I will upgrade my Wireless Controller Firmware 7.2.103.0 But I dont know WCS will support manager new controller firmware 7.2.103.0 ?is need NCS to manager? or WCS can be manager new controller firmware 7.2.103.0 all feature?
Now My hw is
Csico 6509 Sup 720 3b 12(33)SXJ
My Controller is WiSM2
WiSM2 is 7.0.116.0
WCS is 7.0.172.0
I am getting an alarm on WCS where a one controller is down, unreachable from WCS, while the other one is reachable on the same WiSM module. Upon investigation, Status of controller is shown as "Oper-Up" for all controllers on Supervisory engine. Hardware platform is Cisco 6509-E.
WLAN
Slot Controller Service IP Management IP SW Version Status
----+-----------+----------------+----------------+-----------+---------------
2 1 192.167.10.11 172.19.47.65 6.0.196.0 Oper-Up
2 2 192.167.10.12 172.19.47.66 6.0.196.0 Oper-Up
However, I can not ping the managment interface of the down controller while the other controller management interface is pingable. All these interfaces are in the same VLAN.
ping 172.19.47.65
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.19.47.65, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Problem is fixed when I reboot the problematic Controller. However, this problem re-appears after some time. I am not able to figure out why controller is not able to ping its default-gateway which is an SVI interface on Supervisory card on the same chassis, and showing status UP/UP. Is it a software bug or backplane fault or any other reason ?
I am in the midst of trying to update the controller firmware of a cisco wireless lan contoller 4402, and having some issues getting the file to transfer to the controller. i am currently running verison 5.0.148 on the controller and attempting to upgrade to the latest version of 7.0.230 and for whatever reason it continues to not transfer. I have tried all 3 methods of cli, gui and using wcs software. all the no avail , I have tried tftp32 and 3cdaemon with the same results.
The error that i am getting from 3cdaemon is got socket timeout aborting code 10054, failing at 66MB transfered. I increased the timeouts both on the wlc and the tftp client to no avail
the error i get on the wlc is Code file transfer failed - Error while writing output file
I can figure out why I cant ping controller 10.1.99.100. Here is my controller config. It is connect to H3C 5800 switch. I have the switch config below as well. The port on the switch is on Native Vlan 1 untagged.
(Cisco Controller) show>interface summary
Interface Name Port Vlan Id IP Address Type Ap Mgr Guest
-------------------------------- ---- -------- --------------- ------- ------ -----
ap-manager 1 untagged 10.1.99.101 Static Yes No
[Code]....
Region : Others
Model : TL-WR1043ND
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 1.8
ISP :
Region : Israel
Model : TL-WR1043ND
Hardware Version (On the back cover): V1.8
From web interface:
Firmware Version:3.13.4 Build 110429 Rel.36959n
Hardware Version:WR1043ND v1 00000000
ISP : Free
1. about USB Printer Controller
I connect my printer HP office jet 5610 All in one, his drivers installed on my computer (windows 7 ultimate, 32 bit). Irun the software "USB Printer Controller" and i didn't seeing anything. Can not click on any button. BTW, i changed the IP range from 192.168.1.1 to 10.0.0.100-10.0.0.139 and my router web interface at 10.0.0.140, if it's changing something.
2. About upgrade the router's firmware, it's safe that I'll upgrading it?
The last version : TL-WR1043ND_V1_120405
I am using WiSM in 6509, this WiSM has two controller with the same management IP subnet, I tired to upload the configuration to the TFTP server, but tried many times, one of the controller working well, but the other one always cannot reach the TFTP server, here is the debugger log for both controller
Failed one:
(KGV-WiSM-1) >debug transfer all a enable
(KGV-WiSM-1) >*TransferTask: Nov 10 16:26:08.735: RESULT_STRING: TFTP Config transfer starting.
*TransferTask: Nov 10 16:26:08.735: RESULT_CODE:1
*TransferTask: Nov 10 16:26:32.018: Locking tftp semaphore, pHost=172.16.102.107 pFilename=/KGV.aes
*TransferTask: Nov 10 16:26:32.018: Semaphore locked, now unlocking, pHost=172.16.102.107 pFilename=/KGV.aes
[code].....
why the controller can't upload the file, I can ping both controller and both controllers can ping to the TFTP server.
Region : Denmark
Model : TL-WDR4300
Hardware Versin : V1
Firmware Version : 3.13.23 Build 121225 Rel.37950n
ISP :
my TP-Link USB Controller after my latest firmware upgrade, and therefor my USB-printer (connected to the router) do not function any more, and i can not find a new software for the Controller
I'm trying to upgrade the VDSL firmware on a 887VA. I've uploaded the file vdsl.bin-A2pv6C035d_d23j to the router. I understand this file has to be renamed with a .bin extension in order to be recognized after a reboot, but the attempts I have made have not worked. What must this file be renamed to in order to load the new firmware into the VDSL controller?
Here is the current firmware information. I've tried several of the obvious file names.
Firmware Source File Name (version)-------- ------ -------------------VDSL embedded VDSL_LINUX_DEV_01212008 (1)
Modem FW Version: 110331_1212-4.02L.03.A2pv6C032b.d23fModem PHY Version: A2pv6C032b.d23f
I know that the 3600 series APs are not supported on the 4404 WLC. However, would the following scenario be supported? I would like to use the 4404 (software rel. 7.0) as a guest anchor with a 5508 (software release 7.2) as the foreign controller supporting series 3600 APs. I ask because the APs do not need to join the guest anchor.
View 7 Replies View RelatedWe have a customer that have 2 5508 as primary and backup controller and a 4400 as an anchor controller. We plan to upgrade the 5508 to 7.3.112.0 and the 4400 is already 7.0.116.0. Will there be any issue if the anchor controller is not the same code as the foreign controller? Do I also have to upgrade the acnhor controller to 7.0.240.0?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are trying to navigate the waters in choosing between a in-house, controller-based, wireless network solution or a cloud-based solution. We have been presented with the usual suspects in cloud-based (Aerohive, Meracki, etc) and with Cisco (5500) and Aruba on the other side. We are a multi-campus organization with approx. 200 APs.Any hard reasons why go with a controller-based vs. cloud-based solution? If we must keep the conversation limited to Cisco, why go Meracki over Cisco's WLC solutions or vise versa?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am looking to configure a wired and wireless guest network. I have industrial barcode scanners that connect to one SSID and then there is the business network on the office SSID (no vlan seperation for these devices just different SSIDs). There is not really a need to seperate the business network from the scanners in any case. However, there are needs for a guest network and this needs to be seperated. At the bare minumum I would like to have the wireless guest network. Here is what I have: 2125 Wireless LAN controller managing 18 LAPs (1 indoor and 17 outdoors)Cisco Cat 2950 switches (2 x 24 port and soon to be replaced with 2 x 48 port 2960's with 802.1x capability) Sonicwall TZ210 firewallOne existing wired and trunked vlan for PLC infrastructure. One ESXi hosting Windows server guests (soon to be 2 with vMotion) The reason for the wired guest access network is tp prevent anyone from plugging into the wall jack in the office with thier home laptops or anyone else from being on the same subnet as our domain machines. Granted they would be unathenticaed but there would be no layer 2 seperation and that is what I think would be best.
How would I go about doing this on the wireless controller without an anchor controller just using my existing hardware? I would like to have the Guest SSID only availible in the front office. Is it possible to offer a guest network while still servicing the business network SSID on the same access point? Then might I be able to have the guest network be treated as it should at the controller? However this might present another issue altogether as the guest traffic will be over the same wire as the business SSID until it hits the controller for management.
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
Can you use the NA firmware on an EU firmware device?I assume yes, since the hardware is the same?What's the difference between the two?
View 14 Replies View RelatedAndroid users can connect to our hospital guest wireless but will not have connectivity. Our wireless infrastructure is WISM based with 2 controllers on 6509 platform. We have a mixed environment of 1231, 1252 & 3502 series APs.
Had issue connecting just Android devices? All other devices connect fine.
All, I am the wireless administrator for a rather large school district in Oregon, and we are seeing numerous issues with iPad's connecting and staying connected to our lightweight AP's in an HREAP configuration. Our iPad carts have about 20 iPads a piece and an AIR-LAP1142 supporting them. We have no issues with getting non-Apple products to connect and stay connected, but for some reason the iPads are creating a major issue. We currently run 8 4400 WISM blades via two 6509's, running code 7.0.116.0.Our AP's are running 7.0.116.0 as their primary software and their IOS is 12.4(23c)JA2.
View 12 Replies View RelatedMy AP get IP from 6509, but client cannot get dhcp from my dhcp pool for client, what is the reason?i have 3750g switch with integrated WLC, i connect it to 6509 I did all configs yesterday here is outputs
WLC
Interface Name Port Vlan Id IP Address Type Ap Mgr Guest
-------------------------------- ---- -------- --------------- ------- ------ -----
ap-manager LAG 10 172.16.10.100 Static Yes No
globus LAG 20 172.16.20.254 Dynamic No No
management LAG 10 172.16.10.99 Static No No
service-port N/A N/A 0.0.0.0 Static No No
[code].....
My company has been contracted to upgrade the 2 WiSM1 modules on a 6509 for a customer. The hardware isn't changing but the software is being upgraded to WiSM2. The cutsomer has HUNDREDS of AP's and dozens of VLANs and subnets (large municipality and school district).
Cisco SE's have been pushing the customer to purchase the WCS 7 software (they've been managing these Controllers independantly) stating there is no mechanism to upgrade WiSM1 configs to WiSM2. I am vaguely familiar with the cisco controllers but have little WiSM experience. So i feel like i'm working without a net here.
So,
1) Any way to migrate from 1 to 2 without the WCS and without having to reinvent the wheel?
2) How does the WCS make this transition easier? What does it do to the WiSM1 configs to make them WiSM2 compatable?
We have a WISM in a 6509. The 6509 lost power (the UPS failed) and upon reboot the WISM isn't allowing AP's to connect. The WISM is blade 4. Upon consoling in, I get this error message for all 8 ports: 42w6d: %EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Gi4/1 is not compatible with Po407 and will be suspended (trunk mode of Gi4/1 is dynamic, Po407 is trunk)
View 13 Replies View RelatedI have inherited a 6509 VSS switch system as the network core and have the task of ensuring proper redundancy and redesign of the directly connected data center devices. One of the connected devices (WLC 4402) physically appears to be connected to both switches - the WLC is in the same rack as VSS-Chassis1 so I can trace the fiber from WLC port 1 to gi1/1/22, the other fiber from the WLC port 2 goes into the floor and presumably over to VSS-Chassis2 gi2/1/22 (there is fiber connected there, I have link lights on both sides, and the port channel, Po200, on the VSS switch which is configured on gi1/1/22 is also configured on gi2/1/22). My question pertains to the CDP neighbor output I get on the VSS switch: (truncated to include just the WLC) [code]
So my question, arising at least partly from the apparently misleading CDP information, is this: How can I confirm that the WLC is correctly dual homed to both core switches? (short of tracing the cable) I ask because there are several other devices (not WLCs) that need to have the dual homed connections confirmed.I tried a layer 2 trace route but for all macs associated with the WLC, the trace abborts with the error "Device has Multiple CDP neighbours on destination port."
We have a mix of 1231 and 1242 access points in an LWAPP environment. They are connected to WiSM controllers in our 6509's and are managed by a central WLC. Everything is running version 7.0.230. My question is can I apply MAC address filtering on a select group of AP's to restrict access to a specific SSID broadcast on these AP's without affecting other AP's also connected to the same WiSM?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am having trouble adding a new controller(2500) to the WCS.
-My WCS version 6.0.196.0
-My WLC version 7.0.116.0
If i upgrade my WCS i may add the new contoller? Even if in cisco DATA-SHEET there isnt any mention regarding this WLC(basicly it says that the WCS does not support this WLC)
Monitoring and migration of selected Cisco Aironet standalone (autonomous) access points. Monitoring of the standalone access points of Cisco 800, 1800, 2800, and 3800 Series Integrated Services Routers.
How to get a WLC on a SRE up and running. I have a WLC installed and running on a 2951 SRE connected to a L3 switch in a lab.
I've tried to follow the Cisco document:
[URL]...
My wireless clients could only receive a DHCP allocated IP address for the 55.XX subnets defined on the wireless lan controller and SRE (shown on page 12 of the pdf). All traffic seemed to be routed via the native vlan of the inside router trunk interface and all DHCP requests arriving at my DHCP server were from 55.XX. Because of this I didn't see the point of trunking
so I've changed it to a point to point routed connection, created a 55.XX DHCP scope on my DHCP server for the wireless clients and all routing works fine.I found the document rather misleading.
output are here
*Mar 1 01:28:21.018: %CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state to DISCOVERY
*Mar 1 01:28:21.022: %LWAPP-3-CLIENTERRORLOG: bsnSetCurrentBHRate : fail to set
radio control and data rate
*Mar 1 01:28:21.179: %CDP_PD-2-POWER_LOW: All radios disabled - AC_ADAPTOR (00
00.0000.0000)
*Mar 1 01:28:21.984: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEth
ernet0, changed state to up
*Mar 1 01:28:34.341: %DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN: Interface GigabitEthernet0 assigne
d DHCP address 192.168.10.244, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname AP2c54.2d0d.c3c4
I have been having some issues trying to stand up an older WiSM that has been incorrectly configured by my predecesssor and has a bad Mgt IP so I am unable to telnet or SSH into it, nor can I console or session into it.
What I would like to do is to change the Mgt address for the WiSM controllers (1 and 2) by way of the Sup (not sure that is possible) because as it stands they are set to 169.254.1.1 and are unreachable even when directly consoled into them.
Core-A#sh wism status
Service Vlan : 52, Service IP Subnet : 10.104.52.2/255.255.255.0
WLAN
Slot Controller Service IP Management IP SW Version Status
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 1 10.104.52.3 169.254.1.1 4.0.217.0 Oper-Up
3 2 10.104.52.4 169.254.1.1 4.0.217.0 Oper-Up
Core-B#sh wism status
Service Vlan : 52, Service IP Subnet : 10.104.52.1/255.255.255.0
WLAN
Slot Controller Service IP Management IP SW Version Status
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 1 10.104.52.50 10.104.30.254 7.0.116.0 Oper-Up
3 2 10.104.52.51 10.104.30.250 7.0.116.0 Oper-Up
I hope to get this WiSM setup on Core A and get it configured like I have my Core B and then run them in a dual failover design with load balancing between the two.
although cisco sw advisor said that the best IOS for my hardware 6509 Sup720 IOS: (s72033_rp-IPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF16 suits the WiSM; And I tested it already with WiSM version 5.0 but when I've upgraded the WiSM to version 6.0 the service interface from the switch side says:
B5_Noc2_CS1(config)#int gig 4/9
% This interface cannot be modified
as the customer refuse to upgrade the switch IOS & He wants to use the latest ED WiSM sw 6.0;
Due to lack of wires we decided to extend our network by using WET546 bridge by linksys. Ideally we looking to create topology like this:
(Computer)--eth--(WET546)---wireless----(AP/WLC2100)---(router)---(Internet)
WET546 successfully authenticates and looks pretty healthy on controller (see below) , however neither of computers plugged to WET546 was unable to obtain ip address from dhcp server , nor working with static ip. I was under impression what it might be related to some default policies on WLC2100. Logs (warning) on WLC2100 looks clean.
We have a 2504 Wireless Controller and it works great!We currently have 6 Access Points (Aironet 1252) connected.We just added the sixth one a few weeks ago and with a properly configured and fully functioning Wireless Controller, it was super easy.Now, I have been assigned to add another Access Point, but at a remote site.The plan is to have up to three or more APs at this remote location and we want them to talk back to the Wireless Controller.We have plenty of licences on our current Wireless Controller.Do do not want to spend the funds for another Wireless Controller and more licenses.
1. How does one manually add a Aironet 1252 to the 2504 Wireless Controller
2. If the AP is on a different subnet than the Wireless Controller, how does one get it registered?
3. The best for last: Can a Aironet 1252 talk to a 2504 Wireless Controller over a WAN link?
I just turned on 2 Wirelless LAN Controllers 5508 and I am getting this message on both of them:
Loading primary image (Image not found)
** Unable to read "linux.pri.img" from ide 0:2 **
Loading backup image (Image not found)
** Unable to read "linux.bak.img" from ide 0:2 **
And it is taking me to the BootMenu. I selected option 4 to Clear Configuration and the controller seems to restart the system but I still get the same error. I checked the LEDs status and Sys is Amber and Alarm is OFF which according to the documentation is a System Crash.
Interface management on WCL 5508 is assigned ip 192.168.255.200 and from a PC ( on different subnet), i can ping but cannot access https to WCL but From a PC ( in the same subnet) i can ping and https.
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller with Cisco Access Point (AIR-LAP1252G-E-K9), everything is running smoothly.How come i use my Access Points without Wireless LAN Controller, is there any possibility then which AP model would be suitable?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have two 4400 WLC's. We have around 20 access points in our network.If we assign controller1 as primary for half of the access points and controller 2 as primary for the other half, does this mean the association of the ap's indicate load balancing by the controllers. Does this mean wlc does load balancing as different ap's associate on different controllers. or does it only server as active-standby wlc.
View 2 Replies View Related