Protocols / Routing :: Unable To Logon To Gmail Site
May 17, 2012I have a gmail site,For some reason, I am unable to log into the site.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Protocols / Routing :: Enable Two Networks To Logon To Same Domain
Sep 13, 2011I have 2 separate networks. One is a DSL circuit, the other is a T1. How do I enable the two networks to logon to the same domain, but use each of their own gateways for internet access?
View 5 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Site-To-Site VPN
Aug 29, 2012I am struggling to setup a site-to-site VPN connection between 2 sites. I have a feeling it's because I configured NAT'd IP addresses on both routers. The IP address range and subnet details are listed below, including the make/model of my VPN router.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 / K9 Unable To Ping Over Site To Site IPSEC
Jul 12, 2012I am trying to set up a site to site ipsec connection. AT site A, I have Vlan's 652-10.55.216.0/24, Vlan653 -10.55.217.0/24, Vlan 654-10.55.217.0/24 and Vlan655-10.55.219.0/24 and at site B, Vlan650-10.55.214.0/24 and Vlan651-10.55.215.0/24.The problem is that I am unable to get any associations when i do a "sh crypto isakmp sa"/"sh crypto ipsec sa" on either router at each site.I am also unable to ping by pluging in a laptop into the site at each site. Laptop at site A is set to access vlan 655 and laptop at site B is set to acess vlan 651. I can ping all the devices from one end to the other.I have turned on debug crypto isakmp, debug crypto ipsec, debug crypto ipsec errors but dont get anything at all as output.I have attached the sh run for each router Cisco (1941/K9) and switch (Catalyst 3750) at each site.
View 4 Replies View RelatedSharing :: Logon Failure / The User Has Not Been Granted The Requested Logon Type At This Computer
May 13, 2012Logon failure: The user has not been granted the requested logon type at this computer" Im having this same problem on two computers. One running windows vista ultimate 64bit and windows 7 home premium 32 bit to windows server 2008 r2 64 bit?
View 3 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Unable To Use FTP
Aug 17, 2011I've been timing out via any FTP client, including FileZilla, FireFTP, and a few others. I even downloaded a few just to see if I could connect with other clients.I contacted my host who can't recreate the issue on their end. I contacted my ISP who instructed me to use my command prompt in order to connect to their server, and that of mozilla. Both times I was able to connect via the command prompt.I don't understand what's going on.If I can connect to the sample sites that my ISP gave me, why can't I connect using an FTP client any longer. What possible change could have been made to have caused that disconnection that happened a few nights ago, and is now causing the timeouts I continue to receive?
View 6 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Unable To View Website?
Oct 14, 2011I'm going to list out my problem, to make it faster to understand.1] My domain name is registered with a company, X.2] My webhosting is hosted by another company, Y.3] My web developer, Mr. Z is trying to do his bit and upload my website.Here's what happens:Mr. Z tells me that he's not able to upload my website and is getting the error "Connection timed out" and "Could not connect to server" on his FileZilla or something. He also tells me that there is a problem with my domain registry.Now, Company Y tells me that the domain name's A-records has to be pointed to the correct IP address [which is, of course, the webhosting IP I bought.]Company X tells me to login to my account and add an A-record pointing it to the correct IP address. I did that.But still Mr. Z tells me he's getting the same error and is not able to connect to the domain name.Now, when I ping my website on MS command prompt, I get a "Request timed out" error.
View 3 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Unable To Log On Because Of Account Restriction
Feb 26, 2011when im entering ip address of other computer in my remote desktop an error msg is coming "unable to logon you because of account restriction" fire wall and virus protection is off.
View 1 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Unable To Connect To Internet
Mar 4, 2013In recent days, there was an electrical fault and my computer does not automatically connect to the wireless network in the house, since then. I do not know what happened.
View 1 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Unable To Forward Port
Feb 2, 2013So I need to forward certain ports to play/log-in game:
TCP: 80, 443, 2099, 5222, 5223, 8393-8400
UDP: 5000:5500
I did forward them in my router and checked them with PFPortChecker, every port seems to open except 2099, I don't understand why.Note that I disabled Windows Firewall, Router's Firewall, and I'm using Kaspersky Internet Security which I disable while checking ports/logging to game
Protocols / Routing :: TEW-692GR Unable To Get To Domain From Outside Network
May 21, 2012We just had a TEW-72GR router fail and replaced it with a TEW-GR. Now I am unable to get to my domain (mydomain.net) from outside the network. Inside the network, all appears to be fine. I can enter that address and get to the site with no issues.We use SBS 2008 with windows 7 clients.All clients can get out to the web, we can send and receive emails, but I can not access the domain.
View 2 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Linksys WRT54G Router - Unable To Set Up Static IP?
Mar 7, 2012Comcast Cable Internet Linksys WRT54G Router (using wired, not wireless)
I've done this a million times over so I thought I knew what I was doing. I set my IP as 192.168.1.236 and get all of the information I need from ipconfig. When I put it all together though, it just doesn't work. I think I'm not getting the correct DNS information from ipconfig and the blockheads at Comcast have no idea what a name server is. I've called and talked to about twenty different people there and no one can give me my name server. *sigh*
At any rate, below is a screenshot of what I'm getting in ipconfig. My assumption is that I'm not getting the correct DNS info, but I don't even know at this point.
Protocols / Routing :: Unable To Do Any Special Downloads Of Music And Movies
Nov 7, 2012I am having several issues with this router we have from TBayTel. We recently had digital cable installed along with the router ComTrend CT-5374 Multi-DSL CPE. It is both wired and wireless combination. We have it set for dial-up connection. The AV I currently use is AVAST Free.What is the usual port forwarding methods used for this type of router as I am unable to do any special downloads of music and movies anymore. I had contacted TBayTel and they said that they would give me a static address I could use. [code]
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 2911 - Site-to-site IPsec Vpn / Unable To Ping Remote Network
Apr 3, 2013I have two Cisco routers - 2911 in HQ and RV180 in branch office. Because in HQ LAN network I have some development servers, to which guys from branch office need to have acces, I decided to setup VPN site-to-site between HQ and branch office. Everything went quite smoothly, on both devices I see, that ipsec connection is established. Unfortunately I am not able to ping resources from one network to other one and vice versa. Below is the configuration of 2911 router (I skipped som unimportant (imho) configuration directives) :
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
[Code].....
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 - Unable To Access Certain Ports Over Site To Site VPN
Jan 16, 2013We have a client that has a Cisco 1801W Firewall that is setup as a site to site VPN terminating to a Cisco ASA 5505. The tunnel is up and established, I can ping from both sides of the tunnel.
The problem is the clients behind the Cisco ASA (192.168.2.x) cannot reach certain ports behind the Router (192.168.1.x). The main thing we're trying to do is browse via UNC path (ex: \192.168.1.120 from a 192.168.2.x machine).
I got 3389 working after I changed the - ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.120 3389 y.y.x.x 3389 route-map DM_RMAP_1 extendable Modified the command to include the public IP instead of interface FastEthernet0
I believe it has something to do with the way NAT and route-maps are setup currently but I'm not familar enough with them to make the changes. I worked with Cisco to ensure the VPN tunnel was fine and it's something security related on the Router.
Here is the configuration (removed a few lines not necessary. y.y.x.x = WAN IP of Router x.x.y.y = WAN IP of ASA).
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 23648 bytes
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[Code].....
Cisco VPN :: 1841 - Unable To Connect Office Network To HQ Via Site To Site VPN
Feb 23, 2012I am try to setup my office network to able to connect to one of my customer HQ via site to site VPN. I am using Cisco 1841 router to do the job.
The problem that I am facing now is no able to connect my other PC in office to the remote site.
show crypto isakmp sa
IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP SA
dst src state conn-id status
202.x.x.x 175.x.x.x QM_IDLE 1001 ACTIVE(code)
Cisco VPN :: ASA 5510 VPN Site-to-Site IKE Initiator Unable To Find Policy
Sep 30, 2012I have a dynamic VPN site to site between ASA 5510 vs C880 with segment 172.23.191.0/25 for ASA side and some host in C880 side (e.g. 128.1.100.211, 128.1.115.181, 128.1.104.212) . The VPN is up, but only have communication with a host (128.1.115.181).
In the logs appears the next message when I try communication for all aother IP in the policy map configuration: IKE Initioator unable to find policy: Intf Inside, Src: 172.23.191.87, Dst: 128.1.115.182..ONLY WHEN I PINGING FROM SOME HOST IN C880 SIDE (e.g. 128.1.100.211) the communication is successfull.
What happen with this VPN, because I need to pinging from C880 IP host to ASA segment for establish communication?
Security / Firewalls :: Cisco - Unable To Configure Site-to-site Vpn
Sep 14, 2012I am configuring Site-to-Site VPN with another company. I already make a couple of tunnels but with this one I have a problem. They I already using on their side my local network 192.168.10.0/24 (server is 192.168.10.10) so we need to use imaginary network 172.16.0.5 as server address. Now I need to do NAT 172.16.0.5 to 192.168.10.10 but I am not so good in that.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: RVS4000 Site To Site - Unable To Ping?
Mar 5, 2012I am unable to ping any device on the internal lan from the opposite side of the tunnel. However, the tunnel connects successfully. I have the firewall disabled on both routers. Site A is using 192.168.3.1 and Site B is using 192.168.4.1. Any thoughts on why I cant ping one router from the other?
View 4 Replies View RelatedProtocols / Routing :: Unable To Access Any Sites Except Google Sites
Jul 8, 2012MY ISP installed one router in my lab.for internet connectivity they mail me steps :connect your Laptop directly to gi0/3 port to check internet connectivity with public ip 1.1.1.x and Gateway 1.1.1.1 with subnet mask 255.255.255.240 after connection I surprised because I am able to access only google sites like gmail,google search etc. but I am able to ping/traceroute all sites.from browser I am able to access only google sites only.In Router no firewall no such access list.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 4.2.2 Unable To Ping 1 Internet Site From Edge Router Able To Ping
Jan 18, 2013From My Router that connects to Cable modem i am unable to ping website 4.2.2.2I am able to ping all other websites fines.Same website i can ping from my pc and all other switches fine.Router has only 1 ACL thats for NAT.
View 25 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Site-to-Site VPN Routing On 5510
Oct 28, 2012I'm really struggling to setup the routing through a site to site vpn to another site using subnet 212.xxx.xxx.0/24 10.1.1.2 is a gateway that has access to the site. If I add to any server on the 10.1.1.0/24 subnet route add 212.xxx.xxx.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2 it is able to connect to any system on the 212. xxx. xxx.0/24 subnet. However it doesn't work for computers connected via remote access vpn. I need to have all the servers on 10.1.1.0/24 subnet have access to 212.xxx.xxx.0/24 subnet and also any computer connected via remote access vpn to the 5510. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: ASA 5525 - Configure Site-To-Site IPsec VPN To 3 Peers
Nov 21, 2012I have an ASA 5525 and need to configure site to site ipsec vpn to 3 peers. I currently have an existing /28 public address from my ISP that is used by other services.Is there a way to use this existing ip range to configure IPSEC tunnels to 3 peers ?
View 10 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: HSRP / BGP / Site To Site VPN On Router 2811
Apr 2, 2012hsrp+bgp+site to site vpn on router 2811.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Routers :: RV082 - SRP527W Site-to-site VPN - Routing Table?
Sep 2, 2012i'm trying to create a VPN IPSEC link between 2 offices. The VPN link is created, and i can communicate but only one way. Clients in Office B seems to have routing problem.
Details :
Office A :
- SRP527W router.
- Client Network : 192.168.0.0 / 24
[Code].....
Cisco VPN :: ASA 5520 - Routing Traffic Between Two Site To Site Tunnels
Feb 24, 2013I am trying to establish routing between two Site to Site vpn tunnels, both of which are terminating on the same outside interface of my Cisco ASA.
find attached Network Diagram for the same. All Firewalls used are Cisco ASA 5520.
Both VPN tunnels between Point A and Point B, Point B and Point C too are up. I have enabled Same security level intra interface permit command also.
How do i enable traffic originating from LAN Subnets behind Point A to reach LAN Subnets behind Point C without having to create a Seperate tunnel between Point A and Point C
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2851 / Site-to-Site VPN Through EVPL?
Mar 26, 2013I have been tasked with creating a VPN tunnel between our site and a vendor's support center. I successfully created the tunnel, which negotiates fine, but I can't seem to get the traffic flowing properly. The issue that I think I am having is that the vendor is using a public IP address for their remote internal network instead of a public one. At least that's what I think the problem is, but I'm probably wrong Here is a diagram of how the traffic should be flowing:
Office #3 Office #3 Office #1 Office #1 Vendor Vendor
Desktop PC Gateway Gateway Firewall Public IP Private LAN
192.168.5.158 -> 192.168.5.1 -> EVPL -> 192.168.0.11 -> 192.168.0.5 -> Internet -> 68.x.x.x -> 192.68.48.0/22
Cisco 2851 Cisco 2851 ASA 5510 Cisco 7206
When I trace a route from the desktop PC to an IP address on the remote vendor end, instead of going to the ASA the traffic goes to another office. Here is what is happening to the traffic:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.5.1 (Office #3 Gateway)
2 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 172.20.254.5 (Office #3 EVPL VLAN to Office #2)
3 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 192.168.1.14 (Office #2 Gateway)
4 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 173.xxx.xxx.xxx (Public Internet)
The office with the desktop PC has no local internet access, so all internet traffic gets routed to office #2 (192.168.1.0) as shown above. I'm asuming this is happening because the vendor is using a public IP address instead of a private IP address for their network. The routers look for the shortest route, which would be the internet, and then route the traffic there. Instead they should be routing the traffic to office #1's ASA and then on to the remote vendor site. The 2851 routers are using EIGRP. I don't know if that is causing this to happen but I tried adding static routes and the traffic always goes to the same place. I can provide configurations on any of the devices mentioned, save for the vendor's.
Cisco VPN :: ASA 5520 / Routing Site-to-Site VPN To Remote Users?
Oct 29, 2011We have a site-site and remote vpn configured in same interface in ASA 5520 ( software version 8.3 ). When Remote vpn users try to connect to computers located on the distant end of site-site VPN, their request failed. I tried No-Nat between remote vpn private IP to the remote site private IP, also stated the same in Split tunneling. I cant find even the tracert, ping also timed out.
View 7 Replies View RelatedCisco Routers :: Routing All Traffic To Vpn Site-to-site With SRP527W
Aug 21, 2011I'd like to create a site-to-site vpn between an SRP527 and an other vpn gateway. The problem is i don't see how to route all traffic from the local network (network defined by the lan ip interface of the SRP527) to the other vpn gateway? It seems to be only possible to define the destination network (accessible via the vpn) with ip/mask (but only for "small" network: for exemple i tried with 10.2.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 and it's ok but i tried with 10.0.0.0 mask 255.0.0.0 -> it's not working. I obtain the message "invalid ip")
View 1 Replies View RelatedSSL-VPN 2000 / TZ100 -Routing Traffic Over Site To Site VPNs
Jun 2, 2013I'm working with a client who has a site to site VPN between the main office and a branch office. The main office is 192.168.200.0/24 and the branch office is 192.168.1.0/24. The issue is when the branch office users use the VPN in they receive a 192.168.200.x address, however, they cannot access a server or any other resources at the branch office.
They have a SSL-VPN 2000 connected to a TZ100 at the main office and a Juniper device at the branch office. I did try setting the Tunnel All mode on the NetExtender but that does not allow me to access the resources at the branch office. Additionally, those users at the main office can access the resources at the branch office without getting on the VPN.
Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 Site-to-Site With UC540 Routing?
Dec 4, 2012We are setting up a new phone system using the UC540 with a VPN connection between 2 buildings using 2 Cisco ASA 5505's at either end.The problem I am having is getting the phones at the remote site to connect to the UC540 at the main site.
Phones/Computers (10.0.1.0/24) -- ASA -------------VPN Tunnel------------- ASA -- UC540 -----------Data Vlan1 (10.0.0.0/24)
|------Voice Vlan100 (10.1.1.0/24)
What i am told by UC500 support is that the phones at the remote site will connect if they have connectivity to the TFTP subnet on the UC540, which is 10.1.10.0/30 I added the static route on the ASA and I can ping the 10.1.10.1 TFTP server on the UC540 from the ASA, but not for any other device on the 10.0.0.0/24 network, such as the DC. I added the static route there and was able to ping, so something in the ASA seems to be preventing it.
I also can't seem to get the ASA at the remote site to ping 10.1.10.1. I've tried adding the static route there in hopes it would forward it through the VPN tunnel.
Cisco VPN :: ASA 5520 / Site To Site Failover VPN Connection And Routing?
Apr 8, 2013We have 3 sites, with a Cisco ASA 5520 at each location.
HQ (Headquarters) internal network: 172.16.110.0/24,
DR (Disaster Recovery) internal network: 172.16.120.0/24
BO (Branch Office) internal network: 172.16.150.0/24
HQ and DR have a 100Mbps permanent MPLS link between each other.Branch Office has a Site 2 Site VPN connection to HQ. If it fails, it establishes a Site 2 Site VPN connection to DR. This works perfectly.Now the routing issue... There is no route to the BO in the routing table at HQ/DR. The default gateway is used to reach the BO and that works for HQ when the VPN is between HQ/BO. If the VPN fails over to DR/BO, HQ can't reach BO anymore.I need to have some kind of conditional route injection from the ASA where the VPN is established. I was considering a tracked static route, but I was wondering if the S2S VPN itself has a functionality to do so. I thought the Reverse Route Injection was it but it's enabled on our crypto map and doesn't seem to work...
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Do VPN Site-to-site Between Two ASA 5505?
Jan 29, 20121. Is it possible to do vpn site-to-site between two ASA5505?
2. Is it possible to do vpn site-to-site between ASA5505 and MS ISA 2006?
3. Is there "Traffic shaping" in ASA5505?