Cisco WAN :: 7613 - Redundancy With WS-SUP720-3BXL Module
Mar 20, 2012
We have Router CISCO7613,SSO redundancy configured with two Sup 720-3BXL running 12.2(33)SRC1 image. Even thought I've configured SSO, my standby sup remains in COLD state with the following logs generated.
Mar 20 22:07:32.514 IST: %ISSU-SP-3-PEER_IMAGE_INCOMPATIBLE: Peer image (c7600s72033_sp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), version (12.2(33)SRC1) on peer uid (8) is incompatible
Mar 20 22:07:32.514 IST: %ISSU-SP-3-PEER_IMAGE_INCOMPATIBLE: Peer image (c7600s72033_sp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), version (12.2(33)SRC1) on peer uid (8) is incompatible
Mar 20 22:08:48.263 IST: %PFREDUN-SP-4-INCOMPATIBLE: Defaulting to RPR mode (Runtime incompatible)
[code]...
These logs says that due to some reasons, the configuration is not being synchronized with active and standby sups and hence the redundancy mode remains in RPR mode and SSO not achieved, and hence COLD state. However, I couldn't find a reason why the configuration is not being synchronized, I've issued the command, redundancy config-sync ignore mismatched-commands, and everything worked fine, SSO achieved and standby sup came to HOT state.Now my query is,
1. Why the configuration was not synchronized and standby SUP got in COLD state??
2. Since I issued the suggested command, at least, some of the mismatched lines in configuration will be ignored, Will that create a problem when my Active sup fails and standby become active?
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 7, 2010
i know that Sup720-3BXL has been used the SDRAM.but i don't know that which of memory? using of ECC or plain memory?if use the plain SDRAM, how can prevent to parity error?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2013
I have the above config in a 6509-E chassis with X2 Cac-3000 psu's
The problem i'm having is when everything is powered up it runs fine for about 10minutes then reloads the switch,The 6748 has a 6700-CFC installed the only way i have managed to get it run without crashes is to remove the 3BXL card from the sup and replace it with a PFC-3B, whilst this has solved the problem the client wants the 3BXL card to be installed, am I right in thinking that the CFC installed on the 6748 is incompatible with the 3BXL or maybe the 3BXL is faulty
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2013
I have a SUP720-3BXL that will not boot. It will get stuck at booting from the SP. It never switches over to the RP. [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2011
I have been using the Cisco7613 and FlexWAN with PA-8E1-IMA PortAdapter.It has been used for ITP (SIGTRAN) Today, I attemted to enter the Port Adapter 13 1 module with using command that "attach" command.But I couldn't that. and I could see the Error Message below." RTTYC_ ATTACH_ REQ Failed with return code 2 , aborting". This Module (13 1) is working normal. but why cannot enter to the PA ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2012
what is that mean-"Redundancy is not supported between an ACE module and an ACE appliance operating as peers" I'm designing network in which I plan to use ACE-4710-0.5F-K9 appliances.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
1) Does the 6500 series router support supervisor module redundancy like the 7304 does? IE, can I put two identical sup720 modules in the chassis for failover?
2) Can I use any ethernet interface on any line card on the 6500 series for router interfaces? If not, which line cards work as router interfaces?
3) Differences between the 6500 series and the 7600 series? Can I use a sup720 modules from a 6500 in a 7600?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2013
We have 7 interfaces with rj45 connections.. all around 100Mbit per connection .. most likely in the future we will need a couple more interfaces.. i was thinking it would be better to take a WS-X6516-GE-TX card then a FE card as for example a WS-X6148-RJ-45 .Now we want to implement a 7606 with a SUP720-3BXL with 1GB dram for the RP(MSFC3)... so enough memory to support the 2x a FULL BGP table to two peers.
Q : Does the SUP720-3BXL work well with two peers sending the FULL BGP table ?
Q : And does that also work with a WS-X6516-GE-TX connected to the two peers sending the FULL BGP table ? .. or is it better to take a 6724 linecard with a DFC3-BXL so that the 6724 will lookup routes locally instead a 6516 will have the S720- perform the routing ? I know that adding the DFC's increases the bandwidth of the chassis significantly (40gbps per slot most 6700 linecards ,and 20gbps for the 6724 which is 1:2 oversubscribed )
Q: Or is it better to connect the two peers to the two SFP interfaces on the SUP720 , and connect the small routers and customer networks to the 6516 linecard?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2012
we have a Nam module on a 7613. I have access to the router. but how can i know the how to access the Nam?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2011
We have built some policers to apply to vlan SVIs on our 7613 so that we can rate limit input and output traffic. We followed the Cisco formula and got this.
policy-map vlan-shape-3meg
class class-default
police cir 3000000 bc 562500 be 1125000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop violate-action drop
There have been some complaints about this not actually meeting the limit. When I do a show policy-map interface xxx I get this. Based on that it looks like the Be value is being change to match the Bc value.
On a separate note, I noticed that every policer we built with the cisco formula actually ends up with a Tc greater than the max Tc of .125 seconds. It seems odd that a recommended formula would end up creating values outside the maximum allowed limits by the software.
I'm not a QoS expert so if any of this seems like basic stuff it's just because I'm a little slow on QoS.
Vlan2
Service-policy input: temp-remove
class-map: class-default (match-any)
Match: any
police :
[code]....
One other thing...in order to apply policers input and output on an SVI does mls qos vlan-based have to be configured on the trunks tagged with the corresponding Vlan?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2007
I have a cisco 7613 router and need to connect a site using Optical fibre (BSNL) on gigabit port,we will use convertor to convert optical signal to electrical .What configuration must be done on router to ensure this point to point fibre connectivity between my router and another router at differnt POp.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2012
I have Cisco 7613 on my edge(MPLS Backbone). CPU utilization is shooting to 100% at frequent intervals. When I tell vendors managing device they tell that it is happening due to one of my server(connected on Fast ethernet port of 100Mbps) generating heavy traffic. My questions are:
1. Can a router of 720Gbps capability be choked due to traffic generated by 100Mbps link?
2. Interrupt CPU process utilization is well below 10% at the said time. BGP router process consumes most of the CPU. Does this means that server in question is generating too many routing updates?
3. Is there any way that I can limit routing updates on a particular link?
4. how to check which link is causing more CPU utilization.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2011
We have a 7613 w/ WS-SUP720-3BXL running 12.2(18)SXF11. We have a 48 port WS-X6748-GE-TX that has one interface that keeps getting output drops for anything over 200Mb/sec.
See the attached file which has more details and show results.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2013
What would cause an interface to show up/up (looped), but you still can't ping that loop?...It is on a Cisco 7613 with an Enhanced FlexWan (WS-X6582- 2PA), with a Mx Serial PA, 8 ports (73-1580-10) and running IOS ver 12.2(33)SRE2 [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2005
I got a problem when I try to create a VLAN in a 7613 router. The screen capature like the following:
router(conf)#vlan 1045
router(conf-vlan)#exit
VLAN(s) are not available in Port Manager
The VLAN is failed to create. The VLAN range which is failed to create is from 1001 - 1060.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2013
I am planning to deploye the fwsm with all this complexity, will this type of senario work or not means traffic will move from msfc to the core.. Is this right to create another svi int2 on msfc to move traffic from msfc to core-switch.
G0/1(cisco7613) Vlan10----Vlan10(inside)FWSM-(outside)vlan20---Vlan20(inside)(svi-int1)MSFC(outside)(svi-int2)Vlan30---Vlan 30G0/2(Core-Switch)-----internet--->
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
I need your opinion regarding moving of IDSM -2 and FWSM Module from 7613 to 6513 chassis.Currently these two modules are in 7613 and we are not using either of them now we have to configure them in 6513 chassis. As you can see from the figure that traffic of all 3 core router i.e 7613 go to 6513 - to proxy ISA 2004 - 6513 - to Internet.
There are also some network attached with 6513 and we want to move both of modules to 6513 so that NetworkA/B/C/D/E which are attached to 6513 can also be configured for FWSM and IDSM -2.
I have a query regarding this migration:Do we need license for these two modules again for 6513 chassis?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2013
is there any specific way to create the SVI Interface on MSFC , actually I need to create the two SVI Int on MSFC to enable routing in between two VLANs on 7613 chassis.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2011
I was wondering about command of Linkset subcommand at ITP7613.I have been using the Cisco7613 chassis for the ITP(SIGTRAN) service.
However, i know that the "tx-queue-depth" command is used for sctp multihoming buffersize that between primary and secondary path at the Link sub-command mode. but i can't adjust the changeover buffersize(retrieval buffer) that between link and another link at the Linkset subcommand mode.
It's above my comprehension.
My guess is that related to "plan-capacity-rcvd" command. it's right?I want to know command that adjust the buffersize of Link changeover.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2012
I have a strange QoS problem with one Cisco7600 (sup7203BXL, IOS 12.2(33)SRE6).
This is layer 2 traffic,and all ports are L2 dot1q trunks:
1) Packet comes with DSCP 46 on Gigabit port (WS6728-SFP) with "mls qos trust dscp" configured. It goes out the port of the same card/slot with DSCP 0.
2) packet comes with DSCP 46 on different Gigabit port on the same card/slot with "mls qos trust dscp" and also "mls qos vlan-based" configured. It qoes out out the port with DSCP 46.
Why the switch behave differently if "mls qos vlan-based" is configured on port (or to say it works correct since it doesn't override DSCP)?
I have global command "mls qos rewrite ip dscp" since this 7600 is also MPLS PE router and I found in documentation that "mls qos rewite ip dscp" is mandatory for QoS on MPLS (EXP bits). So I can't turn off "rewrite ip dscp". Again the problem that I presents is L2 problem not MPLS (MPLS is used for different traffic).
Also mls qos mappings are ok COS to DSCp are 5 to 46 and vice versa.
Furthermore, as far as I know if I have configured "mls qos trust dscp" on Gigabit ethernet port, switch (7600) should work in this order:
- make internal DSCP from packet DSCP
- since I don't have configured DSCP mutation DSCP should stay the same (46)
- using map DSCP - COS ( 46 -5 ) switch will choose queue on outgoing interface in regards to mapped COS
View 0 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2011
Cisco 6500 Sup720-3B SPA IOS SXI - GRE tunnel will not come up.It worked fine on SXF code, but the crypto map can not be applied on tunnel interface.The iskmp is up with the OM_IDLE The crypto give it a Cryto UP, the the Tunnel does not come up. It is UP down.Does some one have a working config with a 6500 IOS SXI Train with GRE IPSEC Tunnel?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2008
we have some problem with GRE traffic which is processed by CPU and not by CEF.In sniffed packets I can see a lot of "TCP window update" packets. I found that some kind of GRE traffic are forwarded to CPU, like packets with IP options or TTL=0 but non of those are seen in the sniffed packets.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2011
Can the sup720b be used in any other slot on a 6513 besides 7 and 8?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2012
We are looking into replacing our current Windows NLB configuration with a SLB solution as NLB creates some nasty multicast traffic.
We are currently curious about the limitations for running SLB without a dedicated ACE Module, will it handle line-rate speed (1 and 10 gbit) with SLB?
Does VSS introduce any limitations for SLB? Any other pitfalls/limitations we should be aware of?
Hardware info: 2x WS-C6509-E in VSS with VS-S720-10G (VS-F6K-PFC3C) running s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI7
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2012
I will use function of span in sup70-3b.How many session can use in sup720-3b? For example, 2 or 4 session.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2012
migration of an existing Sup720 configuration to a new Sup2T. At present we have a Sup2T chassis in the lab running 15.0(1)SY1 and a production Sup720 chassis running 12.2(33)SXI5.I've taken a copy of the production startup-config, renamed it to 'startup-config-BGFL_6509_MBAS-020712' and copied it to the bootdisk (and slave bootdisk) of the new Sup2Ts.I've then added the command 'boot config bootdisk:startup-config-BGFL_6509_MBAS-020712' in an attempt to boot from that config and have the Sup2T migrate it to the new config standards (particularly from a QoS perspective as mentioned here :[URL]
!
boot-start-marker
boot system flash bootflash:s2t54-advipservicesk9-mz.SPA.150-1.SY1.bin
boot config bootdisk:startup-config-BGFL_6509_MBAS-020712
...
Router#sh bootvar
BOOT variable = bootflash:s2t54-advipservicesk9-mz.SPA.150-1.SY1.bin,1;
[code]....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 10, 2011
How can i find the serial number of sup-720 which is totally dead and not boot?By which sticker on SUP and where ? How many digits ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2011
I have received a sup720-3B from Cisco with an internal 512MB flash(sup-bootdisk). I want to verify what IOS image is on the disk and do not have an spare 6509 chasis. Can I remove the 512 MB flash disk and insert it to my disk0: on my production 6509 with the sup32 that the 720 will repplace and view what is on the disk without corrupting?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2013
We have a Cisco 7600 Router with SUP720/MFSC3 that was running version 12.3(33)-SRC3 for more than 2 years now. We recently had to upgrade to a newer release to solve a bug issue after recommendations, so we chose to go to SRD8 release. Since then we are facing a rather strange problem with one of my peer ebpg. we have 2-3 peering on the same router. only one of them is affected. The ebp keeps flapping every 3 minutes due to hold down timers.
12:14:33: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 15.14.11.18 Down BGP Notification sent
12:14:33: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 15.14.11.18 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
12:14:33: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 15.14.11.18 IPv4 Unicast topology base removed from session BGP Notification sent
12:14:47: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 15.14.11.18 Up
[code]....
We asked our peer if they have similar problems but it seems they do not. Our peer is using Cisco 12810 running 12.0(32)SY11 After downgrading back to version 12.2(33)SRC3 again, the probem was fixed...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2011
to the above question. I see the specs for the WS-SUP720-3B and 3BXL but not the WS-SUP720-BASE with the MSFC3 and PFC3A daughter cards.The 3B can handle 256,000 routes using IPv4 and the 3BXL can do 1,000,000.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2012
when using "show mls statistics" I see a lot packets are getting L3 Processed. Does that mean they are getting software-forwarded?
IOS is 12.2(33)SXI5.
Cat6k#show mls statistics
Statistics for Earl in Module 5
L2 Forwarding Engine
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2011
Currently we do not have multicat routing enabled on either of our 2x Sup720-10G 6509 Switches. We have no intention of doing so either. I am looking for clarification on how mutlicasting operates within a Vlan.
IOS: s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH2a.bin
Our Vlan has IGMP snooping enabled. Here is the output.
6509Switch#sh ip igmp inter vlan 25
Vlan25 is up, line protocol is up
Internet address is 10.1.1.254/24
IGMP is disabled on interface
we do not want to disable IGMP due to this one concern that I can't find documented. If we disable IGMP snooping on the vlan, what happens to multicast packets with a TTL > 1. Do they get flooded to the entire switch and all Vlans? Or does it stay within the Vlan?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2011
I got a new VS-S720-10G it had 122-33.SXH8b on there. I had to downgrade it to 12.2.33.SXI1 to match our other switches. I installed the file I use in all the other switches, s72033-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI1.bin but the Sup is now is only booting up only to ROMMON mode.
Initializing ATA monitor library...
Self extracting the image... [OK]
Self decompressing the image : #################################################
################################################################################
################################################################ [OK]
%SYSTEM-1-INITFAIL: Network boot is not supported.
System Bootstrap, Version 8.5(4)
Copyright (c) 1994-2009 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Cat6k-Sup720/SP processor with 1048576 Kbytes of main memory
[code]....
How do I get the older version of IOS to load up?
View 5 Replies
View Related