i have server with two uplink to pair of 6500 non-VSS, this server member of vlan 100 sw-1 is active HSRP while sw2 is a standby HSRP , how can i make this server forward traffic on both Link . the server admin told me only one link is active (green) on the server while the other link is orange
View 5 Replieswhat is the best configuration betwen vmware ESX server with 10 Physical NIC card and cisco 6500 , This ESX Server host 12 vm with VLAN 100,150.200
View 10 Replies View Relatedwhat is the best configuration between vmware ESX server with 10 Physical NIC card and cisco 6500 , This ESX Server host 12 vm with VLAN 100,150.200.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a switch(6500) with 2 vlans(2 SUBNETS) and from the other side of my network i have 2 terminal servers.
I want to have a VIP in my 6500 switch which i have the 2 vlans and when the first vlan(network) try to connect to the VIP
my switch will forward to first terminal.When the second vlan try to connect to VIP the switch will forward to second terminal.
I'd like the switch to decide in wich terminal server will forwared the packet based on source network.
I am not sure how i can do this???I use VIP with SLB???I use NAT???PBR?
I have 2 servers, one active, the other standby, both will be using the same IP. If the active fails then a re-patch for the standby to make this the active. I understand that i will need to clear the arp & maybe mac address table on the 6500 for the new active server to work, as the failed server will have its mac address on the 6500,.
is there a way around this so i dont have to clear the arp cache & clear the mac table? [code]
cisco WS-C6509-E Core switch with IOS "s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF11"
i have 2 question
Q.1 i want to upgrade this switch what is the latest IOS ver. supported by this module ?
Q.2 i need to enable http server on this switch when i run this comman it's accsebt but i cant get http work
I have an Cisco 6500 CS and there is a Cisco Unified Communication Manger Server connected directly to the Core Switch.I tried to change duplex and speed ( fix and auto ) for both sides, but the same problem.
View 9 Replies View RelatedFour 6500 connected to each other to form a full mesh. Switches 4 and 7 is running eigrp. A question came up, why didnt it have eigrp on SW 2 & 3 ? Will it still be redundant if link between SW3 and SW4 is removed? If redundancy is working, SW3 should be able to find its way to SW4 via SW7 or SW2, yes?
The config looks:
SW4 eigrp
router eigrp 100
network 192.168.0.0
redistribute static
auto-summary
[Code]....
Recently, the eigrp was configured to SW 2 and SW 3 as well, it included the “redistribute static” statement. The route for SW2 and SW3 now has the VLANs, 51 or so. Sent ping from a PC to VLAN1 IP of SW3, then link between SW3 and SW4 was disconnected, network connectivity went down for about 20secs, and ping came right back. Thought it was a success. All of a sudden, outside connectivity was lost. Ping within the LAN was successful, but no internet connection.
The eigrp on SW2 and SW3 was removed, and the internet connection came back up. The initial concern was that although there is physical redundancy in place, the other routes may not be known. Hence, eigrp configuration has been attempted for SW2 and SW3. Perhaps the “redistribute static” should have never been configured on SW2 and SW3, SW7 does not have the “redistribute static” statement anyway.
Without eigrp running on SW2 and SW3, does it still have redundancy? For what it’s worth, SW4 and SW7 are both VTP servers. With the current configs, does it still have redundancy? Link redundancy was never tested; it always has been assumed that it works. Later today, with it’s current config, the link redundancy will be tested.
I have two Cisco 6500 switches connected via fiber, this is my small network. One end goes to a provider, and the other end goes to a server. My IT department wants some sort of link state propagation since the provider keeps going down, but the IT team is unaware until they contact me.
We provide a Layer2 point-to-point circuit, access ports at the ends. We use V LAN's to transport the traffic. Please let me know if there is anything I could do to support link state propagation.
I need to implement the shaping VLAN only on the trunk link between the 6500 and 3560. [code]
View 8 Replies View Relatedhow can we upgrade 6500 non modular ios to normal 6500 ios?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have an issue with a Cisco 4900M switch with a WS-X4908-10G-RJ45 half card. The link connection between a 10Gbase-T server nic and the switch does not establish, i believe it is an auto negotiation problem. The link fluctuates constantly between connected and disconnected when set to auto negotiate. When the 10G half card port groups are configured for 1G connections it does the same. If i hard code the server nic to 1G the link remains up when the port group is at 1G. If i hard code the server nic to 10G the link stay down, i don't think the port speed and duplex can be hard coded on the switch end. I have tried updating the drivers on the server as well as diagnostic tests on the nic, which passed. The 4900M IOS code is version 15.0.2-SG2. If i plug a laptop into the 1G configured port the switch and the laptop negotiate at 1G. Also, i believe, if the 10G server nic is plugged into another 1G only switch the link auto negotiates to 1G as normal. The server nic is an INTEL Server Adapter AT 10G, which became end of life in 2009. I believe the half card came out in 2010.
View 5 Replies View RelatedAs per my understanding 6509 all slots are dual channel, so 9 slot * 40 per slot (20 g in and 20 g out) = 360 GB How cisco claim the 720 ?? What about the 6513 chassic switch fabric connection?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am seeing a strange situation on my 6500 switch?By having snmp walk on '1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3' (== cpmCPUTotal5sec), I came to know that there are two processor and the cpu util for switching processor is gone to 88 % and some time creeps to 99 %.
snmpwalk -v2c -c "removes" sw6500 '1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3'
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3.1 = Gauge32: 12 (--- this is for CPU of Router Processor )
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3.3 = Gauge32: 99 (--- this is for CPU of Switching Processor )
but when I do sh process cpu on the console, all looks normal as it shows cpu utilization of RP. why the value is so high on the switching processor ?
For intervlan routing, Is 'IP routing' command enabled by default on a 6500 series switches based on the IOS?and on 3750 switches, do we need to enable the "ip routing" command manually for intervlan routing?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm looking to restrict Inter-VLAN routing through L3 switch (cisco 6500) and wanted to know best possible way to do it. I used VACL and achieved success to some extent, but my config is making clients take up to 5-6 mins to authenticate IP address from the DNS (bootps).My VACL config was as follows:
Subnet to restrict is 10.100.15.0 (VLAN 15)
STEP 1: Created extended ACL to allow bootpc/bootps through DNS
ip access-list extended EACL_DNS
permit udp any eq bootps any
permit udp any eq bootpc any
STEP 2: Created standard ACLs to allow only relevant subnet, server VLANs & some IPs from other subnets for printers/scanners etc.
ip access-list standard SACL_VLAN_15
permit 10.100.15.0 0.0.0.255 (the subnet I'm restricting)
permit 10.100.50.0 0.0.0.255 (server VLANs)
permit 10.100.25.45 0.0.0.0 (printer in another VLAN which has to have access in VLAN 15)
STEP 3: Created VLAN access list
vlan access-map VACL_15 10
match ip address EACL_DNS
action forward
vlan access-map VACL_15 20
match ip address SACL_15
action forward
STEP 4: Applying VLAN Access list on VLAN 15 vlan filter VACL_15 vlan-list 15 Though the above works, below is noted:
1. I'm still able to PING 10.100.15.2 (the switch virtual interface) from outside the subnet, which I don't intend to do so. Howeve all cients in the subnet have no connectivity from outside the VLAN 15.
2. As mentioned its taking quiet some time to negotiate with the DNS server at system boot time.
I used to "ip routing" command in order to enable inter-vlan routing, for example with 3750 cisco. I have a 6503 cisco with SUP720 MSFC3. I was able to create some vlans but I can not configure inter-vlan routing.
sw#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
swsur(config)#ip routing
[Code]....
For intervlan routing, Is 'IP routing' command enabled by default on a 6500 series switches based on the IOS?hes, do we need to enable the "ip routing" command manually for intervlan routing?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhere is the "ip routing" command in Cisco switch 6500 series?
is the ip routing enable by default accoridng to the: [URL]
i would like to check out what's the difference between the naming convnetion for the 6500 IOS.
I read the data sheet to support my POC deployment to support NCS v.1 the 6500 IOS need to upgrade to 12.2 (33) SXI
Is it able to work if i using SXJ instead of SXI, with the same IOS version 12.2 (33)?
I have tried to test copy tftp: numerous time with no success. I believe the reason it is failing is my laptop to Ethernet port is in vlan 62 and the tftp process operates in a different IP space.I am using gig 7/1 and configuring my laptop nic for x.x.x.254 mask 255.255.255.0. I can ping from laptop to gateway) and I can ping from the switch to my laptop using ping vrf production x.x.x.254. Can you tell me what vlan I need to set my laptop connection in or if there is something else I need to change to make tftp work on vlan62?Does TFTP only work in vlan1 or can it be changed?
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow to upgrade IOS in switch 6500 connect in VSS from 12.2(33)SXI IOS to 12.2(33)SXJ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe are setup like a hotel style workers camp. We have wings full of rooms and residents with 3750 stacks in them. Those switches connect back to our core 6500's. The network is mostly all Layer 3, interfaces are routed with IPs.
When it was built before my time they included an ACL for each wing so that residents couldn't access internal devices (IE SSH to 6500) but I've come to notice it's not working.
I see hits on the ACL for accepts but nothing is hitting the deny rule at the top.Here is the configuration below:
mls qos aggregate-policer INTERNET1 24000000 80000 80000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
mls qos aggregate-policer INTERNET2 24000000 80000 80000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
mls qos aggregate-policer INTERNET 24000000 80000 80000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
[Code] ....
On googling I came across documents that say OTV (Overlay Transport Virtualization) is supported on Cat 6500. Any authentic information whether OTV is supported on Cat 6500, especially with Sup-720B? FYI, Cisco Feature Navigator does not mention it.
View 1 Replies View RelatedSUP2T-D#sh proce cpu hist
11111111111 1111 1111 1111 1111
0000000000099999000099999000099999999990000999900009999999
0000000000099999000099999000099999999990000999900009999999
100 **********************************************************
90 **********************************************************
80 **********************************************************
70 **********************************************************
60 **********************************************************
50 **********************************************************
40 **********************************************************
30 **********************************************************
20 **********************************************************
10 **********************************************************
0....5....1....1....2....2....3....3....4....4....5....5....
0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5
CPU% per second (last 60 seconds)
SUP2T-D#sh proce cpu sorted
CPU utilization for five seconds: 100%/83%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: 99%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
416 3324188 879928 3777 13.05% 14.42% 14.45% 0 Spanning Tree
633 104408 5091 20508 1.50% 0.53% 0.45% 0 Env Poll
75 22000 298 73825 1.10% 0.13% 0.07% 0 Per-minute Jobs
168 69696 163563 426 0.39% 0.23% 0.22% 0 slcp process
2 532 1010 526 0.07% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Load Meter (code )
I am trying to guarantee 100mbps for a vlan across a gig link. I have done some research and found this command for switches
mls qos srr-queue input priority-queue 2 bandwidth 20
However it doesn't seem to work for my 6500. I know the 6500 uses PFC for QOS but I have no idea how it works. how I can guarantee a vlan 100mbps across a 1gig link?
We are getting ready to start testing Quad VSS for our production VSS environments we have done the research and per documentation it seems pretty straight forward.
I want to make sure that the dual to quad VSS is easily done across our multiple VSS setups and I am curious of those that have done this already have you ran into any gotchas on the turn up of the ICS Sup?
Also, just a ICS in a single chassis instead of one in both chassis of the VSS?
In one of our environments we have all single home devices going to VSS switch 1 and only dual homed devices. going to switch 2 so may be desireable to only install an ICS in the switch 1 VSS.
Cisco 6500 with 2T supervisor engine with following software Cisco IOS Software, s2t54 Software (s2t54-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 15.0(1)SY1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4)
The problem is that, I am not able to configure Multilayer Switching (MLS) (mls rp ip) in the global config command. Although the "mls" is visible on the config menu. but when I say "mls ?", the router prompt "unrecognize command"
Not sure if SUP 2T support MLS or it come with different name.
I have WS-C6509-E chassis with VS-S2T-10G supervisor.
Currently I have IOS " S2TIBK9-15001SY - Cisco CAT6000-VS-S2T IOS IP BASE FULL ENCRYPT "
Can I upgrade the IOS to " S2TISK9-15001SY - Cisco CAT6000-VS-S2T IOS IP SERV FULL ENCRYPT " without purchasing this IOS?
Will I face issue in TAC cases?
I have a question which i am unsure of, on the 6500 i know i can set mls qos trust to cos or dscp since I don't have any trunks configured on that switch that i want to trust cos most of my ports trust dscp instead. The question is will packets coming in or going out at L3 with the TOS bits set get placed in the correct in/out queue. For example if a packet comes in on a port with a mls qos trust dscp and has the TOS set to XX will this XX get mapped to the correct COS value based on the default dscp to cos map and end up going out the correct queue which handles that specific COS number?
I mainly asked this because i saw the following on the cisco site and again i am suing dscp trust and not cos.
Weighted Round Robin (WRR), Deficit Weighted Round Robin (DWRR) and Shaped Round Robin (SRR). WRED and all the Round Robin scheduling options use the priority tag (CoS) inside an Ethernet frame to provide enhanced buffer management and outbound scheduling.
Someone had told me the 6500 switches can be stacked via fiber. This feature is available for the 3750s?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have this message "DHCP Timeout"on few cisco IP Phones .try to assign IP manually and it's working fine.. seems DHCP not giving IP's to those.. 6500 have configured as DHCP pool.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am looking for a way to see packets that are matched on certain ACLs in a CoPP policy map. I have read that it is not a good thing to add the log keyword at the end of an ACL when using that ACL for CoPP. I initially tried to use a logging policy map but the 6500 12.2sx doesn't support this.
how I can see source/destination IP for a certain class in a CoPP policy map?