I just got a WAP321 to replace a very frustrating WAP4410, what is the the SNMP OID to obtain associated wireless clients for each of the SSIDs ? I'd be happy with any OID for client numbers so total clients associated will be fine.
View 6 RepliesI just bought 6 Cisco WAP321.
What I want is to have 1 SSID for all 6 WAP so all employee from 2 floor building can access.
WAP # 1 connect to LAN with cabe and setup as Master with WDS Bridge enabled. WDS interface is also enable with MAC address input from WAP #2; WAP #3 & WAP#4.WAP #2 connect to WAP #1 via wireless with WDS Bridge enabled. WDS
[Code].....
how to setup a separate SSID for guests (without a password).
Basically, we have one SSID now called Mnet which has a WPA2 password. For guests coming in i want Mnet Guests where people can connect without needing a password. They should be able to use internet but not connect to LAN devices, how to accomplish this with this WAP321?
Setup a WAP321 with the new 1.0.1.10 firmware. Setup 2 SSIDS:
WIRELESS (vlan:1)
GUEST (vlan:99)
The wap is plugged directly into a port on my router so I configured the port and additional vlan99 port. I have a DHCP scope assigned on the router to both the port and port.99 interfaces.clients on WIRELESS have no problem and work correctly, however when a client joins guest...a packet capture on the router port shows that a dhcp request is being received for the same MAC on both untagged and tagged 99 interfaces....thus it appears the WAP is not handling the vlans properly
16:07:10.566932 PortA, IN: IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from 84:c9:b2:78:fc:31, length 331
16:07:10.566947 PortA.99, IN: IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from 84:c9:b2:78:fc:31, length 331
How many wireless clients can connect to a single WAP321 Access Point?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI would like to share one problem with WLC 5508 . we added a new virtual interface on the WLC. One new SSID is associated with this interface.
We created a ACL for this interface to restrict the access via WIFI to certian services. It´s not correct that everything works fine because the change were not applied. [code]
The changes of the ACL are applied on the fly, but for reason we don´t know, the clients don´t get a DHCP IP-Address (after changing the ACL) until the Controller is rebooted.
I am struggling with the following issue. I have 6 1130 Accesspoints in lightweight mode connected to a 2106 wlan controller which runs software version 7.0.98.0. Everything seems to work fine. Clients can connect to the wifi network. However, they don't get an ip address from the dhcp server which is on the same subnet as the wlan controller. See attached screenshots for configuration. I have also tried the internal dhcp server of the wlan controller, but the same problem remains.
The logs says: Dropping primary discovery request from AP e8:b7:4x:xx:xx:xx - maximum APs joined 6/6 There are 6 AP's connected
I have a strange behavior between a WLC 5508 (version 7.0.116.0) and NEXUS7010.
WLC
The WLC is configured in DHCP Bridging Mode (it sends DHCP requests without change)
Nexus
The VLAN interface is configured as follows
interface Vlan501
ip access-group acl-int-vlan501-in-1 in
no ip redirects
ip address 10.12.56.4/21
ip ospf network broadcast
ip router ospf 100 area 10.23.0.0
hsrp 51
Clients can not obtain an IP address intermittently. If I deactivates the ACL when the problem appears(when the client can not obtain an IP@) the probleme is resolved
Note: Before the WLC was connected to Catalyst 6500 and worked properly for 2 years (with same configuration)
I saw this note about differences between DHCP relay on the NEXUS7000/NXOS an Ip helper one the 6500/IOS URL. Do you think the problem may come from the DHCP relay or ACL on the NEXUS.
I have a WAP4410n which has been configured with a single SSID since implementation several weeks ago with no issues. I am now trying to add a second SSID and not having any success. Originally the second SSID was not being assigned a MAC address and thus not being broadcasted. After upgrading firmware to 2.0.4.2 I now see a MAC address associated with second SSID and it is being seen by clients, but they still cannot connect. I reset the AP to default settings and reconfigured from scratch but still no luck. I have two of these APs, the other one is still at FW rev 2.0.1.0 and has same issue (it does have MAC address associated with second SSID so I didn't bother upgrading firmware yet).
I have tried a few different authetication options, including disabling authentication, to no avail. Question - I do not see an IP address associated with the second SSID - is that the problem and if so, how do I fix that?
I use two wlc 4400 (4.2.x version) with a mobility domain and one ssid, both wlc are connected to a cisco l2 switch infrastructure. On the wlc I use the p2p blocking action 'drop' [URL] to isolate the clients from each other. Does only unicast traffic is blocked or also multicast and broadcast traffic like arp requests?Concerning blocking p2p traffic of clients connected to the same ssid but different controllers I found the following statement in the LAP FAQs [URL]
Q. In autonomous APs, Public Secure Packet Forwarding (PSPF) is used to avoid client devices associated to this AP from inadvertently sharing files with other client devices on the wireless network. Is there any equivalent feature in Lightweight APs?
A. The feature or the mode that performs the similar function of PSPF in lightweight architecture is called peer-to-peer blocking mode. Peer-to-peer blocking mode is actually available with the controllers that manage the LAP. If this mode is disabled on the controller (which is the default setting), it allows the wireless clients to communicate with each other through the controller. If the mode is enabled, it blocks the communication between clients through the controller. It only works among the APs that have joined to the same controller. When enabled, this mode does not block wireless clients terminated on one controller from the ability to get to wireless clients terminated on a different controller, even in the same mobility group.
what's the best practise to prevent this inter wlc client traffic? I already read about using acls on the wlc dynamic interfaces, or private vlans on the l2 switch vlans where the dynamic interfaces are connected to. Is it allowed to completely isolate the wlc from each other on these dynamic interfaces with acls or private vlans or do the wlc need to see each other on this interfaces (e.g. heart beat)?
My controller is vWLC installed in ESXi which has to vNet Cards configured with all vlans(4095), then it is connected to a 3560 switch with trunk. The configuration of the switch interface is as belows: The SSID is BYOD and I can connect the SSID and get the IP address such as 10.10.10.118/24, but for now, i cannot ping 10.10.10.1, but i can ping 10.10.10.90.
View 3 Replies View RelatedRegion : Others
Model : TL-WR941ND
Hardware Version : V3
Firmware Version : 3.13.9 Build 120201 Rel.54965n
We are trying to use a TL-WR941ND purchased about a month ago, but it keeps hanging, usually within a day or so of operation.To be clear: by "hanging" I mean the device stops providing wireless services (its SSID is no longer visible in WiFi clients) and becomes nonresponsive to pings or control access attempts (via settings web page) from the internal network connections.The device is used in a very simple scenario, where it's being employed as a simple access point, not as a router. As such, the device's configuration is as follows:
* WAN interface is configured with a dummy static IP (10.10.10.10/24) with gateway and DNS set to the internal IP address of the actual routing device connected to the external world.
* LAN interface is configured with an IP address inside the actual internal IP subnet (192.168.1.0/24).
* DHCP is also disabled as this service is already provided.
* Wireless settings: radio enabled, SSID broadcast enabled, WDS disabled, 11bgn mixed mode, auto channel width, max TX rate, channel 7 (manually set). Using WPA-PSK security.
Rest of the settings are unchanged from their default values, as the device isn't being used as an IP router by any client - just as a WiFi/Ethernet layer 2 bridge. We're using what appears to be TP-Link's latest stock firmware for the device.The settings described above appear to provide the connectivity required by the WiFi clients. However, the device continuously hangs within a day or so of operation, requiring someone to physically attend to the device and cold-restarting it (disconnecting it from power and reconnecting it) to regain an operational state.
After performing a cold restart, the system log shows nothing beyond the startup entries: "System started" entry followed by security info entries regarding enabled protocols. Then the device appears to work well for a while, until it hangs again, forcing again someone to attend to the device, etc.
I have a client with a 2112 WLC and 1252AG radios. The clients work fine, but an SNMP management server can not reach any of the clients over the wireless. Before the WLC and new AP's were installed, they were running older Cisco Autonomous AP's and had no problems with SNMP. My monitoring system uses SNMP and it can reach the WLC just fine, so there doesnt appear to be any issues on the switched network. What can be blocking the SNMP on the WLC?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have 4 desktops cat5 to Dlink DIR 615 router. All work fine. Any wireless clients, laptop or netbooks, see the desktop computers for a while then disconnect somehow. All machines can see the Internet through the router at all times. The desktops disappear from the laptop/netbooks but the wireless machines can be seen from the desktop computers but clicking on them gets 'Access Denied' message after a wait.3 desktops = XP, 1 98SE. All laptop/netbooks = XP
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow do i find my password or key for wireless router
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm using two WAP321 with 4 VLANS
VLAN 100 - WPA PSK
VLAN 101 - WPA Radius
VLAN 102 - open (captive portal)
VLAN 103 - Management (no wifi)
Everything worked fine until I activated clustering on both devices yesterday. Since then, I can't connect via wifi anymore. I still have access to the management via ethernet. It seems like the wifi clients are not able to reach the Portal, Radius or DHCP Server anymore.
I have a WAP321. The unit hangs about on every day. Web interface and WLAN let not respond anymore. By a reset the unit will be back. I have put all unnecessary stale. Tracing the turned on, I can say nothing flashy.
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have configurate AP1230 as DHCP server. And I have 2 vlan and SSID :
vlan 1: office use
SSID: OFFICE
vlan 11: guest use
SSID: GUEST
Now the user can login with OFFICE's ssid for obtain IP from windows server 192.168.3.4. But GUEST's ssid can't obtain IP after login.
ip subnet-zero
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.20
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.40 10.0.0.254
[Code].....
My new EA4500 (fw ver 2.0.36) won't obtain an IP from a Brighthouse TM502G cable modem. The EA4500 replaced a functioning WRT54G which would obtain an IP from the ISP. I've tried upgrading firmware and have used both straight-through and crossover cables between the EA4500 & TM502G to no avail. The EA4500 would issue IPs to it's clients, but not obtain one from it's TM502G. At the moment, all 3 are daisy-chained together with the old WRT54G in the middle in order to make the EA4500 work. Both WiFi and LAN ports function in this configuration.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhere to go to get my WAP321's captive portal. If i type the IP address of the WAP321 it simply takes me into the Administration page.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe need U-APSD (a special WMM Feature).Does the WAP321-E-K9 Support this feature?We need it for powersave mode from cordless wlan phones.
View 1 Replies View RelatedAny info if the WAP321 is any good? Do they have the dropping connections problem that the WAP4410n's do.I can't afford to buy another lemon.
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy current setup is an AP1262n located ~400 feet from my WAP321. I would like to take the wireless signal coming from the AP1262n and rebroadcast it using a WAP321. configuration setting on these two devices.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow to configure multiple WAP321 Wifi at once? Because I need to configure around 100 APs and i want to know if there is any software from Cisco to do it, like a WLC or something else.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI plan to use the WAP321 as a WLAN Hotspot. But I need more than one AP. What is the Design for this?
Do I need to configure every WAP321 with the captive portal and the user need to re-login every time they roam to another WAP321?
Or can I redirect all WAP321 AP to one captive portal?
It's my intention optimize our business WiFi network.Actually we don't have a "Guest" access.Probably WAP321 should be the best solution for us.We will need 3 WAP321 to cover offices area.I have different questions/doubts about Captive Portal functionality.using 3 different WAP321 everyone has the "captive portal" feature, or you can configure only one of the three the feature of "captive portal"?if is possible to configure only one of three the feature of "captive portal", the others WAP321 trusting the authentication?what is the ip address released from the "Captive Portal"?all Guest user have the same username and password?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhen I connect to WAP321 only connects at 130 Mbps. Why?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhat is the required power by WAP321 ? There's no information about IEEE 802.3af class at the datasheet.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have configured my WAP321 with captive portal enabled but how to a get to the captive portal. If i browse to its web address and get back into the administration GUI and if i connect to the wireless connection configured on this AP it does the normal wireless login.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow I install the WAP321 with repeater?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI was looking for some clarification on the capabilities of these devices to allow roaming of clients between AP's. Take a basic scenario of 3 AP's and a single SSID. I know the AP541N has clustering which uses the Fast Client Roaming Protocol, which basically does a quick re-connect to the new AP. Not quite as seamless as using aironet and a controller, but still pretty good.
Question 1 How does the WAP321 handle roaming? Obviously without the clustering feature you would have to configure each AP independently. But after setting them up, would it support roaming in a similiar way to the AP541N??
Question 2 Would running three standalone Aironet 1141's operate any differently in terms of roaming?
In summary I like the roaming capability of the AP541N but hate the large clunky form factor. I need something that can be mounted in an office environment (ceilings) that will handle easy client roaming. A short disconnect isn't a concern as long as it reconnects on it's own. Wireless controllers are a little out of the price range for this setup.
I have a RVS4000 witch I use as router, and DHCP server. I have a WAP321 witch I have configured SSID with one VLAN. Both devices have fixed IP address. I can connect computer to the wifi access point. But the computer cannot get an IP address from the DHCP server of the RVS4000. If I set the IP configuration manually, it can get an access to the network and Internet.
With another wifi access point it works, the computer get an IP address for the DHCP.
What should I have to do to make my DHCP server works with my wifi access point ?
Any Cisco small business switch that would be capable of powering five WAP321's? I don't know the power profile on these AP but have noticed that the Poe injectors pump out 16.8 MAX watts. I can't find anywhere what the power profile is on WAP321 AP but ~17 WATTS seems to me to be quite high.
In fact, I was interested in the SF100D-16P which has a power budget of 64W over 8 ports... the price range is in my budget.
Does the SF100D-16P can power 5-6 WAP321's sufficiently?