I am using WiSM in 6509, this WiSM has two controller with the same management IP subnet, I tired to upload the configuration to the TFTP server, but tried many times, one of the controller working well, but the other one always cannot reach the TFTP server, here is the debugger log for both controller
Failed one:
(KGV-WiSM-1) >debug transfer all a enable
(KGV-WiSM-1) >*TransferTask: Nov 10 16:26:08.735: RESULT_STRING: TFTP Config transfer starting.
*TransferTask: Nov 10 16:26:08.735: RESULT_CODE:1
*TransferTask: Nov 10 16:26:32.018: Locking tftp semaphore, pHost=172.16.102.107 pFilename=/KGV.aes
*TransferTask: Nov 10 16:26:32.018: Semaphore locked, now unlocking, pHost=172.16.102.107 pFilename=/KGV.aes
[code].....
why the controller can't upload the file, I can ping both controller and both controllers can ping to the TFTP server.
I was uploading a big 2gb file to my FTP server, it was all going good and I managed to upload the whole thing hassle free. After I finish I log out, and return about 3 hours later and try to log back in, to no avail.WinSCP gives me the following error:
I can't upload on file-sharing sites , I have tried to upload on wupload.com , fileserve.com , ****file.com and other sites and I click to upload but the progress don't start only stay in 0% I have waited 3 hours to upload a music with 150 MB and still in 0% progress .
I want to download the iOS update to my Cisco 2800 Series Routers and Cisco Catalyst 2960 Series Switches and leave them there till im ready to install them. Is this possible?
are there any free services where you can remote upload a file (zip file 25MB) and have it sent to me via email as an attachment. not a link where i have to download the file.
I want upgrade my switches 2960-24PC-L RAM: 128MB and Flash: 28MB, but in the web page of cisco I see that the requirement of hardware is RAM: 128MB and Flash: 32MB.
I download the IOS file and this file is only 11.2MB so my question is if I can upgrade the IOS because my flash is enough for upload the IOS file.
is it possible to upload a htm file to the router using a command prompt? the page is located at [URL] I want to change the option of Allow All to Restrict Access at 8pm every night?
I have an odd problem with the FTP server. I currently hooked up a 250GB portable HDD which is formatted in NTFS. A single folder in the root of the drive is mounted as the FTP server. Every time I upload a zip or far, the file comes out ends up being uploaded corrupt and double the original file size. I have used 2 FTP clients, using either ASCII or binary. No matter how I go about it, I can't make the files upload at the normal file size. Its not just archives, however, I tried an mp3 and it too got uploaded corrupt and double the size. I then downloaded the mp3 to try and play it but it didn't play in windows media player. However I loaded the 'corrupt mp3 into audacity and the file played like normal.
If i connected the latop to brand new out of the box ASA 5505 through consloe cable and i have a config file on this laptop from other ASA5505, is there anyway i can upload that config file into startup-config of this new ASA5505 through console cable, without using TFTP or FTP?
i recently bought a new Supervisor Engine 720 WS-SUP720-3B and 48-port 10/100/1000 RJ45 EtherModule WS-X6148A-GE-45AF. Once i fired it all up i got this error %C6KPWR-SP-4-UNSUPPORTED: unsupported module in slot 2, power not allowed: Unknown Card Type. the System image file is "bootdisk:s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXE6a.bin".
I have a 6509 up and running the same mods and working fine BUT the System image file is sup-bootdisk:s72033-ipservicesk9-mz.122-18.SXF7.bin. Is the boot image what is causing my isses?
I will upgrade my Wireless Controller Firmware 7.2.103.0 But I dont know WCS will support manager new controller firmware 7.2.103.0 ?is need NCS to manager? or WCS can be manager new controller firmware 7.2.103.0 all feature?
Now My hw is
Csico 6509 Sup 720 3b 12(33)SXJ My Controller is WiSM2 WiSM2 is 7.0.116.0 WCS is 7.0.172.0
I am getting an alarm on WCS where a one controller is down, unreachable from WCS, while the other one is reachable on the same WiSM module. Upon investigation, Status of controller is shown as "Oper-Up" for all controllers on Supervisory engine. Hardware platform is Cisco 6509-E.
WLAN Slot Controller Service IP Management IP SW Version Status ----+-----------+----------------+----------------+-----------+--------------- 2 1 192.167.10.11 172.19.47.65 6.0.196.0 Oper-Up 2 2 192.167.10.12 172.19.47.66 6.0.196.0 Oper-Up
However, I can not ping the managment interface of the down controller while the other controller management interface is pingable. All these interfaces are in the same VLAN.
ping 172.19.47.65 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.19.47.65, timeout is 2 seconds: ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Problem is fixed when I reboot the problematic Controller. However, this problem re-appears after some time. I am not able to figure out why controller is not able to ping its default-gateway which is an SVI interface on Supervisory card on the same chassis, and showing status UP/UP. Is it a software bug or backplane fault or any other reason ?
I have to upgrade our Wireless LAN Controller modules inside 2811 routers.I downloaded files from Cisco site, verified MD5 hashes and hoped it will be pretty easy.the problem is, that WLC is only capable of code upgrade via TFTP and that the image size is ~80MBTFTP transfer hangs at approximately 64MB at the exact same packet number[CODE]
I am getting very slow window file transfer speed (4 Mbps per second) between two connecting servers in Cisco 6509 switch. I have connect the two laptops in 6509 switch in same module using the same vlan and try to copy the files from one laptop to another and vice versa and got the same speed on 4 to 5 Mbps per second. Switch utilization is not more than 10% and both the laptops are connected in 1 Gbps full duplex.
I have checked by removing the gateway in both laptop but the output is same.
I am doing image upgrade on Catalyst 6509-E. During TFTP image transfer to sup-bootflash I always see !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!o!!!!!!!!!! "o" out of sequence packet. Although the image size seems to be correct at the end but there is always some "o" packets.
I am assuming not, but I haven't tried loading with the image after seeing this.
I need to take the backup of configuration file for WLAN Controller 4420, I tried all the possibilities given in the documentation but the backup fails, I have main confusion with the file name to be backedup, i am not able to findout the configuration filename any where even when i use CLI?
I just upgraded my cable modem from the Motorola Sufboard 5120 to the DOCSIS 3.0 capable 6120. Provisioned it with Comcast and their "Blast" service (supposedly it caps at 16 down, 2 up).
I had, in the past, used my desktop via N-format wireless (DWA-525 N-format PCI adapter and DIR-655 N-format router) to do a speedtest.net test. I was getting 16 down and 2 up (as advertised). When I switched to the 6120, I did a speedtest.net test again to see what kind of gains, if any, I was getting. Turns out, I was getting 20+ down (nice improvement) and 1/2 Mbps up (a fourth of what I used to be getting?). Called Comcast. They "sent signals" (don't they always?) and claimed that it fixed it. My download speeds increased a smidge (about 22), but my upload speeds were still .5. Called Motorola, they had me do a few things and now I get 1 Mbps up and 27 - 30 down via wireless.
My download speeds are great. I'm content with that. If I hardwire from the cable modem directly to a ****py old laptop, a speedtest.net shows 4 Mbps up. So why do I get such a high upload speed when hardwired (4 Mbps), but a fraction of it (1/4th) when wireless? I'm not using any other devices to sap bandwidth (some are connected -- i.e. another desktop, my Droid phone, etc., but aren't actively pulling packets). And why would it go from 2 up (on my desktop via wireless in the past) to only 1 up (via wireless now) when the setup is the same across the board (as best I recall) other than upgrading my cable modem.
Since I get 4 up when hardwired straight off the cable modem, I assume my DIR-655 is slowing me down somehow. How to pick up the pace a bit? I've already tried the standard "power cycling", etc.
Oh, and the reason I go wireless -- my cable modem and wireless router are in my game room in the basement for my PS3. My desktop computer (and the wife's desktop computer) are two floors directly above it in our "office". Signal strength is "excellent" ... always has been. And again, pretty much everything is the same.
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports x1 NAM x2 Sup720 Running 12.2(18)SXF3
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports x1 NAM x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
I am working on a Drupal site which is on a virtual server (the way it's been explained to me). I've been told I need to work with it through webdev. So I can copy a file off the server and onto my local machine. I make my edits and then try to upload it to the server. I get locked out with the message: Error 0x80070021: The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file. I have tried shutting down my code editor, opening and closing the connection, tried different methods of reaching the server (Cyberduck and through Window's map network feature) to no avail. What can I do?
I know that the 3600 series APs are not supported on the 4404 WLC. However, would the following scenario be supported? I would like to use the 4404 (software rel. 7.0) as a guest anchor with a 5508 (software release 7.2) as the foreign controller supporting series 3600 APs. I ask because the APs do not need to join the guest anchor.
We have a customer that have 2 5508 as primary and backup controller and a 4400 as an anchor controller. We plan to upgrade the 5508 to 7.3.112.0 and the 4400 is already 7.0.116.0. Will there be any issue if the anchor controller is not the same code as the foreign controller? Do I also have to upgrade the acnhor controller to 7.0.240.0?
We are trying to navigate the waters in choosing between a in-house, controller-based, wireless network solution or a cloud-based solution. We have been presented with the usual suspects in cloud-based (Aerohive, Meracki, etc) and with Cisco (5500) and Aruba on the other side. We are a multi-campus organization with approx. 200 APs.Any hard reasons why go with a controller-based vs. cloud-based solution? If we must keep the conversation limited to Cisco, why go Meracki over Cisco's WLC solutions or vise versa?
I am looking to configure a wired and wireless guest network. I have industrial barcode scanners that connect to one SSID and then there is the business network on the office SSID (no vlan seperation for these devices just different SSIDs). There is not really a need to seperate the business network from the scanners in any case. However, there are needs for a guest network and this needs to be seperated. At the bare minumum I would like to have the wireless guest network. Here is what I have: 2125 Wireless LAN controller managing 18 LAPs (1 indoor and 17 outdoors)Cisco Cat 2950 switches (2 x 24 port and soon to be replaced with 2 x 48 port 2960's with 802.1x capability) Sonicwall TZ210 firewallOne existing wired and trunked vlan for PLC infrastructure. One ESXi hosting Windows server guests (soon to be 2 with vMotion) The reason for the wired guest access network is tp prevent anyone from plugging into the wall jack in the office with thier home laptops or anyone else from being on the same subnet as our domain machines. Granted they would be unathenticaed but there would be no layer 2 seperation and that is what I think would be best.
How would I go about doing this on the wireless controller without an anchor controller just using my existing hardware? I would like to have the Guest SSID only availible in the front office. Is it possible to offer a guest network while still servicing the business network SSID on the same access point? Then might I be able to have the guest network be treated as it should at the controller? However this might present another issue altogether as the guest traffic will be over the same wire as the business SSID until it hits the controller for management.
I recently switched from wireless connection to a normal one because i had speed issues with my internet but since then i can download just fine, even faster than before, but my computer seems to be unable to upload any data on the internet. I mean i go on skype and talk to my friends but when i have to upload a .jpg or i want to send somebody a message with bigger content than 5 KB it just keeps uploading but does nothing. I searched for virus and even disabled my firewall but it doesn't seem to work.
I need to upload IOS c7200-advipservicesk9-mz.124-15.T16.binin 7206 NPE 400 router , As per cisco recommendation router should have DRAM : 256 MB ; Flash : 64I think my router contain only DRAM= 128 MB but not sure.
how much DRAM & Flash it contains.
Router1#sh versionCisco Internetwork Operating System SoftwareIOS (tm) 7200 Software (C7200-IK9S-M), Version 12.3(1a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.Compiled Thu 05-Jun-03 20:58 by dchihImage text-base: 0x60008954, data-base: 0x61E0C000
I would like to upload the signed certification to LMS 4.2.2.After checking ( 4. option ) I choosed the 6. option and press "y" for questions and the perl script is freezing.
Have existing 1811 router works fine. Purchased 2911 configured same as 1811. Download speed same as the 1811 the upload on the 1811 is 60 mb. the upload on the 2911 is 2 mb.
I have 50GB storage on box.com and DropBox.So i just want to back up my files there.Web interface just sucks and offers no customization.Their desktop programs are only to sync, and dont do much to just upload.I dont wanna sync folders, i just want to upload files!
