Cisco VPN :: ASA5520 Two VPN Group Clients To Use Two VLAN

May 9, 2012

I have a VPN network (in ASA 5520) with two VLAN (999 and 997) and two remote clients (User1 and User2). The VPN connection with both users is correctly connected but I can't make a ping to another computer of the same VPN network, when the VPN network is connected. For eg: When User1 is connected, has the IP: 172.16.1.230, but can't make ping to another connected PC (IP:172.16.1.236). [code]

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco :: WLC 5508 AP Group - Clients Using Wrong VLAN

Feb 14, 2011

I have a network setup as live-ssid.  It is using the Interface for VLAN 14.  All APs under the default-group AP Group obviously allows clients to DHCP an address from VLAN 14.  This is working fine.
 
I created a new AP Group called 3rd Floor.  This has the live-ssid setup, but instead of using the Interface for VLAN 14 it is setup for the Interface for VLAN 50.  I have all the APs on this floor moved to the 3rd Floor AP Group.
 
The problem is that 95% of the clients on 3rd Floor are still picking up DHCP addresses from VLAN 14.  I checked and all the clients are connected to the APs on the 3rd Floor.  Only 4 Clients are getting an address from VLAN 50.
 
I'm not sure if something is configured wrong or not since some devices pick up the new VLAN and the rest don't.  I've manually reboot the APs on the 3rd floor to see if that would fix it.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: OpenLDAP Group Authentication With ASA5520 RA-VPN

Jul 24, 2011

I've configured RA VPN on ASA5520 with OpenLDAP server authentication. It works fine for all the users existed in LDAP database, but my requirement is I want one particular group to be able to access VPN and not all the users. I have checked most of Cisco documents but all are leading to Microsoft's AD and LDAP attribute map creation. Is there any way to achieve the same thing with OpenLDAP server and not with AD?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5520 Split-TunnelAcl Set Group Is Not Working

Oct 21, 2012

I have an ASA5520 with mobile VPN Ipsec.The "splitTunnelAcl" set the group is not working.

View 7 Replies View Related

How To Check Applied Group Policy On Domain Clients

Jun 16, 2012

How to check applied group policy on the domain clients

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: 1262 Maximum Number Of Clients In Work Group Bridge Mode

Dec 6, 2011

What is the maximum allowed number of wired clients behind a workgroup bridge? In other words, is there a limit on MAC addresses?I assume 1262 AP in WGB mode is connecting to a lighweight AP (1262 or 3502), latest IOS and WLC software. I wasn't able to find the answer from Cisco documentation.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Cat6500 To Add Vlan Group For Fwsm

May 22, 2012

i have fwsm in cat6500, i have one firewall vlan group which is in firewall module 1 vlan group 10. I need tocreate another vlan  group and add to firewall module 1 vlan group 10, 20. i need to have zero downtime.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: ACS 5.2 Assign VLAN Based On AD Group?

Apr 18, 2011

I'm trying to configure ACS 5.2 to assign the VLAN to a user dynamically based on the AD group that the user belongs to. I've gone into:
 
Users and Identity Stores -> External Identity Stores -> Active Directory -> Directory Groups tab
 
and selected the group name from the AD. If I understand correctly, I should now see this group under:
 
Policy Elements -> Authorization and Permissions -> Network Access -> Authorization Profiles -> Common Tasks -> VLAN ID/Name
 
However, it does not. Am I missing something?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C2960 - Edit Vlan SNMP Group Context?

Feb 6, 2012

When using Cisco IOS c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-50.SE3.bin we can delete line in SNMP group config with 

  no snmp-server group <group-name> v3 priv context vlan-<vlan-id>
without problems.
 
But, after upgrade on version c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin there is output:
 
#####% Ambiguous command:  "no snmp-server group <group-name> v3 priv context vlan-<vlan-id> "
 
It looks like some bug, but there is nothing in the bug toolkit.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2560 Create Dynamic VLAN For Specific Group Of Users

Feb 6, 2012

We have Cisco Cat4503 series L3 Switch and Cisco L2 2560 Series Switches, some of the users want to have a dynamic VLAN membership, and connecting with the network as mobile users,
 
can it possible and create dynamic VLAN for specific group of users.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: Use 802.1x To Authenticate Clients On Network With Dynamic VLAN Assignment From RADIUS?

Apr 11, 2013

I'm trying to use 802.1x to authenticate clients on my network with dynamic VLAN assignment from RADIUS. We have IP-Phones(powered by PoE) that only supports EAP-MD5, and we would rather use MAB(it also uses LLDP-MED for some settings) to authenticate the phones using the MAC-range from the phones vendor. The following scenario works perfect:Connect the phone and let it boot up(takes a while) and authenticate with MAB.Connect a computer in the phones data-port and let it authenticate with 802.1x(or fail and reach guest-vlan) However, the following scenario doesn't work:The computer is already connected to the phoneThe phone is then connected to the switch What happends now is that the computer is authenticated using 802.1x before the phone boots up and get's authenticated with MAB. When the phone is ready, it's authenticated with MAB and everything works. However, after a short period(let's say a minute), using `debug authentication all`, we see a "NEW LL MAC: phones mac" message(which is weird since the mac has already been MAB-authenticated), and then we are unable to contact the phone using ping. When I check `show mac address-table` it has now moved the mac from `Port Gi 0/12` to `Port Drop`. However, if I check `show mab interface Gi 0/12` or `show authentication sessions` it lists the phones-mac as `mab auth sucess `.why the first scenario works, and not the second?
 
The switch is a 3560E PoE 24p with IOS 12.2.58SE2. Sample of the switch-config: network-policy profile 1voice vlan 90!interface GigabitEthernet0/12switchport mode accessnetwork-policy 1authentication control-direction inauthentication event fail retry 1 action authorize vlan 60authentication event server dead action authorize vlan 60authentication event no-response action authorize vlan 60authentication event server alive action reinitializeauthentication host-mode multi-domainauthentication order mab dot1xauthentication priority mab dot1xauthentication port-control autoauthentication periodicauthentication violation replacemabdot1x pae authenticatordot1x timeout tx-period 5dot1x max-reauth-req 1spanning-tree portfast!Btw, when we tried authenticating the phones using 802.1x too (EAP-MD5), there are NO problems in any of the scenarios. However, we want to use MAB instead of 802.1x to avoid the requirement of configuring the phones with a username and password. The RADIUS response was the same when using 802.1x as it is with MAB for the phones (including device-traffic-class=voice AV-pair).

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Add New Vlan In Existing Firewall Group In 6500?

Jan 19, 2013

I want to add new vlan in existing firewall group in 6500. I am confused if it will add new vlan or overwrite.. I am using ASASM module with 6500.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 8.4 LDAP Group To ASA Group Policy Mapping?

Jul 31, 2012

I try to map LDAP Group to ASA Group policy following documentation:
 
[URL] 
 
This is a config for ASA 8.0. I would have expected it to work on 8.4 as well but I do run into problems. The mapping as shown in LDAP Debug and ASA Log will actually happen but it is overwritten by the "GPnoAccess" Group Policy configured locally in the Tunnel Group. From earlier works with RADIUS I would have expected the user specific Attribute to be "stronger"?
ASA Log:
 
AAA retrieved user specific group policy (correct Policy) for user = XXX
AAA retrieved default group policy (GPnoAccess) for user = XXX

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5520 To ASA5520 Via L2L Tunnel

May 31, 2011

Our firewall expert has gone off on long term illness leave and I am trying to pick up the pieces :-(
 
We have an ASA 5520 (local office) talking to another ASA (remote office) via a VPN Tunnel.
 
My 1st problem is that I cannot ping from my inside network (local) to the outside interface of my remote ASA.
 
My 2nd is that I have debug enabled on my rules but am not logging anything.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5505 VPN Clients Can't Ping Router Or Other Clients On Network

Jun 18, 2012

I have a ASA5505 and it has a vpn set up. The VPN user connects using the Cisco VPN client. They can connect fine (the get an ip address from the ASA), but they can't ping the asa or any clients on the network. Here is the running config:
 
Result of the command: "show running-config"
 
: Saved
:
ASA Version 7.2(4)
!
hostname ASA
domain-name default.domain.invalid
 
[code].....

what I need to add to get the vpn client to be able to ping the router and clients?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5520 / 5510 - Can VPN Clients Communicate With Other Dynamic Clients

Nov 5, 2012

We currently have an ASA 5520 communicating with 10 ASA 5510's, all on static outside addresses.  I was asked to add 5 additional 5510's on dynamic address.  All worked well in testing until it was decided that some of the dynamic clients needed to talk to each other.

My testing shows packets just dying in the 5520.

View 1 Replies View Related

Routers / Switches :: Dlink DIR 615 Router - Wireless Clients Can't See Ethernet Clients

Feb 1, 2011

I have 4 desktops cat5 to Dlink DIR 615 router. All work fine. Any wireless clients, laptop or netbooks, see the desktop computers for a while then disconnect somehow. All machines can see the Internet through the router at all times. The desktops disappear from the laptop/netbooks but the wireless machines can be seen from the desktop computers but clicking on them gets 'Access Denied' message after a wait.3 desktops = XP, 1 98SE. All laptop/netbooks = XP

View 2 Replies View Related

Netgear WNDR4500 - Clients Not Showing Up In Clients List

Jul 6, 2012

I have a Netgear WNDR4500 running the stock firmware, acting as a router for my home. I also have 2 routers that are flashed with DD-WRT (Linksys WRT54G and Asus WL-520GU) running as client bridges. The Netgear is 192.168.1.1 and the other 2 client bridges are 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.10.3. The Netgear router is performing DHCP giving addresses from 192.168.10.100 to 192.168.10.254. I have numerous machines connected to the Netgear, wirelessly and wired, and numerous machines wired to each client bridge. All machines have IP addresses that are 192.168.10.100, 192.168.10.101, 192.168.10.102, etc... Everything is working fine, but I have one question: When I access the Netgear router, it shows the client bridges as clients, machines that are wired and wireless to the Netgear router are listed as clients, but the client list does not show any clients that are connected to the client bridges. I assumed that since the router is performing DHCP that all clients would show up.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: ACS 5.3 - How To Associate Identity Group With AD Group

May 1, 2012

how to associate an AD group - which i have defined in users and identity stores/external identity stores/Active Directory/Directory attributes to associate with the relevant identity groups - Users and identity stores/identity groups Is there an example of this being done somewhere as i am having problems understanding how to do this from the user guide.All i want to do is associate identity groups with ad groups.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 Can't Ping VPN Clients But Clients Can Ping

Feb 29, 2012

I have a strange issue on my ASA 5510 (8.4). I can't ping or connect to the VPN clients but the VPN clients can ping/connect to any inside resources. I have checked all the NAT extemtion entries.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SF300-24P / Configure Vlan 10 For Data And Vlan 20 For Voice On The Same Port?

May 12, 2011

We are trying to config vlan 10 for data and vlan 20 for voice on the same port - port 1 of swtich SF300-24P to run both data and voice on different vlans.Do I have to add vlan 10 as an untagged vlan to port 1 and add vlan 20 as an tagged vlan to port 1?If I do not want to assign the native vlan 1 to port 1, how can I remove it ? The GUI page - assign VLAN to port does not allow to remove it.Aslo, what mode shall I set up on port 1? General, trunk or access ?

View 18 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: VLAN To VLAN Firewall Rules Support Missing On RV180?

Jan 12, 2013

How do I submit an RFE (Request For Enhancement) to the Cisco SBR team to encourage them to  implement the missing support for VLAN to VLAN firewall rules that was available in the RVS4000 (See [URL]) and that was supposedly added to a beta release of the RV220W firmware (See  [URL])?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 Possible To Create Vlan Inside Transport Vlan?

Jan 10, 2012

Between our hosting and a customer we have an extended vlan, traveling on a fiber, between two cisco 3560 switches.The thing is, that we want to create one or more vlans inside that extended vlan, in some way if possible?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Extending VLAN To Remote Switch That Already Has VLAN ID In Use

Jan 10, 2013

I have two networks at two sites with a dot1q trunk between the two L3 switches at both sites (no routers involved)
 
SITE A - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.10.50.0/24
 
SITE B - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.20.50.0/24
 
I would like to extend the SITE A VLAN to SITE B so that I can move hosts from SITE A to SITE B without needing to change their IP address but the vlan ID is already in use. Obviously the easy solution is to change the VLAN ID for one or other of the sites but both sites contain hosts that run 24/7. Is there a way to join two VLANs with different IDs together.So for example I create a new VLAN 60 at SITE B and associate it with VLAN 50 at SITE A.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 / FWSM VLAN Configuration Mismatch And Some VLAN Deleted

Aug 12, 2012

We  have 6509 VSS with FWSM Module and we have created two context on it, one is INTERNALL CONTEXT othe is EXTERNALL Context? We have spanned various VLANS in switches and FWSM context level.  All VLAN Gateways are configured in context level.
 
Activity description : We had planned migration of these devices into a new Datacenter, it was a planned activity. During  migration of devices from one Dc to a new DC  we broke the VSS and kept the primary running and removed the secondary switch and migrated this secondary to new DC  and powered this device ON in the new DC and checked all the config was very much fine but this device was OFF network as secondary was brought to new DC just to limit the downtime during the primary switch movement.
 
During the activity ( Primary switch movement )We powered off the Primary switch  and mean time before shifting into new Data center  We had brought up secondary switch which was already existing in the DC was put live in the network and it was working fine without any issues.
 
Later  we had moved  Primary into new data center and tried to put into VSS with the secondary , during this period the secondary device into went into RECOVERY MODE  and  primary device was not responding and devices  went off network and immediatly we  removed the VSL link and brought up  primary into production network without secondary online in the network ( Without VSS just stand alone switch ) network started working, but bringing up the primary we found that some of the VLANS in the FWSM was deleted and some VLAN had misconfiguration ( example : say original  VLAN  ip 10.200.112.1 has become  10.300.13.1 ) also some of the access list as well as SVI was deleted making configuration mismatch.
 
Wanted to know while syncronization b/n primary and secondary switch in VSS if we pull out VSL link would create this type of issues.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Switchport Voice Vlan Command Not Putting Port In VLAN?

Feb 2, 2011

I have set up 2 DHCP pools and 2 VLANs (1 *the native* for data / 1 VLAN for voice). When I use the command "switchport voice vlan 20" the port disapear from the show vlan brief list. When I use the "switchport access vlan 20" it shows up in the show vlan brief in the correct VLAN and gives the phone an IP. I assume that using the access instead of the voice is wrong and the phones would not configure correctly. But when I use the access the phone goes to the next step and tells me the TFTP files are not found. Why does the port disapear from the VLAN list?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Route Data From Vlan 10 To Vlan 20 On 2960s?

Mar 31, 2013

i need to solves this little problem on 2960S lan BASE but i dont know if it is possible.
 
Uplink port config for gi 1/0/28 is:
 
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk alloved vlan 10,11
  
but on interface gi 1/0/1 i want to have data from vlan 10 tagged as VLAN 20.
At this time i have solved this issue very primitively
 
I have set up gi 1/0/2 as int mode acces, acces vlan 20 and i have connected gi 1/0/2 with gi 1/0/3 with eth cable. int gi 1/0/3 is switchpor mode acces, switchport acces vlan 10

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G / VLAN 1 Is The Only VLAN And Its Disabled

Sep 16, 2012

I have a 3750G switch in my production network that only has VLAN 1 on it. All ports are in a default state and VLAN 1 is disabled. The switch is passing traffic but shouldn't having the default VLAN shut down cause the ports not to pass traffic? If I start to create VLANs will that cause the switch to stop passing traffic?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: 802.1x Auth-Fail VLAN And Guest-VLan Not Available

Oct 12, 2011

I'm wanting to setup a Virtual Office scenario. Everything is working fine except for 802.1x...I can get the 881 to authenticate things connected to it, but I don't have the options of guest-vlan or auth-fail vlan.Idea is if the users takes the router home and someone, either accidentally or on pupose, connects an unauthorized Laptop, they stay off the Corp network but can get to the internet still.I found this link on Cisco's site: [URL]That link shows them configuring a guest vlan right on the fa0-3 ports of an 881W. I dont have that option on mine. I can only configure 802.1x on the vlan interface. I have 802.1x working, for things that connect to vlan1, but I would like to have a "fallback" setup.
 
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#int fa1
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#dot
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#dot1?
dot1q 
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#dot1

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: L2tpv3 Vlan-to-vlan Tunnel On 890

Jun 13, 2011

I am trying to setup a L2tpv3 VLAN-to-VLAN tunnel.My setup has two Cisco 890 router with Cisco IOS Software version 15.0(1) M4. These routers are connected directly on FastEthernet port 8.
 
One linux machine is connected on FastEthernet port 0 on each router. The two linux machines are on same vlan. I am trying to establish a vlan-to-vlan tunnel between the routers and send traffic between the linux machines.
 
I followed the case study 11.4 from [URL] and configured the l2tp-class and pseudowire-class. However, the vlan interface configuration is different on 890 router.
 
I configured a vlan interface as follows.

(config)#vlan 200
 (config)# interface FastEthernet 0
#shutdown
#switchport access vlan 200
(config)# interface vlan 200
 
I don't see the 'xconnect' command in this context. What's wrong with my configuration? 

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Low Bandwidth On 3750 From Vlan To Vlan?

Nov 20, 2012

We have a low bandwith (15-20 Mbit/s) to the ASA from our Client vlan. If i connect the Client to the same vlan as the ASA is, the bandwith (90 Mbit/s) is good.
 
Here are the Layer 3 Design:
 
Client     ->     vlan 2 - Switch - vlan 7     ->     vlan 1 - ASA 5505     ->     ISP
 
The Layer 2 Design:
 
Client     ->     Gig2/0/13 - Switch - Gig4/0/43     ->     Eth0/1 ASA5505     ->     ISP
 
IP Address:
Client: 172.16.2.10Vlan2: 172.16.2.1Vlan7: 172.16.7.1ASA: 172.16.7.2
  
I assuming the switch has a problem with routing ?It is a stacked Switch with following members:

switch 1 provision ws-c3750g-12sswitch 2 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 3 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 4 provision ws-c3750x-48
 
And we have following error message in the log from the switch:

%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX: 

One or more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded I first get the idea that the switch is overloaded with router traffic. Thats why i assuming i have to check the sdm templates, but i'm not sure if this resolves the issue. 
 
Here are the relevant config:
 
ASA Interface on the Switch:

interface GigabitEthernet4/0/43description ASA-inside LANswitchport access vlan 7switchport mode accessspanning-tree portfast
 
Client Interface on the Switch:

interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1switchport access vlan 2switchport mode accessswitchport port-securityswitchport port-security aging time 2switchport port-security violation restrictswitchport port-security aging type inactivitymacro description cisco-desktopspanning-tree portfastspanning-tree bpduguard enable

[code]...

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Routing Traffic From Non VLAN To VLAN On Same Interface?

Nov 21, 2012

i'm going mad on following problem. I'm trying to get 2 networks seeing each other while one of the network is a non VLAN network and the other one is a VLAN network.They should use the same interface so i added VLAN e0/0.122 to the interface e0/0.Send a ping from my asa to both gw-IP's made me happy at first. In second in figured out that i cannot reach any client in the other network. For testing purpose i created an permit acl to any/any for both networks, but the packets still get dropped by the default implicit rule. (deny any/anyMaybe i'm to stupid for this

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco :: SF302-08 VLAN Setup - VLAN Cannot Communicate With Each Other?

Nov 27, 2012

I am trying to set up a Vlan on an SF-302-08 small business switch. I would like two Vlans both with internet access but the two cannot communicate with each other. I am not really sure how to go about setting this up as its all fairly new to me. I have successfully set up the Vlans and the ports on each VLAN cannot communicate with each other however the internet access will only work when plugged into either VLAN but wont work on both together

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved