Actually I am new to this ASR , in my environment my 6513 is connected ASR , I want to know how can we access and configure VLAN on Gigabit interface which is connected to 6513.
View 9 Replies
how to configure vlan tag on routed layer 3 interface in cisco 3945 device?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCurrently we have a 6513 core (running IOS and doing limited routing) with VLAN Trunking to about a dozen 3560 edge switches, with various VLANs going to each of the edge switches. All works well. We are downsizing and replacing the 6513 core with a 3750G stack. We have the stack up and running in the lab, and want to slowly (as we move floors) migrate all of the edge switching to the 3750 stack.
The plan is to connect the 3750 stack to the 6513, then slowly migrate the edge switches to the stack (from the 6513). I would like to put in place 4 x 1GB trunk links between the 6513 and the 3750 stack before I start moving edge switches to ensure adequate bandwidth. Once all of the edge switches are on the new 3750 stack, I will start to decommission the 6513.
What is the best way to configure the links between the cores (old 6513 and new 3750 stack)? I can easily get the edge switches configured to the 3750, but am worried about the core links. I really want to avoid having to perform an all-at-once cutover of the cores. Another question is when do I try and migrate the VTP server role from the 6513 to the 3750 stack? I could simply make everything transparent, and ditch server-based VTP, as we rarely change or creat VLANs.
We have a Cisco 6513 Switch. During some parts of the day it is having large amounts of transmit discards on a certain interface because of the amount of data we are pushing. We have determined it is a link problem and not a problem with the switch. The link cannot handle the amount of packets the switch is pushing out. I was wondering if there is a way to create a buffer or a way to regulate the maximum amount of packets that can leave that interface without losing any packets?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am trying to make the multicast working between few hosts inside a single vlan. Host are running mysql cluster and Multicast is used to send master/slave status information to the IP 228.10.10.10 on port 45566.The vlan is defined in FWSM and the host are connected via the core-switch(6513). (hosts-->core-sws--->fwsm)I have tried searching the documentation, but couldn't find specific info to enable multicast between hosts residing in same vlan. FWSM is running code 3.1(4). since the hosts are residing in the same vlan, I am thinking of applying the <multicast-routing> just for that SVI in FWSM.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a query regarding the deletion and creation of one of my SVI interface on 6513 ,The reason behind it as follows.My traffic get to Internet in this manner
proxy(external int.)[IP:192.168.1.30] --> Gi0/9[6513 in VLAN 170] --> SVI VLAN 170[IP:192.168.1.10] --> Gi0/10[In VLAN 170] -->ASR[IP:192.168.1.20],I need to assign this VLAN ie 170 to my inside interface of firewall but it was mentioned in books like this "Assign the VLAN for the FWSM before it is applied to the MultilayerSwitch Feature Card (MSFC)." so I am thinking the following steps to assign VLAN 170 to firewall group first before creating SVI Interface for it
1.Remove all currently assign ie Gi 0/9 & Gi0/10 interfaces from this VLAN and then delete this VLAN.
2.Create the same SVI ie VLAN 170[IP:192.168.1.10] by this way the issue can be resolved.
As in part of my configuration PBR is define like this .
interface Vlan170
description "PUBLIC IP VLAN"
ip address 192.168.1.20. 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map NAT
route-map NAT permit 10
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop 192.168.1.10
I need to clearify what impact it may have on PBR part if I delete and create the VLAN 170.Will the traffic move to the inside interface of FWSM.
I have created 5 new 2 Gig port channels on a 6513 WS-X6516A-GBIC blade connecting to 5 4510R+E switches. 3 of the 5 Port-channels show up/up. 2 show down/down. However, for the 2 showing down, a duplicate Po interface was created with an "A" appended to the name that shows up/up. E.g:
Port-channel26 unassigned YES unset down down
Port-channel26A unassigned YES unset up up
Each of the 4510s has a second 2Gig PO to another 6513 with an identical config and all of those come up fine.
We have 2 6513 switches with SUP720/PFC3A and various POE modules and a 6748-GE-TX facing our servers. Additionally, we have a 4Gbps portchannel trunk interconnecting the switches. We have approximately 300 Nortel IP 1140e phones in use between the two switches.For the purpose of call recording, we've attempted to mirror the voice vlan using various approaches and have been met with limited success. We mirrored the VLAN using tx, rx, and both. When using both we appear to get duplicate packets at the destination interface.We seem to lose packets completely going in one direction or another for a given call. Packets are lost before they get to the destination interface?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are trying to config vlan 10 for data and vlan 20 for voice on the same port - port 1 of swtich SF300-24P to run both data and voice on different vlans.Do I have to add vlan 10 as an untagged vlan to port 1 and add vlan 20 as an tagged vlan to port 1?If I do not want to assign the native vlan 1 to port 1, how can I remove it ? The GUI page - assign VLAN to port does not allow to remove it.Aslo, what mode shall I set up on port 1? General, trunk or access ?
View 18 Replies View Relatedi'm going mad on following problem. I'm trying to get 2 networks seeing each other while one of the network is a non VLAN network and the other one is a VLAN network.They should use the same interface so i added VLAN e0/0.122 to the interface e0/0.Send a ping from my asa to both gw-IP's made me happy at first. In second in figured out that i cannot reach any client in the other network. For testing purpose i created an permit acl to any/any for both networks, but the packets still get dropped by the default implicit rule. (deny any/anyMaybe i'm to stupid for this
View 10 Replies View Relatedwe have a chassis 6513-E and a module WS-X6748-GE-TX, I'd like to know if could I put this module in any slot, since the documentation from Cisco says that any slot from a chassis 6500-E Series can support this module. And then in the documentation of WS-X6748-GE-TX says that this module is not compatible in the slots 1-8 of the 6513 chassis, only from 9th to 13th slots, in those slots from the 6513-E we already have 4x WS-X6748-GE-TX, and we'd like to know if could we put the module in the rest of the slots. The 6513, and 6513-E is kind of confusing.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have Cisco router 851 at my region site. It has five Fa ports. One of them is connected to ISP and has ip address 10.1.1.2 (for example). It also has vlan 1 interface, that has ip address 192.168.0.1 (also for example). I also have Tun0 interface that goes through ISP network and connects to my hub network. The rest of Fa interfaces are swithcable and they are in vlan 1.The problem is that from hub LAN I can telnet to 10.1.1.2 ip address, but I can't telnet to 192.168.0.1. Whereas I can Ping 192.168.0.1 from my hub LAN.
Topology:
Hub LAN -------ISP---------Spoke Router 851
How to apply access list on Vlans ?
my Scenario is
13 Vlans in cisco 3560 switch (Vlan 10,20,30........ 130)
vlan 10 ---- ip range 192.168.10.0/24 interface vlan 10 ip add : 192.168.10.1
vlan 20 ---- ip range 192.168.20.0/24 interface vlan 20 ip add : 192.168.20.1
here i want to block vlan 10 access to vlan 20 i created extended access list deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
and applied in interface vlan 10 as out now i cant able to access any host in vlan 20 (host 192.168.20.1) but i can able ping vlan 20's gateway 192.168.20.1
I am trying to roll out a new internet router. The problem I am faced with is the LEC only supports VLAN 1227 and greater, specifically they are assigning me VLAN 2528. I am able to create the sub-interface and setup dot1q encapsulation for VLAN 2528, but the vlan database does not have the ability to add VLAN 2528 to it so I am unable to get layer 2 up and going, thus preventing me from getting the implementation done.
View 11 Replies View Relatedi have linksys modem which already working for different v lans then for lab we take other switch 3750 switch and created different v lans. v lans are working fine but we need internet for different v lans for that linksys modem how we can make interface V lan1/
ip address 10.1.1.10 255.255.255.0
ip default- gateway 10.1.1.1
no sh
interface Vlan10
ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
no ip route-cache
!!interface Vlan20
ip address 10.1.3.1 255.255.255.0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1
ip dhcp pool vlan10
network 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.1.2.1
dns-server 10.1.1.1
!
!ip dhcp pool vlan20 network 10.1.3.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.1.3.1 dns-server 10.1.1.1
I'm trying to set up a Guest VLAN for wireless at a client site, and I feel like I'm missing something small in the configuration, since I can't ping any of the VLAN interfaces from my laptop when the address is statically set to something in the 172.20.100.x range.
I've pasted the configs for the ASA 5505 and the 6 switches below for convenience. Near as I can tell, all should be well. The ports are in trunking mode, the "show cdp neighbors" command returns the proper information, VLAN 100 exists on all the switches, etc.
Code:
ASA Version 7.2(4)
!
hostname ASA
domain-name xxxx.local
enable password Cj3LF.ehxXN3xVkxWcxd encrypted
passwd Cj3LF.ehxXN3xVkWcxd encrypted
[Code] ......
I bought for a little office a SA520 Security appliance (for future VPN with another distant office) and a SG 300-10P switch for connect 3 PC and 3 IP PHONE. THe SA 520 is the router. I must configure 2 VLANs on the switch :
VLAN2 : DATA (for PC)
VLAN3 : VOICE (for IP PHONE)
VLAN1 : DEFAULT.
How can i simply configure all ports ? I would like to configure ports 1-4 on VLAN2 and ports 5-8 on VLAN3 and port G10 is reserved for the router SA520. I want to divise network DATA/VOICE.
I think i must create a trunk on G10 for SA520 ...
Trying to work out if I can setup a VLAN interface on a 1721 router.The only interfaces that are listed are the Ethernet (W1-ENET) and the Fast Ethernet interface.I'm still super new to all of this and learn how to change IOS via rommon and TFTP after realizing I had an IOS too large for the memory?
View 3 Replies View RelatedMay I know the reason why we cannot create interface vlan on Cisco ASA 5510?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhether it is possible to have same vlan on multiple interface on ASA 5510 and higher models ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 10Mbps connection link which I will like to reduce to 5Mbps on a 6509 switch as indicated in the config below. [code] After applying the service policy on the vlan interface, i got this "match vlan is not supported for this interface". I actually tried the rate limit command but I cant see the effect using the speedtest.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm looking to build (cheaply) some l2tpv3 tunnels across a campus network. I have a pair of 881's and I was hoping to xconnect the VLAN 1 intfcs between the two of them. "xconnect" is not a CLI option on the interface configuration, although it is for the individual Fa0-3 interfaces. Just for grins, I xconnected the l2tpv3 tunnel between each Fa3 on each router, and the tunnel comes up successfully and I can see a session established. I am routing between the WAN interfaces (Fa4) on each. However, L2 traffic is not passing between the two Fa3 interfaces. I can do it backwards, i.e. route between the Vlan1 interfaces and xconnect the Fa4 interfaces (i.e. WAN), and I can see broadcast traffic from the destination network appearing on the local interface. However, I'd really rather have the four interfaces in VLAN1 tunnelled rather than the WAN interface. I am guessing this has to do with ISL vs. 802.1q, since I'm trying to encapsulate VLAN1 as Ethernet and not as dot1q.
View 8 Replies View Relatedwe've to configure our router 1841 to use both 2 interface Fe for two different vlan (also the second has to go on internet).
Actually we have int Fe0/0 configured with an ip address 192.168.1.1 for lan1 192.168.1.0/24 and we will use the second int Fe0/1 with another ip address like 192.168.2.1 for lan2 192.168.2.0/24.
see below configuration:
[code]...
We have a new optical fiber connection from a new ISP (only for Internet) and we found that our Cisco router RV220w won't work with this new connection because is not possible to add the V LAN ID 20 for the WAN traffic, as required by our ISP/connection. Now we would like to know what Cisco routers can support this feature and that can be "similar" to the RV220w or if there is another way to solve this problem and maintain our actual RV220w, because the features on this particular router (apart of the V LAN ID on Wan) are more than enough for us -
We would like to have a “simple” router and with firewall and VPN features as RV220w, because the one that our provider says that works seems to be too much for us Cisco 2951-SEC K9 – We are a small company with a network of around 10 computers and we only need some VPN connections for our sales companies in Europe and workers when traveling (3-5 VPN connections are OK).
we have a cissco 4506-e switch with ios version 03.02.05.SG . We ae currently facing a strange problem . Vlan interfaces configured in he switch are not showing input and output traffic, whereas the traffic is seen on the Gig interfaces mapped to the respective vlans . We also tried configuring the load-interval 30 , but there is no change . Interace 3/5 is mapped to vlan 5 . For this issue we have also done the IOS upgrade from 3.1.1SG to 3.2.5SG recently still the issue is same. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible for me to create 2 vlan interfaces on the 6500 and have them both in the same subnet?
For a specific customer requirement I would like to have a vlan interface on the 6500 as default gateway, sat in it's own vrf, and then route all traffic inbound and outbound to this vlan through the FWSM interface, preferably in the same subnet. I don't think this will be possible so just looking for confirmation either way.
As I will be running EIGRP between a pair of central 6500's and 2 remote offices it will make things much easier for me advertise the connected FWSM interfaces in to EIGRP for access in/out of all my VRF'd subnets. If I need another subnet for each VRF FWSM next hop then I'll have to reditribute a list of statics which I don't really want to do.
The reason I am not just using the FWSM as gateway is because I need to run HSRP across 3 different devices (another 6500 in a second suite), and failover FWSM will only give me 1 level of redundancy for those gateways.
The is VLAN id setting in some network/LAN interface .... how can I ping this lan/network interface in XP ..any freeware can do it ???
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a customer who is on thr 192.168.254.x subnet and is using a Cisco 881 as their gateway.
They wish to create a second VLAN for the 192.168.253.x subnet.
The Cisco has Dialer0 configured for an ADSL connection.
I have partly configured the router but need some info regarding router a device on the 192.168.253.x subnet to the internet.
configure routing to the internet on the new VLAN and assist in setting up a DHCP server on that vlan. I have attached a copy of the current config.
i purchased 300-28 how it config for stp and trunk
View 2 Replies View RelatedI currently have an ASA5510 with 2 interfaces (outside and Inside) running remote VPN for clients and L2L VPN for a couple of sites. I have traffic entering the inside interface, matching interesting traffic, being wrapped up in IKE / IPSEC and sent out via the outside interface. All straightforward so far.Now I have a new VPN which is required to go over another interface and not the outside. The traffic comes in to the inside interface as normal and should be matched via ACL, encrypted and sent out th e new interface however the traffic is simply sent out of the outside interface and doesn't get any IKE headers. If I reconfigure the interface to be be the outside it does at least match the ACL, wrap it up nicely in IKE and try to get to get to the remote peer.My questions are why does this behaviour occur and why isnt the traffic marked interesting and sent out the new interface.I don't have any issues creating a new VPN if I want it to go external, I just add the required information to the outside_map but i need the traffic to be encrypted and sent over another interface. I not a huge fan of the GUI for this but I've tried both CLI and GUI with the same results.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have configured a qos policy and I am trying to apply the policy to a vlan interface which is physically connected to a switch module port of a 3845 Router.When I try to apply, the message configuration failed appears.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have ASA 5505 with base license. I created 3rd vlan on it.it was created. but i am unable to assign IP to it. i assign ip address it takes it. But when i do sh int ip brief it does not show any ip.
Code...
I have used the following basic configuration to do rate limiting on a vlan interface on a 6509:
access-list 100 permit ip any any
class-map match-all ratelimit
match access-group 100
policy-map ratelimit-10Mb
class ratelimit
police 10000000 428750 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
[code]....
How do I combine the two correctly to give me a vlan port rate limited at 10Mb up and down, but still setting aside (dynamically) 2Mb for voice?
