Cisco VPN :: 5512x / RA VPN Using AnyConnect In 2nd Site?
May 14, 2013
I am looking into a DR plan where should a primary site go down users with the Cisco anyconnect client will be able to VPN to a second site. The ASA I am configuring is a 5512x for the 2nd site. The main site has a pair of 5510's in a HA pair. Is it possible to setup a secondary Remote Access VPN connection for users to connect to? If I was to configure Anyconnect RA VPN on the ASA on the 2nd I would need to purchase an SSL cert in order to configure this?
we have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail) Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Recently I used the wizard to create an IPsec site-to-site connection, which went very smoothly; however, I now noticed that when I connect via Anyconnect 2.5.0217 I cannot get to local and subnatted resources on the network.
I rolled back to saved config file, which was taken before the site-to-site vpn was created, but that did not work as well.What should I check to see why I can no longer get to different subnets after the site-to-site vpn connection.
I have 2 ASA5505's connected through a site-to-site using IKEv1 and IKEv2.Recently, I ran through the wizard to configure the AnyConnect software. [code]Now, my site-to-site connection will only come up using IKEv1.Is there a way to have both the Site-to-Site and the AnyConnect VPN connections use IKEv2?
I have a Cisco ASA 5502 and a Sonicwall TZ-210.The ASA is Office A and the Sonicwall is Office B.
Office A and Office B have a site to site vpn setup and people connected to either network can access resources on both networks.
people in Office A use the Cisco Anyconnect client, which is on a different subnet than the office A network, to vpn into office A. they can access resources in Office A but not Office B.
from what I can tell by looking at the split tunnel rules for the Cisso anyconnect client and the ACL’s on the ASA 5505 the Office B network is listed in the correct places.I I created an address group and had the Subnet for Office A and the anyconnect client for Office A to the group and set that as my remote network on the TZ-210 but no go…
I did some searching around on the forums and the interwebs, but all I found was Cisco to Cisco stuff when it came to the anyconnect client or site to site VPN to Sonicwall.. didn't find much on the anyconnect client over the site to site with a sonicwall.
We are in the middle of upgrading from two PIX's to some new ASA5512X's. To give you some background on the situation we are upgrading these since the PIXs are fairly old. We had one extra that we had to use since one PIX has failed already. The guy that implemented the PIXs orginally was learning how to do so as he went so there is alot of needless config in the PIX, atleast from what I can tell. Another guy that works with me has done some configuration on the new ASAs and has done the majority of it so far. Today we went to install the new ASAs and switch everything over hoping it would work, but that didn't happen. It seems that there is something wrong with our NAT and ACLs somewhere along the lines. The way our network is laid out is that we have two school campus with a site-to-site VPN one is 172.17.0.0/16 and the other is 172.18.0.0/16. We also have a remote-access VPN on both ASA's. When we connected the new ASAs up and brought up the interfaces, nothing on the inside could ping the internet nor the other side. The VPN showed active on the ASA's and each ASA could ping the others outside interface, but that was it. I have posted the configs below.
ASA1:
: Saved : Written by enable_15 at 04:26:18.240 CDT Tue Mar 12 2013 ! ASA Version 8.6(1)2
I am updating my 8.2(3) code for my new ASA5512 that is running 8.6(1) and am unable to get on the internet with my current configuration from the inside interface.
i found this part number for asa5512x product "ASA5512-SSD120-K9" it's a New Product Hold and under group "Cisco ASA CX Context-Aware Security" Who have know more information about this? Cisco ASA CX Context-Aware Security ASA5512-SSD120-K9 ASA 5512-X with SW, 6GE Data, 1GE Mgmt, AC,3DES/AES,SSD 120G
Recently upgraded to an Asa 5512x from a pix 515e. I have an Ipswitch secure MoveIT server on the dmz1 interface that needs to be accessed from both the inside and outside interfaces. I have setup a static nat from the outside to the dmz1 and it works, I can also connect from the inside interface. Now I need the MoveIT server to access the DNS server and email server on the inside interface so it can send notifications. On the pix I just created a static from the inside to the dmz1 using its own IP address - static (inside,dmz1) 192.168.1.7 192.168.1.7 net mask 255.255.255.255. I would then add the access-list to allow. How would I set this up with the Asa 8.6 commands?
I'm trying to get started on setting up my first Transparent ASA.I understand an ASA in Transparent Mode can now have an ip address with Bridge Groups or some such mechanism. I'm looking for examples of how to set that up and other information below. Is the ip address associated with the device or is it interface specific? Will I be able to SSH with that ip address setup? Can I use ASDM if the Transparent ASA has an ip address? This 5512X has an IPS. Any one who has setup an IPS on this platform knows it has some very particular requirments in order to communicate with the outside world. I need examples of how to do that with a Transparent ASA.How is NAT setup differently (if at all) on a Transparent ASA?Are ACLs done any differently?
I have ASA 5512X and I'm trying to run CX features on it. but the problem is I don't have SSD drive in the chassis. how can I get one? is any kind of SSD drive compatible with cisco ASA-CX firewalls or i should order it from cisco only? what is the part number for that model?
I was wondering how to tighten the security of my email delivery to a range of ip addresses (I know how on my old firewall but the cisco is quite a bit different). Right now anyone sending email to a particular ip address on my firewall can do so. I want to restrict that to two ip address ranges it will accept deliver from. I'm thinking I need two network objects for the two ranges then add to a network object group. Configuring the ACL for delivery using that group if I'm correct about that ?
url...For the New Firewalls i.e. 5512X , 5515X etc there seems to be integrated IPS and we don't need to order any extra license or part number to get the IPS features .
But for the 5585X It says 2Gbps for SSP10 engine but I have seen in the Dynamic Configuration Tool that SSP10 and IPS-SSP10 are different things . Which means that I will have to order 2 service engines SSP10 and IPS SSP10 to get the IPS features and if I only order SSP10 with that Chasis I will only get firewalling ?
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
We have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
The scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.
Building configuration... Current configuration : 5425 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01 ! version 12.4 no service pad
cisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510. I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).
I have ASA 5505, i configured site to site vpn between central site and remote site and is working. Now the problem is we use remote site for troubleshooting purpose, so we need to create a tunnel from remote site to central site. I need to configure such a way that remote site can craete a tunnel to central site, but central site not able to create a tunnel, it just respond to remote site.
i have 2 router asa 5505 with base license i wanna make site to site vpn connection and remote site using vpn client to connect first i have hdsl router with 5 public ip i wanna try it by giving 1 public ip to each router and try the vpn but nothing work?
I am trying to set up a site to site ipsec connection. AT site A, I have Vlan's 652-10.55.216.0/24, Vlan653 -10.55.217.0/24, Vlan 654-10.55.217.0/24 and Vlan655-10.55.219.0/24 and at site B, Vlan650-10.55.214.0/24 and Vlan651-10.55.215.0/24.The problem is that I am unable to get any associations when i do a "sh crypto isakmp sa"/"sh crypto ipsec sa" on either router at each site.I am also unable to ping by pluging in a laptop into the site at each site. Laptop at site A is set to access vlan 655 and laptop at site B is set to acess vlan 651. I can ping all the devices from one end to the other.I have turned on debug crypto isakmp, debug crypto ipsec, debug crypto ipsec errors but dont get anything at all as output.I have attached the sh run for each router Cisco (1941/K9) and switch (Catalyst 3750) at each site.
I have an ASA 5525 and need to configure site to site ipsec vpn to 3 peers. I currently have an existing /28 public address from my ISP that is used by other services.Is there a way to use this existing ip range to configure IPSEC tunnels to 3 peers ?
Our Headquarter (asa 5510) is running a site to site vpn connection with a Branch office (router 2811). All remote users are accesing the internet through the VPN and also accesing headquarter file servers.I want to know if there is a way for some remote users to be able to use the vpn for accesing the file servers but to access the internet through the branch office. The rest of the remote users will be still accessing the internet through VPN.
We've just deployed a site-to-site VPN using a 5505 ASA on the client's site and a checkpoint Nokia FW on our site. Everything seems to be fine except that the user's connections to their file shares seem to be intermittently dropping. One minute the connection to the shares is there, next thing it's lost. There is no logic to it because no two users are experiencing issues at the same time, as a matter of fact even on the same PC where a user has access to 3 shares on 3 different servers, one could be showing as connected whereas the other two be dropping. [code]
As you can see the Duplex and Speed are set to auto, I've rectified this since then and I'm keeping a close eye on the output errors, and collisions. However, I'm afraid that this did not rectify the issue and the users are still experiencing intermittent connection dropping to their file shares over the VPN!
I have a request to establish a site to site VPN with a customer. While collecting the information I give them our local network subnet which is a private subnet (192.168.5.0). They asked me if I could give them a public address instead. They can not work with the 192.168.5 subnet. Is this possible?
My side of the VPN is an ASA 5505 running 8.2(2). The other side i believe is a Checkpoint.
I've setup a site to site vpn on an ASA 5510 using ASDM (as I have many times before) and the tunnel appears to be up but I am not able to pass traffic. When I run the packet tracer from my inside network to the remote destination network, it shows that it is blocked by the implicit deny ip any any rule on my inside incoming access list.
Got an ASA5505 connected to another endpoint running IPsec and being NAT'd at each end to a 10.0.0.0/24 network. I can pass other types of traffic through the ASA 5505 but not RTP traffic. The moment it is NAT'd and hits the firewall rules it gets denied by the default deny at the bottom of the list.
Currently the rules are as follows
Incoming External allow ip any any allow tcp any any allow udp any any default deny
[code].....
It wont allow us to setup a voip call...however when the same call manager sets up a voip call NOT using this ipsec tunnel it works just fine.
I setup RA-VPN under local asa 5510 IP pool (192.168.127.0/24) and all was working fine. I got internet and local network access. Then i have 5 site to site VPN working fine but when im traying to access to those L2L VPNs from the remote acces client im not able to do that. So after that i decided to obtain IP addresses from my DHCP server so i can obtain IPs from my local network (172.17.16.0/16) and then access normally to the VPN site to site. But the surprise was that the VPN cisco client is getting local IP address (172.17.16.222) perfectly but im not able to access even to my local network.
I have the same-security-traffic permit inter-interface same-security-traffic permit intra-interface enable.
