We are using a 2821 Router as our boundary router. It has installed into it a 9 port HWIC for layer 2 switching as well as allowing the router to communicate on the Network Management VLAN. All of the devices on the Network Management VLAN are segregated from the managed traffic, which unfortunately also doesn't allow them external NTP services. Can the router be programmed as a NTP server so that all of the network appliances can utilize it for NTP from either it's NM Vlan IP address or from a loopback address?
I have a 2821 ciso router and i want to setup a vpn for my windows domain users , they must to reach the domain from outside. There is posibile to intregrate Active directory auth with pptp running on 2821 router? kind of dialin via radius server(IAS running on windows server 2003).
For a config on a 2821 router with IOS 15.1?I've setup an internal web server and am able to acccess it from outside our network but not from inside (on a separate internal LAN - 192.168.10.0). When on the internal LAN - DNS points to the Public IP for the web server - so we'd need to route through the Public IP to access the web server.
What is the best way to allow access to the web server XX.XX.XX.231 from 192.168.10.0 network?
Related Config Lines to Allow Access to Web Server NAT ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.230 80 XX.XX.XX.231 80 extendable ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.230 443 XX.XX.XX.231 443 extendable ACL ip access-list extended WAN permit tcp any host XX.XX.XX.231 eq 443 permit tcp any host XX.XX.XX.231 eq www
The router is 2821 and is setup to perform static NAT from one internal ip address mapping to one external ip address for each of our servers (inside the LAN): [code] Servers all have internal ip addresses and each of them represented to the outside world by their public ip address with above command on the router. Here is the problem.When I'm in a server (for example 192.168.0.210) and try to access other servers by their public ip addresses (i..e. *.*.*.211) the connection fails. However, When i try to access the same server by it's private IP address (i.e. 192.168.0.211) it works!
My issue is i don't want to modify windows host file for a manual mapping (for example mail.mydomian.com goes to 192.168.0.211 rather than *.*.*.211) because we host many domains and just doesn't make sense to do it one by one.So we must be able to access our servers by their public IP addresses in order for us our applications works correctly.
We have 6 brnaches configured with NAC Module in Cisco 2821 ISR router. The WAN link being used to connect all the branch to the HQ CAM is via WIMEX wireless Broadband. The bandwidth is 2MB.OOBVG is the mode used. All branches were working well last 1 year. Last month it is suddently disconnected from the CAM.I opened the TAC. Cisco history of TAC experience, We have total 6 TAC enginners tried one by one still the problem not resolved. The following are the findings
1. Timing is accurate between CAS-CAM 2. Shared secret key correct 3. SSL temp certificate ok also image being used it 4.6.1. 4.Tcpdump from both CAM and shows some initial packet drops of 10 sec with the below CAM log
I believe that NAC is not a matured products and the problem like this even by Cisco TAC can not solve.
I have a cisco 2821 router and it has an advanceip image in the flash each time on reboot it gives the message software forced crash and checksum error and finally goes into rommon. i tried xmodem and tftpdnld -r but same problem persists. I even changed the CF with a working router's flash but the same problem occurs.I also loaded an ip base image of about 13Mb size and all the same problem repeats with it.
URL What changes are needed to the 2821 config that is behind another Cisco router? And what static ports should be opened on the MAIN Cisco router that is in front of the 2821?
I have setup nat on three sub interfaces but when trying to browse to local servers, such as our web server, that have been translate, we get a prompt to logon to the router. I suspect these internal addresses should not be natted for local users.
I have a Router 2821 with c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T1.bin and with a Cisco Integrated Service Engine(s) Cisco Unity Express 7.1.1 in slot 1 , this router shows a high cpu utilization.I think is a bug with the IOS , because there is no voicemail configured on the CUE, there is no traffic to the CUE , just traffic from:
- voice calls - ospf
The ospf is not the cause of the high cpu , because the high cpu utilization appears before I put the ospf proccess on the router.
i am using cisco 2821 router at the edge in my network where the WAN link is terminated.i want to configure Redundancy . So will 2821 support ? If yes what is the another router .Is it the same series or different for redundant configuration.
I'm using a Cisco 2821 router to provide temporary Internet access for a private network of about 300 users for a conference at a hotel. The hotel has provided me a public IP address for the WAN side. On the LAN side I have a 10.x.x.x /8 subnet with the router providing DHCP and NATing (overload) across the WAN interface.
Users can pick up an IP address and access the web. Light web pages such as Google tend to load without issue, however if a user does something that takes more time, such as streaming a Youtube trailer or opening an RDP session, the connection will freeze.
It doesn't appear to be related to bandwidth availability. Pings return on average 10-15 ms. However, I will get a request time out about every 10th continual ping. Steaming video will load about 4-6 seconds worth of data, then will appear to freeze without dropping. Doing something like speedtest.net will send a large amount of data then will hang, without ever ending the conversation.
This doesn't happen when I plug a laptop directly into the hotel public Internet line. They also don't have issues with their network similar to this.
I do not have any ACLs, etc. loaded. The router is basically wide open as far as I can tell. I don't see the router resources getting used much at all.
Recently I have bought a 2821 router from an auction. The router did have some configuration and password on it. I tried to break into it by restating it and pressing control and pause break signal. Old cisco method. Now when I try this method on my 2821. It does say that password recovery is disabled on the router. After this message router proceed with normal boot process. How to break the password ? Even if I loose the configuration.
I want to clear the keys on a 2821 and generate new ones using the command crypto key zeroize command but I don't see this command available as an option. Below is the output of the available options..
ROUTER#crypto key ? lock Lock a keypair. unlock Unlock a keypair.
Currently I'm looking for a way to failover our internet connection from one site to another site over our MPLS line, should that internet connection go down.
My layout: Internet > Cable internet modem (Site B) > ASA 5510 (Site B) > 2821 Router (Site B) > MPLS Line > 2821 Router (Site A) > ASA5510 (Site A) > ISP provider internet router (Site A) > Internet
Facts:Site B is the one with the internet issues.The MPLS line is routed using BGP. [URL]
I am sitting on Internet and want to copy IOS Image to router. I can SCP, itu authenticated to Router but ends with a message "host is not communicating for more than 15 seconds".
Router : Cisco 2821 Current IOS: (C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T1.
I am looking to find the correct router for a 50 Mbps Ethernet connectin that is for Internet traffic. It will need to support 50 Mbps throughput, along with routing protocols for BGP, and maybe NAT/ACL's. It most likely will be a used router, in the 2800 series. I'm thinking a 2821 would work, but need to make sure before I pass it on to the customer. They currently have a 3660 they were thinking of using, but I think it would be too weak, and probably only pas 30Mbps at the most before it chokes. They are a mini ISP with their own ASN, Tier 3.
I have a cisco 2821 router configured as a CME version 7.1. Now I want to upgrade the IOS to version 15 to get a CME version 8.6 but I faced a problem that the flash of the 2821 is 64MB and the IOS version 15 required flash 128MB. I tried to replace this flash with another 128MB installed on Cisco 2811 router but when I installed the 128MB flash on the 2821 CME the 2821 didn't boot from it.
I have Zone Based Firewall running on a 2821 router and would like to configure Url Filtering with Websence . IOS running on that device is c2800nm-adverterprisek9-mz.150-1.M7.bin . Once you have ZBF config you cant configure url-filtering using classic way ( ip inspect ) and this has to be done using class , policy maps .For this to to happen it is required to have match protocol http command under the class map , it wont work using the match access-group command.[code]
Once I put match protocol http command browsing becomes dead slow , also without using match protocol command I cant continue to configure Url Filtering . Is this a problem related to IOS where match protocol command isnt working fine . I have checked CPU utlization of Router and it was roughly near 7 percent .
I am looking for a simple router recomendation for multihoming dual 100Mbps internet connections with BGP routing. What are the current best practices regarding required resources for the full Internet BGP routing table? We were thinking of specing a 3945 for this application, but is that overkill? The customer has a 2821 that is not in use, I'm thinking this would be too slow for Internet BGP routing combined with the 100Mbps line speed.
Yesterday my router was hangs and my services was stuck. I start the router hard booted and it works fine.This was second time i was facing this kind of scenario. The attached are the "show tech support" of the cisco router 2821.
I have a problem with the command mls qos trust dscp, I used the ios c2800nm-ipvoice_ivs-mz.124-25f.bin but i can not enable dont show me the complete command in the interface Ethernet o Giga. I want to configuring mls qos trust dscp.
Basically I run 3 voice gateways on 2821 routers. In two of my routers I've had fan failures, one router has had two fans die and one has had just the one.
I was going to buy the offical Cisco fan replacement kit but then I thought with such as high failure rate I'd rather buy something else and better guarentee the service to my call centres.
So, what i'm asking is:
- Is there any reason why I cannot procure a standard 80mm 12V fan with a better rating (cooling and reliability) and install this in my 2821's?
I understand this may invalidate any warranties but mine have long expired.
We've got Cisco 2821 for our 90mb/s Internet Access. Its CPU usage is around 80%. Show process cpu does not show any cpu proccess with high utilization. But we have got plenty of policing configured for our clients using policy maps. Can this policing affect cpu usage?
I have customer that we have configured netflow on the 2821 router that their traffic is on. Currently the company they have contracted with for the analysis is seeing data duplication. Below is the configuration for the interface and the router
Cisco 2821;
interface GigabitEthernet0/0 description TVC-FI-Ethernet-Fiber-Ethernet link ip address 216.255.164.33 255.255.255.248 secondary ip address 192.168.5.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 216.255.166.129 255.255.255.128 secondary
I have some issue on Card Hwic-D-9ESW with Router 2821, i was install card 9ESW in to router 2821 on slot 2 and 3. After I show run, the Cisco Router 2821 have interface F0/3/0 - F0/3/8.and i configure V lan already and interface up also.
When i connect PC to port F0/3/0, the interface is up, but i cannot pint go interface, i mean it request time out. My question is, Is it correct that i install card into slot 2 and 3?
What is the problem all port up but i cannot ping to interface?
I am currently running a 2821 to terminate vpn links from all our branch offices over a WAN. I need to add a second interface in order to facilitate a move to a different WAN provider. seeing as the 2800 models are EOL I was looking for an upgrade. My local retailer wants to sell me the following:CISCO3925E-SEC/K9 IS Router 3925E security bundle SEC license pack,HWIC-2T 2 port serial WAN card,MEM-3900-1GU2GB Upgrade to 2GB 1,now my question is why can't i use the 2900 models in order to save some money?All I need is a router that will accept 2 different incoming WANs and the ability to create vpn tunnels over them..
