I'm trying to get IPSec VPN working onto a new Cisco ASA5505. Pretty standard configuration.Setup:
* Cisco VPN client on Windows 7 (v5.0.07.0290 x64 on Laptop1 and v5.0.07.0440 x64 on Laptop2)
* PPPoE/NAT and internal DHCP on the ASA were configured with the Startup Wizard in ASDM
NATting is working fine - internal PCs get an IP address in the 192.168.2.0/24 range and can all access the Internet.I wanted to be able to connect from anywhere to the ASA in order to reach one of the internal servers. Should be pretty basic.First I tried with the built-in ASDM IPSec Wizard, instructions found here.VPN clients can connect to the ASA, are connected (until they're manually disconnected), but cannot reach the internal network nor the Internet. Note VPN client can connect fine to a different VPN site (not administered by myself). [code]
Unfortunately I'm getting the same "AddRoute failed to add a route with metric of 0: code 160" error message.I'm very confused as this should be a pretty standard setup. I tried to follow the instructions on the Cisco site to the letter...The only "differences" in my setup are an internal network of 192.168.2.0 (with ASA IP address 192.168.2.254) and PPPoE with DHCP instead of no PPPoE at all.
We have a VPN setup and here's the configuration on the Cisco ASA 5505: [code] The problem is that i'm able to ping the otherside of the tunnel i.e. 192.168.23.14 from the dmz IP 172.16.1.2 but i'm unable to ping from the hosts behind the ASA.Also the other side is able to ping 172.16.1.2 IP but no IP's behind the ASA.
Each FW have a LAN behind it. The D-Link and the unknown device are both working perfectly and clients on each subnet can connect to the internet?However when I connect the ASA 5505 to the 2960 SW with a configued static route: Route Outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.202.1 1 is says it has no route to host?
If I connect the ASA5505 to the LAN of D-Link DSR-1000N and give it a static address and a static route match the D-Link LAN network, it works perfectly, however not when I connect it the the Cisco 2960 Switch
We have one pair Cisco ASA 5505 located in different location and there are two point to point links between those two locations, one for primary link (static route w/ low metric) and the other for backup (static route w/ high metric). The tracked options is enabled for monitoring the state of the primary route. the detail parameters regarding options as below,
Frequency: 30 seconds Data Size: 28 bytes Threshold: 3000 milliseconds Tos: 0 Time out: 3000 milliseconds Number of Packets: 8
[code]....
I'm not sure if the setting is so sensitive that the secondary static route begins to work right away, even when some small link flappings occur. What is the best practice to set those parameters up in the production environment. How can we specify the reasonanble monitoring options to fit our needs.
I have a customer thats got a Linksys router now, that has a DMZ port.The DMZ port is configurede to it routes the extra public ip-adress to the DMZ port it has.At the DMZ port they have another router connected, where they routes the public ip-adresses på some other devices.How can i make this setup on a Cisco ASA 5505 (With the Security Plus licens)What i have to do is to replace the Linksys router, and make it so, so it works like it was before with the Linksys.
I want to know with an ASA 5505 w/ Security Plus License I get up to 20 VLANS/Named Interfaces.I have a customer that is getting a new subnet of external IP addresses from their service provider and a different default gateway to accomodate re-hosting their datacenter at their main office instead of at a Colo. My question, when building out their new DMZ, can I have multiple route 0.0.0.0 commands?
Example.
Current Default Gateway 1.1.1.X
Internal hosts 192.168.1.0 use and are natted to 1.1.1.X
New Default Gateway for DMZ Servers 2.2.2.x
Internal hosts still use 1.1.1.X, but server hosts in 192.168.1.3 should use 2.2.2.X -- there are also a bunch of pre-existing static NAT rules for these servers such as 2.2.2.30 translates to 192.168.1.30.
I think I would accomplish this by using the following:
We have a ASA 5505 and a 5510, that we are using site to site.I need to traceroute from the 5505-5510.. From the outside interfaces.. Don't want to do this through the site-to-site.I have temporarily added a few acl on the outside interfaces.when i traceroute it only goes one hop.. Maybe thats the way it suppose to be? I need to know all the hops between the outside interfaces on the 5505 to the outside interface on the 5510.
I have ASA 5505 Firewall with security plus license, I configured two V LAN 1 and V LAN 5 as my inside V LAN for different sub net, i need to route the traffic between this two V LAN's through ASA. I configured
int vlan 1 nameif inside Security level 100 Ip address 172.16.100.1 255.255.255.0 [Code] .........
The problem is i am not able to ping other sub net, for ex my PC is in V LAN 1 not able to ping 192.168.22.1 ... For troubleshoot i type debug icmp trace while pinging other subnet
ICMP echo request from 192.168.22.2 to 172.16.100.101 ID=512 seq=4608 len=32ICMP echo request from 192.168.22.2 to 172.16.100.101 ID=512 seq=4864 len=32ICMP echo request from 192.168.22.2 to 172.16.100.101 ID=512 seq=5120 len=32ICMP echo request from 192.168.22.2 to 172.16.100.101 ID=512 seq=5376 len=32
I need to move the client machines off of the 3750 (and their DHCP dependency on it) to the SGE2010 and absolutely route their internet traffic out through the outside interface on the 5505. They must also be able to communicate back into the internal environment in order to communicate with the production servers.
The clients currently use .254 addressing through a dumb dell switch to the 3750 but I am trying to migrate them over slowly to the .253. I know that the 2010 will not do DHCP, so I am putting a DHCP server on that switch right now. The 5505 won't let me add an additional nameif statement onto one of the other eth0/x interfaces and I'm not sure if that has anything to do with it's capabilities to act as a DHCP server (it's not an option in the ASDM) or it's ability to serve as the internet gateway for the 2010 clients. (Side notes: The 5505 has a base license and is currently also connecting 1 site to site VPN. As is the 5520, so all of it's interfaces are used as well).
I statically assigned a moved client with a .253 address and plugged it into the 2010. I have tried giving the 2010 both a .4 address and a .253 address but neither will allow me to ping any of the addresses on the 5505. The 2010 shows automatic routes to the two subnets and I set it's default route to 253.1. The link between the 2010 and the 3750 works - clients receive a .254 address from the 3750 and can get out to the internet via the 5505 and reach the production servers as well.
Why won't the 2010 see the 5505 as a gateway and allow clients to get to the internet and also traverse the 3750 when they need access to the production network?
The reason why I dont' just connect the two swtiches and call it a day is because I also need the production servers to ALWAYS go out/receive web requests via the 5520 outbound/outside interface. I'm having such a hard time wrapping my head around why i can't get my clients moved over to the new switch, I haven't even grasped how I'm going to do that yet.
We have two sites: 192.168.100.x and 192.168.101.x currently connected via IPsec VPN. On each end we have a Cisco ASA 5505. However, each site also has an MPLS VPN with intentions to move all traffic to this link. Will this work on the ASA? We need to make sure traffic can hit the ASA @ site A on the inside interface and trafiic will forward to the MPLS VPN router which then handles the traffic. Too, will it cause any problems in bi-directional flow between the two sites?
I have 2 Vlans with seperate networks and want to create a route between one server in vlan 465 to another server in vlan 436 via port 80.Vlan 465 has a ASA 5505 inside that IP address 89.254.12.35 will be initiating the connection to address 10.200.1.213.
-Vlan 465: server address 10.200.1.213 -Vlan 436: server address 89.254.12.35
However for extended security I would like to restrict the firewall opening to an IP to IP opening.
I am running ASR1002 with latest XE IOS version asr1000rp1-adventerprisek9.03.02.01.S.151-1.S1.bin configuration bellow
router bgp 65000 bgp router-id 1.1.1.1 bgp log-neighbor-changes timers bgp 5 15 ! address-family ipv4 vrf LABR01-VRF bgp router-id 1.1.1.1 neighbor bgprrclient peer-group neighbor bgprrclient remote-as 65001 neighbor bgprrclient password 7 1234 neighbor bgprrclient update-source Loopback0 neighbor bgprrclient version 4 neighbor bgprrclient route-reflector-client neighbor bgprrclient route-map set_weight in I then tried to create new route-map and get error that match next-hop can not be used on inbound
route-map set_weight permit 10 match ip next-hop prefix-list thirdparty match as-path 1 set weight 1000
LAB-ASR1002(config)#route-map set_weight permit 10LAB-ASR1002(config-route-map)# match ip next-hop prefix-list thirdparty% "set_weight" used as BGP inbound route-map, nexthop match not supported% not supported match will behave as route-map with no match% "set_weight" used as BGP inbound route-map, nexthop match not supported% not supported match will behave as route-map with no match% "set_weight" used as BGP inbound route-map, nexthop match not supported% not supported match will behave as route-map with no match% "set_weight" used as BGP inbound route-map, nexthop match not supported% not supported match will behave as route-map with no match% "set_weight" used as BGP inbound route-map, nexthop match not supported% not supported match will behave as route-map with no match Not sure why Cisco is not supporting a pretty basic feature for BGP route maps.I tried looking into matching other variables but I am unable to get same result as I have same routes on bgp table from multible inbound peers.
I also get this message when configuring tacacs. I looked for "new" cli but no luck:LAB-ASR1002(config)#tacacs-server host 2.2.2.2 This cli will be deprecated soon. Use new server cli
I've got an existing Cisco 1841 connecting to a 10Mbps Internet Leased line. With my current setup I've configured PAT for internet access for my users, and we also have some servers on site which are assigned public ip addresses, these can be accessed from the internet. Now we have procured a Cisco 1921 ISR to replace the old 1841, when I connect the 1921 with an identical configuration in place of the old router, 2 things happen.
1) The users accessing the net via the nat are able to work without any inconvenience (good)
2) My servers which have public IP addresses are unable to reach the internet and subsequently I am unable to reach them via the internet (very bad)
I have purchased a subnet of 8 private IP addresses from my ISP. 109.x.x.128/29.The ISP has placed a juniper router within our data centre which is routing purely from 109.x.x.206/30 to 109.x.x.128/29 with the ip of fa0/1 set to .129.
I have linked a cisco 5505 to fa0/1 of the juniper from fa0/0 and configured its IP to .130. I have configured NAT to translate our client pool 192.168.16.x /24 address' to the internet.
Is it possible for the 5505 to route / map my remaing private IP addresses through its external port? I have tried creating a seperate VLAN for a DMZ for our servers to sit within but am returned with a subnetting error as VLAN for my external port is all ready configured within the same subnet.
i have a Layer3 Switch Cisco WS-c3750G -24T , initially i have a IOS version c3750-Ipbase , recentely i have upgraded my IOS to c3750-Ipservices-M to enable to PBR for my network , i have created all the acl and tried to give the route-map with PBR , the command was initiallying but i am not able to see the applied route-map in my policy route , i have gone through the blog and enabled SDM prefer routing , but no luck .
Wireless client receives a DHCP address from central DHCP server fine. Unable to route outside of own subnet . Continuous ARP WHO HAS (Default Gateway addr) TELL (client IP) messages being received. WLC running OS 4.2.99.0.
I have an issue where I can get traffic to pass from HDQ to two branch offices over our ipsec/gre tunnels even though the tunnels appear to be UP. The HDQ is a 2811, branch is a home office using an 871W and branch runs a 2801 router. I initially had HDQ working fine with the 871W but when I configured branch2 (2801), they both broke. The tunnels appear to be up but traffic is not routing across them. The two 2801 routers run 12.4 (c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T2.bin). These are gre over ipsec tunnels. Currently traffic flows over an exsting MPLS network that we are getting away from due to cost. As soon as I change the routes to point to the Tunnels, it breaks. Traffic doesn't appear to pass through the tunnel. I have attached my sanitized configs.
HDQ#sh crypto sessCrypto session current status Interface: FastEthernet0/1Session status: UP-ACTIVEPeer: 205.205.205.21 port 500 IKE SA: local 204.204.204.66/500 remote 205.205.205.21/500 Active IPSEC FLOW: permit 47 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 Active SAs: 4, origin: crypto map IPSEC FLOW:
Have cisco router 1921 and 3 cisco switch 3560G i want to configure the cisco router so as network 192.168.4.0/26,192.168.3.0/26,192.168.2.0/26, all to access internet R1921(config)# ip nat inside source list 102 int G0/0 overloadR1921(config)# access-list 102 permit ip ?
I am right to do this below?
R1921(config)# ip route 192.168.4.0/26 10.10.10.2R1921(config)# ip route 192.168.3.0/26 10.10.10.2R1921(config)# ip route 192.168.2.0/26 10.10.10.2
i have configured SSL VPN on Cisco ASA5510 which is working fine .My Users connected the VPN and access the servers remotely. But now i face one challange my users use PPTP VPN of the customer now a days configured at the Customer Network. When they Connect the PPTP VPN unable to Access the servers remotely defined on the SSL VPN Route.
I have a Cisco 527w which we are wanting to deploy to our remote sites however i've found a bug. We use ADSL with an IPsec tunnel as primary and 3G APN for failover . When the ADSL goes down the route via the IPSec tunnel remains and i am unable to route the traffic via the APN backup without disabling the VPN tunnel .
On 1811W Router i have OSPF running and i do not need this static route.ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.3,when i try to delete i get error ,1811w#,config t,Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.,1811w(config)#no ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.3,%No matching route to delete,1811w(config)#.
Here is my configuration below , i have upgraded my C-3750 switch IOS from IPbase to IPservices , after upgrading i have tried to apply PBR on my Vlan 4 and failed , when i am tying to apply route-map to Vlan4 the command was taking but i am unable to see the route-map when sh run , i am giving the command as "ip policy route-map TTSL" in my Vlan4 , below is the configuration.
In Vlan2 i have connected one ISP and Vlan4 I have connected one ISP , my local subnets are 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x , now i want to route the 192.168.1.x traffic from Vlan2 and 192.168.2.x Traffic from Vlan4 .
sh boot coreswitch#sh boot BOOT path-list : flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5.bin
We an 887m router in our office with an unmanaged switch. We have two networks, 192.168.0.x and 192.168.11.x connected to router on the same interface (192.168.11.253 is a secondary ip) but I can seem to be able to route packets from one network to the other. Internet traffic is fine from both networks. I can't see what I'm doing wrong here. I can ping the 192.168.11.253 (router) from the 192.168.0 network but nothing beyond that.
I tried this at home with no other config and its the same. Is this by design?
I've set up a standard site-to-site VPN between 2 ASA 5505s and the VPN is working fine for traffic between these ASAs and computers which are in the same LANs.but when I'm trying to connect to computers which are in another VLAN I have a problem.
My office connection have low ping to a game server that i play and i'm thinking on how to route my home internet connection to it.Home ~230msOffice ~120msThe ping from my home to the office firewall and router is pretty low since it's in the same area but going out to international connection made it jump really high when i'm at home.[CODE]
I have site-to-site VPN using two ASAs 5505. I can ping between two computers C1 and C2. Now I want to add subnet 192.168.1.0. How do I configure routes on ASA so that I can ping between computers C3 and C2?
We have a six node MPLS network, all nodes route to our main office for a variety of services (email, core, fire shares, Internet, etc). Therefore, the link to our main office is crucial. In the event that the MPLS link to/from our main office becomes unavailable, we would like to establish a secondary route into our main office via virtual private network. Our main office and two branch offices have redundant broadband internet connectionsWe currently have Cisco 1921 routers as our branch routers and a Cisco 2800 as our “core” router at the main office. We also have two SonicWall TZ-200 series firewalls at the two branch locations and a SonicWall NSA-2400 at our main office. The VPN connection seems to work okay.How would I configure my branch routers to advertise and route traffic out the VPN connection in the event that the MPLS leg to/from our main office is down?
I have to connect through VPN for work so that I can RDP into my remote development machine, but their internet speed is painfully slow. Is there any way I can route my general internet browsing traffic through my local connection, while still maintaining the VPN connection to my remote box?
Sothe Internet connection that we have in the office is 22 Mbps down and 10 Mbps up. So, when I connect my computer directly to the cable modem, I get exactly that! But, when I connect the router and connect to the router, the connection drops to 7 down and 4 up. Why?
We have an Adtran NetVanta ...Replace the router? Or, get a different LAN module for the back of the NetVanta?
I've enabled antispoof on all interfaces on asa 5510.If you start a traceroute to a network on the default route, everything works, since replies comes to an interface with route 0.0.0.0/0 defined.If you start a tracer route to a network that is NOT on the default route (let's assume coporate MPLS), you only get response from first carrier router, the other are discarded because of anti spoof violation.
I have ICMP inspection and icmp-error inspection enabled.
I am a complete newbie to Cisco equipment. So far I've been able to figure out how to do most of what I needed by using the ASDM but I have run into something that is a little more complicated that just opening a port. We currently have a connection to our remote site. This site has a T1 internet connection. Our connection is a site to site VPN with an ASA-5510 on this end and a ASA-5505 on the other.
We are upgrading this connection to a 75mbit hybrid microwave/fiber link. The provider is going to hand it off to us as an untagged VLAN. We made the decision to route all of the remote site's internet access through this location as to avoid having to split off part of the bandwidth of this link to dedicate to internet access.........
