Cisco Routers :: RV042 / Getting Message 400 Bad Request?
Feb 6, 2012I am getting the message '400 bad request' whenever I try to backup the configuration or export a certificate under Certificate Management.
View 1 RepliesI am getting the message '400 bad request' whenever I try to backup the configuration or export a certificate under Certificate Management.
View 1 RepliesOur detail is "RV042 V03" and using 2 bridge mode modem.
After i upgraded a new firmware v4.1.1.01-sp (Dec 6 2011 20:03:18) , i got many problems in NSD. Both of Modem always hang 5-6 times a day. And today, i just saw the log line :
Apr 26 03:31:16 2012 Kernel last message repeated 2 times. ( It takes around 5-6 times per hour)..
I upgraded my Linksys RV042 firmware to 1.3.12.19-tm and exported the config file, then tried to convert it using RV0xx_Migration_Utility_v1.0.2.2 in order to import it to a new Cisco RV042 (v3). The migration utility returns a config create fail message and fails to convert.
The LOG file ends with:
Get PORT_101 VLAN Group setting fail.
***log end***
how to make this work or how to move config file to v3?
I have 2 ASA 5510 firewalls at 2 different sites. Both running on version 8.0.4. Users are using an Instant Messaging type of application provided by a local telco here which is able to send and receive SMS using SIP (from the packet capture that I've done).
When users use the IM in site A, they are able to send and receive text messages via the IM from behind the firewall. However, when the users are in site B, users are able to send out text messages but not able to receive them.
I noticed that when I remove "inspect sip" from site-B's global policy map, users from site-B can successfully receive text messages. I have confirmed that it is the firewall that drops the packets as I have captured the inside and outside interfaces of site-B's ASA and I can see the incoming sip "request: MESSAGE" packet on the outside interface but I do not see the packet exiting the inside interface.
I have cross check both firewall configurations, and I do not see anything suspicious commands relating to sip that might cause this issue. Is there any command to troubleshoot why the sip inspection is dropping the sip packets on site-B?
The error message "5405 RADIUS Request dropped", what does it mean ? We have implemented 802.1X on a C4506 switch running IOS 12.2(53), it has worked fine for about 3 months but now I get users not able to authenticate. In the loggs on the ACS I get the obove message.
ACS 5.2 is running 5.2.0.26 Build 3075.
I have an RV082 (running 2.0.0.19-tm) set up as the gateway to the Internet on my home LAN, and connect to it through several switches / hubs around my house. Randomly, and from various connections around the house (which are all plugged in to different ports of the RV082), a Web request will fail to load, giving a "Server not found" error in the browser. When I look at the log in the RV082, it says, "Connection Refused: Policy Violation".
It seems to be just blocking the DNS requests - everything else appears to go through normally. For example, I get the message "Looking up domain name.com" in the bottom corner of the browser and the request fails, displaying the Mozilla "Server not found" error page. When I click the "Try Again" button the page, it goes through just fine and everything works.
I don't have any services running behind the firewall, and do not use the VPN settings. Here are my current firewall settings:
Firewall : Enable
At this moment (firmware 1.0.3.5) the router has no IPv6 firewall and therefore when used in a typical dual stack IPv4/IPv6 network it has no protection regarding IPv6 traffic. Hopefully this will be fixed with a firmware update before the World IPv6 Day on the 6th of June 2012.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI want to pass my client VPN request to MS Win Server 2003 - on FW I forwarded port for PPTP service to my server address, but on client side I get an error 619. On Cisco RV120W I have Site-to-Site VPN tunnel which works fine, PPTP server on Cisco is disabled. What should I do to pass VPN request to my LAN server to handle it?
View 4 Replies View Relatedrecently, i have connected the internet to my PC with cable. Here the problem is , the packets are not receiving in the status bar of internet connection. I have checked in command prompt, the ip address is connecting properly but the default gateway ip address is showing "Request Timed Out" message.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have RV042 and E4200 routers . I tried the manual UPnP port forwarding using Rv042 router and was succesful ( by typing 192.168.1.1 in the explorer and logged in using user name and password )
I am using a linux embedded system whose Internal IP ,Internal port are mapped .This system is connected to one of the LAN ports
I want to try auto UPnP port forwarding both for RV042 router and Linksys E4200 routers
After enabling the Upnp option only and logging out ,Can i add a port mapping entry in this router without logging in using a C++ program which runs on linux embedded system .
I was looking for a small business router that has VPN support and dual WAN support for load balancing. Upon reading reviews, I think RV042/RV042G is a good choice. Now am thinking if it supports intervlan/ router-on-a-stick configuration?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI keep getting log messages like the following on my router:[RV220W]Tue Aug 14 00:00:14 2012(GMT+0200) [RV220W][Kernel][KERNEL] BW_LIMIT_PKTS IN=LAN SRC=10.0.0.10 DST=173.194.35.134 PROTO=TCP SPT=1159 DPT=443,i.e. a large number of BW_LIMIT_PKTS messages regarding traffic from the LAN to the WAN destined to ports 53, 443 and 80 only. Is it related to QoS policies? What is the meaning of this message?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhat does this error message mean? What is wrong? Appears when adding a new One-To-One NAT rule. The first rule is OK. When I try to add a rule nr. 2, this error message occures.
View 3 Replies View RelatedSome background information of my current configuration.
VLAN 100
-Computer A
interface gi1/1/1
[Code]....
From computer A, i had run command prompt and ping 192.168.2.100(computer B) and successfully get a response. I had repeated the step but ping to a broadcast address (192.168.255.255) and it was unsuccessful.
I just got myself a Cisco RV220W, connected my laptop to configure it. I receive an IP adress by DHCP (192.168.1.x) and can ping the router (192.168.1.1). However, when I try to connect to the router by the web interface, I receive this message in my browser (Chrome):
The webpage at https://192.168.1.1/ might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address. Error 113 (net::ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH): Unknown error.
In FireFox: Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a connection to 192.168.1.1. Cannot communicate securely with peer: no common encryption algorithm(s). (Error code: ssl_error_no_cypher_overlap)
In IE9: I get no error message, the page never loads
Is it DoA or how to get connected to the web interface?
Same problem ' network cable unplugged' even if it is physically connected. I have sony vaio pczim series with win 2000 xp home edition with a broadband (cpe adsl2+ type) connection. While everything working fine for past two years, suddenly after a thunderstorm night, I noticed the network connection failure with the message. I checked the router, cable and the same are working fine with other hp laptop. Even the vaio is running with the same router while usb port is used and even the wireless and bluetooth are fine, but network with ethernet cable connection does not.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two Internet connections-
1-DSL Modem (WAN1-Internet Port)
2-Cable Modem-Comcast (WAN2-DMZ/Internet Port)
I connected the DSL (WAN1-Internet) port in and the Cisco RV042 was able to get an IP automatically. I tested the connection and it works just fine. Then I connect the Cable Modem-Comcast (WAN2-DMZ/Internet Port) in and I have the RV042 automatically optain IP address. But it just says 0.0.0.0. I've tried release/renew and that does nothing. Also, when I connect the 2nd Internet connection the Internet goes down. The only way it goes back up is when I disable under the PORT MANAGMENT setting.
All the settings have been kept to the default.How can I get the router to obtain an IP address from the Cable Modem-Comcast (WAN2 DMZ/Internet Port).
We have an Cisco RV042. We need to setup a VPN with a business partner who is already using our current IP scheme on another VPN with another client. They have asked us to NAT our IP's from 192.168.25.x to 192.168.245.x
I can't seem to figure this out on this router. I have done it on a Sonicwall and Watchguard, but can't seem to get it to work on the RV042.
I have setup the VPN and the One-To-One NAT. The tunnel will connect (using the 245.x IP as our local IP on the VPN setup), but no traffic will pass through.
The Lg840g is a tracfone with wifi capability. I get strong wifi signal and connection at home, but receive failure to connect to requested host message when I open the browser. This phone works at wayport wifi, so I assume it's a compatibility problem with the router. Is there a fix? (Router works great with our Acer and Kindle tablets though.)
View 1 Replies View Relatedi was planed to make a vpn over rv042 so i get the rv042 connected behind a thosmon 456(configured as a bridge) and 1 static ip ... and i configured the vpn and worked great ...but due to some circumstance i get a package of 6 ips insted of the old ip , so when i try to configure the router with the ISP they but the wan ip 10.232.x.x and told me that an internal ip from there lan ... and give me the 6 ip of 196.x.x.x to use as 1 for internal interface for the rv042 and 5 for the pc's,now the vpn not working anymore...notice: when try to configure the vpn tunnle in the local securty setting i mark the ip only and the ip that abear is the wan ip 10.232.x.x but i can't ping that ip beside i can ping the internal ip of the router 196.x.x.50does rv042 can support static and virtual ip inside the lan |! can i configure the thomson as pppoe and use one static ip from 196.x.x.x as wan ip for it ... and use anther 196.x.x.x ip for the rv042 to get access from outside and connect the lan to the rv042 with internal ip 192.168.x.x ...so i can access the vpn from outside .....and can connect the device i need to use static ip to the thomson ...
View 0 Replies View RelatedFirmware v4.0.4.02 has a nasty bug in the VPN section. If you switch to "IP by DNS Resolved" (yes, it says "Resolved" instead of "Resolution". Gotta love all the Engrish in the RV042!), it will automatically populate the field with "@yourdomain.com". This will cause the VPN to not lookup the proper IP address. Simply deleting the atmark after it populates will fix the problem.
Let's see what happens when we validate a Cisco RV042 webpage:
Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional!
Result: 353 Errors, 1 warning(s)
Don't even get me started on the horrible Javascript...
i am trying to make a simple Site to SiteVPN between two offices, one has Cisco ASA and one has RV042 router.when traffic initiated from ASA side, i keep getting this message in Debug and tunnel wont come up
.
[IKEv1]: Group = A.A.A.139, IP = A.A.A.139, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages to be processed when P1 SA is complete.Apr 26 00:15:53 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Pitcher: received a key acquire message, spi 0x0
whereas if traffic initiated from RV042 side, i keep getting this message in debug and tunnel wont come up.
Apr 26 00:43:44 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = RV.RV.RV.139, Oakley proposal is acceptableApr 26 00:43:44 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = RV.RV.RV.139, IKE SA Proposal # 1, Transform # 0 acceptable Matches global IKE entry # 6Apr 26 00:43:44 [IKEv1]: IP = RV.RV.RV.139, Connection landed on tunnel_group RV.RV.RV.139Apr 26 00:43:45 [IKEv1]: IP = RV.RV.RV.139, Connection landed on tunnel_group RV.RV.RV.139Apr 26 00:43:45 [IKEv1]: Group = RV.RV.RV.139, IP = RV.RV.RV.139, Freeing previously allocated memory for authorization-dn-attributesApr 26 00:43:45 [IKEv1]: Group = RV.RV.RV.139, IP = RV.RV.RV.139, PHASE 1 COMPLETEDApr 26 00:43:45 [IKEv1]: IP =RV.RV.RV.139, Keep-alive type for this connection: DPDApr 26 00:43:45 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group =
[code].....
Apparently one of my two ISPs,CenturyLink, supports 6rd connections to IPv6.
This is supported natively on my Q1000 ActionTec modem, however my modem is in "transparent bridging" mode, so that the RV042 v3 can be the only router.
how to configure the RV042 to operate in this manner.
Per the CenturyLink FAQ: the IPv6 address space is:
2602::0 /24
Most importantly, can I do this WITHOUT buying a new modem.
I have a RV042 router (Ser#: NKS10462300, HW V3) running Firmware version v4.0.2.08-tm (Jan 14 2011 22:08:38) set up as a gateway. Right after it boots I am able to long into its web interface but shortly after that if I try to log into it I go through a very log time out while the web page is waiting the router to respond and then eventually IE comes back and says it 'cannot display the web [age'.
View 30 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco RV042 VPN Router and I have added a group vpn, but when I am trying to connect I got an error that the remote vpn server isn't responding.
Here's my log:
2013/01/15 12:24:53 [STATUS]OS Version: Windows 7
2013/01/15 12:24:53 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Domain Profile Settings: ON
2013/01/15 12:24:53 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: OFF
2013/01/15 12:24:53 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: OFF
2013/01/15 12:24:53 [STATUS]One network interface detected with IP address MY HOME IP
[code]....
If I am trying to connect the status of the vpn user in the remote interface is "online".I have deactived my firewall at home and at the server for testing purposes.
I am looking to configure RV042 for VPN access to local machines and Win 2008 server. The story: Had issues with remote printers being created for clients logging into old Linksys RV042 with Linksys VPN software. First Tech exposed server without security, and it had to be removed as it was being attacked, but did not fix printing issue. 2nd tech could not get VPN to work after 1st tech. 3rd tech, 4hours, and I got that the router is a piece of ... So I'm out over 1000, and not able to have a simple router set up. The present situation. New RV042 with firmware V4.1.1.01, using Cisco VPN client 5.0.07.0410, most XP 32 bit machines coming into network, one 64 bit win 7. My clients have been unable to access their data for too long.
View 3 Replies View RelatedIs there any documentation out there on a step-by-step instructions on setting up a vpn on a RV042 router?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to set up 2 subnet with two RV042 routers. One router will act as a gateway and both WAN ports will be used by two different isp connection. The first router (gateway) LAN IP will be 192.168.0.1/24. I would also like to set up another router behind the gateway with with separate subnet 192.168.1.X/24. And I would like clients on the 192.168.1.x subnet to use the internet through the gateway router and clients on the 192.168.0.x subnet to access resources on the 192.168.1.x subnet. Am I able to do this with two RV042?
View 6 Replies View RelatedThe issue is when I am using PPTP the router seems to die, not every time but I would say about once a week now. I am the only PPTP user, simply using RDP. A few hours into an RDP session the PPTP connection drops and cannot be re-established, or quickvpn, nothing. Routing still works (somewhat, high latency) locally.
When I've checked the logs both times I see:
TimeEvent-TypeMessageSep 3 17:07:56 2012KernelOut of memory: Killed process 14354 (pppd). Sep 3 17:07:56 2012KernelOut of Memory: Kill process 14354 (pppd) score 177 and children. Sep 3 17:07:56 2012KernelOut of memory: Killed process 14367 (sh). Sep 3 17:07:56 2012KernelOut of Memory: Kill process 14354 (pppd) score 234 and children. Sep 3 16:46:41 2012KernelOut of memory: Killed process 14330 (pppd). Sep 3 16:46:41 2012KernelOut of Memory: Kill process 14329 (pptpctrl) score 134 and children. Sep 3 16:46:41 2012KernelOut of memory: Killed process 14324 (pppd). Sep 3 16:46:41 2012KernelOut of Memory: Kill process 14324 (pppd) score 177 and children. Sep 3 16:46:40 2012KernelOut of memory: Killed process 14328 (sh). Sep 3 16:46:40 2012KernelOut of Memory: Kill process 14324 (pppd) score 234 and children. Sep 3 15:36:15 2012KernelOut of memory: Killed process 14187 (pppd). Sep 3
[code]....
I have an RV042 connected via VPN to the office (to a LinkSys DFL-700). Sometimes the VPN is dropped and never activates again. In this state, if I try to connect to the WEB interface, I can log in, but the router hangs at the login screen. I have to power recycle the router to make it work again.
Updated to latest firmware 4.2.1.02 for V3 hardware. The funny thing is that services from the WEB routed through to local IP adresses on the lan is still accessible. I have setup PPPT VPN on the router, and that also fails to work.
Is there, as a workaround, any possibility to access the routers reset page or access via TELNET to reset the router? This migth be useful, when I'm out. (I have a backup solution to access the local network at home).
I have just purchased the RV042 and while it is working great on WAN1 over Xfinity/Comcast broadband, I'm unable to get it working with my AT&T DSL for WAN2. I am planning on running this in failover mode - not load balancing.
The DSL modem it is connected to is a SpeedStream (hooking up laptop directly works etc. etc.). The SpeedStream is set to PPOE authentication passed in via the computer (in this case the RV042). On the RV042 side, I set it to use PPOE, using the credentials as given my AT&T DSL. The DNS servers are set to the ones recommended
Are the RV042 and RV082 routers SIP AWARE?I haven't had any luck finding documentation stating such.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have setup vpn connection (client-gateway) using quick vpn ( default cisco) and third party like thegreenbow. connection is ok (established) but why from outside I can only ping to IP LAN PC , if I ping ip server the result is request time out(failed). I have been trying do this to 3 server ( windows server 2003 as OS).four your information I have made firewall "OFF" on all of those servers. the result is same, failed.
View 0 Replies View Related