We have configured following commands on switch to fallback to local Vlan if both radius server (policy persona's) is found dead. For test purpose we shutdown both servers (policy persona's) but fallback didn't work. We have 3750 switch running image 12.2(55)SE6 having following configuration.We do not know whether we configured switch in proper way or do we need to modify it. [code]
View 5 RepliesI have ACS 5.1 configured to authenticate users based on Active Directory. I have configured wired 802.1x too, with machine authentication enabled on ACS.When I login with credentials that exist in AD, it works fine. Then I configured Windows Authentication to ask for credentials (popup window). But I experience network disconnection when I login with a local account even though I entered correct AD credentials.I want to do the following: for an account that exist on the machine being authenticated (non-AD account), ACS should check its local database and reply with authentication success if it finds it, so the user is granted network connectivity.I heard about Identity Sequence in ACS. But I still don't see the right configuration,
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am testing a Aironet1040 in AP setting. During the process of trial run of GUI on this 1040, I saw a local radius setting and it can set something like FAST-EAP.
Is it after using this setting (plus other steps), I can set this Aironet1040 as an AP with the capability of simple Radius Server for authentication purpose?
If not by this way as I mentioned above, can Aironet1040 be set as simple Radius Server? This is because if it can set as simple Radius Server and not need to work with an external Radius Server, that would be great and save trouble to find another server.
When I upgraded my cisco 3750 ME from c3750me-i5k91-mz.122-46.SE to c3750me-i5k91-mz.122-58.SE2.bin all commands for radius disappeared? However, there are a lot of commands to ldap which was missing in the previous version. Seems as if the radius has disappeared and been replaced by ldap?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are setting up a new office and I am trying to get RADIUS setup for authentication to my switches and routers. Currently I am working on a 3750 running IOS 15 and getting hung on what I think on something small. I have attached my Microsoft NPS Network Policy. Below is my IOS config:
aaa group server radius corp-radius
server 10.15.10.20 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
!
aaa authentication login default group corp-radius local
aaa authentication login radius-localfallback group corp-radius enable
aaa authorization exec default group radius
[code]....
is there a way to assigen a QoS service policy via Radius to an Caltalyst 4500/3750 Switchport?
in detail, we would like to assign this policy
policy-map SET_EF class class-default set dscp ef
to an interface. All traffic should be marked with a defined DSCP value.
This works find when doing it statically with
interface FastEthernet2/1 service-policy input SET_EF
but we would need to assign such a policy via Radius during the 802.1x Authentication. different users should get differnt policies. We use Cisco ACS 5.2 as Radius Server and there actually is a field for that in the Authorization Profile Common Tasks Configuration. in detail, this uses the cisco-av-pair "sub-policy-In=<policy name>" attribute to assign a service policy to an NAS.
we found also two other attributes "sub-qos-policy-in" and "ip:sub-qos-polcy-in" for that. CCO says that "ip:sub-qos-polcy-in" works with Catalyst 65k [URL]
unfortunately this seems to not work on Catalyst 45k and 37k.
In the ACS Logs we can see that these attributes are attached to the Radius Reply, but unfortunately they are ignored by the switch.
it is interesing that when entering "show aaa attributes" on the Catalyst 45k, these attributes are displayd - so for my understanding the switch should understand these attibutes (?)
4503-E#sh aaa attributes AAA ATTRIBUTE LIST: Type=1 Name=disc-cause-ext Format=Enum Type=2 Name=Acct-Status-Type Format=Enum
[Code]......
When the users connect their laptop they are getting a authentication prompt but the switch is not changing the VLANs on the port after successful authentication.Below are the logs on the switch
Jan 28 2013 17:21:32.417 CST: RADIUS: Framed-MTU [12] 6 1500
Jan 28 2013 17:21:32.417 CST: RADIUS: Called-Station-Id [30] 19 "E4-D3-F1-0B-C6-0A"
Jan 28 2013 17:21:32.417 CST: RADIUS: Calling-Station-Id [31] 19 "84-8F-69-A8-BD-1D"
Jan 28 2013 17:21:32.417 CST: RADIUS: EAP-Message [79] 45
[code]....
Lets say I have the following topology.
DataCenter<---Etherchannel(2)-->BuildingB<---Etherchannel(2)--->BuildingA
There arer 3 stacks of 3750 at each building. The core switch/router in our network is at location B. The way it was originally setupis every L3 device has an ip address for each lan. So let's say we have VLAN 200 withnetwork 192.168.200.0/24. The DataCenter would be assigned (192.168.200.3), Building B would be assigned (192.168.200.1), and Building A would be assigned (192.168.200.2). I'm configuring the DC and BA to be L2 only and Building B to be the only real router in the network besides a few ASAs. When I ran a 'no ip address' on the vlan interface on Building A, the internet connectivity for 192.168.200.0 dies, but local connectivity is fine. After doing some research and troubleshooting, I found out that if I set the next hop on the ASA for the local networks for an IP address on building B everything works perfectly.
The way the routes on the ASA are setup for local networks are as follows.
All local networks have ip route localnetwork mask x.110.215.17. This address is the IP address of the inside interface on the ASA. Now, when I kill the IP address on the vlan interface on Building A internet connectivity goes down, while the next hop is still pointed to this address, BUT if I give it a next hop of the vlan interface ip address on B everything works fine. Now, I can easily fix this, I was just wondering why this is happening?
I'm trying to use 802.1x to authenticate clients on my network with dynamic VLAN assignment from RADIUS. We have IP-Phones(powered by PoE) that only supports EAP-MD5, and we would rather use MAB(it also uses LLDP-MED for some settings) to authenticate the phones using the MAC-range from the phones vendor. The following scenario works perfect:Connect the phone and let it boot up(takes a while) and authenticate with MAB.Connect a computer in the phones data-port and let it authenticate with 802.1x(or fail and reach guest-vlan) However, the following scenario doesn't work:The computer is already connected to the phoneThe phone is then connected to the switch What happends now is that the computer is authenticated using 802.1x before the phone boots up and get's authenticated with MAB. When the phone is ready, it's authenticated with MAB and everything works. However, after a short period(let's say a minute), using `debug authentication all`, we see a "NEW LL MAC: phones mac" message(which is weird since the mac has already been MAB-authenticated), and then we are unable to contact the phone using ping. When I check `show mac address-table` it has now moved the mac from `Port Gi 0/12` to `Port Drop`. However, if I check `show mab interface Gi 0/12` or `show authentication sessions` it lists the phones-mac as `mab auth sucess `.why the first scenario works, and not the second?
The switch is a 3560E PoE 24p with IOS 12.2.58SE2. Sample of the switch-config: network-policy profile 1voice vlan 90!interface GigabitEthernet0/12switchport mode accessnetwork-policy 1authentication control-direction inauthentication event fail retry 1 action authorize vlan 60authentication event server dead action authorize vlan 60authentication event no-response action authorize vlan 60authentication event server alive action reinitializeauthentication host-mode multi-domainauthentication order mab dot1xauthentication priority mab dot1xauthentication port-control autoauthentication periodicauthentication violation replacemabdot1x pae authenticatordot1x timeout tx-period 5dot1x max-reauth-req 1spanning-tree portfast!Btw, when we tried authenticating the phones using 802.1x too (EAP-MD5), there are NO problems in any of the scenarios. However, we want to use MAB instead of 802.1x to avoid the requirement of configuring the phones with a username and password. The RADIUS response was the same when using 802.1x as it is with MAB for the phones (including device-traffic-class=voice AV-pair).
getting a Cisco WLC to work with MS NPS server? We've done it before albeit with differnt code versions.
I have a Cisco 5508 WLC running 7.0.116.0 code hosting a WLAN configured for WPA2 with 802.1x for authentication. I have two Windows NPS servers configured as the RADIUS servers for EAP-TLS authentication. Via debug info on the WLC I can see the 802.1x handshake take place with the wireless client and the WLC as well as a successful transmission of an Authentication Packet from the WLC to one of the RADIUS servers. However on the WLC I see repeated RADIUS server x.x.x.x:1812 deactivated in global list and on the NPS server I'm seeing event log errors indicating "The Network Policy Server discarded the request for a user" along with the pertinent auth request info that I would expect the NPS server to receive from the WLC. Based on the WLC debug info I'm never actually getting to the EAP-TLS certificate authentication part. It seems the NPS servers don't like the format of the initial RADIUS authentication request coming from the WLC and so don't respond whcih in turn casues to WLC to switch to the other NPS server which produces the same issue.
Is there any way to set up our ISE to provide Radius instead of acting as Radius Proxy? In our Company we use ACS 4.2 to provide AAA via Tacacs+ and this works proper with all our Cisco-Switches. Now we are testing the ISE 1.1.1 as NAC-Solution.
I know how to set up the ISE as 'Radius Proxy', configuring the Sequences and Policies, but till now we are using only Tacacs+ for AAA. The current version of ISE does not support Tacacs+ and I don't want to set up a Radius-enviroment in ACS if not necessary. Somewhere ( I think the specs) I read, the ISE is a merge of ACS and NAC. So in my Opinion there should be a way to provide AAA via Radius on the ISE without ACS and without 'Radius Proxy'.
I have a 3750 switch stack running version 12.2(53)SE2 IPBASEK9-M. I have dot1x configured on the switch and have a Windows 7 PC connected with 802.1x configured on the interface. I see the EAPoL start message from the PC, but I don't see any RADIUS packets from the switch to the RADIUS server. I have a simple dot1x config just to try to get it working prior to adding additional features such as guest-vlan...
Config and debug file attached.
I don't know if the ip dhcp snooping and arp inspection configuration is causing an issue with this or not. I see the EAPoL packet received on the switch as seen in the debug attachment, but I still never see the RADIUS packet. I did set both to trust on the interface but still the same outcome. I can't disable it since it is a production switch with a test interface.
Wondering if it's possible to send a VSA from my radius server to my ASA-5505 that will instruct the ASA to use one of several split tunnel lists I have created, based on the user name supplied in the Radius request.For example, I can send a VSA of "ip:inacl#1=permit ..." and the ASA will dynamically create an access-list for that user.Is there a similar VSA for split tunnel?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI was just wondering if it was possible to turn a cisco 887 Router into a RADIUS Server. What i wanted to do was setup my wireless AP to authenticate using RADIUS, but didn't want to setup another server for the purpose.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using CiscoSecure ACS v4.2 appliance, in there any way that RADIUS logs upload to FTP server because it has limitation to store RADIUS logs.
View 15 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure ACS 5.4 as radius server for network access (PPP connections).In monitoring and reports the users have green color , but the clients cannot send data. Auth method is CHAP/MD5.
Allowed protocols are set to CHAP and PAP only.
I can authenticate between our MDS 9216i switch and RSA radius server but my role does not come across. The logged in user is a network-operator not admin. In the AV Pair i have defined shell:role*network-admin but it doesnt seem to come across
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a couple of ACS 5.2 configured as active and backup and I am doing dot 1x authentication using these servers . I have configured the switch with the bellow configuration.
radius-server host 10.0.10.15 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646
radius-server host 10.0.10.16 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646
radius-server key 7 aaaaaaaaaaaaaa
please help to understand what will happen in switch
1) in case of primary failure
2)in case if primary returns alive .
I am trying to install Radius server for a cisco 2801 router. I am not able to configure it properly.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI tried to authenticate and authorized Nokia/checkpoint Nortel/AD3 and Nortel 5510 platform using an 4.1 for windows ACS. the ACCESS-REQUEST is well processed bi the radius server wich send ACCESS-ACCEPT to the AAA Client (ie NORTEL or NOKIA), but i'have got privilege access denied on the Client side. RADIUS IETF Dictionnary is used for every device. all others Cisco Devices authenticate and are well authorized.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have several ASA 5510 firewalls which are being used as VPN gateways.RSA SecurID is the authentication mechanism using native SDI connectivity. No ACS server is being used.Is it possible to assign user Group and other attributes (such as ACL), using the SecurID RADIUS server? I know this is what the Cisco ACS is for, but is it possible using the RSA RADIUS server itself?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI am configuring TACACS Authentication on Cisco 3550 switch .It has Version 12.2(25)SEA IOS image. A strange thing is happening, whenver I am enabling AAA new-model on this switch, and then after enabling I see ruuning-config . It shows me this
tacacs-server host x.x.x.x
tacacs-server host x.x.x.x
no tacacs-server directed-request
tacacs-server key 7 xxxxxx
radius-server source-ports 1645-1646
* included here to hide the specific information I dint specified any RADIUS server , why it is showing me radius-server source-ports 1645-1646 after enabling AAA New-Model As soon as i give "no aaa new-model", this parameter also vanishes. I think this is the only reason I am not able to do tacacs authentication.
I have a customer who used to own a 3750 with a older version of IOS. The switch he had used a three year old version of IOS which allowed him to browse to the switch IP and manage it via HTTP without entering a password at all. Now that he has a replacement switch with a new ver of IOS (since the previous switch died). We slapped the config on from the old switch but no matter what we do (understanding that new http aaa authentication commands were added) we cant get this thing to let him in without prompting him for a password. I understand this was an insecure config to begin with so I shouldn't be advocating using it in the first place, but this is what the customer wants.Basically what I'm trying to figure out is are we banging our heads into the wall for nothing as the "ip http server" will not allow an authentication method of "none" anyway? None of the offical documentation I have read for the http aaa authentication cmds shows this as an example nor have I found any blog posts on how to do it ether. Perhaps Cisco removed this by design.
Here is the config:
aaa new model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authentication enable default none
aaa authentication login none none
ip http server
ip http authentication aaa login-authentication none
[code]....
I have a new ACS 5.3 configure and a ASA5550 to authenticate VPN users using a remote LDAP server. Once I try to authenticate the users with the ACS it gives me the error message "22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s)."
I checked out the documentation and have already configure the Identity store sequences to redirect everything to the LDAP server, I also did the Bind test and it says that is ok, but I still have the same problem.
I validated the Access Policies Menu, and tried to create a new Service Selection Rules, but whet I get to the option of modifying the Identity option I get the error: "This System Failure occurred: {0}. Your changes have not been saved.Click OK to return to the list page. " and I'm not able to modify the identity, not in this new option I created, nor in the ones already created in the ACS.
I have two ACS v 5.2 (primary and secundary) and some users are in the internal stor and the others are in the AD.The local site topology is like this:
PC - AP - WLC - ACS - AD
Authentication method is PEAP(EAP-MSCHAPv2) and all user have the certificate company installed. The OS in the client users is Windows 7.Users was working fine but some users reports intranet disconnections. I see in the ACS log many "22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s)." and "24415 User authentication against Active Directory failed since user's account is locked out" alarms.I believed it was because user wasn´t in the AD data base, but some times the same user is authenticated successfull and other i see the "22056...." or "24415...." alarms.
I switched the role for ACS primary to works as secundary and we see the same alarms.
After completing an AD upgrade to 2008r2 I've had my fill of roaming profiles. I want to change all users back so that their profile is on their pc. Of course ideally I'd like this to occur with the user affected as little as possible. Most users are still winxp but some win7 machines too.
View 18 Replies View RelatedI am transitioning from RADIUS auth to local auth and i don't want to hassle everyone to change in one hit.If i can get auth requests to look in the WLC local net db first and if not found try RADIUS then this is what i am after! You can easily do it with web auth but doesnt seem so easy via WPA2 method.
View 1 Replies View RelatedMGMcc solved my set up problem with my KDL-32ex713 which (i've swapped for a new model - its a long story). I used exactly the same ip addresses for the set up on this KDL-373x524 and got messages "wireless device found, local access failed, internet access failed". As my router and pc are the same as last time why the set up doesn't work this time and what I should do?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have two networks at two sites with a dot1q trunk between the two L3 switches at both sites (no routers involved)
SITE A - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.10.50.0/24
SITE B - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.20.50.0/24
I would like to extend the SITE A VLAN to SITE B so that I can move hosts from SITE A to SITE B without needing to change their IP address but the vlan ID is already in use. Obviously the easy solution is to change the VLAN ID for one or other of the sites but both sites contain hosts that run 24/7. Is there a way to join two VLANs with different IDs together.So for example I create a new VLAN 60 at SITE B and associate it with VLAN 50 at SITE A.
when I ping another workstation on my local network I should get back it's local IP but instead I am getting an ip address that resolves to somewhere in Germany! In fact if I ping any bogus name, I mean anything, it returns this same address 62.116.181.25. If I shut down my cable modem then everything resolves correctly. And yes I have DNS relay enabled because it seems to be the only way to get the workstations to resolve external sites correctly.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a low bandwith (15-20 Mbit/s) to the ASA from our Client vlan. If i connect the Client to the same vlan as the ASA is, the bandwith (90 Mbit/s) is good.
Here are the Layer 3 Design:
Client -> vlan 2 - Switch - vlan 7 -> vlan 1 - ASA 5505 -> ISP
The Layer 2 Design:
Client -> Gig2/0/13 - Switch - Gig4/0/43 -> Eth0/1 ASA5505 -> ISP
IP Address:
Client: 172.16.2.10Vlan2: 172.16.2.1Vlan7: 172.16.7.1ASA: 172.16.7.2
I assuming the switch has a problem with routing ?It is a stacked Switch with following members:
switch 1 provision ws-c3750g-12sswitch 2 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 3 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 4 provision ws-c3750x-48
And we have following error message in the log from the switch:
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX:
One or more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded I first get the idea that the switch is overloaded with router traffic. Thats why i assuming i have to check the sdm templates, but i'm not sure if this resolves the issue.
Here are the relevant config:
ASA Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet4/0/43description ASA-inside LANswitchport access vlan 7switchport mode accessspanning-tree portfast
Client Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1switchport access vlan 2switchport mode accessswitchport port-securityswitchport port-security aging time 2switchport port-security violation restrictswitchport port-security aging type inactivitymacro description cisco-desktopspanning-tree portfastspanning-tree bpduguard enable
[code]...
Tech Support Guy System Info Utility version 1.0.0.2
OS Version: Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium, Service Pack 1, 64 bit
Processor: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU E5300 @ 2.60GHz, Intel64 Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 10
Processor Count: 2
RAM: 6134 Mb
Graphics Card: Intel(R) G33/G31 Express Chipset Family, 256 Mb
Hard Drives: C: Total - 463782 MB, Free - 396406 MB; D: Total - 13154 MB, Free - 1850 MB;
Motherboard: PEGATRON CORPORATION, Benicia
Antivirus: McAfee Anti-Virus and Anti-Spyware, Updated and Enabled
I recently bought a Sony Bravia HD TV with wireless internet capabilities.When I try to connect to my wireless internet. The TV finds our wireless router name, but when we try to finally connect wirelessly it gives the following message: TV wi-fi found, local access failed and network access failed. The router we have is a Actiontech PK500.On the TV we have three differant ways for the tv to locate the router they are by scanning, the WPS button and by entering the WPS pin. We've tried all three and got the above message.
i'm trying to setup a local DNS server to manage small office local-only domain names for our servers. i have the DNS working properly (resolving local machines and using the ISP dns if it can't). so i put the DNS server ip into the "Static DNS 1" field of the router settings. the other 2 static dns fields are empty.the problem is that the router is still using the ISP dns server as the primary and my local dns server as the secondary. i verify this in two places. first, if i go to the "status" tab, DNS 1 shows the ISP server while DNS 2 shows my local DNS server. secondly, if i connect to the wireless device with a linux-based machine, the /etc/resolv.conf file shows the nameserver ips in the same incorrect order.
View 1 Replies View Related