Cisco Switching/Routing :: POE Devices Not Working As Expected AIR-CAP3502I-A-K9

May 29, 2012

I have 10 new AIR-CAP3502I-A-K9 connected to a WS-C3750X-48PF-L switch.  8 of the APs power on and connect perfectly, but two are problematic. Both devices are granted power, but they never go past the stage of getting power from the switch.  A look at POE shows: [code]
 
Where the AP that is not working is connected to Gi1/0/4.  The interface shows down/down.  I've tried shutting the interface, removing power, cdp etc.
 
Are there any other tricks you can think of to get it working or would you say that it's 2 faulty APs?  I am not based at site unfortunately so I cannot console to the APs and check them out.

View 5 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Wireless :: AIR-CAP3502i-e-k9 Led Stop Working?

Dec 9, 2012

i've one of my 3500 that when finish to download the os, the front led stop working. During the power on and all the test the led is flashing in various colors pretty ipnotizing :-) When it bacame operative, the led stops. If i issue the test led flashing console command it works.

View 1 Replies View Related

Routers / Switches :: ACL List Not Working As Expected?

Mar 29, 2011

access-list <#> permit/deny <protocol> <sourceAddress> <sourceMask> <destinationAdd> <destinationMask>Say I applied an ACL inbound on Fa0/0, would the source address be the outside the LAN?So if took the same ACL and applied it as outbound, would the source need to be change to an IP inside the LAN?I am a bit confused by the data flow I'm seeing in packet tracer simulation mode to. I set up an ACL for testing purposes "access-list 199 permit ip 193.20.30.0 0.0.0.63 any" set as inbound, the idea being it permits any traffic from the .0 subnet.When I watch the packet in the simulation, it makes it to the destination address then is dropped by the router on it's way back out to the sender.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Application :: CSS 11503 Flow Idle Timeout Not Working As Expected?

Jan 20, 2012

I have a CSS 11503 with a basic content rule for TCP 10000 going to a few backend servers. I was looking into the default timeout values for flows and when testing using telnet the flow didn't terminate as expected?
 
For example, i have no 'timeout multiplier' specified in the config and when i look at the output of 'show flow-timeout default' it tells me the default 16 seconds timeout is in effect for *. With that in mind, i telnet to the content rule vip on TCP 10000 and on the backend server using wireshark i can see the TCP threeway handshake. With no data passing i'd expect the CSS to terminate this flow after 16 seconds.. yet it takes exactly 128 seconds before wireshark shows the RST and the flow is terminated. 128 being 8 times the default 16 second flow timeout.
 
If i try to force the connection to close early by specifiying 'flow-timeout-multiplier 2' in the content rule, or even a multiplier of 40, it still waits 128 seconds to close the telnet connection.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: 2960 Unprotected Identity Pattern Not Working As Expected

Oct 28, 2012

I'm trying to test such 802.1x wired environment:windows xp sp3 as supplicant windows NPS as radius server 2960 as authenticator latest anyconnect (3.1.01065) + nam and standalone profile editor.I have a question: What is the difference between protected identity pattern and unprotected identity pattern (set in nam profile editor)? As I understand documentation PEAP-MSCHAPv2 is a tunneled method and it uses un- protected identity pattern to protect user's identity during phase 0. But if I use any fake identity here (anonymous, anonymous@[domain], etc) access is rejected (Access-Reject in switch debugs). I have to use exacly the same pattern in unprotected identity pattern as in protected identity pattern ([username] or [username]@[domain]) to gain access, regardless of authenticaton mode (same in machine only, user only authentication).

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - IOS Update On Several Devices

Jul 4, 2012

I got 10 Catalysts 3750 (all of them identical) and I got the IOS Update. Anyway I only have service contract for 4 of them.
 
Am I allowed to update all of them? Or only the four devices which have the service contract?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Discovering ASA 5510 Devices In LMS 4.2.3

Dec 9, 2011

i'm currently deploying LMS 4.2.3 Demo version and i'm unable to discover my ASA 5510.how to discover my ASA to mange it in my Cisco Works 4.2.3.

View 35 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Connect Devices To 6509

Apr 11, 2012

My question is if I do not want to purchase any additional switches can I connect the devices to the 6509 and put them in their own separate vlans?I am a little fuzzy about the physical connections needed to make this design work as it is.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Add N2K To Existing N5K - Can't Ping Devices

Mar 5, 2012

I have several cabinets with top-of-rack N2K's attached to N5K's via FEX's.  9 cabinets with 2 switches each. 
 
Recently I added 3 more cabinets to the mix, for a total of 12 cabinets with 2 switches each.
 
I can get into the new switches and see the FEX's and configure ports, etc. but no device I attach to the 'new' N2K's is pingable over the network.  I can take the same device, same cable, and attach it to a legacy N2K talking to the same N5K's, and it immediately joins and is pingable over the network

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Configure Kompella L2vpn Between Devices

Oct 18, 2012

I want to know how to configure kompella l2vpn between 2 cisco devices in CISCO IOS. We know Martinna l2vpn type runs on LDP. but kompella runs on BGP. I need the configuration for same..

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Shut Down Procedure For Devices 5508

Oct 15, 2012

Is there any shut down proceedure for cisco devices in data center cisco router,switches,firewalls ASA-5580-20,ace-4710 and IPS-4260 devices.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - How Much POE Watts Can Be Reduced On Certain Devices

Jun 21, 2012

I'm getting currently installing a full Valcom IP sound and clock system , along with all new Cisco 2960 gig ps-l switches. All devices run off of POE. In the past, I have read that most AP's only draw approx. 12.5 watts (va's). But you must take into account length of wire to add your additional draw which puts you at the 14.5 they auto draw.  My question being that the clocks I have auto draw 15.4 watts, which is eating up my 370w of power on my switches. The spec sheet on the clocks show only a power consumption of 4.5 watts.  So today I turned a few ports down to 4.5 watts and everything still worked fine.. Any experience by chance with Valcom devices or just turning the power down on devices in general? I can imagine that a clock is drawing enough to care about the length of the wire run.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7206 VXR - Multiple GRE Tunnels Between Two Devices

Nov 18, 2012

Has come across issues with multiple GRE tunnels between two devices when using the same source and destination addresses. I've tried using tunnel keys but this makes no difference. The only way I can get this to work is between different source & destination addresses.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: E4200 Not Giving Android Devices Connection

Jan 3, 2012

I just upgraded to the e4200 v2 and I seem to be having connection issues with my android phone and tablet. Both are 802.11n compatable but they seem to have issues staying connected. Just so everyone is up to speed, there are two connections made by android, a general one to the internet, and a second one to the google servers (for syncing e-mail and contacts and the like) When just connected to the internet, the wireless icons are gray, when connected to the google servers as well, the icons turn blue. It's the drop in connection to the google servers that I'm having an issue with. I currently have the router set in full auto for channel and frequency band, but I've also tried setting specific ones thinking maybe the change in channel or something was causing the disconnect. The disconnect will even happen when I'm sitting right next to the router. The phone is a Samsung Galaxy Nexus (Verizon LTE) running Android 4.0.3 and a Asus Transformer tablet (Wifi only) running android 3.2.1.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Firmware Upgrade For SRP527W To Support More Usb Devices

Jan 21, 2013

im guessing there is zero chance of a firmware upgrade for the SRP527W to support more usb devices is there?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2950 - Devices Can't Connected To Server At Core Sw

Jan 11, 2013

In my organization we have several 2950T that conected each other. We have 4 floor with each floor have 1 sw except 4th flr have 3 sw.
 
Main server, apps, db ( 15 units) connected to core sw at 4th flr. Currently the problem is others devices can't connected to the server at core sw. Test ping and the network to core sw is intermittent problem. When ping 100 times only 30 reply. After 10 minutes the connection restored. Ping 100 times successful. It will not having problem again until the next day. This already happen 3 days. Any command for me to use to check if port or the switch having problem? Any log i can collect

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 887 - How To Restrict Devices Connected To 800 Series Router

Jan 30, 2013

I have a Cisco 887M router which I wish to restrict the devices allowed to be connected/allocated an IP address to two, and *only* two.
 
I can't, for the life of me, find out how to allow these two devices to connect to ANY port - I can configure a MAC restriction on a single port, but I don't know how to make it so that I can allow JUST these two devices to connect to any port in the 4 port switch/VLAN (VLAN 1 is used because the mongrel who set this up was lazy). I know the MAC addresses I want to allow
 
How I can do this? I *can* restrict any given port to the two MAC addresses - but if I try to add the MAC addresses to another port, they get removed from the initial one. I need to be able to have them connect to ANY port and work, but allow NOTHING else to work.
 
For those wondering, this is to counter a user who is utilising company resources for purposes not approved - and costing us quite a bit of money in the process.

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C3750X When Run Command CDP NEIGHBORS / 3400 Shows No Devices

Aug 6, 2012

We just installed a Cisco ME-3400EG switch at one of our sites.  A Cisco C3750X switch is connected to the 3400.  When we run the command CDP NEIGHBORS, the 3400 shows no devices.  We can access the 3750 via the 3400.  Also, when we run CDP NEIGHBORS on the 3750 we do not see the 3400 (but other devices are displayed).  How can we get CDP to display the devices on the 3400?  We have already tryed CDP RUN.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Upgrade IOS Image On Multiple Devices Same Time?

Sep 5, 2012

I have a 10nos of cisco 2960 switches and 1no of cisco 3725 gigabit switch. all 2960 switches are parallaly connected to 3725 switch though fiber.
 
all the switches are having same vlan and public ips for management.
 
Now I want to upgrade IOS for all 2960 switches at a time, how to up grade IOS same time for all switches.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - Randomly Devices Will Drop Offline And Then Come Back

Aug 28, 2012

I have a network that has a pair of 6500 switches on either end, running HSRP. In between each 6500 are two to three ruggedcom switches. They are connected to each other and the 6500's by trunk ports in a straight line. The 6500's see each other as CDP neighbors, and the 6500's can see the rugged- com as LLDP neighbors (ruggedcom only supports LLDP).
 
The issue is that randomly devices on the ruggedcoms will drop offline and then come back. The problem is that the devices that drop offline are all in the same VLAN, so it appears like a virus -  i.e. one device drops off, then multiple. Eventually the HSRP starts flapping between the two 6500s and this causes havoc on the network.I'm almost to the point of taking a laptop and plugging it into one of the ruggedcom's to see traffic, but the issue is that the ruggedcoms are outside in cabinets that laptops shouldnt be exposed to.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1921 Router To Ping The Local Devices Connected To Network

Feb 7, 2013

I wounder if there is any way to ping the local deviceses connected to a network hosted by a Cisco 1921 router? I wan't to be able to ping the device(computer name) but currently cant do that.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cat6500 / IPTV Multicast Network Devices High CPU Utilization?

Jan 30, 2013

i have a campus network with 2 core Cat6500 and multiple 4500 series distribution switches plus 2960 series access switches,we have deployed IPTV system in the network but currently 50 TVs are working through sattelite stream from streaming server Cisco's DCM 9900.we are planning to add more  300 TVs in the network and i am wondering that when all of them will be deployed then what will happen for switches cpu utilizations when all the Tvs will be running on the same time with different different channels.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 Command Shows Two Devices Connected Through Same Local Port?

Oct 14, 2012

show cdp neighbors command shows two devices connected through the same local port?I have a Cisco 3560 that when I issue the "show cdp neighbors" command I get the following results: [code]
 
the question is why is this showing that Gig0/3 is being used twice to  connect to two different devices.  I have verified there is no hub  connected to this port and in fact Switch3 is not connected to Switch1  at all yet it still shows up in the CDP table.
 
I have cleared the CDP table on every device at this location and still get the same results. 

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: List Of Supported External HDDs / NAS Devices For 857w Router?

Mar 19, 2012

Where can I find a list of supported external HDDs or NAS devices for a Cisco 857w router?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: Resetting AIR-CAP3502I-A-K9

Sep 21, 2011

This summer the IT department at my location rolled out a little more than 100 AIR-CAP3502I-A-K9's to much success. We have had an issue with only one AP. This paticular AP must have gotten unplugged during the updating process after the initial conneciton to the controller was made as the LED currently blinks red-blue-red, indicating an error in the flash memory according to the manual.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco 2801 Gear Expected Life

May 12, 2011

I am doing some really rough budget numbers. What can I expect for a life cycle on some Cisco gear like a 2801 router and a 48 port PoE switch? Is 4 years pushing it too much? We usually don't upgrade unless something breaks.

View 15 Replies View Related

Not Getting My Expected Mbps Speed On Speakeasy

Jan 17, 2012

I'm paying for 18 Mbps download speed, and my laptops and one desktop get this speed, but the computer from which I write only gets 5 Mbps. He didn't know why.I'm pasting my HJT and DDS logs, and attaching Attach.txt. Ark.txt will be copied to this also.

[code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: SG300-10 See All Traffic From All Connected Devices On Any Port / Where To Connect Listening Device

Dec 20, 2012

In my LAN environment, I'm using two cisco SG300-10 switches. Both switches are connected by GE10 on both switches, where both ports are set to trunk.Now on all ports 1-9 on both switches, I'm having client computers attached. So I set ports 1-9 to "access" mode.All interfaces on any switch is left in default vlan.
 
Is it normal that I see all traffic from all connected devices on any port where I connect a listening device?What I'd like to achieve is, that only traffic that is meant for a specific workstation is actually forwarded to this workstation. By now it seems that I get all the traffic from everybody.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4948 E HSRP Connect Devices To Standby Unit That Do Not Require Redundancy

Jul 29, 2012

If I setup 4948E's in HSRP configuration.  And I connect devices to the Standby Unit that do not require redundancy.  Will there be any issues passing traffic?  I don't believe that standby unit blocks the traffic but wanted to confirm.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: Some AIR-CAP3502i-e-k9 Vo1 No Joining Network?

Dec 14, 2011

We've just replaced some 1240 LAPs with 20 x 3502i.
 
Seem to have a problem, most of the 14 * 3502i have regersted on the network and working, 6 arent connecting and log below. I've replaced one of the AP with a differnt one, same model and batch and this works.
 
WISMs on 7.0.98.0 
Scirpt
 *Mar  1 00:15:16.015: %CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state to

[Code].....

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: Wall Mounting A AIR-CAP3502I-E-K9

Nov 23, 2011

I was under the impression that the AIR-CAP3502I-E-K9  is a ceiling mount AP only. Is any one using these as wall monuted AP's?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: Air CAP3502i In Boot Loop?

May 8, 2013

We are setting up one of these for the first time. It is in a constant rebooting process.
 
Here is the boot process:
  
r WRDTR,CLKTR: 0x8200083f 0x40000000
r RQDC ,RFDC : 0x80000032 0x00000211
using  eeprom values

[Code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: CAP3502I Not Responding For Traceroute_tracert

Oct 18, 2012

I have 1 cisco AP (CAP3502I) which is not able to associate with WLC (version 7.0.235.0), using CAPWAP. Simply from debug I can see that AP is trying to contact WLC on port udp/5246 but can't see any response from WLC.
 
*Oct 19 07:06:50.055: UDP: sent src=x.x.x.x(4271), dst=wlc.wlc.wlc.wcl(5246), length=47
 
AP is getting config about WLC from DHCP option 43 and have own reservation to get same IP address (+default GW). AP is NOT associated but as it has IP address from DHCP then it is pingable. But don't know why, but I'm not able to tracert/traceroute to this AP, as I can see it is getting packets but it is not responding.
 
But on different locations, where are same APs model (associated with WLC) I have no problem with traceroute it, as APs are responding.
  
My question: It is not related that AP is not able to associate with WLC (still working on it) BUT should I be able to traceroute/tracert to unassociated AP (to his IP) and get response???
 
NOTE:
==> WLC is in DC and AP on one location, so diagram could be: WLC ---- L3 device ---- Provider MPLS router..........Provider MPLS router ---- L3 device -- L2 switch --- AP (CAPWAP)
 
@It means that there is NO FW on tha way :-) 
 
I check many other APs with same model and non of them has problem to respond for traceroute, but this particular unassociated one has :-

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved