I have a 7606-S router ( non redundant ) with SUP32 and i wand to replace it with RSP720-3C-GE , i am asking abouth the procedure?shall i switch off the router ? or just removeSUP32 and insert RSP720 ?are there any steps should i do before the upgrade ?i am planning to take the router out of service during the operation, how much down time it will be ?
View 9 RepliesI have to do a migration of sup32 to RSP720 for which I need to know if you can operate the equipment connected with the 2 supervisors at the same time??? and it still working ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 7606-S router ( non redundant ) with SUP32 and i wand to replace it with RSP720-3C-GE , i am asking about the procedure?
-shall i switch off the router ? or just removeSUP32 and insert RSP720 ?
-are there any steps should i do before the upgrade ?
-i am planning to take the router out of service during the operation, how much down time it will be ?
I found that there is no force-switchover command under redundancy configuration mode. How can I do a switchover from primary RSP720 to secondary RSP720?
I am using SSO and NSF.
C7609-2(config)#do sh redundancy
Redundant System Information :
------------------------------
Available system uptime = 1 hour, 51 minutes
[Code]....
We are installaing a new RSP720 on 7606 platform and facing a peculiar problem. It is prompting for a enable password. We have not configured anything on router yet, still it is asking for enable password.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow can we confirm the memory requirement for a RSP720-3c-ge card ?I got a link for 6500 series [URL]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to create a policy to provide only 4 Mbps bandwidth for mail out of 16 mbps pipe terminated on 7606 router (at Datacenter) having WS-SUP32-GE-3B.But I can't create policy with bandwidth percent,even exact value with priority command does not work. When I am going to enter service policy output command at interface it is showing as"priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface Configuration failed!" All I want to restrict bandwidth at backbone link for mail traffic. From all remote locations use to access mail server over the same link.
View 1 Replies View RelatedAfter inserting a RSP720-3C-10GE in module 6 and running the show module command display the following [code]what is the meaning of the UnKnown on the oline diag status ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs Enhanced FlexWAN module compatible with 7603-S with RSP720-10GE?We have a PA-POS-2OC3 on a 7200 router and we want to use it on 7603-S.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a cisco 7606-S with dual RSP720-3CXL. Devices reloaded and now none of the RSPs are booting.When I have tried to take the console using only one RSP, card going to rommon mode after that it hangs. I guess its firmware is corrupted.
View 4 Replies View RelatedSince a couple of months, I have some CPU problem.
There is no high process :
l#sh processes cpu | exclude 0.00CPU utilization for five seconds: 39%/30%; one minute: 32%; five minutes: 32% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 130 52713208 240359987 219 0.95% 0.91% 1.00% 0 IP Input 202 1811824 1218190 1487 0.07% 0.06% 0.05% 0 HIDDEN VLAN Proc 338 20873364 219225 95214 7.11% 0.94% 0.71% 0 BGP Scanner
total amount of traffic on the router around 700Mb-1Gb out / 300Mb In
cisco CISCO7603 (R7000) processor (revision 1.1) with 458752K/65536K bytes of memory.Processor board ID FOX090308DTR7000 CPU at 300Mhz, Implementation 0x27, Rev 3.3, 256KB L2, 1024KB L3 CacheLast reset from power-on5 Virtual Ethernet interfaces9 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces1915K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K)
I have a sup 32 (WS-SUP32-GE-3B) i dont find any msfc card ? is there any command to check if msfc is present or offline/online ? Also will i be able to upgrade IOS for this sup with out MSFC ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have been tasked to replace a failed sup on a 6500 Sup32 running IOS. Now, the primary sup doesnt have a compact flash. I don't have any CF on me. The replacement sup i received also doesnt have a CF.From the cisco website it says that the moment I insert the secondary sup into the chassis. it will automatically download the IOS and boot details from the primary to the secondary sup.
[code]....
I am going to upgarde SUP2 to SUP32 on my 6509 by next week. right now I have 2 SUPs on the 6509 in redundant mode.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI need to upgrade 2xsup2 module to 2xsup32 on my cisco 6509. I just found out that I can not have the CISCO WS-X6500-SFM(Cisco Switch Fabric Module switch) with Sup32 and I have to remove 2 xCISCO WS-X6500-SFM2 modules from the switch.I am using this switch as a access switch and most of the ports are 100Mbps.
let me know if the upgrade would be safe or not as far as the bandwidth?
I have (2) Sup 32 configured in a 6509 chassis. I have 1 power supply plugged into the wall and 1 power supply that is not plugged into anything but it is in the chassis and has green light to show that it has been recognized.
My problem is the "system light" on both sup32 remains amber and does not turn green. I have done show modules and sh diagnostics and sh power and everything checks out OK. Also there is an amber light on "active" on the 2nd Sup32 which I am assuming means that it is in standby mode so that would be correct.
Q: My question is could it be the power supply that is not plugged into anything causing the "system light" to stay amber and not turn green?
Q: Will this amber system light on the Sup32 stop the 6509 from running as normal?
I understand that my questions seems to be rather strange cos supervisors is rather old (Sup1A especially). But i am interested in understanding what puprpose were in production SUP32. I cant find out enough differencies between Sup1A with MSFC2 and Sup32 to understand what reasons lead to deploying new sup in none fabric supervisor series.
Both supervisors have same perfomance - 15Mpps and have limitation on backplane bandwith of 32 Gbps (cos both use swithing bus), both supervisors equipped with MSFC2 and etc. Differencies i found:
SUP 32 have 10Gbe ports support (but this seems to be doubtful enhancement - with it perfomance GE ports seems to be more appropriate technology isnt it?) SUP1A equipped with PFC, SUP32 with PFC3BSUP32 deploys CEF (what is benefit of CEF if perfomance same?)
I have 1x Cisco 6509 with Sup2 and MSFC2 and it is running on IOS (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11). I have following policy map :
Policy Map VOIP
Class IP PHONE
priority percent 75
and the following command on each interface: service-policy output VOIP those configuration are working fine on SUP2 with MSFC2 but last week I tried to upgrade the SUP2 to SUP32 on the switch and upgrade the IOS to the latest version (s3223-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SXJ4) but when I try to put service-policy output VOIP on each physical interface I am getting the following error:
"Priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface" and when I try to add service-policy output VOIP on a V LAN interface I am getting following error:
MQC features are not supported in output direction for this interface. Will I need to change something after upgrading to SUP32..
We have about 70 AIR-1131AG-A-K9 APs that were installed about 5 years ago. The controller we use is a 4404 WLC, with software 4.1.171.0. This provides us our wireless network. We use Cisco switches as access, distribution, and core switches.
We have two guest networks, one for visiting physicians and another for patients and their guests. Each of these guest networks use a 4402 WLC as an anchor controller, with software 4.1.171.0. They use the same APs as our business network.
According to my understanding of the guest networks is that a tunnel (I don't know if it is encrypted or or encapsulated) is created between the APs/Guest WLAN to the anchor controllers, so this guest traffic is isolated from our business traffic. Futhermore, these guest controllers connect directly to our firewall, which only allows them access to the Internet, and not our Internal LAN.
Our Problem
=========================
Well, we've been having problems with our wireless system, specifcally with patient guest access. It has gotten bad enough that they are looking to replace the Cisco APs on the south side of the hospital. We've been told that "you can get better guest access at McDonalds" : ( . I think part of our problem is that our controller code is so very old and we are have a our patient guest network open and "restrict" the number of clients attached to it by limiting our DHCP scope. The biggest complaint we get regarding the patient/guest wireless is people saying "I can't connect to the wireless", which we almost always identify as an issue caused by us running our of DHCP leases (we have about 200). These DHCP lease are used quickly, by an devices that comes into range that is set to automatically connect to any network that is in range. A lot of our staff is connected to our patient guest network and don't even realize it.
We are interested in Meraki APs because they are magaged using a cloud controller (we won't have the added expense of another controller) and they seem really easy to manage. Our biggest concern regarding Mearki is security. They make use of NAT, a Layer 3 firewall, and LAN isolation (a firewall rule that only allows clients Internet access) in each AP as a means of isolating the guest traffic from the business traffic. Does this seem like a secure way to accomplish this or are the Layer 2 tunnels that Cisco and from what I've been told recently Aruba and Juniper make use of a more secure approach?
We've been working with a Meraki vendor, who also happens to sell Aruba and Juniper wireless networks. It seems like don't suggest Meraki if we are concerned with security. They said they are good for situations where you have many geographically seperated sites. They suggested we use Juniper and Aruba, specifically because they use Layer 2 tunnels and that they used technologies like clear air (APs self adjust channels and power, which Meraki claims to do too). I thought that, hey does Cisco that too, why wouldn't we just go with Cisco if those are your selling points for Juniper and Aruba?
I have a ASA 5505 which is replacing an old firewall. Everything is working apart from the dail in pptp sessions. These are forwarded to the windows 2003 server. [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am currently replacing my Sonicwalls with Cisco ASA5520's. One of my VPN tunnels currently functioning on the Sonicwall Requires a IKE Peer ID be programmed, I tried programing the ASA without one but the tunnel will not stay established.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI just installed a new NIC after troubleshooting old NIC and I am still receiving limited or no connectivity error. I checked router, cable modem & cable; all work fine.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI'm currently in the process of replacing SBS 2003 x 64 on my Poweredge 2900 server. I would prefer to upgrade to Windows 7 x 64, but would do XP in a pinch.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCan I replace my Replacing D-link 604 w/ D-link ebr-2310 ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedAny documentation or information pertaining to replacing an existing wireless network. I will be looking to replace a 4400 w/12APs with a 5500 w/12APs. The users typically utilize the WiFi network on a regular, so I am trying to figure out how to replace the existing hardware without interrupting the service.
What would be the best way of handling a situation as such? I am currently looking on the Cisco Doc. website, hoping to find something related to this.
I'm replacing an 877W router with an C887VA-W-A-K9.The new router uses the service module for managing the AP independently - So I know I can't simply paste the config accross from the old one.
The current router is connected to an ISP with a VPN back to the head office router. DHCP is supplied from the router and clients connect to that via wireless.
I know I can type most of the commands in - but what is best practice going from an all-in-one to having a separate AP? What order should thing be entered?
I need to replace an ageing PIX 506e with an ASA 5505.The current setup looks like this: The PIX is used for site-to-site VPN connection via the WAN 2 link. The WAN 1 link is used for general Internet connectivity.I don't have access to the Draytek Router as it is supported by a 3rd party, but I believe it uses static routing to direct the relevant traffic to/from the PIX.
When I replace the PIX with the ASA, the inside i/f connection experiences dropouts - but no errors show in the logs.The only significant difference I can see in the config is that the ASA utilises VLans for the inside & outside interface configs - I used the PIX-to-ASA Migration tool to make the initial configuration on the ASA.In tests, if I only connect the inside i/f of the ASA, pings from the LAN are stable. Once I connect the outside i/f, pings timeout approx 80% of the time.
I got a task to replace our current cisco 2800 series router which is used for easy vpn remote access with cisco asa 5510.I have a got a lot of users, i wish that user shall see no difference except of ip address they are going to use for remote login.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have two 6509 will active/passive sup 720-3BXL cards in each and 1GB DRAM. Each handles full bgp routing table with 4-5 ISP(eBGP) connections. The problem we are facing is.. 6509 were meant for core/aggregation and seam to be wasted are edge devices. With each ISP added the DRAM creeps up to a point were is it 80% utilized.
I am looking to replace both 6509's with routers which were meant to work on the edge. As mentioned earlier, it will have 4-6 external bgp peers per router. Handle full bgp tables. Should be capable of policy based routing.
I am new to Cisco wireless and would like replacing WLC 4404 with 5508. I mean any link or doc (best practices).
View 13 Replies View RelatedMy brother's Speedstream has died. Lights don't work, etc. etc. He has ATT DSL in Detroit; Detroit does not have an internet wireless service, so he has to deal with ATT. He's po'd that he's paying $92 a month for service that doesn't work. I told him he needed a new DSL modem.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow to replace a defective redundant sup. I read on several articles that inserting new redundant sup should not be an issue as the active sup will always send its configuation to the standby. We are running SSO on the Sup720. Should I switch it to RPR before I install the redundant sup? I read a case wherein they switched it to RPR from SSO before inserting the new redundant sup. My concern is the IOS mismatch since Cisco doesn't always send the same IOS on RMAs.What I am planning is this.
1. Save/Backup configuration
2. Remove the redundant sup on slot 8 (since it is a 6513)
3. Insert the new redundant sup on slot 8.
4. Check if all the configurations were synced from slot 7 to slot 8.
5. Copy the IOS from sup-bootflash to slavesup-bootflash. (if the IOS are not the same)
6. Check show bootvar to see if the boot variables are correct.
7. If bootvar is the same, reload slot 8 to boot the new IOS.
Is this a good plan or am I missing something? I am worried with this document if the redundant sup has a different software. If i insert the card in slot8, according to Cisco, it will revert to RPR. If slot 8 boots and it has a different OS, then slot 7 will switch to RPR even if it's active. Would I still be able to access the slavesup-bootflash of slot 8? Is it going to boot 100%? I read that doing a force switchover will cause a flip and RPR would cause the line cards to reinitialize and I don't want that. Well I am not going to do a force switchover since i want slot7 to be active and retain slot 8 as hot.
I am replacing a faulty sup720 on a 6513. It s the backup/hot not the active sup. It has the same IOS on it. Is it correct that all I need to do is remove the faulty and replace it with the new sup and do a wr mem? Fromwat I have read their should be no down time all connectivity should remain stable?
View 6 Replies View Related