Cisco Security :: How To Apply 3rd Party Certificate To 1811 ISR
Sep 29, 2009
I am attempting to install a third party SSL cert (GoDaddy) to properly secure the external interface of my 1811 ISR so that I can implement SSL VPN. I have tried using SDM 2.5, but that doesn't appear to be working. I am familiar with doing this on a Cisco 3005 Concentrator, but I'm not aware of how to install an intermediate cert on the 1811 (or if it's even possible), in order to properly have the GoDaddy cert properly imported and used for SSL VPN. I have gone through the CSR process and have the initial cert from them generated and have imported it, but it never appears to be identified correctly if I browse to the external interface on the router. The router always defaults to its self-signed cert.
I am using a cisco asa5520 and i have set up remote access vpn with an AnyConnect connection profile.In the connection profile i have set up that users should authenticate using both certificate and AAA.Due to a high security requirement, the user certificate is issued from a 3rd party. This is working fine and the user now need a valid certificate and a username/password to authenticate successfully.I added the CA certificate as a associated trustpoint on the ASA box to get the certificate verification working.Problem:If Jane and Joe both have a valid certificate AND a valid username/password, Jane could authenticate using a combo of Joes certificate, and Janes username/password. Both are valid (isolated), but i only want jane to be able to authenticate with her username/password and her personal certificate.
get a installed certificate work on a 5508 WLC Controller without rebooting. Is there a way? Is it possible to just reload a process to get the certificate work?
I've configured SSL VPN on an 1811 router running 12.4(9) IOS. I'm using the full SSL VPN client and do not want to split tunnel the traffic. I can reach my inside resources just fine, but I can not reach sites on the Internet. I want to tunnel my Internet traffic to the router and then have it hairpin out the same interface.
I've successfully configured this type of hairpinning on an ASA for SSL VPN, but have yet to find a way to do it in IOS.
I've got a Cisco 851 running IOS12.3. I'm trying to install a SSL Certificate but after following all the instructions and installing a CA certificate I'm not getting the full chain of authority in a browser just the devices certificate itself. I've repeated the installation process using individual CA certificates all up and down the chain but still the same results.
Is it possible to generate CSR using SH1 instead of md5 on Cisco 1841 for SSL VPN, because the provider that I try to use doesn't accept md5. Also tried to import there private key and got an error "Error: invalid PEM boundary"
I have a SSL certificate from a third party that is showing under the Identity in ADSM, howerver the audit scan of the firewall shows that the SSL Certificate Signed with an unknown certification Authority. I have installed the Intermediate Primary and Secondary Certificate from the third party under the CA Certificate of the ADSM however when I verify the SSL certificate it still shows as self-signed. What other steps do I miss. I have attached some screenshots.
We have the acs server which has the ssl certficate(certifcate authority) running in acs 3.2 windows version for eap-tls enduser authentication.
We want the same to be migrated to acs 4.2(appliance) application. I have tried in different ways to push the certificate but i couldn't.
I have tried Thru System Configuration --> ACS Certificate Setup --> Install ACS certificate --> Download certficate file In that i have mentioned the FTP server IP address, credentials, path and file name
But if i submit the request its giving the directory not found or credentials wrong.
We have NAC 4.0.5 and windows active directory domain the clients log on to the client to access the network with their domain credentials and they used to get the "Certificate is issued from an untrusted." until I installed the url.. certificate to the local certificate store.
I seem to have done something on the NAC manager that messed up something, cause now the client considers the certificate issued from a trusted source, BUT a warning stating that the name on the certificate does not match the name.
i have a problem with some sites! i cant access to them ! some sites are hotmail, this one, and many other! the msg that i see every time is : There is a problem with this website's security certificate. The security certificate presented by this website has expired or is not yet valid.
I have bought and installed a 2048bit certificate from Thawte on a ACE20-MOD-K9 module. The appliance can't use it and gives the following error: "This certificate cannot be verified up to a trusted certfication authority."I have contacted Thawte about this and they suggest to install an intermediate certificate from Thawte on the module, but I can't find such a certicicate for Cisco on their site. Also I'm not sure how to go about implementing such an intermediate certificate on the ACE.
My issue occurs on ALL of my home computers (MacBook and iMac using wi-fi) and ALL of my browsers (Safari, Firefox, Chrome).The problem:- Security Certificates: They pop up daily for Facebook mostly, but also Twitter. I will click Continue, which takes me to...- 404 Error/Page Not Found Error: After the Certificate error mentioned above, this happens. Mostly to YouTube. It will stay like this for a few hours. I've cleared cache, rebooted, etc. etc. Nothing works.- Images turn into little blue boxes with a question mark in them. **When this happens, it's an indication that a Certificate box will pop up out of the blue.- Even on Google.com, it will say: Invalid URLThe requested URL "/", is invalid.Reference #9.df260e6b.1336506889.420cf4fSo what can I do? It happens on both my Macbook Pro and iMac - both connected wirelessly to a Linksys router/cable modem. The router is Wireless-N Broadband Router WRT160Nv3 with Firmware Version: v3.0.02.
There is ASA with remote access VPN and users are authenticated using third party signed certificates (CA is not local in ASA).When user certificate expires i can see it in syslog messages. For example:
%ASA-3-717009: Certificate validation failed. Certificate date is out-of-range, serial number: (...)
I would like to know if there is an opportunity to view user's certificate expiry date beforehand, say, 3 days before?
Any 3rd party CA to provide a root cert for the ACS & verify csr's generated by the 7925's? I've spoken with customer service at Verisign and GeoTrust and either i'm explaining it totally wrong or their not providing CA services for this type of secured environment. sHA1 using EAP-TLS.
I would like to use the NCS 1.2 to monitor Juniper SRX 210 firewall. When I try to import the MIB File from NCS, which show "Error: Failed to load MIB File "mib-802" because it is not in the resource path.what I can upload the MIB File from Juniper. [code]
I have came across some third-party ws-g5483's that I was thinking of using. But when I go to plug them in, nothing seems to happen. I have tried them in ws-c3548-xl-en and also a ws-c3524-pwr-xl-en with the same results. I know on the newer switches you can do the serviice unsupported-transceiver command but is there anything I can do to get these to work with older switches?
I'm responsible for designing the network for a LAN party that will be held in October. There will be up to 400 participants and 25-30 crew members. 10 table rows, 40 participants and one 48-port gigabit switch on each table. Core network will be a couple of Cisco 3560G or similar. There will be 2xGbit between the table and core switches.So, how to set up VLANs and subnets for a 400+ people network?
1) Everything on one /23 subnet, or
2) Participants on one /23 subnet, separate subnets for servers, crew and wireless, or
3) Participants on two /24 subnets, separate subnets for servers/crew/wireless, or
4) Separate /26 subnets for each table switch and for servers/crew/wireless?
As far as I can see, the main disadvantage of all participants on one subnet is troubleshooting and isolating network problems - and the main disadvantages of separate subnets is more complex setup and that people cannot browse LAN games other than those on the same switch.
I am thinking about running some third-party unified communications apps under VMWare ESXi5 on a Cisco SRE 900 module. According to the Cisco docs, third-party apps are supported on these modules (see table below) but the app in question is NOT on Cisco's list below.
[URL]
Some questions:
1. As long as the third-party app is capable of running under VMWare/VSphere ESXi5, is there anything on the SRE that would prevent you from running this third-party app even though it's not on Cisco's list?
2. What is Cisco's policy on the use of third-party apps that are not on their list? For example, will they take a support call on the SRE running a non-listed app. (I don't want to void any sort of support contract through the use of a third-party app not on their list).
I have a school club, but our school does not allow any wireless networks within the school perimeters.Wired are allowed, but wireless are not allowed.I plan to host a LAN party for my club, and we will have about 20-30 people.We cannot have any internet access, and I have not touched a wired stuff, There is a 24 ethernet switch, and if I buy one, and suppose I buy another 24 ethernet switch (I know there is a 48 ethernet switch), can I connect those two 24 ethernet switches to make 47 ports?* For a LAN party without internet access, can we use an ethernet switch or do we use something else?* For 20-30 people, it is recommended that we have a ~8mbps upload speed. When ethernet switches advertise 10mbps, is that upstream & downstream? When all the computers are hooked to 24 ports, does the advertised 10mbps go lower? (I have seen 100/10 mbps, and I don't know what that means)
I'm trying to connect a few of my devices to the wireless internet at home.
1.Xbox 360 2.Galaxy Tab 10.1 3.My Touch 4g
All of them can recognize the the network they just will not connect. All my freq are good 2.4 or 2.5. WEP Key works no problem, just the minute I try to connect the galaxy tab and cell phone just says "remembered, secured with WPA/WPA2 PSK." The xbox when running the test connection fails as well.
I had something odd happen to my Dlink router DIR-651 model. During the early evening hours someone changed the SSID name of my Router. Nothing else changed that I could see right off. So I reset the router to Factory Defaults.
You got lots of bandwidth, expected throughput is low, and anticipated queuing/congestion is insignificant?My understanding is that QoS will kick in when there is congestion or queuing on an interface. Since an interface could either be 100% utilized or 0% utilized, is it fair to say that at any given point there could be congestion or delay on an interface?I know that the higher the interface speed, the lower the serialization delay will be, which means the lower the delay will be to put bits on the wire. For a 10Gig link, where the serialization delay is incredibly short, I imagine that even with occasional congestion, the delay would be insignificant and not affect VoIP traffic. Would this be true?
I have windows 7 clients (supplicants), D-link access point (authenticator), Cisco acs 5.2 virtual appliance with evalution license (acts as authentication server - Radius server). I want to setup EAP authentication (PEAP) that users will be able connect to Wireless LAN with login-password. I've done some configurations, but I did not get any result. in ACS 5.2 I get this error message: 11014 RADIUS packet contains invalid attribute(s): RADIUS Request dropped.
So since my web auth cert is expiring I got it renewed from VeriSign and they sent me back the file. Do I need to again combine the "myprivatekey.pem" file and the new one that I got and then load it on the WLC? Can't find any guidelines and instructions from Cisco on this. Or do I need to go through the whole regenration of CSR process again etc?
We have just installed a Cisco RV120W behind a third party firewall. All works correctly now, but we are struggling to get the Quick VPN clients connected. I have enabled port forwarding for PPTP & L2TP over IPSEC on the third party router, but still cannot connect (the RV120W was previously used as a primary router & worked perfectly). What ports do I need to open on the third party router to get this to work correctly?
I have a scenario.On our website, there is an option to pay mobile,electrycity etc bill from payment gateway (third party). when user click on that link, my servers(behind CSS) should go to paymrent gateway using their SSL cert (payment gateway SSL cert) and should provide payment gateway link to user on our website.
How to implement this scenario using CSS115003 ?
user access URL---click on Payment Gateway---My servers get authenticated from pyament gateway using their cert--revert back and provide payment gateway link to user on URL.
I'm fairly new to networking but I've learned quite a bit on my own without being educated. I'm trying to just figure things out on my gear. So for my LAN party i'm going to need an internet connection. I'm not going to rely on my venues subnet though so i want to create a new /24 subnet(250 hosts is good for a start). I want my subnet to be able to speak to the outside network too.
I am new to these forums and I have upgraded from firmware 1.00 on the DIR-815 to the 1.01 firmware and once I upgraded, I can log into Xbox, but can't host party chats or host game rooms. I also noticed that any and all messages sent from friends didnt show until I rebooted my console. Something is SERIOUSLY WRONG here and would like a MOD to comment on this.
Xbox works fine for some things, I can access Netflix, can download from live marketplace, etc, but cannot join a party and cannot play a game. Other people cannot join my party, cannot play my game. Error when I try to join a party is "Can't connect to xbox live party, there might be a network problem."
Xbox join party and games work fine when connected directly to comcast (motorola) modem.Dir-601, firware 1.02NA and 101NA. Hardware version A1.Port forwarding TCP 53,80,3074 and UDP 53,88,3074 - also included TCP 80 and 21 to no avail.
In CUCME if you do not configure any translation rules and leave the system mainly at default, when a call is routed to the PSTN the CUCME system sends the true calling party ID which would be a users extension number. Is it correct to assume that a CUCM server based system, when too left at the majority of default (without translation rules or stripping etc) that it will send the true calling ID to the gateway?
