I am suggesting an ASR1001 as a head end router for a small hub spoke WAN consisting of 4 branch sites connecting to the head via LES. 3 are 100mb, one is 30 mb. I will be connecting the LES circuits to a swithc and then trunking to the router. I would like to apply outbound shaping to these 4 subinterfaces on the router, and just want to check this is supported?
View 1 RepliesI want to take 100Mb incoming from a service provider and police it off into several VRFs for customers.One of these VRFs will be 30M.I further need to traffic shape this (30Mb) out to 40 x 0.75Mbps (burstable to 30M) customers.
I am using an ASR1001.
I make qos on VPN Tunnel, but i make command service-policy output name, it show the error below Traffic Shaping feature is not supported in user defined class of parent level policy.My cisco router 1921, IOS : c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M5.bin
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have catalyst 3750 I want to controle traffics on every port I have tried Frame-Relay Traffice shaping and Quality of service but there is no support for these commands in the switch.do we have any way to limit traffic on every port in catalyst 3750 and 2960 switches ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedDoes VPLS is supported on the Cisco ASR1001?With the feature navigator it looks like the ASR1001 is the only ASR1000 series router with VPLS support but I can't find any documentation confirming this.
View 10 Replies View RelatedWe are looking to implement traffic shaping/policing primarily for P2P traffic. As natively the ASA5550 is only capable of p2p inspection if the traffic is tunneled via port 80 is the AIP-SSM the way forward? We have 2 5550s in active/active failover config. As a side note we are also looking to implement an IDS/IPS system so could this module cover all?Is this module going to provide the desired outcome or is there another module/device out there better suited for this? I would prefer to use the ASA5550s as opposed to implementing another product if only that we can make use of the investment we already made on these devices.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to come up with the best way to traffic shape traffic with 3750 Me switches. the traffic will be coming from a 6504 Sup-7203b downstream and going out the wan. Core---L3---->6504--intvlan80--trunkport to--->3750Me---g/1/1/1-trunkport to---MetroE network--->int f0/0.80--branch router. The idea is to use the 3750 to traffic shape the traffic going towards the wan/branch to 500 to match the contracted rate and then to use qos on shaped rate. I tried to apply it to g1/1/1 using port based policies but it did not shape the traffic. I changed everything to IP interfaces and it worked. I need to break up the metroe into different vlans so I can bring branch offices in on different vlans.c
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am a traffic shaping newcomer and need some guidance as how to BEGIN to approach a problem with traffic. We have been rolling out Windows 7 at sites and the additional traffic it causes on installation is considerable as it has to request information from our central site to populate My Documents and Outlook mailboxes.This has caused some problems on sites as there traffic rates increase to the point that QoS is not sufficient to protect voice traffic and delays and one-way audio are being experienced.One question is this - is GTS a solution or is CBWFQ within GTS the solution or is something else preferable? The sites involved are data/voice with a variety of routers.Second question is this - if we have a remote site with a 3725 router as the WAN aggregator with one 4506/Sup IV and one Cat 3550-24-PWR the shaping should be best placed on the 3725, correct? Also, are there issues with shaping incoming/outgoing traffic as I seem to have read?FYI, the 3725 router has 12.4(8d) with IP VOICE/NO CRYPTO IOS version. The 4506 has 12.1(23)E4 with basic L3 feature set.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhat's the good, inexpensive way to add traffic shaping to a small network? Let's say there are about 20 users on a T1 circuit. Existing router is an Adtran 3430 (from the telco so we can't touch it). Everything works fine except when they get really heavy with uploads/downloads when document scanning, and the telnet sessions to the mainframe app start getting dropped. Major PITA. Basically need to make telnet traffic a priority.Now, I could drop a pfSense box in there using an old workstation, but I'd like something I can stick in a rack, or is at least really small and hopefully under $200 or so.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have a 3825 with a 1Gb fiber card at one of my sites. Our ISP and MPLS provider hand off a single gigabit fiber to us that contains 2 50MB EVC's.I need to apply QoS to one of the EVC's and shape them both to 50Mb to avoid upstream rate mismatch bottlenecks. Both of the EVC's generally only push 10Mb during business hours.When I run UDP stream tests (various rates from 500k-6m that are marked as AF41) to one of my other sites I am consistently getting about 2% packet loss, despite the fact the circuit isn't even close to 50% saturation. When I remove Shaping and QoS all together, the issue nearly clears itself up, except during peak hours and I get small bursts of packet loss, which is still unacceptable.When the pipe is at near zero utilization (after hours) there also is no packet loss with or with out the shaping/qos applied.
View 1 Replies View RelatedThere is a remote server that downloads info from a server here at HQ. When the dowloads start the rxload on the S0/0/0 interface jumps to 98 percent or so; rxload 250/255. I needed to limit the bandwidth utilization between the servers, so I added the below line to the LAN interface on the remote router.By adding the command, it reduced the download utilization -which is what I wanted.
access-list 185 permit ip host 10.6.27.1 any
!
int f0/0
traffic-shape group 185 10000 8000 8000 1000
Question:How would applying this to the LAN interface cause the download utilization (Coming from s0/0/0) to decrease?
I have a client who has Cisco 3800 series routers in their data centre with which they have QoS/CoS policies implemented. They wish to further manage traffic by limiting outbound traffic to their branch sites in line with the network access bandwidth each site has available. Is this possible whilst leaving the QoS policies in place? If so how?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have following scenario - router 2911 connected to 2950 switches with about 80 vlans. How can I limit speed on each of the 79 vlans (to equal % acros all of them) and give vlan 80 lets say 30% of total bandtwith. Since I am new to QOS, can you point me to the right website or give me example.
View 4 Replies View RelatedIs there any difference with traffic shaping capability on the 5510 as opposed to the 5505? is there anything the 5510 can do that the 5505 cant? with regards to TShaping?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to get ride of an old traffic management appliance and would like to replace it by a simple Cisco 3845.
The configuration is really simple:
Customers -- Router 3845 -- Internet
I want to be able to provide bundles to customer such 64kps garanteed/ 2mbps MIR (retail) and 2mbps garanteed no MIR (business).
I need also to specify to the router the total internet bandwitdh available (example: 20mbps symetrical).
This configuration will work ? Should I worry about any performance issue if I start to have a lot of customers ?
ip access-list extended Cust1
permit ip any sub_Cust1
permit ip subCust1 any
I would like to know if there is a way to apply in the Cisco asa 5510 traffic shaping not for a interface but a single IP address.For example i would like to limit the bandwith for the IP address of my FTP server.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI hava Cisco ASA 5520 with AIP-SSM module. I would like to have the below features with ASA installed in Transparent mode.
1. Traffic shapping per user
2. Traffic shapping per IP subnet
3. Traffic shapping per Application
Is it possible with ASA installed in Transparent mode?
We are a new medical school located in PA. Just have just completed a new building and are now working on getting our network finished. Here is the situation we have a 50MB Internet Connection that comes into our network that then hits the ISPs Cisco 3750 which sends it to two of our Cisco 3750s for redundancy. From the 3750 goes into our Cisco 6509 with a FWSM module, then out from there to our distribution switches which are all Cisco 2960s.
What we would like to do is to control how much WAN connectivity each of our VRFs get. Right now we have a Faculty, Student, and Research VRF formed, and are trying to figure out the best spot where we can say Faculty gets 30MB of Bandwidth, Students gets 10, and Research gets 10. If possible would like burst capabilities.
I am trying to do policy on the interfaces of my switch WS-4507R, below the configuration I used to shap the traffic to 1 Mbps. However, when I tested it the traffic excceded the 1 Mbps.
class-map match-all 1MB
match access-group name 1MB
!
policy-map 1MB
class 1MB
[code]...
how I can restrict my bandwidth on the interface on 1 Mbps.
I am looking for step-by-step configuration on how to enable rate-limit and traffic shaping on Cisco 6513 vlan interfaces. I am not able to find this particular document on CCO.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have lots of PPPoE users that get Virtual Access interfaces created upon login based on a virtual template. I need to traffic shape them. I know how to get it to work on an individual basis, because the policing within a service policy works fine. As soon as i change it to shaping it leaves things wide open.I really dont care how it gets done, I just need to be able to specify a speed to be traffic shaped and apply that to a virtual template. I need to limit speeds on the download and upload, i understand that the upload i will use the policing, but the download i need it to smooth out the flow and be traffic shaped, not policed.
Here is my Policies and classes:
***
policy-map CHILD class class-default bandwidth 1650policy-map PARENT class class-default shape average 1650000 service-policy CHILD****
Here is my Virtual Template:
****
interface Virtual-Template8 description pppoe-auth-FTTH ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group subs-in-FTTH in ip mtu 1493 timeout absolute 6120 0 peer default ip address pool FTTH-POOL ppp authentication pap pppoe-auth ppp authorization pppoe-auth ppp timeout idle 84600 service-policy output PARENT
[code]....
The results i am getting is unrestrcited throughput, i am seeing about 40mb of throughput when the target is to limit to 1.65MB. As you can see from the output the PARENT class is seeing 279116 packets, but the shaper only saw 59. In all the examples i see on the internet these two numbers should be the same. Why is the shaper not acting on all the traffic crossing that class/policy?
Hardware/IOS:
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200-IK9SU2-M), Version 12.4(12), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
ASA 5520 can handle 2 ISP? not to load balance or not standby/active but to use the 2 ISP at the same time and separately. for example, ISP_A who has 10m will be dedicated to the customer A/VLAN A, then ISP_B who has 4m will be for the rest of the customer's traffic. Can the ASA 5520 do traffic shaping or policy map just like in a normal router?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe have some ASR WAN routers which have a dedicated 400M interface to a remote site.
Servers on our Local network source the data through some firewalls via 10G interfaces, which connects to 4500X WAN switches then to the Routers on 1G links.
The sources are rate limiting the traffic but the routers are periodically dropping packets which I think is mostly due to burstiness in the traffic between as it traverses through from 10G links to 1G then to 400M.
How to setup traffic shaping on the 4500X outbound port to our WAN routers.I'd like to see if we could buffer and smoothe out the traffic as it exits the 4500X WAN switch 1G port to the WAN Routers.
i need to know if the built-in GE ports in ASR1001 or ASR 1002 (-X) have the features of QoS without restrictions, or QoS features are supported in SPA modlue ports only?
View 2 Replies View Relatedi'm trying to accomplish the following:I want to trasport a bunch of vlan layer 2 etherchannel on a pair of layer3 connections, using L3 to load balance.i was considering a pair of options:
1) bridging + gre (non applicable since i cant bridge 2 interface beloging to a etherchannel to a tunnel)
2) L2TP is it possible to accomplish this with the above tecnology? any reference, configuration example?
3) AoMLPS is it possible to accomplish this with the above tecnology ? any reference, configuration example?
I cant modify topology, the routers used are ASR1001 It is mandatory that both sites have a layer2 connection between them.
I noticed in RME inventory, my ASR1001 hardware is not recognized. I checked my Ciscoworks and it only knows ASR1002, 1004, and 1006 routers.
I checked the supported device table for LMS 3.2 and did not find ASR1001. Is there a separate device package I can download. This is not a deal breaker, but it's unnerving to see the question mark icon next to the name of my router in the Cisco works GUI.
I have a 7200 router with a 12.2.(46a) IOS and I am trying to activate Netflow on a subinterface. From the documentation of Cisco, I should be able to do it since the ios 12.2.(14)S but the command is unavailable.
[URL]
I have tried also to enter the command in the subinterface directly but it doesn't recognize it.
Any document to explain the differences in the Software images for the ASR1001 routers.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe are looking at buying an ASR1001 but I'm confused by the Licenses and I've struggled to find the information in the cisco data sheets. The router will need to run IPSEC on gre tunnels and I figure that I need the IPSEC license (FLSASR1-IPSEC) do I also require the Advanced IP Services license? or is all that is required the IPSEC license? Is there some sort of list that shows the feature set of each license, they cost the same amount so I'm not sure which license fits what we require best or if we need both.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI want to load balance my Internet traffic between two ASR 1001 routers that are connected to our core switches. Both routers are connected to the same ISP (Comcast) going to the same BGP AS on different /30 subnets. Is there a way for me to load balance my Internet traffic using both connections with BGP rather than having one of these connections sitting idle? If not, the only solution I see is to configure my layer 3 devices to split internet traffic between both routers (i.e. default routes with same AD).
View 6 Replies View RelatedI was doing some research on the Cisco ASR1001 model Router and within the description on the official Cisco page it mentions having various models that come with an "Integrated Daughter Card" or "IDC". I was curious as to what the IDC is exactly, considering there is an ASR1001 model without it.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've done a similar solution before where I put bandwidth inherit on the Dialer interface of the CPE and it inherited the ATM interface speed (the upload sync rate) and prevented the CPE from maxing out and hitting hardware queuing in the DSLAM. I can't seem to find a way to do this downstream from our ASR1K to the customer though.
Platform is ASR1001 with IOS 3.7.2 or 15.2(4)S
Problem description:We have many xDSL users (ADSL2+ and VDSL2). They all sync at different speeds depending on how far they are from the DSLAM.
Example:
Customer A might be connected at 40000kbps/10000kbps (VDSL2)
Customer B might be connected at 5000kbps/600kbps (ADSL)
When they connect and the PPPoE session comes up, the bandwidth on the Virtual Access Interface is equal to the customer's downstream sync rate, so Customer A's virtual access interface, Virtual-Access 2.13 will say 40000kbps, and Customer B's virtual access interface Virtual-Access 2.39 will say 5000kbps.Using RADIUS, we apply a sub-qos-policy-out to the PPPoE session.I want to shape the customer to 80% of their sync rate so that we do not hit interface congestion in the DSL network which makes VoIP perform poorly.I cannot use an absolute value for the shape, because the sync rate varies for each customer.The problem I have is at present the policy-map is using the interface bandwidth of Gi0/0/1 (1Gbit) instead of the bandwidth of the Virtual Access Interface. Therefore the customer is being limited to 800Mbit which means the QoS policy will never take effect.
RADIUS Config Below:
cisco-avpair += ip:sub-qos-policy-out=QOS-POLICY-OUT-PARENT-DSL
Class Maps
class-map match-any QOS-CLASS-VOIP-RTP-DSL
match protocol rtp audio
match access-group name QOS-VOIP-RTP
class-map match-any QOS-CLASS-VIDEO-RTP-DSL
[code].....
I have an 861 that we are using for a test network and need to add static igmp addresses for multicast. We are using the router as a router on a stick with subinterfaces on the WAN link. I've looked everywhere to see how to add the static igmp addresses.
interface FastEthernet4
no ip address
no ip route-cache cef
[Code]....