Cisco WAN :: ASR 1004 Bridge Group Command Missing
Jul 19, 2012
On the Cisco forums, an example is shown for how to configure BVI and bridge-groups on an ASR1004 but the same command (bridge-group) is not available under the interface on our ASR routers. We are running version of code: asr1000rp1-advipservicesk9.03.06.00.S.152-2.S.bin
I need to create a Cisco VPN Client connection: I am following the cisco vpn client link and I don't have the command crypto isakmep client configuration group XXXXX
[URL]
This is what I get: crypto isakmp client configuration ? address-pool Set network address for client
This is my show version, if there is an IOS that will work:
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IK9S-M), Version 12.2(17a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
is there a command available to run diagnostics in ASR port/SPA? the one below is from a juniper remote device. i was only able to find 'test interface' but haven't run this yet (currently in production).
The only QoS command i have in global config is (no MLS qos) :
REMOTE-ROUTER1(config)#qos ? restore-show-output Restore old show output shape-timer Set the HQF shape timer interval
The router is running IOS:
System image file is "flash:c2801-ipbasek9-mz.151-4.M5.bin"
Am i just running the incorrect IOS or am i missing somehting, i need to change the QoS Map for my Nortel VoIP. The VoIP phones connect to a 3750 PoE which used to conenct to a 2651XM to route VoIP and data traffic over the same copper pairs (WAN link to hub site) hence the need for a Service policy but being Nortel phones, require changing the cos-dscp map. the 2801 is going to replace the 2651XM using a new HWIC.
I have a stack of 3750's running IOS 12.2(25). "IP forward-protocal" command is configured, but the IP helper command is just not an option to put on an interface. Any have any idea of why that could be?
My 3550 is always 2 characters short on the command line. So my global configuration mode will look like this:Switch3550(config Say I wanted to enabled ftp, it would look like:Switch3550(config)# ftp enab.
I've finally got my 3560 switch IPv6 capable (IP Services IOS), but I've stumbled upon something strange: I can configure a tunnel interface, but I can't put the tunnel in ipv6ip mode. The command is missing. I can choose GRE, IP in IP, and a bunch of other things, but no ipv6ip. I'm a bit desperate here and probably I am going to have to live with it, but just in case? I need the IPv6 tunnel for an uplink to a tunnel broker which only supports this type of tunnel, and I'm surprised this is missing.
My customer has upgrade his 4506 from 6L-E to 7L-E 10GE.Ever since then if he run the command show dot1x interface gigabitEthernet x/x details some information are not been displayed (below are missing information)Is this intensional or do I need to kick this to TAC?
I have two Aironet 1231Gs, that are both running the same version of fimware: Version 12.3(8)JEE
From the gui, I try and change the channel on the main radio interface--It works from one, and I get just a blank page on the other. When I try and change it via the cli, I use the "channel" command in conf int mode, and it works one the one, but the other one, the "channel" command doesnt exist.
I have been looking around and I can not find the " crypto isakmp policy " command on this Cisco Router 1941. I just wanted to setup a regular IPSEC Lan to Lan tunnel and surprise, the command is not there. Do I have the wrong IOS? I thought that a K9 image would do the trick. [code]
I recently rebuilt the configuration of our Cat6500 multilayer device for use as a user stack. The device is funtioning as it should be, but I am unable to set SSH using the 'crypto key generate rsa' command. The crytop command isn't avaiable at all, which suggests a firmware issue.
I have configured a hostname and Ip domain-name and the image is the only one available.
The show version output is listed below. show verCisco Internetwork Operating System SoftwareIOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICES_WAN-VM), Version 12.2(18)SXF12, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)Technical Support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1986-2007
This question might actually belong under tacacs server but it's only happening with the ACE. I've configured tacacs on the 4710 and configured the tacacs server per the documentation. If I enter the shell:<context>*Admin default-domain under the group settings when I login with my tacacs ID my role is set to Network-Monitor. If I set the shell in my specific tacacs ID I'm assigned the correct role as Admin. We're running ACS ver 4.1 and the ACE is A4(1.1)
I've got a Cisco 1841 with 2 FastEthernet ports here. My Cisco isn't great, and I've been given a problem I don't seem to be able to crack.Essentially, I have one network with two sides. I've connected these to fe0/0 and fe0/1 on the router, and put them interfaces into a bridge group which as far as I can tell, essentially makes the router a 2 port switch...I know this won't make a lot of sense from a normal network point of view, but what we need to do is allow all traffic from fe0/0 to fe0/1, but not allow any traffic in the reverse direction. The traffic allowed to flow from fe0/0 to fe0/1 must include broadcast traffic (infact that is the most important traffic, its how the silly theatre application works). None of the traffic is IP addressed.... ie, each of the devices on the network assign themselves an IP address, and then throw broadcast traffic out on to the "dedicated physical network" that exists between them for communication[CODE]
We are connecting a cisco router (819) to wireless lan network (lwapp) through its wireless interface.
clients ---> 819 ---->AP (WGB) ------ lwapp ----- AP ---> LAN ---> servers.
since the clients are on the same subnet as the the VLAN on the lwapp, everything works great.When we add a new L3 VLAN on the 819 router, and we try to ping the clients from the servers, the packets can reach the clients but never received by the servers back. it seems like the bridge is dropping the packets when they go back from the client to the servers.when we use a GRE tunnel from the 819 to the LAN, everything works great.
I have a Cisco 2951 Router and I am trying to set it up to use DHCP and for security purposes I need to use the "IP Access-Group in" command. The DHCP will not work when I have this command on the interface that I need to run it through, DHCP works fine when I do not have the "IP Access-Group in" command in the configuration. When I check the log after the failed DHCP attempt it shows up as denied, as if it's being blocked. The IOS I have is c2951-UNIVERSALK9-m 15.0 (1) M3. Conf Reg 0x2102.
We are deploying two Cisco 5585 in transparent mode and multiple contexts. they are running Active-Active fail over.
There are a lot of V LANs need to be added in the contexts, we are trying to use least contexts to fulfill.
ASA supports 8 bridge groups for each contexts, and maximum 4 interfaces for each bridge group.
We have assigned four interfaces in different V LANs , set two of them as a pair with one IP sub net and the other two interfaces are in another IP sub net.
For example :
Bridge group 1:
inside1 and outside1 -------> 192.168.1.0/24 inside2 and outside2 -------> 192.168.2.0/24
However, we can only make one sub net(V LAN pairs ) work when the BVI is set to that IP sub net. If the BVI set to 192.168.1.0/24, the inside1 and outside1, the other pair not work. If the BVI set 192.168.2.0/24, then only inside2 and outside2 work.
Since the BVI can only be assigned to either of the sub net, Is it possible to make both vlan pairs work ? Or we only can have one sub net in one bridge group ?
I came across an interesting issue and thought I would see if anyone else has encountered it before contacting TAC.I have two Cisco Catalyst WS-4510R-E switches with a single Supervisor V module in each chassis. Both Sup cards are now running 12.2(54) SG1; ipbasek9 firmware; yes, I plan to move both switches to 15 code but that's another story. Anyways, prior to the upgrade the one switch was running 12.2 (33) code; I suspect the code was never upgraded; running ipbase non - K9 code. The other switch was running 12.2(44) with K9 prior to upgrade to 12.2(54).
I have two Cisco Catalyst WS-4510R-E switches with a single Supervisor V module in each chassis. Both Sup cards are now running 12.2(54) SG1; ipbasek9 firmware; yes, I plan to move both switches to 15 code but that's another story. Anyways, prior to the upgrade the one switch was running 12.2 (33) code; I suspect the code was never upgraded; running ipbase non - K9 code. The other switch was running 12.2(44) with K9 prior to upgrade to 12.2(54). With the background set, one switch reports the following:SwitchA (config)#r?radius-server redundancy regexp represourc rmon route-map router.
What is the maximum allowed number of wired clients behind a workgroup bridge? In other words, is there a limit on MAC addresses?I assume 1262 AP in WGB mode is connecting to a lighweight AP (1262 or 3502), latest IOS and WLC software. I wasn't able to find the answer from Cisco documentation.
I want to set up FWSM 4.1 on Cat6509 with multiple bridge groups in one transparent context. (as the manual says it can support up to 8 bridge-groups and the intent is to save security contexts) For a host in VLAN21 (b1_inside) to talk to a host in VLAN41 (b2_inside), traffic needs to be go out to MSFC which routed back the traffic through the FWSM. My question is how can I define a default route per bridge-group, I would assume FWSM should take the following two default routes per bridge-group interface but it won't;
seems like it allows only one default route per the context and gives me an error - "ERROR: Cannot add route entry, possible conflict with existing route"
How can I achieve outside per individual bridge-group?
I try to map LDAP Group to ASA Group policy following documentation:
[URL]
This is a config for ASA 8.0. I would have expected it to work on 8.4 as well but I do run into problems. The mapping as shown in LDAP Debug and ASA Log will actually happen but it is overwritten by the "GPnoAccess" Group Policy configured locally in the Tunnel Group. From earlier works with RADIUS I would have expected the user specific Attribute to be "stronger"? ASA Log:
AAA retrieved user specific group policy (correct Policy) for user = XXX AAA retrieved default group policy (GPnoAccess) for user = XXX
ASR 1004, has a image, which is on the harddrive, not bootflash and we have no boot commands in the configuration…We are running the ROMMON version ‘15_01rs’ The ASR boots into Rommon, as it cannot find a image (as expected), as the configuration has no boot commands.Trying to TFTP or getting an IOS back into bootflash is proving problematic.Follow all TFTP commands..
we are going to build L2L IPSEC VPN on ASR 1004 at our new datacenter edge. but i don't find any familiar CLI on my 1004. any special license,IOS-XE version or processor is required ? ASR1000-ESP10 is necessary ?
From PEC training - Cisco says to perform a proper ASR 1004 shutdown by executing 'reload' , then wait for bootstrap message to appear, then [before commencement of unpacking of the IOS] turn off the power switch. IS THIS ACCURATE. Anyone have any doc related to the recommended POWER DOWN process on the ASR 1004. We have a UPS cutover coming up and I want to be ready to power down and restart the new ASR 1004s we have - properly.
I'm moving this [ URL], discussion here because I feel I will get a quicker response. In a nutshell the setup is as below:
ASR1004=={ GRE }==C7206
I need to run layer 2 services between the 2 without mpls support from the service provider. Unfortunately there is no specific detail on getting EoMPLSoGRE up and running. I have the GRE tunnel working and I have mpls forced to my loop backs and the x connect configured on the 2 router interfaces. However the mpls forwarding table on the 7206 shows the outgoing interface is 'none' and I cannot pass any traffic across.
7206>sh mpls forwarding-table Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes tag Outgoing Next Hop tag tag or VC or Tu [code]...
On the ASR it looks fine: asr>sh mpls forwarding-table labels 201Local [code]...
I am in the process of staging a couple of two new Cisco ASR 1004's which are located at two locations with a WAN link in between. I need to set up connectivity between servers plugged directly into each ASR router across the WAN link. The ASR has 16 gig interfaces (gi0/0/0 - gi0/0/7 and gi0/1/0 - gi 0/1/7), and a management interface (gi0). I have connected the WAN link to gi0/0/0 and put an ip address on it. The servers will be plugged into the remaining gig interfaces. I tried to create an SVI (vlan interface) in an attempt to create an L3 interface to support routing to these servers but these routers don't allow SVI's to be created. how to put these server connected ports on a vlan and to create an L3 interface to provide routing to them?
i just configued a L2L tunnel between ASA 5510 and ASR 1004. tunnel is up but got serious packet lost (more than 70%) and isakmp always up-down intermittently.i compared parameters on both sides again and again but no luck. [code]
I bought a Prolink Wireless Router WGR1004 and I have problem connecting it with internet. My windows able to detect and connect to the Wireless connection but the internet browser cannot display any webpage. I have a Linksys WB300 ADSL Modem when wired to my pc it pings IP 192.168.1.3 , default gateway 192.168.1.1 My connection to Wireless pings IP 192.168.1.2, default gateway 192.168.1.1ADSL phone cable connected to my modem and Ethernet cable linked from Modem to Internet Port of Wireless router. Settings in Network Connections=>properties=>TCP/IP=>Obtain an IP address automatically and obtain DNS Server address automatically. Web browser connections settings=>Internet Options=>Lan settings=>Automatic detect settingsRouter Configuration=>Lan IP address is 192.168.1.254 Internet IP address is 192.168.1.2, Security and SSID are working properly. The problem is my web browser cannot display webpage.