Cisco Routers :: Rv110 VPN Routing
Dec 10, 2012I'm trying to get 2 rv110s to IPsec VPN each other. They have to stay gateways to allow internet access. How do I simply add a static route to allow each to route to the other's LAN?
View 1 RepliesI'm trying to get 2 rv110s to IPsec VPN each other. They have to stay gateways to allow internet access. How do I simply add a static route to allow each to route to the other's LAN?
View 1 RepliesI'm setting up a site-to-site VPN between two offices, Site A uses a Cisco RV110W VPN Router with a static WAN IP and local IP 192.168.1.0/24 while Site B I have set up with a Belkin N300 VPN router which also has a Static WAN IP and the local IP is set to 192.168.2.0/24
I'm able to ping from Site B (192.168.2.xxx) to Site A, however I can't communicate from Site A back to Site B.how I could go about troubleshooting this? I've been scouring the internet for 3 days trying to get to the bottom of this with no luck.
I want to ping ip dslam, which is in another subnet
The connection is like this:
MyPc-----Rj45----------Adsl2+ Modem---------Rj11-------Dslam
192.168.1.4----192.168.1.1---172.80.1.3-------------172.80.1.2
-----------------LanSide-----------WanSide---------------------
The modem is set to Static Ip Address Encapsulation.
How can I ping ip dslam with this setup, or what do I need to change about the architecture?
I tried the "Advanced Routing" Feature over the RV-042 V3 Dual WAN VPN Router , And the New IP Subnet i added ( 10.0.7.0 ) in the Static Routing Table does NOT Appear in the Routing Table of the Router. Please review the attached Print Screen for both the Static Routing Entry Configuration & the Routing Table of the RV-042 Router.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI started using RIPv2 on Packet Tracer. I got two subnets to connect with two routers. After I completed that, I decided to add a third router. How to setup the Routing Table for atleast R3 ?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI've a RV120W with the last firmware version (june 2011), i want to create two vpn tunnel:
- Professional: lan routing all packet for the 192.168.0.0/24 to the first VPN tunnel
- Other: all other address IP destination to a second VPN tunnel
The first tunnel (professional) is ok but what rules can i use to configure the second ?
let me know whether you can make the attached network using by RV110W or not.When I read the mannual of "rv110w_admin.pdf", P38, I guess RV110W cannot be built both NAT & Router mode.Because, I cannot setup NAT for internet access if I setup "Operating Mode" as "Router" on the setting of "Networking > Routing".And, I cannot setup the routing for internet access & MPLS-VPN access if I setup "Operating Mode" as "Gateway" on the setting of "Networking > Routing".
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have an RV082 setup with WAN to the internet and LAN IP of 192.168.188.1.If I add a static route like so:
network: 192.168.166.0
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: 192.168.188.2
hop count: 1
interface: LAN
The device with IP 192.168.188.2 will be connected directly to one of the LAN ports on the router.Will that work to route, trying to get to 192.168.166.0 to the IP of 192.168.188.2?It just seems odd because the packets would hit the router then go back out through the LAN port.
I am planning to add a second router to my network. I currently have a Cisco 841 which is running great no issues no down time solid.My only issue with the 841 is that I can not VPN into my network remotely using 1. Native VPN client on Windows based computers. Windows 7 , Vista and XP. 2. Ipad's and Iphones also cannot VPN in. Only way to VPN is from the Cisco client on the Windows platform. No such app exists for the Ipad or Iphone.
So I am looking into getting a Cisco ASA5505 and add it to my network.I could then remove the VPN services from my 841 and use the ASA5505 for all VPN traffic.
Questions.
1. Would I need to have another static ip address?
2. Can I just forward all VPN traffic thru the 841 to the ASA5505?
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.69.9 1792 interface FastEthernet4 1792
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.69.9 1723 interface FastEthernet4 1723
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.69.9 1701 interface FastEthernet4 1701
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.69.9 500 interface FastEthernet4 500
192.168.69.9 would be the new ASA5505 router?Would be nice if the 841 would work using PPTP but I believe it only supports IPsec
I've just set up an IPSec VPN between 2 x RV120W which are both behind other router. Here's what we have :
RV120W #1 (192.168.1.254) --- (192.168.1.1) Office Router #1 (PUBLIC IP) --- (((Internet))) --- (PUBLIC IP) Office Router #2 (192.168.2.1) --- RV120W #2 (192.168.2.254)
It works great, tunnel is UP.
[Code]....
I've just set up an IPSec VPN between 2 x RV120W which are both behind other router. Here's what we have :
RV120W #1 (192.168.1.254) --- (192.168.1.1) Office Router #1 (PUBLIC IP) --- (((Internet))) --- (PUBLIC IP) Office Router #2 (192.168.2.1) --- RV120W #2 (192.168.2.254)
[Code]....
Now, I need to be able to reach the server (192.168.1.100) from a PC on LAN #2 with IP 192.168.2.50. So, I've created au static route on Office Router #2 (192.168.2.1) because of course it doesn't know how to reach private subnet 192.168.1.x. My static route looks like this :
192.168.1.0 / 24 (Destination network) --- 192.168.2.254 (Gateway)
...but it doesn't work, no ping. When I do a tracert to server IP (192.168.1.100) from PC on LAN #2 (192.168.2.50), the result is :
1st jump ---> 192.168.2.1
2nd jump --> 192.168.2.254
...and it doesn't go further.
I have the device configured in Router mode with 2 VLANs. I am able to communicate between the VLANs however my intention is to get VLAN 2 to talk to the internet and that is not working. A caveat is that I am not using the WAN port on this router at all.
The way I intend for this to work is that I have configured a default route on this device to point to a next hop IP in VLAN 1. Even though VLAN 1 is configured on this device the default gateway for this VLAN resides on another device upstream towards the internet connection. That upstream device is providing the DHCP etc for VLAN1. All devices in VLAN1 are able to get to the internet. Even the ones that reside behind this WRVS4400Nv2.
VLAN 2 is only configured on this device and the Default GW resides on this device. This WRVS is configured to be the DHCP server for this VLAN. Even though hosts in VLAN2 can communicate with devices in VLAN1 and vice-versa none of the hosts in VLAN2 are able to reach the internet. A simple ping gives the message "network unreachable from <IP of WRVS-VLAN2>. So it seems like the WRVS is not using the static default route.
I have upgraded the firmware to the latest version V2.0.2.1. Below is a simple diagram of the setup
VLAN-1 |
------- WRVS4400( IF: LAN1 )--------( IF: LAN1 )Generic Router( IF: WAN )---------INTERNET
VLAN-2 |
actually function as a router or is it that router mode is only to disable NAT and it really does not look up its routing table to route pkts out another LAN interface.
I'm wanting to use the SRP527W (from Telstra) to route a block of assigned internet addresses (/29) over the WAN internet IP address. Is this possible on the 527W, or does it only do NAT routing?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a RV016 with an internal address of 192.168.1.1. Also on the 192.168.1.0 network is a gateway server that the rest of my clients sit behind. The clients are on a 172.16.3.0/24 network. All of the gateway server does is forward the packets. It does not NAT. There is a static route to 172.16.3.0 on the RV016.
So my question is how do I get traffic from 172.16.3.0 to route through the RV016? Computers on the sub net can ping the RV016 and get a reply so I know the gateway server is forwarding the packets between the two sub nets just fine and that the static route on the RV016 works. Any traffic that tries to go beyond the RV016 never makes it. It just disappears at the RV016. I have checked all of the ACLs and they should let all internal traffic through.
I'd like to simplify my setup a little bit, but unfortunately I'm not sure how to do this.
I have a triangle of CSB RVS devices, 2 RVS4000, 1 WRVS4400 each router has a gateway to gateway VPN with the other 2, so from any of the 3 sites, you can access the resources on the other 2. It also works well, that if for some reason one of the VPN legs goes down, it routes through the other router. atleast It appears to work that way when tested.
I have 2 laptops that go around, Mine and one at the office. If either of these are off site and connect to any of the routers through the QuickVPN client. they can only see the resources on the router they connect to. How would I be able to connect in to 1 router, and be able to access resources on the other VPN'ed routers?
I've goggled and searched here, and I can't seem to find what I'm looking for. I need to make a couple changes to a clients Cisco 800 series router, enable ping replies add ip addresses to the ssh ACL.I can't seem to find any basic commands for CLI anywhere.
View 2 Replies View Relatedgetting a SF300 to properly route IP between 2 VLANs. I've watched the demo video and performed everything it showed, but I get the most bizarre half-way results. I haven't done anything on Cisco routers in about 15 years, so I'm a little rusty.
We have an office LAN with a cable modem/router for Internet access where the modem/router has IP address 192.168.1.1. We have the usual 24 bit prefix net mask. The SF 300 is connected to this network on port 1.
I have configured port 1 to VLAN 1, interface in Access mode, assigned a static IP address of 192.168.1.36, which is a free address on our office LAN. I have configured port 2 to VLAN 2, interface in Access mode, assigned a static IP address of 192.168.3.1 I put a static route in the modem/router, pointing 192.168.3.0/24 to 192.168.1.36.
I have a PC on 192.168.3.10 attached to port 2.
The SF300 can ping 192.168.3.1, but not 192.168.3.10. 192.168.3.10 can ping 192.168.3.1. It can also ping 192.168.1.1, and can pull up an HTTP router admin page from 192.168.1.1. 192.168.3.1 can be pinged from anywhere on 192.168.1.x, but 192.168.3.10 cannot be pinged from 192.168.1.x. Finally, 192.168.3.10 cannot ping any other addresses on 192.168.1.x except 192.168.1.1, and cannot reach the Internet.
Here's my configuration:
switch6d919d#show runconfig-file-headerswitch6d919dv1.3.0.59 / R750_NIK_1_3_647_260CLI v1.0set system mode router
file SSD indicator encrypted@ssd-control-startssd configssd file passphrase control
[Code].....
Looking for routing with an SA540 router connecting to corporate VPN.We have an odd configuration that is beyond the scope of what I have configured previously with these devices..I am trying to configure the routing to the additional IP addresses listed for the HQ. The VPN tunnel between the .26.120.x and the .17.0.0 networks is built however it does not appear to be routing. The Cisco administrator at the HQ site says that they have "fully configured the routing" from all the listed IP addresses back through the VPN tunnel. The options I am unsure of for configuration of the SA540 router are: GW - I believe that I use the internal IP address of the 17.26.120.x router.Is this logical since the VPN tunnel. We are using NAT for the firewall internally.The existing 3 172.26.x.x VPN tunnels are live and working and fully routing between themselves.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCan I have two different routers (different subnets) on one cisco 3500XL switch and still be able to communicate between the two? If so how can I do it?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a few questions regarding IPv6.
Question 1.
I have no idea how to route IPv6. My provider has provided me with a subnet. This subnet is for example 1:1:1::/48
The router of the provider is located at 1:1:1::1 and my router should get 1:1:1::2(Cisco router). Every subnet I want to create must be routed by 1:1:1::2, for example if I want to create 1:1:1:1111::/64 it needs to be routerd by 1:1:1::2
How do I configure this on the RV220w?
Question 2.
I have the possibility to create vlans on the RV220W. I can configure IPv4 addressen per vlan. Only for IPv6 this is not possible.How do I configure this or when will new software be released to configure this?Or do I have to edit the configuration file?
I just received a blu ray player for Xmas that has an Ethernet connection for streaming Netflix,YouTube, etc. my problem is my router is upstairs and the blu ray is downstairs. I really don't want to run an Ethernet cable from the blu ray to the router. Can I use another router on the same network and have it close to the blu ray?,I have a netgear router just laying around and the main router is a Verizon fios router.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a need to use two routers (Each with different ISP) on my (LAN) office network.I presently DO NOT want to go the (Two ISP's on one router, or Load Balancing router). I Just simply want two routers with two separate ISP's.I will assign the managers workstations to the faster ISP, and other Workstation to the slower connection.And it seems to work, and all resources seem to be available on the LAN, regardless of which (Gateway) Router(1 or 2) I point the workstation to.I assume because all devices are on the same LAN 192.168.0.XXX Is this a proper way to allocate and use two routers on the same LAN?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am currently using 2 routers. One is a 2wire router with stock firmware it is connecting to the internet and can't be altered all too much, it also has a PC connected to it. The other is a WRT54GL with Tomato on it with pretty much EVERY other PC and device connected to it, it is also connected to the 2wire and DMZ'd through it.What I want to do is somehow allow everything on the Tomato router to have access to the 2wire router's PC. (For media access or printers or whatever on Windows 7)
View 13 Replies View RelatedAny experience with IP Routing on Draytek routers?We have a 2830 and I'm trying to set it up like the following: [code]
Now a server in VLAN 2 with address x.x.x.77 can ping x.x.x.74, but I can't access any of it's services (Apache, SSH etc) from the internet (testing through my phone and other people).I've removed the IPs from the NAT pool in the WAN settings, setup LAN2 for IP routing and put it into the second VLAN, but apart from that not done much else.
Just need to verify if HWIC-2T is compatible with the Cisco2800 routers?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIs there any way to granularly allow hosts from one vlan to be able to access another vlan with Inter-VLAN routing DISABLED?Can the use of an ACL override the setting?In general I don't want any traffic between VLAN's but there are 2 hosts on one VLAN that I would want to allow access to a server on another VLAN.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 3 877 ADSL routers for internet connectivity. I recently installed a FW behind them and would like to use the Ciscos as load balance in order to get better utilization from my 3 internet links.
1) the 3 routers are on DHCP from the ISP on the WAN side.
2) the 3 ciscos are on the same class C subnet on the LAN side: 10.201.1.252, 10.201.1.253 and 10.201.1.254
Initially we had a rv110w in place and had problems with the port forwarding stopping a few times a day so we replaced with with a RV180W. Now port forwarding appears to be staying up, however I have a new problem. We host a web page, for some reason when an internal user points the url to the web page it resolves to the web interface of the Router and not the expected web page. If you are outside of the network it resolves to the correct web page. I am not sure why this is happening as it didn't happen with the RV110W or the PIX before that.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am using a RV110W as a VPN client to establish a VPN conection since some months. So far everything works fine. But all traffic is routet thru the VPN tunnel. Now I try only to route specific adresses thru the tunnel but not the internet acess.
RV110W is in Gateway mode
WAN interface is connected with internet
I am using PPTP with PAP and MPPE for VPN
so far no static routes (I could not set e.g. a route to 0.0.0.0 because web-interface says its not a valid adress)
Goal is to route only traffic for the target network thru tunnel and the rest direct via WAN interface.
I've set up a simple lab network of two cisco routers 2611XM and to each router I've attached a computer (host). I have set up a dhcp ip addresses for each host. I've set up a correct routing as well on each router. There are 3 networks: 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.3.0/24 The first network between the first host and first router, second is between two routers and third is between the second router and second host. If I use first host (192.168.1.20) I can ping to any ip address (192.168.1.1 (router 1), 192.168.2.1 (router 1), 192.168.2.2 (router 2), 192.168.3.1 (router 2)) except the second host ip address which is 192.168.3.20. When I sit on the second host (192.168.3.20) i can ping to 192.168.1.1 (router 1), 192.168.2.1 (router 1), 192.168.2.2 (router 2), 192.168.3.1 (router 2) but i can't ping to the first host which is 192.168.1.20. I've even tried with attaching a switch to a router and assign it an ip address of 192.168.1.3 and the ping was echoing to it.
View 5 Replies View RelatedMy book says there are two types of firewall supported on cisci ios routers:
Classic cisco ios firewall
Zone-based policy firewall.
zone-based policy firewall with configurations ?
What kind of firewall is supported on Cisco PIX 515E ? Is it Classic CIsco ios firewall or Zone-based policy firewall ?
Our clients claims the problem of loss startup configuration with power outage especially with 877 series , all the router are configured to store configuration in NVRAM ( confreg = 0x2101),
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have been banging at this now for two days and just cannot get Inter-VLAN routing working to work on this router.
Upgraded to latest Cisco firmware (1.0.1.9).Starting with factory default settings, I added 2 VLANS as follows: [code]
BUT....PC2 cannot ping PC3 - NOT WORKINGPC3 cannot ping PC2 - NOT WORKING [code]