I've finally got my 3560 switch IPv6 capable (IP Services IOS), but I've stumbled upon something strange: I can configure a tunnel interface, but I can't put the tunnel in ipv6ip mode. The command is missing. I can choose GRE, IP in IP, and a bunch of other things, but no ipv6ip. I'm a bit desperate here and probably I am going to have to live with it, but just in case? I need the IPv6 tunnel for an uplink to a tunnel broker which only supports this type of tunnel, and I'm surprised this is missing.
The only QoS command i have in global config is (no MLS qos) :
REMOTE-ROUTER1(config)#qos ? restore-show-output Restore old show output shape-timer Set the HQF shape timer interval
The router is running IOS:
System image file is "flash:c2801-ipbasek9-mz.151-4.M5.bin"
Am i just running the incorrect IOS or am i missing somehting, i need to change the QoS Map for my Nortel VoIP. The VoIP phones connect to a 3750 PoE which used to conenct to a 2651XM to route VoIP and data traffic over the same copper pairs (WAN link to hub site) hence the need for a Service policy but being Nortel phones, require changing the cos-dscp map. the 2801 is going to replace the 2651XM using a new HWIC.
I have a stack of 3750's running IOS 12.2(25). "IP forward-protocal" command is configured, but the IP helper command is just not an option to put on an interface. Any have any idea of why that could be?
My 3550 is always 2 characters short on the command line. So my global configuration mode will look like this:Switch3550(config Say I wanted to enabled ftp, it would look like:Switch3550(config)# ftp enab.
My customer has upgrade his 4506 from 6L-E to 7L-E 10GE.Ever since then if he run the command show dot1x interface gigabitEthernet x/x details some information are not been displayed (below are missing information)Is this intensional or do I need to kick this to TAC?
On the Cisco forums, an example is shown for how to configure BVI and bridge-groups on an ASR1004 but the same command (bridge-group) is not available under the interface on our ASR routers. We are running version of code: asr1000rp1-advipservicesk9.03.06.00.S.152-2.S.bin
I have two Aironet 1231Gs, that are both running the same version of fimware: Version 12.3(8)JEE
From the gui, I try and change the channel on the main radio interface--It works from one, and I get just a blank page on the other. When I try and change it via the cli, I use the "channel" command in conf int mode, and it works one the one, but the other one, the "channel" command doesnt exist.
I have been looking around and I can not find the " crypto isakmp policy " command on this Cisco Router 1941. I just wanted to setup a regular IPSEC Lan to Lan tunnel and surprise, the command is not there. Do I have the wrong IOS? I thought that a K9 image would do the trick. [code]
I am currently doing an audit at a customer site, i.e. am checking if any IOS upgrades are needed. I have found that alot of IOS versions that the customer is running are not available in the Cisco Software Download area anymore. Taking IOS 12.2(44)SE2 for the 3560 for example: some earlier and later versions are available as downloads, but this exact version is not. It also is not listed as a deferred version.What is Cisco telling us with this exactly? Are these "missing" versions not supported anymore i.e. is an upgrade to a supported version adviseable?
I need to create a Cisco VPN Client connection: I am following the cisco vpn client link and I don't have the command crypto isakmep client configuration group XXXXX
[URL]
This is what I get: crypto isakmp client configuration ? address-pool Set network address for client
This is my show version, if there is an IOS that will work:
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IK9S-M), Version 12.2(17a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
I recently rebuilt the configuration of our Cat6500 multilayer device for use as a user stack. The device is funtioning as it should be, but I am unable to set SSH using the 'crypto key generate rsa' command. The crytop command isn't avaiable at all, which suggests a firmware issue.
I have configured a hostname and Ip domain-name and the image is the only one available.
The show version output is listed below. show verCisco Internetwork Operating System SoftwareIOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICES_WAN-VM), Version 12.2(18)SXF12, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)Technical Support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1986-2007
I have a really weird issue with my cisco catalyst 3560G.
-device: cisco catalyst 3560g -ios: 12.2-53(SE) IP SERVICES
scenario: configured IPv6 iBGP link between this switch and a router. the router is announcing 1 (test) route. the switch sees the route properly, but doesn't add it to routing table (the route never gets to be "best path", although it should be).
So I have a Cisco PIX 506e that I've modified a bit, but am quite happy w/ when it comes to performance and configuration (I can actually set up the VPN server w/o too much thought.) I also have a Mikrotik Routerboard 750, I'm no longer using it as my router due to a few config issues I had plus the fact I had to hard code my internet gateway's arp address into the device due to some issues.
What I am wanting to do, which I'm sure is possible and easily accomplished (I just don't have the time right now to try it) is set the routerboard up behind my pix and have it function as an ipv6 router, while the pix handles my ipv4 duties. I've already set up the routerboard w/ an ipv6 tunnel broker when I had it running as my router, I am just curious if it will work in a similar fashion when configured behind an ipv4 device.
Recently I wanted to setup IPv6 for my home network. I signed up for tunnelbroker.net service and was provided with IPs. Then I configured the IP address in my DIR-615. But It's not working..
Screenshot of IPv6 config (router) : Screenshot of my Win 8 network Config : I also tested at [URL] but failed...
I have a Dlink DIR-825 B1 with firmware 2.05NA. I recently reset it to factory defaults to make sure I didn't misconfigure something.
I have been struggling to get a IPv6 in IPv4 tunnel working with tunnelbroker.net. I think the issue is a problem with the router itself and i'm not sure how to get it fixed.
All of my machines were getting IPv6 addresses (both windows, mac, linux) but none of them seemed to work. All I was able to do was ping the gateway itself using the local lan address. In each case they were missing a default IPv6 route. If I added a default route then it would work.
I started looking at the packets using a network sniffer and the Router Advertisements all had a Router lifetime value of "0" which is RFC4816 speak for "don't use this router as the default router". So Windows/Linux is exactly right by not setting a default route.
The strange thing was that when I reboot the router I would briefly get a router advertisement with a lifetime of 1800s, the corrert prefix and dns server but then another router advertisement would come along 5 seconds later with a router advertisement of 0.
I have TCP' Other observations
... using 6to4 I would get working IPv6 address. The difference again seemed to be the Router Lifetime. But I want to use a permanent tunnel. I have found 6to4 unreliable.
... the router never responds to router solicitations. It only sends a router advertisement when it wants to.
... the router never responds to DHCPv6 when that is configured.
I came across an interesting issue and thought I would see if anyone else has encountered it before contacting TAC.I have two Cisco Catalyst WS-4510R-E switches with a single Supervisor V module in each chassis. Both Sup cards are now running 12.2(54) SG1; ipbasek9 firmware; yes, I plan to move both switches to 15 code but that's another story. Anyways, prior to the upgrade the one switch was running 12.2 (33) code; I suspect the code was never upgraded; running ipbase non - K9 code. The other switch was running 12.2(44) with K9 prior to upgrade to 12.2(54).
I have two Cisco Catalyst WS-4510R-E switches with a single Supervisor V module in each chassis. Both Sup cards are now running 12.2(54) SG1; ipbasek9 firmware; yes, I plan to move both switches to 15 code but that's another story. Anyways, prior to the upgrade the one switch was running 12.2 (33) code; I suspect the code was never upgraded; running ipbase non - K9 code. The other switch was running 12.2(44) with K9 prior to upgrade to 12.2(54). With the background set, one switch reports the following:SwitchA (config)#r?radius-server redundancy regexp represourc rmon route-map router.
I have to go back into settings and deactivate the IPV6 tunnel daily to keep access to youtube. My provider does not support IPV6. Saving changes has no effectIs there a way to ensure that the IPV6 tunnel remains deactivated?I have firmware version 1.0.30 build 126544 2011-12-24. Firmware update function says I got the latest version.
i have my Cisco E4200 set up with a 6rd tunnel. the tunnel seems to work fine for the most part. i can ping ipv6.google.com and get a response.however, i cannot ping the addresses of the IPv6 Tunnel ends from within my network. If i run a ping from outside the network, i can ping the IPv6 address of the server end, however, i cannot ping the E4200's end of the tunnel. is there a specific option that needs to be set? i have allowed ping so that my IPv4 address is pingable, am i missing something for IPv6?
I am using cisco packet tracer to configure the hsrp on 3560 (c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-37.SE1.bin) but the standby ip Command is not available on the interface the problem in that IOS or in config
I have been experiencing some issue with a portchannel interface.I have two cisco switches 3560 and I have a portchannel between them ( It is composed by two gigabitethernet interfaces generating a portchannel of 2 Gigas ).Unfortunately, I am verifying that one interface traffics about 893MB but the other interface only traffics about 100MB.Is there any cause why is this happening? I thought that maybe both interfaces would traffic about 450MB.Is there some wrong configuration with the load-balance command?. At this moment there is no load-balance, It is only configured the port channel with the default configuration.
While working in a 3560 all of a sudden I received the message "command authorization failed" while trying to issue certain commands.
It appears I lost my priv 15 authorization. We have seen this before, we do not have access to the ACS to trouble shoot the issue.I tried logging in a 2nd and 3rd time using tacacs and received the same error whenever I issued a command such as dir flash: , copy tftp flash or show run. At the time I was trying to copy IOS to the switch, I had a co-worker log in and it was fine for him and he completed the copy.
Once completed I logged back in and all was fine again. We suspect an issue with ACS? possibly a timeout of our TACACS authorization ?
I am using ASA 5520 Image in GNS3, when i come in Configuration Mode and try to create Tunnel through command "interface Tunnel 0", but this command doesn't exist. I need this command to create Tunnel for GRE Lab.
I have a Cisco 1941 router with the Security license running IOS c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M.bin. Is there a "tunnel bandwidth" command like with routers that have the Advanced IP Services license? My concern is being able to adjust the bandwidth to a value greater than 8 Mbps...
I'm looking to utilize one of my 3925's to create a LAN-LAN IPsec VPN tunnel with another site.
I was under the impression that I needed to get a securityk9 license installed and then I would be good to go. I got a temporary 60 day trial license and successfully installed it, but none of the commands that I need to create the tunnel are showing up for me.
I'm trying to use the "crypto isakmp" command, but that is not showing up: Router(config)#crypto ? ca Certification authority key Long term key operations pki Public Key components
Here's my show license: Index 2 Feature: securityk9 Period left: 633 weeks 4 days Period Used: 0 minute 0 second License Type: Evaluation License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA accepted License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Low
