Cisco WAN :: 7609 - Configuration Failed On Policy Map
Aug 3, 2011Im having this error on the 7609, but for other policy its working.
Code...
Im having this error on the 7609, but for other policy its working.
Code...
I was trying to configure copp on one of 6500 sup-2T. Is it ok to add customized policies to the default copp "policy-default-autocopp".When I created my own customized policy using policy-map, I get following error
control-plane service-policy input policy-custom
error: failed to install policy map policy-custom
I just update my cisco 7609 to Version 12.2(33)SRD6. I encounter a strange problem with this version, everytime i change BGP policy ( input or output ) this will take effect immediately without "clear ip bgp neighbor <address> soft". Are there anyway not to take BGP policy affect unless command "clear ip bgp neighbor <> soft" ?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am facing issue while configuring service-policy output command in Cisco 7609-S router with c7600s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SRE2.bin IOS. However, in the same series router having IOS c7600s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SRC6.bin is supported service-policy output.Both the switch have WS-SUP720-3BXL SUP.
View 2 Replies View RelatedDoes any know the meaning of this log message in a 7609 router - "SP: FAILED to write to DS1338 RTC device"?
So far as I can tell DS1338 RTC is supposed to be a (linux-related?) clock but I don't see how that's related to the.
Yesterday, myself and local support team has been engaged to perform troubleshooting the issue of some web site accessing .Mos of this case is cased by MTU issue, So, I've tried to configure the following configuration on interface tunnel 0.Device: Cisco 7609 with IOS s72033-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF8.bin
I've tried to figure out what the supporting command after 'ip tcp' in tunnel 0 and following likes..ip tcp ?compression-connections Maximum number of compressed connectionsheader-compression Enable TCP header compression.there is no such command about 'ip tcp adjust-mss.So, my questions is that what is the replace command for 'ip tcp adjust-mss' ? Is this only support on Router? such as Cisco 7200. or not, to take effect same functional on C7609, what is the command for that?
To understand and configuring VPN setup to give secure access to my DB & Application Server exist in my Datacenter, to other Service Provider organisation. They need to access those DB & Application Server sitting at their company LAN itself.
My DC Setup :-
1. Core Router 7609 with SPA-IPSEC-SSC400-1 ( Cisco 6500/7600 IPSec VPN SPA Bundle 1 )
2. Core Switch 6513 with FWSM, ACE, SVC ( Network Analyser ), SUP 720
3. Distribution 6509 SUP 720
All the DB & Application Server connected to Distribution Switch in various VLAN,The Server support team from another company need the access to those, for that we will take MPLS link connecting out Core Router.
sample config for ASA 8.4 L2L VPN using Policy NAT?We could have multiple VPN tunnels terminated on the central ASA and our customer's LAN subnets could be interfering.Basically I need to build something like this [URL]but the problem is that I have ASAs running 8.4
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow to migrate a following VPN (site-to-site) config from ASA 8.2 to ASA v8.3,ASA 8.2
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have the following very simple policy configured on a Cisco 1841.
policy-map Shape-2Mb class class-default shape average 2000000 interface FastEthernet0/1[code]....
I'd just like some clarification on the best ways to monitor this. Looking at the 'sh policy-map int fa0/1' i get this:
FastEthernet0/1 Service-policy output: Shape-2Mb Class-map: class-default (match-any) [code]...
some of the sections don't make much sense to me. What is the output of that command.
I need to configure Policy Based Routing. There are two WAN Links from two Different ISP : Campus NW has one CORE switch - Cisco Catalyst 6506. [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy client is upgrading from anyconnect 2.5.2014 to 3.1.00495. The ASA is running ASA 5520 version 8.2(5)33 and is in an active/standby failover pair.when trying to push out the new 3.1 from the pair to windows 7 and XP machines, he gets the error "Failed to get configuration from secure gateway. Contact your system administrator". When he tries to push 2.5.2014 and 2.5.6005 out from the pair this works fine.When pushing the 3.1 out from a stand-alone test ASA 5520 it works fine.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am attempting to configure DDNS on an 1811W, but my configuration fails. Apparently,it is not connecting to the TZO server, because when I run <show ip ddns update> in telnet, the message "update destination not available, although rh.tzo.com can be pinged. I am attaching a copy of the config file. the ip name-server entries are my IP DNS, and the url/user name/ key entry was provided by TZO support.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWindows clients work fine. When loaced from safari in Mac OS, it also works fine. -- If I browse to the url, like vpn.xxx.com/profilename, I can login and anyconnect will start and connect automatically. Only when run from applications > Cisco > Cisco Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client, I will get this failure. Is this a configuration issue?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe recently installed Cisco 6509-E with dual Sup 720-BXL. We are using this switch on internet Edge. Internet connection is terminating on 10GIG fiber port.We do have following line cards installed.
1. 10 GIG * 4 port line card
2. 1 GIG * 8 port line card
3. Empty
4. Empty
5. Sup 720-3BXL
6. Sup 720-3BXL
7. 1 GIG * 48 ports
8. 1 GIG * 48 ports
9. 1 GIG * 48 ports
We do have 2 GB internet pipe.We are running load test sending http port 80 request and when load reach to arround 100 to 200 mbps and connections from out side to inside 80,000 switch start reponding very very slow and start packet loss and when I try to ping from one server to second server it show normal ping but if I tried to ping gateway IP of server which is SWITCH IP it show packet loss and very high letancy.
Switch also throw message "No memory available: Update of NVRAM configuration failed"
I have two 1811's connected in a lab using a ipsec vpn tunnel (using a switch to simulate an internet connection between them).I am trying to configure one of the routers as a ZBPF just to allow a remote windows login (DC on the firewalled side, workstations on the other side).I'm trying to verify that the zbpf is working, but it doesn't seem to stop anything. I had match icmp added to the class-map, but took it out to test if icmp would fail. It didn't. Basically, I don't think the firewall is working at all. Any thoughts on how I can configure this so that the policies will work between zone-pairs?
Here's an quick drawing:
Here are the configurations:
Local router:
hostname sdc-1811-LocalLab
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
no aaa new-model
!
resource policy
[code]....
I am having Cisco 3845 series router with c3900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M2.bin IOS . I want to install new Licence on it for DATA. When i am trying to install licence on it i am facing the error "% Error: License installation failed with error: XML parsing failed".
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a scenario with 2 7609s connected through a MPLS service with 10 GE. In each7609 we have a 24 port channelized T1 Circuit Emulation Over Card.
The requirement is in 2 parts. First, we need to provide a T1 emulation service between the 2 7609s T1 cards.
The second requirement is that in one end there is an OC3 port, so the customer wants to send the traffic from this emulated T1 onto the OC3.
I am currently setting up a new VRF on a Cisco 7609 which is advertising (as a RR-Client) an iBGP route to a Juniper MX960. This route is then getting sent back to the default route table on the 7609 but rejected due to the cluster-id loop prevention. Although not ideal I need this route to be visible in both tables.Is there a way of changing the bgp cluster-id per VRF rather than just globally?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat are the prerequisites before doing this? I have to upgrade a router this week if there is an opportunity to move it to a code that is more current that the one the client is currently running which is 12.2(33)SRD4. I see on the Cisco Support site that after this code, everything moves to 15.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a router 7609 with Supervisor Engine 720 (WS-SUP720-3B) (Policy Feature Card 3 and MSFC3 Daughterboard) and We have to configure QoS over a FastEthernet interface on a WS-X6148-RJ-45. When I try to apply the policy command I get the next log:
#service-policy output TEST_QOSbandwidth percent command is not supported in output direction for this interfaceConfiguration failed on: FastEthernet1/2 What kind of hardware and software requirements I need on my router to perfom QoS over ethernet interfaces?
Configuring MPLS over GRE tunnels. I did not find any proper configuration example. I need to do this for encrypt the traffic between two PE routers. I have 7609 routers.
View 20 Replies View RelatedI have a hight CPU utilisation problem in my CISCO7609-S routers. the cpu utilisation can rise 99% et this is usually. In the moment of hight CPU the the process CPU give the following:
the show processe cpu history give: show version
i have a problem of high cpu on my CISCO 7609 cased by LMS 3.2. I have captured the trafic flowing between LMS and the router,
View 2 Replies View RelatedFirst and foremost, what I have are 2 x 7204VXR (Gateways), 1 x 4507R-E (Coreswitch), and our ISP have 7609.Got some issues with redundancy with our ISP.
7609
I I
I I
7204-A 7204-B
| |
| vrrp |
| |
-4507R-E-
|
|
internal network
Both outside interfaces of 7204 gateways are connecting to 7609 with different public ip block. I used VRRP for my internal nework and failover have been tested working.
Even tried to remove link of 7204-A and 7609, the failover works perfect. If I shutdown/ remove the link between my 4507R-E and 7204-A (primary gw_higher vrrp priority), vrrp redundancy/failover still works, but pings from internal network to internet is only 50% success....alternate 4 ping reply and 4 time out.
I have to do a migration of sup32 to RSP720 for which I need to know if you can operate the equipment connected with the 2 supervisors at the same time??? and it still working ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a router CISCO 7609-S with two RSP 720 engines,and other cards are 7600-ES+20G3C,7600-ES+40G3C.One day it has a error cord " %XDR-6-XDRIPCNOTIFY: Message not sent to slot 4/0 (4) because of IPC error queue flush. Disabling linecard. (Expected during linecard OIR)" and the card resets.Cisco TAC told us it is a bug which is CSCtj05576.and I want to upgrade the ios from c7600rsp72043-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRD4.bin to c7600 rsp 72043-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRE5.bin.Now I want to know this:1, Is it right to upgrade to this new ios? Is the new ios suitable for the cards?2,I want to know the right way to upgrade ios in two engines.
Atfer I copy the new ios to the master engine and slave engine,and then change the bootvar and save config.Is it auto copy the config to de slave engine?Atfer do this ,I want to know how to apply the new ios,Does it reload the slave engine first and then force-switchover the master engine to slave engine. Or Atfer do this,I reload the router on active engine directly?
In my existing production router 7609 of my company, sup-engine already fixed in slot 5 with SRC2 12.2(33) IOS and I need to insert another sup engine in slot 6 with SRE7 IOS code image and after this, again sup engine in slot 5 must be with SRE7 IOS image...(also I have extra sup engines with SRE 7 code image ready with me) Query:i am going to offload router before proceed for this activity?i will insert new sup engine in slot 6 with SRE 7 ios image and now i need to re-install spare sup engine with SRE 7 code readily available with me by removing existing sup engine from slot 5 (Active) so what will be the proceedure to insert new sup engine with SRE 7 code in slot 5 and slot 6 with minimum downtime of router?
existing setup sup engine in slot 5 with SRC2 12.3 (old hardware) slot 6 is EMPTY
final result should be like this: sup engine in slot 6 with SRE 7 (new hardware)
sup engine in slot 5 with SRE 7 (new hardware)
I have a cisco 7609 running IOS version c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE0a.bin with the following modules..
sh mod
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
3 20 7600 ES+ 7600-ES+20G3CXL
[Code]....
The circuit has been tested as clean , so for the moment we have to assume that it is not a circuit issue We also have another idential 7600 in another POP with similar config that does not display the same problem
I have a 7609 with a Flexwan module with a PA-POS-1OC3. Is there a command to determine they type of SFP in the module ? sho controllers POS didn't provide the SFP type.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have Cisco 7609 Router and one 6 Mbps link which is on ethernet . When we are trerminating on Gigaethernet of 7609 router it is not coming up. While same link is showing up and working fine on other routers which is having Ethernet interface.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHave high cpu utilization on Cisco 7609 router. when i check output "Sh proc cpu sort".
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs the 7600-SIP-400= & SPA-1XOC12-POS still supported in the old models of the Cisco 7609 i.e.;
CISCO7609SUP32-GE-3B7609-S323B-8G-RS7632ISK9-12218SXF