I'm looking to use a Cisco 3945E to terminate a 1Gbps Ethernet internet connection and I want to know the realistic throughput that I can expect. The router will only be configured with BGP with partial routes. No firewall or QoS will be configured.
View 8 RepliesWe want to terminate new 10M link via Ethernet interface on Cisco 1841 router. We have free Gig port on the router. We also have HWIC-FE module inserted in the router. However, our implementation team said that Cisco 1841 doesn't support 10M link. It is not designed to cater to such high Bandwidth.
View 14 Replies View RelatedPutting in a 1Gbps private Ethernet link between 2 sites. Currently have 2 2811's at each location, don't think that will cut it.
I was going to get 2 2911's, but looking at the docs it looks like they can only do 180mbps of throughput? Am I way out of my league here?
I was wondering how this would work if your hard drive can't write at 1Gbps. How exactly would this work? Like mine only goes 35.03MBps which isn't even half a Gb per second.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a PC that I built with an Asus P8Z68-V PRO motherboard and I just bought the Negear WNDR4500 router. I am unable to connect to the PC to the router at a link speed of 1Gbps. when I go into the properties of the nic card and set it to 1Gbps, it doesn't connect and says the network cable is disconnected. If I choose auto-negotiation, it will only connect at 100Mbps. I have other devices that can connect to the router at 1Gbps just fine. I have tried the latest nic drivers from Asus's site, I tried installing windows 7 64bit from scratch, I reset the router, upgraded the firmware. all my cables are cat6 or better and I even tried removing all other devices from my router. I just can't get it to connect at 1Gbps.
View 31 Replies View RelatedSo I have a Windows 2008 R2 SP1 Enterprise Server and a gigabit LAN network card onboard. But it refuses to run at gigabit speed and if forced to it, it just says that network cable is unplugged and doesn't work.
I tried switching to a newer and better motherboard (still with gigabit LAN)I have updated drivers.I have checked cables (which are all cat 6 cables and work just fine with other computers in gigabit LAN mode)I've checked and switched ports on the switch and the switch itself...no change. They work just fine with other non-W2008 machines, they get gigabit LAN
I am completely stomped as to what I can do to fix this. It runs just fine in 100 Mbit mode, but can't in any way get it in gigabit mode.I am completely stomped as to why it refuses...is this a limitation of Windows 2008 or something or is there a fix to this?
i've connected a laptop with "Realtek RTL8168C(P)/8111C(P) PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC" to a onboard NIC of Asus M4A89TD Pro wich is "Realtek 8111E Gigabit LAN Controller", which both support 1gbps but they will auto-negotiate at 100mbps.
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe are testing a new 1Gbps WAN circuit between 2 sites. We have cisco 3750 and 4507 on each end. Every time we run extended ping sweep ranging from 36 to 18024 bytes the packets are being dropped randomly once the size goes above 1500 bytes. Our ISP claims Demark to Demark test are clean and they don't want to acknowledge the problem, they blame our switches. To prove the problem is not on our end we've put different switches at each end, still facing the same issue. Ping success rate is around 98 to 99 percent.
View 11 Replies View RelatedDoes following configuration is responding to the request of my client asking for 20 T1/E1 connections on a Secure ISR 3945E, by combining on the same router One (01) NM-8CE1T1-PRI card and Three (03) HWIC-4T1/E1 cards.
Here are the router configuration:
CISCO3945E-SEC/K9 Cisco 3945E Security Bundle w/SEC license PAK
MEM-3900-1GU2GB 1GB to 2GB DRAM Upgrade (1GB+1GB) for Cisco 3925/3945 ISR
MEM-CF-256U1GB 256MB to 1GB Compact Flash Upgrade for Cisco 1900,2900,3900
NM-8CE1T1-PRI 8 port channelized T1/E1 and PRI network module
HWIC-4T1/E1 4 port clear channel T1/E1 HWIC
SM-NM-ADPTR Network Module Adapter for SM Slot on Cisco 2900, 3900 ISR
PWR-3900-AC/2 Cisco 3925/3945 AC Power Supply (Secondary PS)
CAB-ACE AC Power Cord (Europe), C13, CEE 7, 1.5M
S39EUK9-15104M Cisco 3925-3945 SPE IOS UNIVERSAL
PWR-3900-AC Cisco 3925/3945 AC Power Supply
3900-FANASSY Cisco 3925/3945 Fan Assembly (Bezel included)
C3900-SPE250/K9 Cisco Services Performance Engine 250 for Cisco 3945 ISR
ISR-CCP-EXP Cisco Config Pro Express on Router Flash
SL-39-IPB-K9 IP Base License for Cisco 3925/3945
SL-39-SEC-K9 Security License for Cisco 3900 Series
I have a NAT setup. Some of my udp packets are dropping. How to find more about the NAT to find whether it missed anything or not. the router is 3945e. [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedCan Cisco 3945E support VRF-Lite ?
View 4 Replies View Relatedthe feature difference between Cisco 7204vxr vs 3945E.
Wanted to know the limitation in 3945E compared to 7204VXR
Features39457204VXR with G2MemoryPacket processingBandwidth support
I have inherited a 3945E router with an NM-8CE1T1-PRI card installed in slot 2 using the SM-NM adapter card. The command 'card type E1 2' has been issued but I only see interfaces Serial2/0:0 to Serial2/0:30.
Since it as 8 port card I was also expecting there to be
Serial2/1:0 to Serial2/1:30
Serial2/2:0 to Serial2/2:30
etc etc.......
Serial2/7:0 to Serial2/7:30
The router will not allow me to issue a sub slot number with the card type command.
Am I missing something in the configuration or is there an issue with this card and router combination? The show inventory has the following:
NAME: "Network Module Adapter for SM Slot on Slot 2", DESCR: "Network Module Adapter for SM Slot"
PID: SM-NM-ADPTR , VID: V01, SN: FOCxxxxxxxx
NAME: "8 port channelized and PRI T1/E1 NM on Slot 2", DESCR: "8 port channelized and PRI T1/E1 NM"
PID: NM-8CE1T1-PRI , VID: V01 , SN: FOCxxxxxxxx
It doesn't give any errors when booting up and the router is running c3900e-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-1.T.bin IOS.
I was looking for Rack Unit required for 7206 VXR & 3945E but couldn't find it.
View 1 Replies View RelatedAm looking at purchasing a router that is capable of serving a WAN bearer at up to 1Gbps. The 3945E has had good reviews as a high throughput router but the datasheets suggests performance of 350Mbps. It also states that additional performance can be ensured by adding SPE modules. Whether the 3945E could achieve up to 1Gbps with SPE modules?
If the 3945E can't achieve such performance, The key features I am after are:
IPV4 and IPV6 support
L2tpV3 support
BGP
IP SLA
1Gb Copper Connections on-board with capability of at least 4 Ports
I have an issue understanding the difference between 3945 and 3945E from VPN support perspective.
If you check this link here:
[URL]
You will see that the 3945E doesn't even have an ISM slot for a VPN ISM module and of course I could not find any ISM module for 3945E (I think this is obvious). Nevertheless, the above mentioned page and
[URL]
say "Embedded hardware-accelerated VPN encryption for secure connectivity" for 3945E
That the Cisco 3945E supports the same VPN features (including packet encryption / decryption in hardware) like a Cisco 3945 with VPN ISM card?
I'm trying to migrate the running-config from our old 3725 router to our new 3945e router. Almost all of the config is copied over except for a few lines that come up as unrecongnized commands. So it looks like these commands were either removed or changed to something new.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have a question concerning about how many ospf and bgp route entries does 3945E isr g2 router support?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am wondering if IOS bundled by default with CISCO3945E-SEC/K9 and CISCO2911-SEC/K9 contains adv. ip services features (like Eigrp, OSPF etc.).
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhat this syslog message means? Being getting this on my 3945e series routers. My gut tells me they are caused by our Security guys scanning my routers with invalid login attempts.
%SSH-3-DH_RANGE_FAIL: Client DH key range mismatch with maximum configured DH key on server
We have an ASA 5510 running 8.3 that we need to use to terminate a LAN to LAN IPSEC VPN.
Problem is we only have one public address available so have had to configure the link between the ASA and the Internet Router on private addresses.
Is it possible to NAT the public address to the inside or outside interface of the ASA and terminate the VPN on that interface?
I am using 3945E Router as Easy VPN Server, with 15.1 IOS. On router I have bunch on usernames for VPN authentication, I want to restrict Router management access for them(ssh,telnet, http and so on).
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying wrap my head around bandwidth guarantee for nested maps. I tried adding a new class to two of my policy-maps today, and got this error: 3945E-1(config-pmap-c)#bandwidth 3000 Insufficient bandwidth 3000 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee
I'm not sure how it knows that with the nested maps and how it's computed. I have a 100mb WAN connectin going to 19 branches. I have a class-map that identifies traffic to the individual branch and within that class, a policy-map is applied to prioritize voice over video etc.
Here's the QoS setup:
class-map Branch1-Policy
match access-group branch-1-acl
*
*
[code]....
I was adding the Video-Conf class to both Traffic-6calls and Traffic-10calls when I got the above error. How would that percentage be calculated? I know by default i can only reserve up to 75% of interface bandwidth. The platform is 3945E running 15.1(3)
I currently terminate my L2L VPN sessions on the "OUTSIDE" interface via the actual IP address assigned to that interface. Can I assign the OUTSIDE interface a second address (VIP, Logical, Virtual etc.) and then terminate my L2L VPN sessions on that second address?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI want to terminate the IP Sec VPN tunnel on the Cisco ASR 1002 router, but it shouldn't have be bedirectional traffic to the other end., and it should be answer only, We don't run tunnle over GRE (no IPSec profile), just IPSec only. I found there is a command "crypto map *** client configuration address respond" but it looks it is global command and we have lots of VPN terminated on the Cisco ASR 1002 router, How can we configure the "Answer Only" for only one specific VPN tunnel and it won't impact the others?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow to terminate a vpn session on the asa 5510, when u issue the command sh vpn-sessiondb remote?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI configured cisco ace 4710 with ssl-proxy and it is not working,url..When i put https://10.1.41.20 the output is: "There is a problem with this website's security certificate", so i click in "Continue to this website (not recommended)" and the ace dont balance the output show error "Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage". [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am having an issue I need to have the outside interface terminate a ssl AnyConnect Client. I have several groups the will login and I need multiple inside interfaces to satisfy my security needs.
I have one group call ombudsman-mhdd and they need to go out interface g0/1.231 and another group called oet-router go out g0/1.232.This works on my 8.2 box but I am having trouble routing traffic out these interfaces.
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description trunk mplsfe-hub g1/10 - - null
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 207.171.92.25 255.255.255.252
!
[code]....
I have a SIP trunk in my Florida office connected to a Cisco 2851 ISR. I'm using Unified Communications Manager 8.0 and life is great.
We just opened a new office in Spain and now the fun begins. We created a site-to-site VPN tunnel using ASA 5510 in Florida and ASA 5505 in Spain. We can register IP Commuicator phones in Spain but when they make calls it shows up as a Florida call. We need it to show up as a Spain call.
We are thinking to get a SIP trunk into the Spain office but I only have a ASA 5505 over there. Can I terminate a SIP connection to it? Is this the best option? If not, what is the recommened setup?
i want to create a trunk between 4507 & 3945E router & route two vlans from router 3945E
4507# vlan 99 & 51
# int vlan 99
# ip add 10.22.100.1/24
#int vlan 51
# ip add 10.22.103.1/24
[code].....
4507 version : IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSAL-M), Version 03.02.00.SG RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4)
3945E: 15.1(2)T4 what I am missing?
On our ASA 5510 we already have one ISP link terminated on outside interface. There is correspoinding nat and global configured for outbound access to internet.
Now we need to terminate second ISP link on one of the DMZ interface to have redundancy for the primary ISP.
When primary ISP link or router is down we need to send all the traffic to secondary ISP router. How do we configure NAT and global for this condition that only when primary is down then only this NAT -Global should be used. Do we have anything like object tracking associated with the NAT-global.
So that as long as Primary RTR - object is up ASA will use the first NAT-Global pair. When primary ISP is down RTR-Object is not reachable then ASA will perform the second NAT-Global operation.
Also can we have default route pointing to Outside interface (primary ISP router) and in case of primary router failure it will point to secondary ISP. Do we have "track" in the static route commands on ASA.
I Have asa 5520 terminate the remote access VPN Connection,when successfully connect to my corporate Network and try to copy a file(30MB) from the share to my PC ,it takes around 2 Hours or it disconnect.what is the speed of the vpn client once y connected to the corporate over the Internet ?at my home i have 512 ADSL while at my corporate we have 155Mbps Internet speed.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 5510 with me. I want to terminate two Internet links on that. The primary Internet Leased Line to access my DC network using Site-to-Site VPN, and the secondary ADSL connection to access my other location network via VPN and and for web browsing. How can I achieve these goals.
View 1 Replies View Related