Cisco WAN :: WS-SUP720-3BXL And WS-X6748-GE-TX Configuration
Feb 20, 2013
I have the above config in a 6509-E chassis with X2 Cac-3000 psu's
The problem i'm having is when everything is powered up it runs fine for about 10minutes then reloads the switch,The 6748 has a 6700-CFC installed the only way i have managed to get it run without crashes is to remove the 3BXL card from the sup and replace it with a PFC-3B, whilst this has solved the problem the client wants the 3BXL card to be installed, am I right in thinking that the CFC installed on the 6748 is incompatible with the 3BXL or maybe the 3BXL is faulty
i know that Sup720-3BXL has been used the SDRAM.but i don't know that which of memory? using of ECC or plain memory?if use the plain SDRAM, how can prevent to parity error?
We have Router CISCO7613,SSO redundancy configured with two Sup 720-3BXL running 12.2(33)SRC1 image. Even thought I've configured SSO, my standby sup remains in COLD state with the following logs generated.
Mar 20 22:07:32.514 IST: %ISSU-SP-3-PEER_IMAGE_INCOMPATIBLE: Peer image (c7600s72033_sp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), version (12.2(33)SRC1) on peer uid (8) is incompatible Mar 20 22:07:32.514 IST: %ISSU-SP-3-PEER_IMAGE_INCOMPATIBLE: Peer image (c7600s72033_sp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), version (12.2(33)SRC1) on peer uid (8) is incompatible Mar 20 22:08:48.263 IST: %PFREDUN-SP-4-INCOMPATIBLE: Defaulting to RPR mode (Runtime incompatible) [code]...
These logs says that due to some reasons, the configuration is not being synchronized with active and standby sups and hence the redundancy mode remains in RPR mode and SSO not achieved, and hence COLD state. However, I couldn't find a reason why the configuration is not being synchronized, I've issued the command, redundancy config-sync ignore mismatched-commands, and everything worked fine, SSO achieved and standby sup came to HOT state.Now my query is,
1. Why the configuration was not synchronized and standby SUP got in COLD state?? 2. Since I issued the suggested command, at least, some of the mismatched lines in configuration will be ignored, Will that create a problem when my Active sup fails and standby become active?
migration of an existing Sup720 configuration to a new Sup2T. At present we have a Sup2T chassis in the lab running 15.0(1)SY1 and a production Sup720 chassis running 12.2(33)SXI5.I've taken a copy of the production startup-config, renamed it to 'startup-config-BGFL_6509_MBAS-020712' and copied it to the bootdisk (and slave bootdisk) of the new Sup2Ts.I've then added the command 'boot config bootdisk:startup-config-BGFL_6509_MBAS-020712' in an attempt to boot from that config and have the Sup2T migrate it to the new config standards (particularly from a QoS perspective as mentioned here :[URL]
I have a two fiber connection from our Central Office(6513) to Remote office (6509). I have a requirement that on the remote office if one of the fiber goes down, the second fiber should work as a failover. I am planning to use SUP720-3B SFP to connect to the CO.
Can I connet one fiber to Sup720-3b G5/1 & another fiber connection to G5/2? or Can I connet one fiber to Sup720-3b G5/1 & another fiber connection to G6/2? I am running EIGRP between sites. Any sample config.
We have 7 interfaces with rj45 connections.. all around 100Mbit per connection .. most likely in the future we will need a couple more interfaces.. i was thinking it would be better to take a WS-X6516-GE-TX card then a FE card as for example a WS-X6148-RJ-45 .Now we want to implement a 7606 with a SUP720-3BXL with 1GB dram for the RP(MSFC3)... so enough memory to support the 2x a FULL BGP table to two peers.
Q : Does the SUP720-3BXL work well with two peers sending the FULL BGP table ?
Q : And does that also work with a WS-X6516-GE-TX connected to the two peers sending the FULL BGP table ? .. or is it better to take a 6724 linecard with a DFC3-BXL so that the 6724 will lookup routes locally instead a 6516 will have the S720- perform the routing ? I know that adding the DFC's increases the bandwidth of the chassis significantly (40gbps per slot most 6700 linecards ,and 20gbps for the 6724 which is 1:2 oversubscribed )
Q: Or is it better to connect the two peers to the two SFP interfaces on the SUP720 , and connect the small routers and customer networks to the 6516 linecard?
We have a 7613 w/ WS-SUP720-3BXL running 12.2(18)SXF11. We have a 48 port WS-X6748-GE-TX that has one interface that keeps getting output drops for anything over 200Mb/sec.
See the attached file which has more details and show results.
I have a WS-X6748-GE-TX with the WS-F6700-CFC daughter card. Is it possible to replace the WS-F6700-CFC daughter card with a WS-F6K-DFC4-AXL to make this compatible with the SUP-2T? Or, are there differences between the CFC and DFC base modules?
I have a cisco 6509 switch in which i have 2 SUPs. I am using 3 Qty. of WS-X6748-GE-TX in the same switch. First 24 ports of module 1 and are not working. I replace the faulty moldule with the working one but now the new (good) module's first 12 ports stopped working. But when I insert the good card (the replaced one with the faulty) in other chassis it works fine.
We are upgrading two standalone 6509E chassis to a VSS system with new VS-S720-10G-3C cards. The 6509's have WS-X6748-GE-TX card with DFC3B daughter cards (see below). The compatablity matrix (see below) states that 67xx cards are supported but it goes on to state DFC3C or DFC3CXL cards are needed. So does this mean that the existing WS-X6748-GE-TX cards have to be upgraded or will they be supported?
Core #1Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL 2 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE SAD 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B SAL 6 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot) WS-SUP720-3B SAL 7 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL 8 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL
its a hardware problem or just not get power to module 1 for module WS-X6748-GE-TX? this is the capture from show module and sh log :
------------------ show module ------------------
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX xxx 5 2 Route Switch Processor 720 (Active) RSP720-3CXL-GE xxx Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
I urgently want to replace a faulty line card WS-X6748-SFP with a new one. The switch concern is a 5609-V-E operating in Virtual Switching System mode.How long do you suggest the down time will be?
currenly running a C6509E, with a WS-SUP720-3B running IOS level S72033-adventerprisek9_wan-MZ.122-22.SXH3. I want to install a WS-X6748-GE-TX blade and would like NOT to have to upgrade IOS at this time. Future migrations are planned. Can this be done?
we have 2 WS-X6516-GE-TX, WS-X6516A-GBIC, and a WS-X6748-GE-TX with a WS-F6700-CFC daughtercard
our sup is a WS-SUP720-3B
we are experiencing packet loss for everything connected in the WS-X6748-GE-TX blade, right now we dont have any production device in that blade due to the packet loss we are experiencing.
this switch was running hybrid before it is now running native ios, however I can't recall if we didn't have that packet loss before. do i need to update a firmware of the card or daughtercard (if this is possible, can't say i've done it before).
I have one Cisco 7606 and i need to install a WS-X6748-GE-TX with WS-F6700-DFC3CXL.When I install the WS-X6748-GE-TX the module is powered off with the following warning:
00:01:45: %C6KPWR-SP-4-UNSUPPORTED: unsupported module in slot 1, power not allowed: Unsupported baseboard/earl combination. [code]
I've installed second WS-X6748-SFP linecard on my catalyst 6509 with sup720-3b and after that NAM-2 and IDSM-2 module become inaccessible from management network. I can only login with session slot N proc 1.When I execute #hw-module module 4 reset, modules become accessible.
#sh module from cat6509
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 2 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL114670XW 3 48 48-port 100FX SFP Ethernet Module WS-X6148-FE-SFP SAL1201BZKF 4 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL1625ETFJ 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B SAL1206FNGQ 6 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot) WS-SUP720-3B SAL1206FVFB 8 8 Intrusion Detection System WS-SVC-IDSM-2 SAD120502LR 9 8 Network Analysis Module WS-SVC-NAM-2 SAD120206LB
Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status --- ---------------------------------- ------ ------------ ------------ ------- 2 001e.4a3e.3b30 to 001e.4a3e.3b5f 1.10 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok 3 001e.4aea.e7b0 to 001e.4aea.e7df 3.3 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok 4 5057.a895.bb84 to 5057.a895.bbb3 2.4 12.2(18r)S1 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok 5 001c.58d0.6dc4 to 001c.58d0.6dc7 5.6 8.5(2) 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok 6 0016.c848.3698 to 0016.c848.369b 5.6 8.5(2) 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok 8 001e.f7a1.54b0 to 001e.f7a1.54b7 6.3 7.2(1) 7.0(8)E4 Ok 9 001e.f72a.ba62 to 001e.f72a.ba69 4.3 7.2(1) 5.1(2) Ok
Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status ---- --------------------------- ------------------ ----------- ------- ------- 2 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL114881B6 4.0 Ok 4 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL1624EGQS 4.1 Ok 5 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1206FNZY 2.3 Ok 5 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL1206FSFH 3.1 Ok 6 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1206FP27 2.3 Ok 6 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL1206FN26 3.1 Ok 8 IDS 2 accelerator board WS-SVC-IDSUPG ADBG7270048 2.5 Ok
I have a server with 4 ethernet ports, 1G, they are bonded together, two of them was pluged into cat6500 module WS-X6724-TX. now we have moved the two ports to the replace module WS-X6748-GE-TX.
I have checked server side, the bond configuration are same no changed. what is possible reason replace module will cause link offline? why "sh run all" give the port is shutdown?
we have a chassis 6513-E and a module WS-X6748-GE-TX, I'd like to know if could I put this module in any slot, since the documentation from Cisco says that any slot from a chassis 6500-E Series can support this module. And then in the documentation of WS-X6748-GE-TX says that this module is not compatible in the slots 1-8 of the 6513 chassis, only from 9th to 13th slots, in those slots from the 6513-E we already have 4x WS-X6748-GE-TX, and we'd like to know if could we put the module in the rest of the slots. The 6513, and 6513-E is kind of confusing.
I have a strange QoS problem with one Cisco7600 (sup7203BXL, IOS 12.2(33)SRE6).
This is layer 2 traffic,and all ports are L2 dot1q trunks:
1) Packet comes with DSCP 46 on Gigabit port (WS6728-SFP) with "mls qos trust dscp" configured. It goes out the port of the same card/slot with DSCP 0.
2) packet comes with DSCP 46 on different Gigabit port on the same card/slot with "mls qos trust dscp" and also "mls qos vlan-based" configured. It qoes out out the port with DSCP 46.
Why the switch behave differently if "mls qos vlan-based" is configured on port (or to say it works correct since it doesn't override DSCP)?
I have global command "mls qos rewrite ip dscp" since this 7600 is also MPLS PE router and I found in documentation that "mls qos rewite ip dscp" is mandatory for QoS on MPLS (EXP bits). So I can't turn off "rewrite ip dscp". Again the problem that I presents is L2 problem not MPLS (MPLS is used for different traffic).
Also mls qos mappings are ok COS to DSCp are 5 to 46 and vice versa.
Furthermore, as far as I know if I have configured "mls qos trust dscp" on Gigabit ethernet port, switch (7600) should work in this order:
- make internal DSCP from packet DSCP
- since I don't have configured DSCP mutation DSCP should stay the same (46)
- using map DSCP - COS ( 46 -5 ) switch will choose queue on outgoing interface in regards to mapped COS
Cisco 6500 Sup720-3B SPA IOS SXI - GRE tunnel will not come up.It worked fine on SXF code, but the crypto map can not be applied on tunnel interface.The iskmp is up with the OM_IDLE The crypto give it a Cryto UP, the the Tunnel does not come up. It is UP down.Does some one have a working config with a 6500 IOS SXI Train with GRE IPSEC Tunnel?
we have some problem with GRE traffic which is processed by CPU and not by CEF.In sniffed packets I can see a lot of "TCP window update" packets. I found that some kind of GRE traffic are forwarded to CPU, like packets with IP options or TTL=0 but non of those are seen in the sniffed packets.
We are looking into replacing our current Windows NLB configuration with a SLB solution as NLB creates some nasty multicast traffic.
We are currently curious about the limitations for running SLB without a dedicated ACE Module, will it handle line-rate speed (1 and 10 gbit) with SLB?
Does VSS introduce any limitations for SLB? Any other pitfalls/limitations we should be aware of?
Hardware info: 2x WS-C6509-E in VSS with VS-S720-10G (VS-F6K-PFC3C) running s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI7
I have received a sup720-3B from Cisco with an internal 512MB flash(sup-bootdisk). I want to verify what IOS image is on the disk and do not have an spare 6509 chasis. Can I remove the 512 MB flash disk and insert it to my disk0: on my production 6509 with the sup32 that the 720 will repplace and view what is on the disk without corrupting?
We have a Cisco 7600 Router with SUP720/MFSC3 that was running version 12.3(33)-SRC3 for more than 2 years now. We recently had to upgrade to a newer release to solve a bug issue after recommendations, so we chose to go to SRD8 release. Since then we are facing a rather strange problem with one of my peer ebpg. we have 2-3 peering on the same router. only one of them is affected. The ebp keeps flapping every 3 minutes due to hold down timers.
12:14:33: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 15.14.11.18 Down BGP Notification sent 12:14:33: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 15.14.11.18 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes 12:14:33: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 15.14.11.18 IPv4 Unicast topology base removed from session BGP Notification sent 12:14:47: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 15.14.11.18 Up
[code]....
We asked our peer if they have similar problems but it seems they do not. Our peer is using Cisco 12810 running 12.0(32)SY11 After downgrading back to version 12.2(33)SRC3 again, the probem was fixed...
to the above question. I see the specs for the WS-SUP720-3B and 3BXL but not the WS-SUP720-BASE with the MSFC3 and PFC3A daughter cards.The 3B can handle 256,000 routes using IPv4 and the 3BXL can do 1,000,000.
Currently we do not have multicat routing enabled on either of our 2x Sup720-10G 6509 Switches. We have no intention of doing so either. I am looking for clarification on how mutlicasting operates within a Vlan.
IOS: s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH2a.bin
Our Vlan has IGMP snooping enabled. Here is the output.
6509Switch#sh ip igmp inter vlan 25 Vlan25 is up, line protocol is up Internet address is 10.1.1.254/24 IGMP is disabled on interface
we do not want to disable IGMP due to this one concern that I can't find documented. If we disable IGMP snooping on the vlan, what happens to multicast packets with a TTL > 1. Do they get flooded to the entire switch and all Vlans? Or does it stay within the Vlan?
I got a new VS-S720-10G it had 122-33.SXH8b on there. I had to downgrade it to 12.2.33.SXI1 to match our other switches. I installed the file I use in all the other switches, s72033-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI1.bin but the Sup is now is only booting up only to ROMMON mode.
Initializing ATA monitor library...
Self extracting the image... [OK] Self decompressing the image : ################################################# ################################################################################ ################################################################ [OK]
%SYSTEM-1-INITFAIL: Network boot is not supported.
System Bootstrap, Version 8.5(4) Copyright (c) 1994-2009 by cisco Systems, Inc. Cat6k-Sup720/SP processor with 1048576 Kbytes of main memory
