I have to do a migration of sup32 to RSP720 for which I need to know if you can operate the equipment connected with the 2 supervisors at the same time??? and it still working ?
View 1 Replies
I have a 7606-S router ( non redundant ) with SUP32 and i wand to replace it with RSP720-3C-GE , i am asking abouth the procedure?shall i switch off the router ? or just removeSUP32 and insert RSP720 ?are there any steps should i do before the upgrade ?i am planning to take the router out of service during the operation, how much down time it will be ?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a 7606-S router ( non redundant ) with SUP32 and i wand to replace it with RSP720-3C-GE , i am asking about the procedure?
-shall i switch off the router ? or just removeSUP32 and insert RSP720 ?
-are there any steps should i do before the upgrade ?
-i am planning to take the router out of service during the operation, how much down time it will be ?
I found that there is no force-switchover command under redundancy configuration mode. How can I do a switchover from primary RSP720 to secondary RSP720?
I am using SSO and NSF.
C7609-2(config)#do sh redundancy
Redundant System Information :
------------------------------
Available system uptime = 1 hour, 51 minutes
[Code]....
We are installaing a new RSP720 on 7606 platform and facing a peculiar problem. It is prompting for a enable password. We have not configured anything on router yet, still it is asking for enable password.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow can we confirm the memory requirement for a RSP720-3c-ge card ?I got a link for 6500 series [URL]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to create a policy to provide only 4 Mbps bandwidth for mail out of 16 mbps pipe terminated on 7606 router (at Datacenter) having WS-SUP32-GE-3B.But I can't create policy with bandwidth percent,even exact value with priority command does not work. When I am going to enter service policy output command at interface it is showing as"priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface Configuration failed!" All I want to restrict bandwidth at backbone link for mail traffic. From all remote locations use to access mail server over the same link.
View 1 Replies View RelatedAfter inserting a RSP720-3C-10GE in module 6 and running the show module command display the following [code]what is the meaning of the UnKnown on the oline diag status ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs Enhanced FlexWAN module compatible with 7603-S with RSP720-10GE?We have a PA-POS-2OC3 on a 7200 router and we want to use it on 7603-S.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a cisco 7606-S with dual RSP720-3CXL. Devices reloaded and now none of the RSPs are booting.When I have tried to take the console using only one RSP, card going to rommon mode after that it hangs. I guess its firmware is corrupted.
View 4 Replies View RelatedSince a couple of months, I have some CPU problem.
There is no high process :
l#sh processes cpu | exclude 0.00CPU utilization for five seconds: 39%/30%; one minute: 32%; five minutes: 32% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 130 52713208 240359987 219 0.95% 0.91% 1.00% 0 IP Input 202 1811824 1218190 1487 0.07% 0.06% 0.05% 0 HIDDEN VLAN Proc 338 20873364 219225 95214 7.11% 0.94% 0.71% 0 BGP Scanner
total amount of traffic on the router around 700Mb-1Gb out / 300Mb In
cisco CISCO7603 (R7000) processor (revision 1.1) with 458752K/65536K bytes of memory.Processor board ID FOX090308DTR7000 CPU at 300Mhz, Implementation 0x27, Rev 3.3, 256KB L2, 1024KB L3 CacheLast reset from power-on5 Virtual Ethernet interfaces9 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces1915K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K)
I have a sup 32 (WS-SUP32-GE-3B) i dont find any msfc card ? is there any command to check if msfc is present or offline/online ? Also will i be able to upgrade IOS for this sup with out MSFC ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have been tasked to replace a failed sup on a 6500 Sup32 running IOS. Now, the primary sup doesnt have a compact flash. I don't have any CF on me. The replacement sup i received also doesnt have a CF.From the cisco website it says that the moment I insert the secondary sup into the chassis. it will automatically download the IOS and boot details from the primary to the secondary sup.
[code]....
I am going to upgarde SUP2 to SUP32 on my 6509 by next week. right now I have 2 SUPs on the 6509 in redundant mode.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI need to upgrade 2xsup2 module to 2xsup32 on my cisco 6509. I just found out that I can not have the CISCO WS-X6500-SFM(Cisco Switch Fabric Module switch) with Sup32 and I have to remove 2 xCISCO WS-X6500-SFM2 modules from the switch.I am using this switch as a access switch and most of the ports are 100Mbps.
let me know if the upgrade would be safe or not as far as the bandwidth?
I have (2) Sup 32 configured in a 6509 chassis. I have 1 power supply plugged into the wall and 1 power supply that is not plugged into anything but it is in the chassis and has green light to show that it has been recognized.
My problem is the "system light" on both sup32 remains amber and does not turn green. I have done show modules and sh diagnostics and sh power and everything checks out OK. Also there is an amber light on "active" on the 2nd Sup32 which I am assuming means that it is in standby mode so that would be correct.
Q: My question is could it be the power supply that is not plugged into anything causing the "system light" to stay amber and not turn green?
Q: Will this amber system light on the Sup32 stop the 6509 from running as normal?
I understand that my questions seems to be rather strange cos supervisors is rather old (Sup1A especially). But i am interested in understanding what puprpose were in production SUP32. I cant find out enough differencies between Sup1A with MSFC2 and Sup32 to understand what reasons lead to deploying new sup in none fabric supervisor series.
Both supervisors have same perfomance - 15Mpps and have limitation on backplane bandwith of 32 Gbps (cos both use swithing bus), both supervisors equipped with MSFC2 and etc. Differencies i found:
SUP 32 have 10Gbe ports support (but this seems to be doubtful enhancement - with it perfomance GE ports seems to be more appropriate technology isnt it?) SUP1A equipped with PFC, SUP32 with PFC3BSUP32 deploys CEF (what is benefit of CEF if perfomance same?)
I have 1x Cisco 6509 with Sup2 and MSFC2 and it is running on IOS (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11). I have following policy map :
Policy Map VOIP
Class IP PHONE
priority percent 75
and the following command on each interface: service-policy output VOIP those configuration are working fine on SUP2 with MSFC2 but last week I tried to upgrade the SUP2 to SUP32 on the switch and upgrade the IOS to the latest version (s3223-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SXJ4) but when I try to put service-policy output VOIP on each physical interface I am getting the following error:
"Priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface" and when I try to add service-policy output VOIP on a V LAN interface I am getting following error:
MQC features are not supported in output direction for this interface. Will I need to change something after upgrading to SUP32..
I have a scenario with 2 7609s connected through a MPLS service with 10 GE. In each7609 we have a 24 port channelized T1 Circuit Emulation Over Card.
The requirement is in 2 parts. First, we need to provide a T1 emulation service between the 2 7609s T1 cards.
The second requirement is that in one end there is an OC3 port, so the customer wants to send the traffic from this emulated T1 onto the OC3.
I am currently setting up a new VRF on a Cisco 7609 which is advertising (as a RR-Client) an iBGP route to a Juniper MX960. This route is then getting sent back to the default route table on the 7609 but rejected due to the cluster-id loop prevention. Although not ideal I need this route to be visible in both tables.Is there a way of changing the bgp cluster-id per VRF rather than just globally?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat are the prerequisites before doing this? I have to upgrade a router this week if there is an opportunity to move it to a code that is more current that the one the client is currently running which is 12.2(33)SRD4. I see on the Cisco Support site that after this code, everything moves to 15.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a router 7609 with Supervisor Engine 720 (WS-SUP720-3B) (Policy Feature Card 3 and MSFC3 Daughterboard) and We have to configure QoS over a FastEthernet interface on a WS-X6148-RJ-45. When I try to apply the policy command I get the next log:
#service-policy output TEST_QOSbandwidth percent command is not supported in output direction for this interfaceConfiguration failed on: FastEthernet1/2 What kind of hardware and software requirements I need on my router to perfom QoS over ethernet interfaces?
Configuring MPLS over GRE tunnels. I did not find any proper configuration example. I need to do this for encrypt the traffic between two PE routers. I have 7609 routers.
View 20 Replies View RelatedI have a hight CPU utilisation problem in my CISCO7609-S routers. the cpu utilisation can rise 99% et this is usually. In the moment of hight CPU the the process CPU give the following:
the show processe cpu history give: show version
i have a problem of high cpu on my CISCO 7609 cased by LMS 3.2. I have captured the trafic flowing between LMS and the router,
View 2 Replies View RelatedFirst and foremost, what I have are 2 x 7204VXR (Gateways), 1 x 4507R-E (Coreswitch), and our ISP have 7609.Got some issues with redundancy with our ISP.
7609
I I
I I
7204-A 7204-B
| |
| vrrp |
| |
-4507R-E-
|
|
internal network
Both outside interfaces of 7204 gateways are connecting to 7609 with different public ip block. I used VRRP for my internal nework and failover have been tested working.
Even tried to remove link of 7204-A and 7609, the failover works perfect. If I shutdown/ remove the link between my 4507R-E and 7204-A (primary gw_higher vrrp priority), vrrp redundancy/failover still works, but pings from internal network to internet is only 50% success....alternate 4 ping reply and 4 time out.
I have a router CISCO 7609-S with two RSP 720 engines,and other cards are 7600-ES+20G3C,7600-ES+40G3C.One day it has a error cord " %XDR-6-XDRIPCNOTIFY: Message not sent to slot 4/0 (4) because of IPC error queue flush. Disabling linecard. (Expected during linecard OIR)" and the card resets.Cisco TAC told us it is a bug which is CSCtj05576.and I want to upgrade the ios from c7600rsp72043-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRD4.bin to c7600 rsp 72043-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRE5.bin.Now I want to know this:1, Is it right to upgrade to this new ios? Is the new ios suitable for the cards?2,I want to know the right way to upgrade ios in two engines.
Atfer I copy the new ios to the master engine and slave engine,and then change the bootvar and save config.Is it auto copy the config to de slave engine?Atfer do this ,I want to know how to apply the new ios,Does it reload the slave engine first and then force-switchover the master engine to slave engine. Or Atfer do this,I reload the router on active engine directly?
In my existing production router 7609 of my company, sup-engine already fixed in slot 5 with SRC2 12.2(33) IOS and I need to insert another sup engine in slot 6 with SRE7 IOS code image and after this, again sup engine in slot 5 must be with SRE7 IOS image...(also I have extra sup engines with SRE 7 code image ready with me) Query:i am going to offload router before proceed for this activity?i will insert new sup engine in slot 6 with SRE 7 ios image and now i need to re-install spare sup engine with SRE 7 code readily available with me by removing existing sup engine from slot 5 (Active) so what will be the proceedure to insert new sup engine with SRE 7 code in slot 5 and slot 6 with minimum downtime of router?
existing setup sup engine in slot 5 with SRC2 12.3 (old hardware) slot 6 is EMPTY
final result should be like this: sup engine in slot 6 with SRE 7 (new hardware)
sup engine in slot 5 with SRE 7 (new hardware)
Yesterday, myself and local support team has been engaged to perform troubleshooting the issue of some web site accessing .Mos of this case is cased by MTU issue, So, I've tried to configure the following configuration on interface tunnel 0.Device: Cisco 7609 with IOS s72033-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF8.bin
I've tried to figure out what the supporting command after 'ip tcp' in tunnel 0 and following likes..ip tcp ?compression-connections Maximum number of compressed connectionsheader-compression Enable TCP header compression.there is no such command about 'ip tcp adjust-mss.So, my questions is that what is the replace command for 'ip tcp adjust-mss' ? Is this only support on Router? such as Cisco 7200. or not, to take effect same functional on C7609, what is the command for that?
I have a cisco 7609 running IOS version c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE0a.bin with the following modules..
sh mod
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
3 20 7600 ES+ 7600-ES+20G3CXL
[Code]....
The circuit has been tested as clean , so for the moment we have to assume that it is not a circuit issue We also have another idential 7600 in another POP with similar config that does not display the same problem
I have a 7609 with a Flexwan module with a PA-POS-1OC3. Is there a command to determine they type of SFP in the module ? sho controllers POS didn't provide the SFP type.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIm having this error on the 7609, but for other policy its working.
Code...
We have Cisco 7609 Router and one 6 Mbps link which is on ethernet . When we are trerminating on Gigaethernet of 7609 router it is not coming up. While same link is showing up and working fine on other routers which is having Ethernet interface.
View 1 Replies View Related
