I live outside the US but want to listen to US radio stations online and, naturally, a lot of them are blocked because I'm not in the US. I've tried a few places and applications, like UltraSurf, FoxyProxy, to get around this but they either don't work or are so convoluted as to be impossible to use. What else is out there that actually works and isn't pain to use?
View 1 Replies
We have three home systems connecting to the internet. Our cable/phone/internet provider upgraded their phone service to digital and installed a new modem/router combo (three months ago). Since then we've not been able to access MSN.com on our XP laptop and droid tablet but can access it on our windows 7 laptop. When the router settings are changed to "Bridged" and the router firewall is turned off, we can connect. We've changed the modem and the problem still continues. Our cable provider is stumped and so am I.
View 9 Replies View RelatedDoes any one know how i know where my server who is hosting my IP is gepgraphically located?
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhy the WAN protocols like Frame-relay, HDLC and PPP are called Layer2 protocols?What is the address scheme they use?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have got a PC at work (Windows XP Pro SP3) that is on two networks with the IPs 10.20.30.167, subnet 255.255.255.0 (internet enabled) and 10.0.0.20, subnet 255.255.255.0 (no internet). On the 10.0.0.X network there is a gateway with the IP 10.0.0.200 allowing access to another network; 192.168.60.X, subnet 255.255.255.0 (no internet). I have added the route on my work PC to access the 192.168.60.X network via this gateway and I can access all PCs on all three networks from this PC.Now, I am using LogMeIn Hamachi so that I can access the networks at work from home. The PC at work is the 'gateway' PC on the Hamachi network. When installing Hamachi it created a new network connection and bridged this connection with my 10.20.30.167 network adapter to allow access to the 10.20.30.X network from an external PC when connected using the Hamachi VPN connection. I have manually configured my Hamachi connection on my PC at home to the IP 10.20.30.169, subnet 255.255.255.0, with the default gateway set to 10.20.30.167. I can ping all computers on the 10.20.30.X network from my PC at home.
I then added a route on my PC at home for 10.0.0.X to go via 10.20.30.167 (the 'gateway' on the Hamachi network). I also enabled IP forwarding on the 'gateway' PC (my PC at work). I can not ping any PC on the 10.0.0.X network from my PC at home apart from 10.0.0.20 (the other NIC in the Hamachi gateway PC) and 10.0.0.30 (another PC on the 10.20.30.X network that is also on the 10.0.0.X network).Now, with IP forwarding enabled on the Hamachi gateway PC I would assume after adding the route on my PC at home for 10.0.0.X traffic to go via 10.20.30.167 that I would be able to ping all PCs on the 10.0.0.X network...I also tried adding a route on my home PC to send all traffic for the 192.168.60.X network via 10.20.30.167 which has a route via 10.0.0.200 to the 192.168.60.X network, but this also did not work.I then tried adding the 10.0.0.20 network adapter into the network bridge that the Hamachi connection made, also keeping both IPs (10.20.30.167 and 10.0.0.20) on this network bridge by adding them into the 'IP Settings' in the 'Advanced TCI/IP Settings'. I also added the 10.0.0.200 gateway for good measure. I still cannot ping any PC on the 10.0.0.X or 192.168.60.X networks from my PC at home.
I have also added the route to the 10.20.30.X network on a PC on the 10.0.0.X network to go via 10.0.0.20 and tried pinging a PC on the 10.20.30.X network but this also has not worked. Also setting the default gateway on a PC on the 10.0.0.X network to 10.0.0.20 does not allow this...Surely bridging the networks 10.20.30.167 and 10.0.0.20 on my work PC would allow another PC on the 10.0.0.X network to access the 10.20.30.X network after adding the route or setting 10.0.0.20 as the default gateway?
Have a Rev. B1 w/207NA on Time Warner with a Moto Surfboard SB5150.Working with TiVo's, we've been through hell and back trying to resolve why Multi Room Viewing doesn't seem to want to work - but only one way! The newest TiVo's their Premiere model with HD and all the bells and whistles, it sees the other TiVo and all the other software that can send programs back and forth with it.
I brought on a Series 2, which is an older model that's non HD and has some older software in it. While the Premiere and the other PC's/Software around the building's network can 'see' the Series 2 and it can 'see' the other shared PC's, etc. the thing can't 'see' the Premiere.This has been going on for awhile, I've worked with TiVo Support also to unlock ports, IP addresses and anything else we could think of. Still no luck. Then we had a strange occurance!
The DIR-655 seemed to 'lock up' or disconnect from the Net. One day I was surfing the Now Playing menu in the Series 2 and the other TiVo wasn't showing as usual. I checked it again during a commercial for something totally different and suddenly noticed there it was!! I thought it was weird, so I went out front to check with the person using the main TiVo if they had made any changes or done anything - they hadn't, but did mention their Net connection was gone.
I turned around and looked at the 655's status lights and noticed while all the rest were fine - the WAN/Net status light was totally out. Not a single blink. And then I looked at the Moto cable modem and noticed it's 'activity' light was also totally dormant. I twisted the Moto to get a better look at it and things started working again, I tightened the cable modem cable on the rear and that was it.
From that point on - once again, the front TiVo won't show on the back TiVo! Does every other way, but not that. In our discussions on TiVo we thought it could've been the cable modem firewall or something, but I retested it and this time it had NO effect. Tried not only taking out the cable-cable but the Ethernet cable as well to ensure all were tested. Still didn't now up. What I thought was going on was the 655 had turned into a giant 'Hub', which would've caused the TiVo's to use their old-fashioned Beacon software to 'find' each other. When the 655 software kicked back in from that glitch, the hub setup would've obviously stopped and the 655's software settings would've kicked back in.
I have a complete list of the ports internally that need to be open for those two TiVo's to communicate, but I can't find anything in the 2.07NA GUI (or Help manuals) that tell me how to write a rule to open those ports internally. I wouldn't think there's any internal blocking or firewalling going on (I have it set to allow communications between clients on the internal Net) but there's so many settings in this GUI it makes your head spin!
I have two computers. Computer A is connected to the internet through GSM network. Computer A also have NIC adapter which is connected to local network with IP 192.168.33.10/24.
Computer B in connected to internet with DSL connection.
On both machines I use TeamViewer to make VPN secure tunnel between this two computers. Computer A gets IP:7.200.100.2 Computer B gets IP:7.200.100.3
How can I access from computer B to specific device with IP 192.168.33.250 which is on local network of computer A?
Is it possible to route traffic from VPN to other local network, or it is some possibility to use port forwarding from VPN connection to specific IP address on the local network to specific port number?
We have a PPPoE DSL link with a dedicated IP providing by a small ISP(ISP A) in Canada. We are having trouble reaching a small group of IPs in the US to be able to access some client resources.We have eliminated all possible local issues by removing the firewall and making a direct connection to the ISP. We have also had numerous tests prove successful when we use other local ISPs.
Trace routes show that the packets get dropped a few hops from the destination on a US ISP(ISP B).The routes even appear to be very similar to the other ISPs we tested. We escalated to ISP A and they say that everything is working properly on their end and the problem is with ISP B. They claim they "have no partnership with ISP B and therefore cannot create a ticket to get it resolved". I tried calling ISP B but I get nowhere because I am not a customer of theirs.
My solution is to give ISP A the boot, but management has denied that request because of the amount of effort required to switch over. How I can escalate this? Is there anyway to go over and above the ISPs?
I am using 1841 LAN router. Recently some broadcast is happening in our network when some users are connected. I need to block them automatically by detecting who are they.
I can block them manually but i want router to detect them and block.
I have a 1921 K9 with a 4 port 10/100/1000 EHWIC switch.
Interface 0/1 = 192.168.1.0
EHWIC = 192.168.5.0
I have Active Directory setup on the 192.168.1.0 network. When I attempt to join the domain from 192.168.5.0 it joins but I get errors. After some troubleshooting using portqry I have found that the services related to class map DomainTrafficUDP are being reported by portqry as being filtered regardless of policy map settings (currently set to allow).
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 18833 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 11:20:25 NewYork Thu Apr 19 2012 by dave
! NVRAM config last updated at 13:56:45 NewYork Wed Apr 18 2012 by dave
!
[Code].....
We have a group of computers on their own VLAN. A router allows internet access while keeping them sandboxed. We don't want them accidentally connect to our production network. We blocked their wireless MACs in unauthorized WAPs. I'd like to do the same thing for their ethernet MACs on our switches, (a mixture of 2950,2960 and 2960G currently testing on C2960-LANBASE-M, Version 12.2(25)SEE2). I've been unable to locate the correct method on google, by searching these boards or in the command reference.
What is the best practice for blocking a group of MACs from accessing a particular VLAN on a network consisting of several Layer 2 Switches?
Blocking Ports don´t send BPDUs, but they can receive them from designated ports.Blocking ports, can it hold BPDUs?
I think that Blocking Ports only receive, analyse and then discard the BPDU.But, what happen if the blocking port receive a better o worse BPDU? in this case, must be the bpdu stored?
I have an skill exercise with 4 Routing Protocols Default Route,Static Route,Eigrp, Ospf. I have about 6-7 routers, and each of them has an routing protocol. But the problem is the Main router INTERNET, which it has to use Static in a direction, and default in the opposite path. This is the scheme of routers and how the r.protocol have to be configured.
View 19 Replies View RelatedThe websites I usually go on now have some type of error page when I go to them. So far it has happened to 2 of them though they might not be related.
Here's what the page says:
Site 1- Valenth
Quote:
Warning: mysql_connect() [ function.mysql-connect]: [2002] Connection timed out (trying to connect via tcp://ec2-184-73-84-14.compute-1.amazonaws.com:3306) in /var/www/valenth.com/include/database.class.php on line 25
[Code]....
i've had this internet problem that has been going on with a wireless laptop i've had since april. it only happens on this computer, and i've tried many solutions. occasionally, i will try and go to pages on google chrome and an error pops up that says "this webpage is not available." when i play games that are online, they get disconnected as well. i've added google chrome and my other browsers to the firewall list and i've also changed the DNS server. when i use the troubleshooter it says something like "router, or modem is not connected to the internet. i've even downloaded the "fix it" program and it detected no problems
View 1 Replies View RelatedI can't get RDP to work on a specific computer.I've already set it up on the router, know the IP address, and I can get it to work great with the server, but the workstation we want it to go to won't accept it.I checked, it's set to allow RDP, the firewall exception was setup, also turned off the firewall completely, removed the antivirus software, checked TCP/IP filtering on the lan connection, even changed the listening port and still nothing.
View 9 Replies View RelatedProblem with a conflicting IP address. Basically on a normal running day my wireless is switched on and connected perfect to my internet, however if i want to download any large files i plug my Ethernet to my laptop and disable the wireless from my laptop, instantly then the LAN connection kicks in and im on the internet again as i find download speeds are faster through a LAN. However today my wireless is fine but the second i switch to LAN the ! symbol appears and a message says their is an IP conflict.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've been timing out via any FTP client, including FileZilla, FireFTP, and a few others. I even downloaded a few just to see if I could connect with other clients.I contacted my host who can't recreate the issue on their end. I contacted my ISP who instructed me to use my command prompt in order to connect to their server, and that of mozilla. Both times I was able to connect via the command prompt.I don't understand what's going on.If I can connect to the sample sites that my ISP gave me, why can't I connect using an FTP client any longer. What possible change could have been made to have caused that disconnection that happened a few nights ago, and is now causing the timeouts I continue to receive?
View 6 Replies View RelatedHow can i actually change my ip...tryed those cmd things but nothing works. Ineed to change ip somehow.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe've got 5 remote offices with cisco 881 routers, Win Clients behind them and all routers connected via vpn site-to-site to central software router.
Mostly all clients recieve ip addresses from routers in their subnets 192.168.x.024
We have Win DHCP Server in subnet 192.168.181.024
The problem is that some of clients,physically sutuated in 192.168.10.024 subnet, recieve ip addresses from Win DHCP server from 192.168.181.024 subnet.
Here's part of cisco cfg:
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
!
interface FastEthernet1
[Code].....
I've run into an odd problem - I have connected two 2960s together with copper on FastEthernet interfaces, and STP on the new switch immediately puts that port into blocking mode. I don't understand why this would be, since there is only one connection between the two, in fact, there is only one connection at all on the switch that is blocking.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI inherited a Cisco ASA 5505 and am trying to piggy back the device off of an established Network. Here is the basic layout:
192.168.10.1 (Core Router - Handles DHCP/DNS)
192.168.10.9 (ASA 5505 - Piggy backing off of Network)
192.168.40.x (ASA 5505 - VLAN)
I'm able to get onto the Internet without any problems. Devices from the 192.168.10x Network can not ping the inside VLAN1 (192.168.40.x). However, I would like traffic going from the inside VLAN to the Outside VLAN to be blocked, except for 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.9. I've tried using ACL's but end up killing my Internet connection. 192.168.10.1 is the default route and is how I get out to the Internet. Is this possible? Essentially, I'm trying to set up a small Network that guests can connect to. The idea is that they can get to the Internet, but that is it. They can't get to internal resources on the 192.168.10.x Network
Here is the config:
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname ciscoasa
enable password EeCsulrpu.9LalEE encrypted
[Code].....
SG-300 52 native VLAN blocking network packets
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a strange issue where spanning-tree is blocking vlans through a mesh network.Here is my set up.
2-Cisco 3560's that have two trunk ports set with do1q and a native vlan of 2. I'm allowing a client vlan (2) and a voice vlan (103) to come over the trunk. They have a native vlan of 2 so the mesh APs can get an address through DHCP. Spanning-tree loop guard is also enabled.
When connected to the mesh network, the voice vlan is being blocked by spanning-tree. I get the following erros:
000129: *Feb 28 19:24:58.289 EST: %SPANTREE-2-LOOPGUARD_BLOCK: Loop guard blocking port FastEthernet0/1 on VLAN0103.000130: *Feb 28 19:24:58.448 EST: %SPANTREE-2-LOOPGUARD_UNBLOCK: Loop guard unblocking port FastEthernet0/1 on VLAN0103.
Eventually the loop is cleared and the port is set back to a forwarding state from a blocking state. I don't want to disabled spanning-tree loopguard since I don't want to create a loop. The mesh network is supposed to act as a P2P connection between two switches. As a test I disconnected the APs from their trunk ports. I then used a cross over cable to connect the switches and no spanning tree loops occured. The mesh doesn't have STP enabled on it and should just be acting as an over-the-air connection from one switch to another.
We have a Cisco 2911 router in our company. I didn't set it up myself nor I was involved. I only started working here recently, bit over 3 months ago. I have been given ongoing task which other IT Technicians been struggling for almost a year with a idea that maybe because I'm fresh person in the company I will find a original idea why could this thing not work.
Our router have a problem with blocking a single IP address, but not completely It's hard to explain but I will try my best. Company is hosting their website externally and accessing the host and FTP on the host on daily bases. It is important for the website to work on the internal network in company. It does work sometimes, but from time-to-time the website showing time-out error 118 on any point before Cisco router using both http and https, have tried putting just the IP address( doesn't matter is it on the general network or last ISA server on DMZ ). I am able to connect to the website using any of proxy gates but not directly to the website. I have also tested the connection past the router and I was able to connect to the website without any problems. I am also able to ping the host's address from the router and internal network.
I have eliminated the possibility of not correctly setup proxy or firewall on the network as problem also occur on the DMZ. I have also checked access-lists on the router and firewall rules for Any possibilities and I can't really see a way why would the router do this.
I have a connection between switches, There are a 3560 (Gi0/37) and a 2960 (Gi0/1), the problem is in the port Gi0/37 of the 3560 switch and this is the log. [code]
I dont understand what is the problem, actually i have added the command power inline never on the port and the problem is solved, but we haven´t changed configuration.
We know that every node in the network uses its routing table to forward the packets towards their destination. I have a doubt that which data structure used to implement these routing protocols.
View 6 Replies View Relatedencapsulation of routing protocols. Where exactly in the OSI, or TCP/IP for that matter, model does the data of the routing protocol fit into ? Is it encapsulated inside the transport layer segment payload ? So far from the I've gathered, that's where it should fit.
#####@@@@$$$$routing/procotocol/and/data/etc#####
#-Data link header and trailer
@-Network layer header
$-Transport layer header.
I just received a blu ray player for Xmas that has an Ethernet connection for streaming Netflix,YouTube, etc. my problem is my router is upstairs and the blu ray is downstairs. I really don't want to run an Ethernet cable from the blu ray to the router. Can I use another router on the same network and have it close to the blu ray?,I have a netgear router just laying around and the main router is a Verizon fios router.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a need to use two routers (Each with different ISP) on my (LAN) office network.I presently DO NOT want to go the (Two ISP's on one router, or Load Balancing router). I Just simply want two routers with two separate ISP's.I will assign the managers workstations to the faster ISP, and other Workstation to the slower connection.And it seems to work, and all resources seem to be available on the LAN, regardless of which (Gateway) Router(1 or 2) I point the workstation to.I assume because all devices are on the same LAN 192.168.0.XXX Is this a proper way to allocate and use two routers on the same LAN?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow to get the packet format of CFM used in the provider backbone domain having ethertype (0x88e7) & Itag fields in it. I think wireshark doesnt have this code implemented yet.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need the capability to log into the 3g/4g modem and change the Wan IP address. Doe anyone know of a 3g/4g modem that allows you to do that. My other option would be to disable the wireless radio on the 3g/4g router and connect my Linksys Wireless router that I know I can log in and change the WAN Ip. It looks like to me that this model below would allow me to do that?MBR1516 Will turning off wireless radio on the 3g/4g router completely turn off all routing or could there be a conflict with my Linksys wireless router?
View 6 Replies View RelatedWe have gotten a tv with wireless capability.I do not remember the WEP key.I currently have my laptop pc and a HP printer working with my D Link router. I have gotten as far at the set up page for the router and am wondering if I change the WEP key, will it automatically update the existing devices (my laptop and printer) or will they be locked out? Can I use the same code for all 4 WEp keys ?
View 6 Replies View Related
