Cisco Firewall :: 6513 - Local User And Privilege Levels
Jul 14, 2011
I have FWSM's in Cat 6513's. I have a need to be able to session from the switch to the FWSM by using default account (not local user), at privilege level 15 I further have a need to allow a user read only access by ssh'n into the FWSM...
I believe I need to setup a local user, at, say privilege level 5, assign the show command only to privilege level 5, then set the authorization command for that user. So, i think my command sets are as follows to accomplish this:
username <username> password <pw> priv 5
priv command level 5 mode exec command show
aaa auth ssh console LOCAL
aaa auth enable console LOCAL
aaa authorization command LOCAL
I think, that this will allow the user at privilege 5 to run only the show command and only by SSH to the FWSM while allow the priv 15 level default login to continue to function properly.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 15, 2012
i am running NX-OS image n5000-uk9.5.1.3.N1.1.bin on the nexus 5020 platform.i have configured authorization with tacacs+ on ACS server version 5.2 with fall back to switch local database.a user test with priv 15 is craeted on ACS server, password test2 everything works fine, until i create the same username on the local database with privilege 0. ( it doesnt matter if the user in local database was created before user in ACS or after ) e.g.: username test password test1 role priv-0 (note passwords are different for users in both databases)
after i create the same user in local database with privilege 0,if i try to connect to the switch with this username test and password defined on ACS, i get only privilege 0 authorization, regardless, that ACS server is up and it should be primary way to authenticate and authorizate the user.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2011
In CLI we have users log in at priv 1 and use "enable" to increase privilege and do configurations. This allows "accounting" of command history. On the AIR-AP1121G-A-K9 (12.3(8)JED1) I cannot duplicate this for http login.
I can log in as a user at priv 1. When I try to go to a privileged link like "Security" I get prompted for a second login/pw. Nothing works here unless I have a second user defined at priv 15 and enter that login/pw. The problem is - that login/pw can be used to log in via http in the first place which bypasses accounting of the actual user. It also allows login to the CLI at priv 15 which I cannot permit.
username test1 secret 5 abcdxxx
username test2 privilege 15 secret 5 efghxxx
enable secret 5 ijklxxx(code)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2011
I want to create a user who only has access to "router>" prompt on the CLI. this user should not be able to do enable command and by no other means be able to go to global configuration mode. I know the command router(conf t)# username ABC privilege 1 password ABCPASS, but even with this command, this user gets privilege 15 access.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2011
I want to create a local user in my Cisco ASA 5520 to allow the user to use the ASDM in Read-Only mode. I want the user to view the Dashboard only.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 15, 2013
We have more than 50 devices handling by PI 1.2 (testing) I like to know how to do configuration archiving with user who doesn't have write privilege.
I tried like this.
username john privilege 6 password cisco privilege exec level 6 show running-config
(result) show run --> blank
I tried this user with one of switch in PI 1.2. It did not do configuration backup
username inout password inout username inout privilege 15 autocommand show running-config
(result) once logged in, it automatically showed running-config. However when I tried with PI 1.2 with this user (inout). I couldn't do configuration back.
reference [URL]
create certain user with read-only privilege while PI 1.2 is able to do configuration archiving ?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2011
I can't seem to enable in ASA with a non-15 privilege level user configured in ACS 4.2 (tacacs).When I enable in IOS device, it enables and "show privilege" shows level 10 as expected. ACS should be configured correctly as it works fine with IOS. User is not set with explicit settings. Group is set with "max enable level" 15 and "shell exec priv level" 15. The enable password is set to the internal ACS PAP password. Works fine in IOS.When I enable in ASA, it fails to enable, and ACS log says "Tacacs+ enable privilege too low". I suspect that ASA tries to enable into level 15 explicitely. If I try to issue "enable 10" command in ASA it says: Enabling to privilege levels is not allowed when configured for AAA authentication. Use 'enable' only. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2011
having LMS 4.0.1 is it possible to authenticate user on a group base and assign different privilege to different groups?. The user's group are available in the LDAP server.Do I have to use a TACACS/RADIUS server between the Ciscoworks LMS and the LDAP repository?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2012
what is the minimun privilege level to assign at username account on ASA 5505 to grant the access with AnyConnect?
username ... privilege ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2013
I´m looking for the best configuration to restrict a user to read-only. The restriction should be configured via CLI not TACACS+.
-Hardware: 3750 (probably not interesting for this question)
-Oldest IOS: 12.2(53)SE1
The user should be allowed to: see the running-configurationtrigger all kinds of show-commandsping and traceroute from the device.The user should not be allowed to: upload/delete/rename files on the flash-memoryget into level 15 (not sure if I can avoid this)all other commands despite those from level 1 and those specified above.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2011
I have a 3845 router (12.4(13r)T10) with ZBF. On my LAN there is a user who need to access a remote IPSEC VPN server. He is able to get the tunnel but afterwards he cannot connect to any service in the remote LAN. As I'm using zbf I think that I should inspect traffic from my LAN zone to EXT zone, There is a document that describe a solution to this? What IP adressess should I use?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 3, 2011
I have a 3845 router (12.4(13r)T10) with ZBF. On my LAN there is a user who need to access a remote IPSEC VPN server. He is able to get the tunnel but afterwards he cannot connect to any service in the remote LAN. As I'm using zbf I think that I should inspect traffic from my LAN zone to EXT zone
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2012
I would like to create a additional user vpn on a 55010 where the user authenticates with the firewall and not the radius server.This user should NOT be able to log on to the firewall, but only be able to authenticates with the vpn client.I'm correct that the command "username abc123 password abc234 privilege 0" ?Also for this remote vpn how to I make sure the user only authencates with this password?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2013
I have a DMZ (50) from where I need to allow some protocols to inside zone (level 0). I am doing that with ACL, but after having done that the implicit security level rule to lower level (outsite level 0) is not working anymore, I guess by the implicity deny after the acl. I'd need allow traffic to the outside zone from DMZ, as well as the inspect traffic from the inside one. Is there anyway to have both ACL and Security levels?
If not, what do I need to do to just allow some protocols going to higher level and leave the higher-to-lower traffic inspected allowed, same schema as we have with security levels.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2011
Is it possible to configure the ASA to:
log syslog informational to one host
and
log syslog critical to a different host
It seems that the ASA allows you to only specify 1 logging severity level for all syslog hosts..
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2012
I have added Cisco 5520 into the Cisco ACS 4.2 Tacacs Server. I can login to the user mode, but I can't login to the privilege mode ? though I have put enable password, but when I use that password, no joy ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2012
we have a chassis 6513-E and a module WS-X6748-GE-TX, I'd like to know if could I put this module in any slot, since the documentation from Cisco says that any slot from a chassis 6500-E Series can support this module. And then in the documentation of WS-X6748-GE-TX says that this module is not compatible in the slots 1-8 of the 6513 chassis, only from 9th to 13th slots, in those slots from the 6513-E we already have 4x WS-X6748-GE-TX, and we'd like to know if could we put the module in the rest of the slots. The 6513, and 6513-E is kind of confusing.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2012
I want to have a local user in ACS that is permitted to login to routers. I have TACACS with AD already working but cannot get a local user to work. I used to do this in ACS 4.x.I created a user in the internal identity store.I tried configuring a policy to allow this users TACACS authentication multiple ways to no avail. I cannot find a config example doc and cannot figure it out from the user guide as the documention is sorely lacking.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2012
I want to limit a local user's access to some specific groups of devices. In Role Management Setup I can define which service they can access, but I want to restrict it to a specific device as well.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2009
We are using an ASA 5510 and remote access (SSL VPN) using the AnyConnect client.
Is it possible to display a user message when a user connects using the AnyConnect client, matching a specific dynamic access policy? Can the message be displayed when the action is "Continue" rather than "Terminate"? I can't seem to get this to work and wondered if there was a LUA function to do this.
We have a DAP which gives a restricted ACL when the user's anti-virus is out of date, and I wanted to notify the user to update their anti-virus and reconnect.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2012
A quick query regarding setting up a local user on a Cisco 2811. I have setup a few users as they need to have remote VPN access into our edge router, this works fine and I'm happy with it. The only thing is that when they come into the office they now have logins to get onto the router, they do not have the enable secret so they can't exactly do a lot (plus I've created them with privilege 0 which cuts a few extra CLI options) but I'd rather not allow them access at all if possible.If they weren't on DHCP then I could setup an access-list but this isn't really an option, I could also set me up statically and deny everyone else, but yet again I'd rather not.Is there anyway to restrict telnet/ssh access based on user alone? So when they put in their login it just boots them out. I could setup something like RADIUS (and therefore remove the local users completely) but I think it will be a bit over kill for the sake of a couple of users.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2011
how I can assign a static IP to a user in ACS 5.2. I am able to do it in ACS 4.2, but I don't see the same options under 5.2. General idea is that users authenticate from our VPN appliance via RADIUS, and upon authentication, their static IP is passed back to the VPN device. I can attach an arbitrary field to my local users by going to System Administration -> Configuration -> Dictionaries -> Identity -> Internal Users, but how do I get that IP address passed back when the user is authenticated via Radius?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2012
We are wanting to use local database users to authenticate our SSH connections to our 6500 cores.
We have added the usernames and password into the 6500 using
username anameduser password astrongpassword or username anameduser secret astrongpassword
We where expecting the commands to be the same as other iOS devices example C3750 we would add.
Line vty 0 4 login local
And this would allow us to use the local user database to authenticate our ssh sessions.
The login local commands are not availbe on the 6500s and we have not found any documentation on how to impliment a local database for this purpose except in a CatOS 6500.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2010
I know the way to configure the ASA to fallback to LOCAL authentication, if the Radius server is not available.
Now we would like to authenticate the local users, if the user is not found in the AD. Is this possible and how can I configure this with the new policies? I tested it with "dropping" when the user is not found in the AD, but then the Radius server will be marked as "dead" and the other AD users can't login for a given period. Maybe we can configure the dead time to 0, but this is not as nice it could be.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2011
How i can use both LDAP Authentication and local user database to authenticate the remote vpn clinet in asa 5505?
when i try to do the things either only one method is working both are not working at a time.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2011
I have a console access to a Cisco 4500 series router over Cisco access server, which has following "line con 0" configuration:
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2011
I am trying to configure an ASA 5505 running 8.3 to allow a priv 15 local user to be able to ssh into the device and be placed into priv 15 mode without having to execute the enable command and type the enable password.Right now when you log in as a priv 15 user you still have to execute the enable command and type the enable password to get to priv 15.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 3, 2012
I'm a bit new to Cisco and i find this AAA a bit confusing..I've turend on AAA by:aaa new-model
Can I use this "default" list for WebVPN ? And what would be a different if i create new "sslvpn" list..Also when I'll be creating user for VPN remote access.. that user will also exist in local database and have access to router via SSH?Because the research I've done it doesn't seem you can group users in different "aaa groups" e.g. user admin belongs under "admin" aaa group which can do ssh to router, users for VPN can only do remote VPN access and not SSH and login into router.i saw ASA has some attribute for users called remote-user
•admin, in which users are allowed access to the configuration mode. This option also allows a user to connect via remote access.
•nas-prompt, in which users are allowed access to the EXEC mode.
•remote-access, in which users are allowed access to the network.
But i can't find this option in IOS on my 1900 Series ISR router.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2013
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 that I've setup with an SSL VPN. This is for personal use, and I therefore don't have need for anything more than local authentication. [code]
I'd like to have one profile/policy where I only encrypt data going to my split-tunnel ACL, and I'd like to have one profile/policy where I encrypt all traffic.
The issue ive been fighting is - it doesn't seem like its possible to associate more than one group policy per user. If it IS possible - can you tell me how I associate both groups to my local account?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2013
One of our customer , where there 2 6509 switch , one is Core_sw1 and other is Core_sw2 , catering about 32 Vlan , and HSRP in running for all Vlans , till here no problem , now there internet Router which having one Internet link , which connected and configured on Core_sw1 in a way that one interface of Core_sw1 is given Public IP and there is vlan 85 which internet vlan and vlan 85 ip are natted with that public IP with one simple static route given toward internet router , this is how internet is working ok.
Now i have configured vlan 85 in hsrp as all other are , how can give redundancy to vlan 85 user , that if Core_sw1 get down , internet traffic can get out through Core_sw2.using same internet router with single internet link .i am not talking of ISP redundancy , but Vlan 85 in Core_sw1 goes down , other Core_sw2 will server internet.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
I need your opinion regarding moving of IDSM -2 and FWSM Module from 7613 to 6513 chassis.Currently these two modules are in 7613 and we are not using either of them now we have to configure them in 6513 chassis. As you can see from the figure that traffic of all 3 core router i.e 7613 go to 6513 - to proxy ISA 2004 - 6513 - to Internet.
There are also some network attached with 6513 and we want to move both of modules to 6513 so that NetworkA/B/C/D/E which are attached to 6513 can also be configured for FWSM and IDSM -2.
I have a query regarding this migration:Do we need license for these two modules again for 6513 chassis?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2012
I am unable to remove an access list. Currently this this access list contains 4 lines of remarks. I was unsure if I was entering the command correctly and now I have 4 lines of "trash" that needs to be removed.
Symptoms:
The "sh run" command shows that I have access-list 100 defined.
The "sh access-list" returns nothing.
Process I have tried: config t
no access-list 100
no access-list remark Test (just trying anything at this point)
clear configure access-list 100 (This returns "Invalid input detected at '^' marker" and the '^' is under the 'e' in clear.)
So the "clear configure" command is not working. The "no access-list" commands does not return an error but does not remove anything.
What step am I missing? Let me know if I can provide any more information.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2013
As I am planning to deploy FWSM Module in 6513 chassis and need your valuable comments regarding the strategy that I create for this deployment.Initially (Without FWSM Deployment) all internal traffic moves in this manner.
7613(G9/5) --> 6513(G10/4) --> ISA (Internal Int.) [NATing] (ISA External Int.) -->
6513(G9/45){This is L2 port in VLAN 164} --> VLAN 164(SVI Int,IP:192.168.40.20) -->
(G9/44){This is L2 port in VLAN 164}--> ASR 1002 -->Router -->Internet.
As you can see from the Image that I am planning to deploy FWSM in transparent mode in between VLAN 164(SVI Int,IP:192.168.40.20) -[FWSM here]->(G9/44){This is L2 port in VLAN 120}By putting Inside interface of FWSM in VLAN 164 and create a new VLAN on 6513 i.e VLAN 120 and put G9/44 in it.know will this configuration will work regarding the passing of traffic through FWSM ? what improvement I have to made in this design. You can check the attached diagram.
View 3 Replies
View Related