, 1841 Software (C1841-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 12.4(9)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)), currently the router up and running on "c1841-advsecurityk9-mz.124-9.T1.bin" and when we try to upgrade the IOS with "c1841-advsecurityk9-mz.124-24.T7.bin" its not taking the new IOS. [code]
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 1841 running IOS Image C1841-advsecurityk9-mz.124-3i and the following feature sets: IP, Firewall, VPN, IPS and NAC. I am having an issue viewing the Additional Task tab under the Configure menu in the GUI. Without doing much research i assumed this is an browser issue and new code would fix it. When i look on the download software there are many different codes availible and i am unsure which i need to get to update the software on my IOS.
Here are the ones i am look at and not sure which one to choose from.
15.1.1-XB(ED)
15.0.1-XA2(ED)
I wanted to know how many sodium memory slots the 1841 Routers have so i can upgrade to more then 128mb of DRAMI want ideally 256+on the Cisco website in the diagrams they dont say if it has 1 or 2 slots
View 8 Replies View Relatedwe need to interconnect multiple branch office (CISCO 1841 with VWIC-1MFT-E1 ) via E1 links to the main site (CISCO 3745 with NM-8E1 IMA ). We succeeded to connect them using the same VWIC-1MFT-E1 at both sides (Branch / HQ), but I need to connect up to 10 sites in the future, so we thought that may be we can use ( NM-8E1 IMA) to make it possible and to save some space for any future upgrades. Honestly, we couldn't find any E1 related commands to configur this card (NM-8E1 IMA). Did we choosed the wrong card (NM-8E1 IMA).?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe currently have a Cisco 1841 router with version 12.4(1c) of IOS using image c1841-ipbase-mz.124-1c.bin. Our goal is to make it so our router can fully support IPv6. The current IOS version cannot. I've seen a site that seems to indicate 12.4T does support with IP Base image but recently had Cisco tell me with the latest IOS release 15.1.4.M4 that I have to use either the "Advanced Enterprise Services" or "Advanced IP Services" image. Did Cisco just remove IPv6 from IPBase in later IOS releases?
Also I've seen conflicting specs on the max amount of Flash and DRAM the router can support. The following link shows that 384MB is the max for DRAM and 128MB max for flash. We're looking to upgrade ours from 128MB and 32MB respectively but as mentioned I've seen it where higher amounts are supported. In fact we bought a backup 1841 to have and it has a 256MB Flash card in it.URL
Last but not least. Where can I find a straightforward documention of this situation where we may have to upgrade our Flash and DRAM and then upgrading the IOS?
Here is the current logical routing path of the network I've inherited:ISP_ASA_1800 --- P2P link_ LAN, However, the equipment is setup up in this inefficient physical topology: Internet_ASA_LAN switch --- 1800 --- P2P link_LAN, The 1800 is the default gateway for all LAN hosts. This means that all traffic not destined for the LAN goes first to the 1800 which has routes for the Internet and for the P2P. If traffic is destined for the P2P, this is no problem. If traffic is destined for the internet, then in my opinion this is an inefficient routing path because the traffic ends up doing this:LAN host > switch > 1800 > back to the same switch > ASA > Internet, So I am thinking of setting up the physical topology to match the logical topology like this:Internet, ASA_1800 ---- P2P link_LAN switch_LAN hosts This means I will connect the 1800 and ASA directly to one another. Am I on the right track? Is this the best way?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with the return path of NAT'd traffic on a Cisco 877W router. Here's the network setup:
gatekeeper1 (192.168.0.1) is a Cisco 857gatekeeper2 (192.168.0.253) is a Cisco 857gatekeeper3 (192.168.0.251) is a Cisco 877W
The default route is 192.168.0.1 on all devices, however there are some static route defined so that traffic to certain IP addresses bounce off to 192.168.0.253 and use that Internet connection instead. This new connection is designed so that traffic aimed for a certain internal IP address (192.168.0.190) comes via this third internet connection in order to take the load off of the main line. NAT is all configured and appears to be working when .251 is the default route but as soon as I set it back to .1, the traffic appears to come in but doesn't go out again.
I have one questions regarding if C6509 suports "ip tcp path-mtu-discovery" ? apply this command to GRE interface on C6509?
if yes, let me know what is the the IOS for that.
I multi homed to dual ISPs using a single 6509e. Currently, I am only receiving a default from wash ISP and marking one with a higher local pref. most of my traffic flow is inbound, so this config meets my need. The issue I have: if either ISP has has an outage upstream from my directly connected peer, my router does not detect that and continues to send traffic out thru that provider only to be black holed. My 6509 will only support 256k routes, so full route tables isn't an option. I could receive partials from each ISP. Is there any other method to detecting this upstream ISP issue and then adjusting my local pref on my default to use the alternate provider path?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to bring the mobility group between 5508 wlc (dmz) and internal 5508 wlc but it says control and data path down. (Ihave allowed port 97 and ports 16666-16667 both ways), should the ntp be sinked inline iwth other controllers ?,should the Mobility group need to match (already discussed this in another forum but experts suggested they never had to match the mobility group), should i first create the ssid and anchor - at the moment i havent created the ssid to anchor.
View 11 Replies View RelatedASA running 8.2(5).When I enable ip spoofing on my network interfaces I see this getting logged:
Deny UDP reverse path check from 10.100.100.102 to 10.100.100.255 on interface SPECTRA-LAN
This is because interface SPECTRA-LAN (VLAN50) is the interface connected to the network with ip 10.100.100.0/24 but the interface do not have a ip address so it does not exist in the routing table I believe?However interface INTERN do also belong to network 10.100.100.0/24 which also is the management interface and the default route for hosts in network 10.100.100.0/24, but has no vlan.
1. move the management0/0 to SPECTRA-LAN and give SPECTRA-LAN ip 10.100.100.1?
2. give SPECTRA-LAN a ip address in the 10.100.100.0 range?
My routing table and interface list is:
Current available interface(s):
DATA-BACKUP Name of interface Redundant1.10
DMZ Name of interface Redundant1.900
GUEST Name of interface Redundant1.990
HOSTING Name of interface Redundant1.100
Infrastruktur Name of interface Redundant1.20
[code]....
I multi homed to dual ISPs using a single 6509e. Currently, I am only receiving a default from wash ISP and marking one with a higher local pref. most of my traffic flow is inbound, so this config meets my need. The issue I have: if either ISP has has an outage upstream from my directly connected peer, my router does not detect that and continues to send traffic out thru that provider only to be black holed. My 6509 will only support 256k routes, so full route tables isn't an option. I could receive partials from each ISP. Is there any other method to detecting this upstream ISP issue and then adjusting my local pref on my default to use the alternate provider path?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI recently bought my book live 3TB everything works well with it, I can stream movies upload them, remote access and much more with a good speed, the problem is when I direct connect my book live to my PC via Ethernet, windows can't find the path of the drive. However, I tried to direct connect via Macbook and it works with no problem.I tried to fast reset my book live to factory default settings and direct connect from my book live to my PC via Ethernet, simply it worked! But then it stopped working for some unknown reason.Its a pain when i need to transfer large files via wireless.
View 4 Replies View RelatedRecently I've changed my all local I.P. series in the server from 192.168..to 10.219..& the server 2008 providing through DHCP.So, I've to re mapped the share folder to change the path in every system.But few files in 1 PC are still keeps the old share folder path when trying to open & failing or taking long time! NOT all files in that machine
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm a network admin for a medium-sized (500-700 people) multi-site business and I have a simple question. Is there any utility or method I can use to identify the physical path a packet of data takes from a workstation on the LAN to a server on the same LAN?
For example, if I send a tracert command at google.com, I can see every router the packet touches before it gets to Google's router. Is there a method I can use to determine a similar path with switches in my internal network? If I use tracert or pathping, I only get a single hop since the workstations are on the same LAN as the servers even though I know there are two physical switches between them.
Basically, I want to send packets from a group of workstations behind a couple switches to a server and see if the packets are being lost in the switch somewhere to identify if there is a failing switch or something causing network slowdowns. map out the network more accurately so it would be useful to know.
i have 9 pcs on a lan. when i attempt to view the workgrp i get a message that indicates the the workgrp is not accessible and network path not found. i have tuned off windows and mcafee firewalls so that the only firewall functioning is with the modem/router(netopia) if i change the workgrp to the default(mshome) i can see the pcs.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a wireless network of PC, Acer Extensa laptop (laptop1), and Acer Aspire notebook (laptop2) which connect wirelessly to a Livebox. All machines are running XP (SP3). Laptop2 connects to the Livebox via a Broadcom 802.11g adapter.There is no problem with any of these accessing the internet. Until recently (not sure how long ago) there was no problem with any of them accessing each other.Yesterday we discovered that laptop2 has lost contact with PC. All other connections are fine (including PC to laptop2). I have checked evrything I can think of and have carried out a System Restore taking the machine back as far as I can but that has made no differenceLaptop2 appears to recognise the workgroup in its 'preferred networks' box but the PC does not appear in its list of computers on the network and any attempt to access the network (My Network Places>Entire Network>Microsoft Windows Network & click on MSHOME) results in "you do not have permission ..." then followed by "Windows cannot find the network path.."
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have attached my home network configuration. Only one part is not working. When the David-PC (win 7) tries to access the SharpeLaptop (XP) i get error code 0x80070035; NETWORK PATH NOT FOUND. This fails on wireless or ethernet hookup. All PC's are using McAfee Virus software which is supplied with ATT U-verse service. Trying to access the the daves-dell PC (XP) works fine Either of the 2 XP PC's can access the David-PC OK. The only failure is trying to access the laptop from the David-PC.If I disable the McAfee firewall on the laptop, then the David-PC can access the laptop. I have tried duplicating all the McAfee settings of the two XP P
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've Cisco7609-S with IOS 12.2(33)SRC2 met an issue is that "show ip route x.x.x.x" and "show ip cef x.x.x.x" shown next-hop is not actual switched next-hop.
For example, "show ip route 192.168.1.1" and "show ip cef 192.168.1.1" shown correct next-hop is 10.1.1.1, but the traffic destine to 192.168.1.1 actually not through 10.1.1.1, but always through the default route next-hop. Everything works normal after rebooted the router. Suppose it should caused by a bug? BTW, my Cisco7609 is runing BGP with ISP which received about 10K routes.
I have always connected to other computers in my network, including my file server, and all of a sudden, it will not work. This is only happening on one computer. You can connect fine on all the others. I am running Windows 7 SP1, and in the network window, I can see the computers, but when I click on them to connect, it says "The network path was not found". If I access them via their IP in windows explorer, then I can access them . I have never seen this before. I attempted to disable Norton, I even un-installed it, and it still does the same thing.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhat is the name or path for the file stored on your hard drive for the configuration settings?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to troubleshoot a problem with mpls fast reroute. The primary (protected) link is between PE-PE and the backup link is PE-P-PE. The IGP I'm using is OSPF. When there is a issue with the primary link and debug mpls tra tunnels signalling there is a message "LSP-TUNNEL-SIG: TunnelX [237]: re-route path verification failed (protected) [Can't use link x.x.x.x on node x.x.x.x]". After 30 seconds (without ospf tuning) the SPF is recalcalated, but that's not the point From the show mpls tra tunnels tu1013 (the backup one)everything looks ok:
Status:Admin: up Oper: up Path: valid Signalling: connected From show mpls tra fast-reroute database everything is ok, the status is Ready I'm using 7206VXR, Version 12.4(24)T3
I have a Cisco router 877. I am trying to configure a backup with ISDN.The primary line is an ADSL over pppoe. The problem is that despite the primary line fails, doesn't change the path and continue going by the main route.I have a very similar setup, also with a cisco 877, but with a normal DSL and it works perfectly.I solved the problem by activating a tracking but is slower than the other method.
View 2 Replies View Related intra-confederation labs -
Ibgp router (R1 ) - propagate updates packets to intra-confederation neighbor (64512) and 64512 - member as sending notification errors to ibgp router R1 - with Malformed AS_Path
R1 neighborship going down after receiving notification
i dont what exact root cause of this issuse