I ride the trains often and I have noticed that I can't stream anything or play any music over the web. Not even Youtube or Netflix. I read somewhere that Amtrak provides there wifi via cellular networks in the area and they block any kind of streaming so they can limit the use of bandwidth across the train. way to change this so I can at least watch some you tube videos?
View 1 RepliesI am using Tenda WiFi Router Model no W316R. It is working fine for my Laptop also on Nokia C3-00 cell phone.Problem is that when i click on Youtube Videos on Cell phone, media player shows an error "No Responce" after few seconds. I showed my phone to company outlet they said that configure your Router properly for Streming on Cell phone
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhat I want to do is be able to control my PC from my TV screen. I mean I want to be able to stream a live ball game or movie I have on my PC hard drive & see it on my TV. I heard about Roku & thought that is what I wanted or Blueray with DLNA. But Roku just pulls streams from subscriber sites like Netflix & Hulu. DLNA will allow you to view video you have on your HDD but will not let you stream live feeds like watching a live event that is streaming on your PC. Is there any hardware out there that will allow me to have whats on my PC screen on my TV screen via wifi (or other means)?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCan you use a 110 cable in a frame that has Krone blocks?
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy ISP is changing out all the ADSL routers in our area and they have blocked the Default Gateway Address, so we can not access it via Web Browser. This is frustrating because they changed our Wi-Fi password, instead of just keeping what we had like an Einstein. They said they did it because of Hackers
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy internet connections drop frequently am still able to go on the router website when the internet drops is the router timing me out or what i have a net gear ive tried disabling passphrases?
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have with my Edimax router. I could not make any progress with Edimax personnel in Taipei.
If i connect my vista box directly w/o the router, i can see that port 21 (Filezilla) is open, using WhatsMyIP.org | Port Scanners/Sniffers
When I insert the Edimax br6215srg router, the port is in timeout as reported by aforementioned site (guess the port scanner gets no synack nor reset back to the syn it sends)
The router is set to "disable firewall" or to "enable firewall and DMZ enabled" with as client's ip the one that is configured in the router's dhcp table for the vista box. The NAT module is set to forward port 21 to the same ip. ipconfig confirms that i do get the ip programmed in the router's dhcp table.
I do not want to believe that this edimax box is unable to forward connections!
I have tried to setup access control by setting up a policy that restricts certain MAC addresses during a period during the day from certain websites. I set up the website filter and a schedule and selected them for the policy. Instead of blocking just the websites on the filter list during the time setup in the schedule, it blocks all websites all the time.I made sure that I setup the policy to 'block some access' NOT 'block all access'.The only thing that seems to work is that only the computers with the MAC address selected are effected.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a simple set-up: a DIR-655 with 2 devices plugged in to it. The Plex Media Server runs on Ubuntu Linux and acts as the DLNA server to a PS3 DLNA client. Both are hard-wired with ethernet cables to the DIR-655. In this set up the PS3 has trouble discovering the PLEX server via DLNA. A 'search for DLNA devices' on the PS3 fails to return the PLEX. Eventually, after some strange time interval ranging from 2-30 minutes, the PLEX server will show up on the PS3's list.
I attached a simple ethernet switch to the DIR-655 and then attached the PS3 and Plex/linux server to it. The PS3 now finds the Plex DLNA server INSTANTLY ... without even having to scan for servers.
It appears that the DIR-655 is trying to be 'useful' in some way by filtering some sort of traffic; multicast/igmp I assume. There don't appear to be any settings in the GUI to alter the Multicast/IGMP/DLNA/UPnP behavior in the LAN ... other then "turn UPnP on."
Note that this is hardware B1 and firmware 2.00NA.
I am trying to configure my ASA 5505 security plus through ASDM to receive two blocks of outside IPs (each of which is on a different subnet and a different gateway ip) to translate to my internal server giving it public access.I have searched for days (and maybe incorrectly) but I am finally asking for the configuration of the ASA to support this.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIn our company we use ASA 5550 as a VPN server (failover pair, FW 8.2(5)). Long time we used Cisco VPN client (easyVPN) only and some time ago we started to use L2TP/IPsec VPN from Windows clients.From this time we can see strange behavior. Some ip addreses (we use ipv4 only) from local VPN ip pool are getting unusable for clients. When client gets this ip address the traffic from client to intranet is ok but the traffic from intranet to the client is blocked. This behavior affect both L2TP/IPsec and easyVPN clients with this ip address.The packet trace shows that the traffic will be blocked because implicit deny ACL but ACL for the connected user is created:
Phase: 10
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype: vpn-user
Result: DROP
Config:
Additional Information:
[code].....
We use RADIUS for authentication and ACL. Failover to the standby ASA solves the problem but this terminates all L2TP/IPsec VPN connections.We use Cisco Anyconnect VPN too and when Anyconnect client gets this „strange“ ip address he can communicate normally without problems. It looks like that this problem is related to IPsec. how to discover why ASA uses -implicit deny- instead of user ACL?
I have an ASA 5510 running 8.4(2) which has a site to site IPSec VPN to a 3rd party who run some form of Checkpoint. The VPN establishes and allows access to a server in our DMZ on all ports that we have tested (so far HTTP, SSL, RDP, FTP) except for SQL which doesn't even seem to reach the server. I've got Wireshark running on the DMZ server and if the 3rd party initiates a TCP conversation from their server on any of the working ports to the server I see all of the expected packets arrive with the correct IPs etc (no NAT takes place across the VPN) but when an ODBC client attempts to query the SQL server on our DMZ box the packets do not arrive at the server. What I can see is the RX byte count on the VPN increasing each time the query is run but definitely no SQL arriving at the server.
Also if I revert the ASA back to the old PIX it has replaced with the same VPN config but on version 7.x then it works just fine.
I have two complete networks in my office. I want to access my printer from both the networks. Condition: With the Firewall I can't access computer of one network from another how can I access the printer from both the LANs. I am not allowed to play with Firewall.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently bought a new laptop (lenovo G560e) running win 7. when i turn it on it disables our old laptop also win 7 my android and console. If i turn on old laptop first everything is fine its so annoying.
i will paste ipconfig/all
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:UsersMikey>ipconfig/all
[code]....
I purchased a Epson Artisan 835, which I am runnung wireless. When I try to check the ink levels from my laptop they are all greyed out. Epson tech said the Dir-655 was the problem and that I needed to get the router to give permission for the ink levels to go through.
View 14 Replies View RelatedWe have 2 IP blocks from my ISP. We have been using just one a /30 block with one IP address used on the outside interface of the device. The new block is a /29 range and I would need to use just two of those IP addresses. Here is the situation I am facing.A company we partnered with wants to set up a VPN, they will send us 2 Cisco 861s to put behind our ASA. Is it possible to assign these 861's with public IPs from the block that we are not currently using? (the /29 range)? I know that it might require an upgrade to the Security Plus.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA that is logging the message %ASA-3-321007: system is low on free memory blocks of size 2048. I ran the "show blocks" command and the "Cnt" value for the 2048 blocks is 0. How do I reclaim these blocks and what are they used for?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to get up to speed on this topic as quickly as possible.
Here is my issue:
1) We are able to access the webiste
2) We are able to upload data packets
3) We allow the website to time out while we are uploading data packets
4) When we attempt to re-access the website the ip is blocked a) this includes pinging and trace
5) After an undertermined period of time the ip is unblocked and we are allowed to access it again.
The ASA 5505 router is the last forward facing stop before entering the VPN tunnel. We have tested by circumventing the ASA and we are unable to duplicate the disconnect. We have reviewed the config file and have not been able to identify what rule/settings could be affecting this.
when tracing port usage, the actions use 2 tcp ports and 1 udp port, the 2 tcp ports open and close by each transaction, when the ip block occures the 2 tcp ports are "dead" the udp port remains open (appearhently sending the remainder of the data packets)
I tried to create an ACL for IPv6. But the acl always drops my packetes. Only in case I allow an Permit Icmp6 any any statement. It works.
With detailed IPv6 entries. I have got drops.
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside; 6 elements; name hash: 0xd5eb1808
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 1 permit ip host fe80::21d:71ff:fe99:d1c0 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0xbb4badda
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 2 permit ip host 2001:a128:0:170::1 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0x473626da
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 3 permit ip 2001:a128:0:170::/64 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0x5b6258d3
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 4 permit icmp6 2001:a128:0:170::/64 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0x7778f0a9
This is the one with the permit icmp6 any any statement, it works !!
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside; 6 elements; name hash: 0xd5eb1808
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 1 permit ip host fe80::21d:71ff:fe99:d1c0 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0xbb4badda
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 2 permit ip host 2001:a128:0:170::1 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0x473626da(code)
I have a notebook that has had wireless installed on it. Other laptops can connect without ethernet cable..but notebook needs it. My carrier has done what they can...but insist there is a program installed on notebook that blocks the wireless signal.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have fiber optic net, going into a TP Link 1043 ND router out in my garage.All of the 4 lan ports go into one of the rooms in the house. I also have two more routers of the same kind, one downstairs and one upstairs.They are configured in a way, that DHCP server is only turned on, on the one in the garage, the other two act as switches.My problem is that 50 % of the time I can't acces facebook, and some other random sites.The interesting bit is that when I chat with someone on FB, I can see what they write, but my message doesn't go through.The way it goes, is that I can browse on facebook for like 5 minutes, after that its unavailable for another 5 minutes.I can still access the site from my smartphone, but only if its not connected to the wifi network, meaning the problem is somewhere within my setup.I've already tried turning the router firewall off, but that doesn't make any difference.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Linksys WRT310N V2 wireless router. Last week it started blocking access to our family website. That website appears to be the only one that is blocked. Every other website we have tried works just fine. I have tried the following.Remove the WRT310N router and plug a computer directly into the broadband modem. After this everything works fine for the one computer I have hooked into the internet.Remove the WRT310N router and substitute an old Linksys non-wireless router. Everything works fine for the hardwired computers on the LAN. Again, not really an option, need wireless access.
Unplug the router and so a soft reset. Still blocks this one website.I have not done a hard reset to factory specs. I wasn't looking forward to redoing everything I had set up.I looked over every setting in this router and can't find anything that would cause it to block a web page. I am far from a networking expert, but most of the settings seem pretty obvious.
No problem setting up the FTP server on the router. It's working perfectly from inside the LAN. But any attempt to access the built-in server from the WAN side is fruitless. I found that if I turn off the IP4 SPI on the router, I can suddenly connect to the built-in ftp server without issue from the Internet. If the SPI option is checked, its a no go.
Is this a bug? I can't imagine that it is intentionally set up such that you have to turn off the firewall in order to use the FTP function externally. At least it isn't mentioned anywhere I can find and it wouldn't seem logical.
I have yet another problem now with the DIR-825. I have a DAP-1522 that I connect my multimedia devices to like my TV, BD player, etc.
For added security, I use MAC filtering to only allow access to my devices that connect to my router. However, after several hours, the devices connected to my DAP-1522 can no longer connect and neither can I connect to them. The odd thing is that I can connect just fine to the 1522 itself. I NEVER had this issue with the DIR-655 so I figured it had to be the 825. After trying several things, I essentially narrowed it down to the MAC filtering.
If I turn MAC filtering off everything works fine all the time. If I turn it on, everything works fine for several hours, even up to a whole day, but then eventually my devices can no longer see or be seen.
Since the change from TeamViewer 6.x to TeamViewer 7.x my router's (WRVS4400N V1.1, latest firmware V1.1.13-ETSI from 2009-02-24 and latest IPS definitions 1.50 from 2011-08-09) IPS blocks its connections to my remotely supported computers claiming a "P2P Vagaa connection attempt - 2". This is not happening with TV 6.x.Who does the error, TeamViewer or Cisco?
View 4 Replies View RelatedCurrently I have an asa 5510 set up with one block of outside IP addresses. Everything is working fine in regards to my initial setup. However we needed to purchase additional IPs from our provider and ended up being a whole complete different block. Where I am getting stuck is getting the new IPs to NAT to inside addresses.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCE IP - 172.18.10.10 /30PE IP - 172.18.10.9/30 I had configured some floating static route on the PE towards CE .The routes were installed correctly till PE - CE link was UP as next hop IP was showing as connected .Now the link has been removed and I am receiving a supernet of 172.16.0.0/12 from PE2 via MPBGP. Although the 1st static route for 10.10.0.0 is showing in routing table, the other 2 ( 172.17.0.0 & 172.24.0.0 ) donot show. I believe that as both the routes and next hop fall under the supernet , the static route is not installing. But I don't know why is this behaviour. I tried to remove the distance 250 from both the routes , but still the static route does not install. I tried this on GNS3 but got the same results .
View 14 Replies View RelatedI try to insert a picture, to make the situation easily understandable.
The problem: After I have connected one more PC to the unmanaged switch, it cannot connect to network neither by DHCP IP, nor Static IP. (Physical Link is Ok, but no communication)
Tests made:
- PC1 turned off, to test connection, but PC2 cannot connect
- portfast has been turned off on the port of Cisco (which connects to Mediaconverter), but PC2 cannot connect
- PC2 has been reinstalled, replaced, other network adapter has been inserted, but cannot connect.
- the unmanaged switch has been replaced to a new one, but no success.
PC2 can connect to Cisco only if connected directly to RJ45 port of D-link Mediaconverter. But this is not a solution, because in that office, I would need for both of the PCs.
running config of the switch:
System image file is "flash:c2900XL-c3h2s-mz-120.5.2-XU.bin"
cisco WS-C2924C-XL (PowerPC403GA) processor (revision 0x11) with 8192K/1024K byt
es of memory.
Model number: WS-C2924C-XL-EN
#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration:
[code]....
I have a sip gateway connect to the LAN side of RV180 router which has ALG enabled. I have no problem to make and receive calls but sometime I see the router does not forward the 'Bye' message from the VOIP service provider to the sip gateway.
[Code]....
In the capture frame 4292, a 'Bye' message reaches the WAN of RV180 but it never forward the 'Bye' to the sip gateway with internal ip. All settings in RV180 are default with only ALG enabled. I tried to setup Access Rule or Port Forward but none seems to work. Not sure if they are over-ruled by ALG? With ALG enabled, is it possible to have individual Access Rule? If there are conflicts between ALG and Access Rule, which has higher priority?
I have an ASA5510 running version 8.4. ICMP is blocked from the internet to the outside interface of our firewall but now our ISP is requesting us to allow ICMP from their network to the outside of our ASA. I need to allow ICMP from three blocks of IP Addresses?
View 9 Replies View Relatedanything I put into my hosts file, will not go through the Cisco RV220W router. This is part of the set up:
192.168.1.10 << RV220W
192.168.1. 15 << A client machine
192.168.1.99 << Internal DNS with forwarder to OpenDNS (208.67.222.222 & 208.67.220.220) + a laptop that's not on the internal network at all.
Now, the client machine and the laptop both have an entry in their hosts files:
174.156.12.81 insight.hello.com
From the laptop, I can both browse to insight.hello.com, and I can ping it in Xterm.
From the client machine (192.168.1.15) which is behind the Cisco Router/FW, I can ping insight.hello.com, but I can not browse to it. This is especially strange since the ping goes through the Router every bit as much as the http traffic does, so why is the router giving me a DNS error on that, but the ping goes through just fine?
The hosts file is supposed to supercede any other information from anywhere, so it out to not be a problem for the router either. Yet, it obviously is.
I have tried to disable the internal DNS server as well as OpenDNS and just run the ISP's DNS servers, but no change - I still get that blue DNS error screen from the CIsco router.
Above IP's & hosts are fictitious.
The hosts file doesn't get blocked in a sense, but what happens is that if you have "Content Filtering" checked - even without any rules - the router can not verify that 174.156.12.81 is in fact insight.hello.com in this case, since it doesn't exist in the public DNS system.
So, I unchecked Content Filtering and now it works as it should.
i have router lynksys WRT120N and the latest 1.0.0.7 firmware. And the problem occured frequently. At about 13.00 i went out, wifi was working okay. At around 18.00 i returned home and i was trying to connect to the wifi with my android phone, and suprisingly it did not work. I tried on my laptop and on a android tablet. It did not work. The only thing that i could figure it out is to reset the router. I checked the settings, and there was no access policy e.g. time based access blocking.
View 5 Replies View RelatedATT Uverse modem provides internet for the house. Uverse modem also includes a wifi router. The HP C410a printer is connected wirelessly to the Uverse router. The printer is able to access the internet, and all computers (including the problem Mac) can print wirelessly when wirelessly connected to the Uverse router. The Mac sits at the opposite end of the house, far outside the range of the Uverse router. To solve this, we have a Netgear Powerline adapter connected to the Uverse router to provide internet over powerlines throughout the house. At the opposite end of the house, the Linksys E1000 is connected by ethernet to the Netgear Powerline outlet. This setup works - all computers, including the Mac, can wirelessly connect to the E1000 and there is fast internet access.
Two different PC's can print wirelessly to the HP C410a while connected to the E1000 - it works perfectly. However, the Mac can't print via the E1000 - I have to carry the Mac over to be in range of the Uverse router and then print. When you try to print on the Mac, it can't "find" the printer. However, if I open the HP print utility on the Mac and manually enter the IP address of the printer, a new printer pops up and I can make it print test pages. But I still can't print anything else from the Mac.
The Mac can print if the E1000 is bypassed with a physical ethernet connection to the Powerline outlet. So the conflict is definitely between the E1000 and the Mac, because everything else works in every other combination.I think something in the E1000 is preventing the print driver on the Mac from sending data to the printer, because the Mac can "communicate" with the printer via the HP print utility software, but whenever you try to print using the driver it can't connect to the printer. I disabled the E1000 firewall