Does VPLS is supported on the Cisco ASR1001?With the feature navigator it looks like the ASR1001 is the only ASR1000 series router with VPLS support but I can't find any documentation confirming this.
I am suggesting an ASR1001 as a head end router for a small hub spoke WAN consisting of 4 branch sites connecting to the head via LES. 3 are 100mb, one is 30 mb. I will be connecting the LES circuits to a swithc and then trunking to the router. I would like to apply outbound shaping to these 4 subinterfaces on the router, and just want to check this is supported?
We have Cisco 4500 device having GRE tunnel and next HOP is ASA is doing the IPSEC VPN over WAN.So this type of Network is called as GRE over IPSEC right? Also when i do on 4500 sh int tu0
Need to understand this shows Data transmitted over GRE tunnel which is not encrypted right? To check data transmitted by ipsec ASA which is encrypted we can do sh crypto isakmp sa right? Where we apply crypto MAP here on ASA physical interface?
Then show ver on my router 3825 lists the below. Technically speaking the below should have the 64M flash required right? Why again it shows as 62592K and not 64000K?
how to confirm the time that is et on a WAG320N ?I have several wireless devices with scheduled restriction times and they don't appear to be functioning correctly.
We are using a ACE 4710 with A3(2.6) software release.I had to change our sticky load balancing method for HTTPS to cookie based.However while connections appear to work if I look at the show sticky database table I can not see or confirm sticky entries for the cookie based connections.Here or config snippets to show the config
I could do configuration of a VPLS in 3750, I have doubt about whether the configuration is similar to that of 7600, but is so I could recommend some document to observe the configuration.
I can't find any configuration info for any MPLS layer 2 extension features for the Nexus 7k devices, is this a strategic decision by Cisco to promote OTV?
My company is moving the datacenter to our new building on Saturday, however the users will remain at the old building until late next month so they bought a 100M Metro E VPLS circuit through their ISP. I went to test it today but could not ping the workstation from my laptop. I wanted to do some bandwidth testing with iperf but could never get to that point because ICMP connectivity wasn't even there. From what I understand, VPLS is just a layer 2 extension so they way I'm testing the circuit below SHOULD work, but it isn't. Spoke with the ISP and they tested the circuit end-to-end on their equipment which was fine so am I missing something?
We have 7606 with WS-SUP-32GE-3B. is it possible to configure VPLS using this settings or we need additional cards. as far as i have found googling is that either ES or SIP cards are required facing the core. But all are mentioned for SUPs other than WS-SUP-32-GE-3B.
I have implement MPLS L3VPN on my network to provide service to customer and right now we plan to have service VPLS on our same router. What is needed to run the VPLS in our MPLS network ? I heard that we need addictional switching module and upgrade my IOS to support it but I am not sure.
One of our customer would like to connect 3 datacentres and decided to use VPLS to extend layer 2 VLANs . For this purpose they have bought six Cisco ASR1000 edge routers( two at each side).They also wanted to buy MPLS SP backbone but have decided to buy 2x10G dark fibre links instead.My question is,
1-Will it still possible to run VPLS over dark fibre? Because all the documents I read regarding VPLS are deployed over MPLS backbone.
2-Any sample configuration for implementation VPLS in ASR1000 ?
I understood that service provider will use hardware Alcatel 6850 on the distribution/core and Zyxel 2108G on customer access level.query is that service provider says it's not VPLS which should work most probably through MPLS network of ISP.ISP noted that it would be direct 802.1q VLAN between two sites without any Layer3 on ISP side.
How to: - understand what kind of connection this will be? - is this connection is fine for customer? - identify if this kind of connection will be fine for converge network (voice+data) ? - what should I ask to ISP to clarify details?
i need to know if the built-in GE ports in ASR1001 or ASR 1002 (-X) have the features of QoS without restrictions, or QoS features are supported in SPA modlue ports only?
i'm trying to accomplish the following:I want to trasport a bunch of vlan layer 2 etherchannel on a pair of layer3 connections, using L3 to load balance.i was considering a pair of options:
1) bridging + gre (non applicable since i cant bridge 2 interface beloging to a etherchannel to a tunnel)
2) L2TP is it possible to accomplish this with the above tecnology? any reference, configuration example?
3) AoMLPS is it possible to accomplish this with the above tecnology ? any reference, configuration example?
I cant modify topology, the routers used are ASR1001 It is mandatory that both sites have a layer2 connection between them.
I noticed in RME inventory, my ASR1001 hardware is not recognized. I checked my Ciscoworks and it only knows ASR1002, 1004, and 1006 routers.
I checked the supported device table for LMS 3.2 and did not find ASR1001. Is there a separate device package I can download. This is not a deal breaker, but it's unnerving to see the question mark icon next to the name of my router in the Cisco works GUI.
We are looking at buying an ASR1001 but I'm confused by the Licenses and I've struggled to find the information in the cisco data sheets. The router will need to run IPSEC on gre tunnels and I figure that I need the IPSEC license (FLSASR1-IPSEC) do I also require the Advanced IP Services license? or is all that is required the IPSEC license? Is there some sort of list that shows the feature set of each license, they cost the same amount so I'm not sure which license fits what we require best or if we need both.
I want to load balance my Internet traffic between two ASR 1001 routers that are connected to our core switches. Both routers are connected to the same ISP (Comcast) going to the same BGP AS on different /30 subnets. Is there a way for me to load balance my Internet traffic using both connections with BGP rather than having one of these connections sitting idle? If not, the only solution I see is to configure my layer 3 devices to split internet traffic between both routers (i.e. default routes with same AD).
I was doing some research on the Cisco ASR1001 model Router and within the description on the official Cisco page it mentions having various models that come with an "Integrated Daughter Card" or "IDC". I was curious as to what the IDC is exactly, considering there is an ASR1001 model without it.
I've done a similar solution before where I put bandwidth inherit on the Dialer interface of the CPE and it inherited the ATM interface speed (the upload sync rate) and prevented the CPE from maxing out and hitting hardware queuing in the DSLAM. I can't seem to find a way to do this downstream from our ASR1K to the customer though.
Platform is ASR1001 with IOS 3.7.2 or 15.2(4)S
Problem description:We have many xDSL users (ADSL2+ and VDSL2). They all sync at different speeds depending on how far they are from the DSLAM.
Example:
Customer A might be connected at 40000kbps/10000kbps (VDSL2) Customer B might be connected at 5000kbps/600kbps (ADSL)
When they connect and the PPPoE session comes up, the bandwidth on the Virtual Access Interface is equal to the customer's downstream sync rate, so Customer A's virtual access interface, Virtual-Access 2.13 will say 40000kbps, and Customer B's virtual access interface Virtual-Access 2.39 will say 5000kbps.Using RADIUS, we apply a sub-qos-policy-out to the PPPoE session.I want to shape the customer to 80% of their sync rate so that we do not hit interface congestion in the DSL network which makes VoIP perform poorly.I cannot use an absolute value for the shape, because the sync rate varies for each customer.The problem I have is at present the policy-map is using the interface bandwidth of Gi0/0/1 (1Gbit) instead of the bandwidth of the Virtual Access Interface. Therefore the customer is being limited to 800Mbit which means the QoS policy will never take effect.
RADIUS Config Below:
cisco-avpair += ip:sub-qos-policy-out=QOS-POLICY-OUT-PARENT-DSL Class Maps class-map match-any QOS-CLASS-VOIP-RTP-DSL match protocol rtp audio match access-group name QOS-VOIP-RTP class-map match-any QOS-CLASS-VIDEO-RTP-DSL
I want to take 100Mb incoming from a service provider and police it off into several VRFs for customers.One of these VRFs will be 30M.I further need to traffic shape this (30Mb) out to 40 x 0.75Mbps (burstable to 30M) customers.
I've configured an static route in the ASR1001 router with a name with it eg: ip route 172.20.x.x 255.255.0.0 172.20.x.x 255.255.0.0 name To_system_X.i want to change the name without removing the route.
I have following requirements to implement on cisco asr1001 router.
1.G0/0/0 and G0/0/1 interfaces are connected to a swith through trunk. Multiple customers are will be using this trunk interface . Each customer will have subinterface with dot1q tag.
2 I want both sides of the ASR1001 to be in same segment .
3 If above two is possible I would like to implement shaping on each customers sub-interface level
is above implementation is possible on asr1001. configration and ios information. I found a technology called EVC . but I am not sure is that the one suited for me.
I'm trying to upgrade an asr1001 (r1) from asr1001-universal.03.02.00.S.151-1.S.bin to asr1001-universalk9.03.02.00.S.151-1.S.bin. i've put in the boot system flash asr1001-universalk9.03.02.00.S.151-1.S.bin command and reloaded but the box keeps loading first image the configuration register is 0x2102. i've tried the license module command to enable adv enterprise but it made no difference so i removed it again. my license is now;
License Package Information for Module:'asr1001' Module name Image level Priority Configured Valid license asr1001 adv enterprise 1 NO adv enterprise adv ip services 2 NO adv ip services ip base 3 NO ip base
To enable netflow export on ASR1001, do i need the firewall feaure license or not ?Docs are not really clear, NBAR requires FW license, but i am unsure about Netflow?
I have been asked what the equivalent of bridge-groups and BVIs is for an ASR1001 and I am struggling to find an example.If we have this IOS configuration:
I have an ASR1001 installed and I want to implement the firewall feature set.The current license level is IPbase and I have the firewall feature installed. The firewall feature shows acive, Not in use. I have tried to activate it without success. My question is: do I need to get a license for advipservices or adventerprise to activate the firewall feature set?
If the "GLC-SX-MM" is offical supported on "SPA-5X1GE-V2" ?My customer tested it and it seems to work but now i need an offical statement In the data sheet there is no entry of the requested SFP. url...
I have a Cisco 7206VXR with NPE-400. The IOS version is 12.4(24)T3. I installed a SA-VAM in the router in slot 6 but getting the following on the console.
AP-Pune-RT#Feb 23 11:16:34.484: %PA-3-NOTSUPPORTED: PA in slot6 (Unknown (type 650)) is not supported on this chassisFeb 23 11:16:34.484: %PA-3-DEACTIVATED: port adapter in bay [6] powered off.Feb 23 11:16:34.584: %PA-2-PABRIDGE: Failed to config bridge for PA 6Feb 23 11:16:35.384: %PA-4-IMPROPER_REMOVAL: Improper removal for slot 6.Feb 23 11:16:35.384: %PA-3-DEACTIVATED: port adapter in bay [6] powered off.Feb 23 11:16:35.468: %CRYPTO-4-PKT_REPLAY_ERR: decrypt: replay check failed connection id=975, sequence number=677864
Is the SA-VAM not supported in the Router 7206VXR?