Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Packet Loss On Blade WS-X6748-GE-TX

Oct 2, 2011

we have a 6509 with ios 12.2.33SXJ
 
we have 2 WS-X6516-GE-TX, WS-X6516A-GBIC, and a WS-X6748-GE-TX with a WS-F6700-CFC daughtercard
 
our sup is a WS-SUP720-3B
 
we are experiencing packet loss for everything connected in the WS-X6748-GE-TX blade, right now we dont have any production device in that blade due to the packet loss we are experiencing.
 
this switch was running hybrid  before it is now running native ios, however I can't recall if we didn't have that packet loss before. do i need to update a firmware of the card or daughtercard (if this is possible, can't say i've done it before).

View 10 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 887 Router - 50% Packet Loss On GRE Tunnel

May 22, 2013

We have a site were we have a 887 cisco hsiung a GRE tunnel
 
When pinging anything froom the tunnel source to the tunnel dest on the local lan we get a  50% packet loss
 
ping
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 10.9.93.22

[Code].....
 
replicated the setup exatly in our lab  and it works 100% with exactly the same config.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Packet Loss With LACP 3560E

Mar 11, 2013

I have a cisco 3560E switch setup with LACP, when using LACP i receive alot of packet loss / output drops
 
When a ping from the server behind LACP:
--- google.com ping statistics ---
44 packets transmitted, 39 received, 11% packet loss, time 42990ms
 
what would cause this packet loss with lacp?
 
some output from the switch:
 
Port-channel12 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is EtherChannel, address is d0d0.fd58.7390 (bia d0d0.fd58.7390)
Description: LACP-PORT

[Code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S - Tune Timers So That Packet Loss Is Minimal

Mar 26, 2012

I have a Cisco 2960S stack and I'd like to tune the timers so that packet loss is minimal if a switch fails.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S Packet Loss Is Minimal If A Switch Fails

Apr 11, 2012

I have a Cisco 2960S stack and I'd like to tune the timers so that packet loss is minimal if a switch fails.To simulate a failed switch I have reloaded it while running a continuous ping to a management address on the stack's SVI: [code] As I see the same results when a ping is directed through the single switch (switched), and through the firewall (routed), I'm inclined to think that this is due to the stack failover timers on the Catalyst 2960S.Is it possible to change the stack failover timers (i.e hold down, failover etc), to speed up the failover process?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960-S With GLC-FE-100FX Fiber Modules - Packet Loss

Apr 19, 2013

I have two 2960-s switches with GLC-FE-100FX fibre modules in and I am seeing packet loss over the link that is connected to the modules. When the interface is shutdown and brought back up it always comes up in half duplex even thought it is set to full in the config. I've seen other posts where you have to use the command no duplex then full duplex to get it to come up int full duplex. This does appear to work when I do a show int it says its full duplex however I'm stil seeing 20 - 40% packet loss on the link which suggests to me there is still a speed/duplex issue. The device at the other end is a Cisco 7200 which is set to 100Full. If I plug a Cisco 2811 into the fibre link I get zero packet loss which suggests its a problem with the switch.
 
I have changed the modules and fibre cables which makes no difference. As I stated at the start I have two 2960's both are showing exactly the same issue. Details of the switch are below the SFP are cisco branded:

Switch Ports Model              SW Version            SW Image
------ ----- -----              ----------            ----------
*    1 28    WS-C2960S-24TS-L   12.2(55)SE5           C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M
 
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
switchport trunk allowed vlan 380,382,384,386
switchport mode trunk
duplex full(code)

View 18 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Monitoring Session Experiencing A Large Packet Loss

Aug 16, 2012

I have been searching the message boards and wasn't having much luck. I am running some monitoring sessions on my 6509 and on the VLAN I am monitoring, I am experiencing a really large packet loss.  If we hook up a laptop to the destination port and run wireshark we are seeing between 80% and 90% packet loss.  I dont see the packet loss on the show port command, but I do on the show int vlan command.
 
The config is as follows:
 
Session 2
---------
Type                   : Local Session
Source VLANs           :
RX Only            : 500

[Code].....

I was doing some reading on Egress vs Ingress and I am wondering if the Egress SPAN replication state could be causing the packet loss that we are seeing or does the ingress & learn command override that?

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: To Mirror Port Only Http Get Packet On 4948 Or 6500

Feb 7, 2012

How to mirror port only http get packet on 4948 or 6500 ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Ping Packet Drop From Core-Switch To Directly Connected Server

Oct 24, 2011

I have an Cisco 6500 CS and there is a Cisco Unified Communication Manger Server connected directly to the Core Switch.I tried to change duplex and speed ( fix and auto ) for both sides, but the same problem.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-X6748-GE-TX And SUP-2T Compatibility?

May 13, 2013

I have a WS-X6748-GE-TX with the WS-F6700-CFC daughter card. Is it possible to replace the WS-F6700-CFC daughter card with a WS-F6K-DFC4-AXL to make this compatible with the SUP-2T? Or, are there differences between the CFC and DFC base modules?

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: First 12 Ports Of X6748 TX Are Not Working

Aug 19, 2012

I have a cisco 6509 switch in which i have 2 SUPs. I am using 3 Qty. of WS-X6748-GE-TX in the same switch. First 24 ports of module 1 and are not working. I replace the faulty moldule with the working one but now the new (good) module's first 12 ports stopped working. But when I insert the good card (the replaced one with the faulty) in other chassis it works fine.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: VSS With VS-S720-10G-3C And WS-X6748-GE-TX Compatibility?

Feb 7, 2012

We are upgrading two standalone 6509E chassis to a VSS system with new VS-S720-10G-3C cards.  The 6509's have WS-X6748-GE-TX card with DFC3B daughter cards (see below).  The compatablity matrix (see below) states that 67xx cards are supported but it goes on to state DFC3C or DFC3CXL cards are needed.  So does this mean that the existing WS-X6748-GE-TX cards have to be upgraded or will they be supported? 

Core #1Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------  1   48  CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP              WS-X6748-SFP       SAL  2    4  CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet      WS-X6704-10GE      SAD  5    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Active)         WS-SUP720-3B       SAL  6    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot)            WS-SUP720-3B       SAL  7   48  CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet  WS-X6748-GE-TX     SAL  8   48  CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet  WS-X6748-GE-TX     SAL

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Getting Module WS-X6748-GE-TX PWRDown On 7606?

Jan 28, 2013

its a hardware problem or just not get power to module 1 for module WS-X6748-GE-TX? this is the capture from show module and sh log :
 
------------------ show module ------------------
  
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
  1   48  CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet  WS-X6748-GE-TX     xxx
  5    2  Route Switch Processor 720 (Active)    RSP720-3CXL-GE     xxx
Mod MAC addresses                       Hw    Fw           Sw           Status

[code].....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: To Replace A Line Card WS-X6748-SFP

Oct 18, 2012

I urgently want to replace a faulty line card WS-X6748-SFP with a new one. The switch concern is a 5609-V-E operating in Virtual Switching System mode.How long do you suggest the down time will be?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C6506-E / TestAclPermit Fail In WS-X6748-SFP?

Dec 7, 2011

in my C6506-E installed module WS-X6748-SFP with WS-F6700-DFC3BXL
 
last time a see errors:

18:42:49: %DIAG-SP-6-TEST_RUNNING: Module 3: Running TestAclPermit{ID=23} ...
18:42:51: %DIAG-SP-3-TEST_FAIL: Module 3: TestAclPermit{ID=23} has failed. Error code = 0x1
  23) TestAclPermit -------------------> F
 Current bootup diagnostic level: minimal
Module 3:
Overall Diagnostic Result for Module 3 : MINOR ERROR
Diagnostic level at card bootup: minimal

[code]...

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IOS Level Support Required For WS-X6748-GE-TX?

Nov 21, 2012

currenly running a C6509E, with a WS-SUP720-3B running IOS level S72033-adventerprisek9_wan-MZ.122-22.SXH3.  I want to install a WS-X6748-GE-TX blade and would like NOT to have to upgrade IOS at this time.  Future migrations are planned.  Can this be done? 

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7606 Need To Install WS-X6748-GE-TX With WS-F6700-DFC3CXL

Nov 13, 2012

I have one Cisco 7606 and i need to install a WS-X6748-GE-TX with WS-F6700-DFC3CXL.When I install the WS-X6748-GE-TX the module is powered off with the following warning:
 
00:01:45: %C6KPWR-SP-4-UNSUPPORTED: unsupported module in slot 1, power not allowed: Unsupported baseboard/earl combination. [code]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: X6748 And NAM-2 Modules Inaccessible After Installing Linecard

Oct 8, 2012

I've installed second WS-X6748-SFP linecard on my catalyst 6509 with sup720-3b and after that NAM-2 and IDSM-2 module become inaccessible from management network. I can only login with session slot N proc 1.When I execute #hw-module module 4 reset, modules become accessible.
 
#sh module from cat6509
 
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
  2   48  CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP              WS-X6748-SFP       SAL114670XW
  3   48  48-port 100FX SFP Ethernet Module      WS-X6148-FE-SFP    SAL1201BZKF
  4   48  CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP              WS-X6748-SFP       SAL1625ETFJ
  5    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Active)         WS-SUP720-3B       SAL1206FNGQ
  6    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot)            WS-SUP720-3B       SAL1206FVFB
  8    8  Intrusion Detection System             WS-SVC-IDSM-2      SAD120502LR
  9    8  Network Analysis Module                WS-SVC-NAM-2       SAD120206LB
 
Mod MAC addresses                       Hw    Fw           Sw           Status
--- ---------------------------------- ------ ------------ ------------ -------
  2  001e.4a3e.3b30 to 001e.4a3e.3b5f   1.10  12.2(14r)S5  12.2(18)SXF1 Ok
  3  001e.4aea.e7b0 to 001e.4aea.e7df   3.3   8.4(1)       8.5(0.46)RFW Ok
  4  5057.a895.bb84 to 5057.a895.bbb3   2.4   12.2(18r)S1  12.2(18)SXF1 Ok
  5  001c.58d0.6dc4 to 001c.58d0.6dc7   5.6   8.5(2)       12.2(18)SXF1 Ok
  6  0016.c848.3698 to 0016.c848.369b   5.6   8.5(2)       12.2(18)SXF1 Ok
  8  001e.f7a1.54b0 to 001e.f7a1.54b7   6.3   7.2(1)       7.0(8)E4     Ok
  9  001e.f72a.ba62 to 001e.f72a.ba69   4.3   7.2(1)       5.1(2)       Ok
 
Mod  Sub-Module                  Model              Serial       Hw     Status
---- --------------------------- ------------------ ----------- ------- -------
  2  Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC       SAL114881B6  4.0    Ok
  4  Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC       SAL1624EGQS  4.1    Ok
  5  Policy Feature Card 3       WS-F6K-PFC3B       SAL1206FNZY  2.3    Ok
  5  MSFC3 Daughterboard         WS-SUP720          SAL1206FSFH  3.1    Ok
  6  Policy Feature Card 3       WS-F6K-PFC3B       SAL1206FP27  2.3    Ok
  6  MSFC3 Daughterboard         WS-SUP720          SAL1206FN26  3.1    Ok
  8  IDS 2 accelerator board     WS-SVC-IDSUPG      ADBG7270048  2.5    Ok
 
cat6500 running 12.2(18)SXF12a ios...

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-X6748-GE-TX Change Module Cause Some Ports Of Server Offline

Dec 1, 2012

I have a server with 4 ethernet ports, 1G, they are bonded together, two of them was pluged into cat6500 module WS-X6724-TX. now we have moved the two ports to the replace module WS-X6748-GE-TX.
 
I have checked server side, the bond configuration are same no changed. what is possible reason replace module will cause link offline? why "sh run all" give the port is shutdown?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Shutdown 4507r-e And Just Swap Out Blade?

Apr 2, 2012

If i replace a card of the same type in the same slot will I lose the configuration for that card or does it live in the backplane of the device?Is there any special command I need to run to replace the card or can i shutdown the 4507r-e and just swap out the blade?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst Blade Switches 3020 For HP

Feb 10, 2013

We have 12 Catalyst Blade Switches 3020 for HP running IOS Version 12.2(55)SE.  In the configuration of these switches I see the statement shown below.
 
no spanning-tree vlan 34,45-55,70,600,643,840,843-850
 
The 12 blade switches are configured as VTP clients and running VTP V2.  I did not configure the statement shown above.  It appered by itself.  And even if I delete it, it will reapper.  (The blade switches are interconnected to two 6509s.  The two 6509s are the STP root and VTP bridges. I configure Vlans and STP on the 6509s).
 
why the statement above appers on the blade switches 3020s?
 
I mean I use other Cisco switches such as 3750s and 3560s and I have never seen the statement above appear by itself.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Trunking Between 3560 And IBM Blade 3012

Nov 18, 2012

Im having problems changing a connection between a Cisco3560 and Cisco IBM Blade switch 3012 actually the configuration is access in Cisco 3560 and trunk int Cisco 3012 when i change the connection to trunk i lose conecctivity to the servers connected in the 3012, i have changed the access from vlan 1 to the respective vlan in the access port of the servers

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509E - Four Port 10G Blade Buffers 16M

Dec 29, 2011

Looking at the specs for WS-X6704-10GE, it shows the port buffers at 16M per port. This doesn't seem like very much for a 10G port. Is this upgradable or related to how much RAM is in the blade?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Blade Switch 3120G VM Etherchannel

Oct 21, 2012

I have vm with 2 nic card  and 2 blade switch 3120g in the same hp c7000 blade enclosure. How to setup etherchannel as highlight in attachment  ?

View 4 Replies View Related

TCP First Packet Loss?

Dec 12, 2012

i am implementing tcp as per rfc 793, i have one doubt, while sending first packet, if that packet lost means, tcp will wait for RTO and retransmit the first packet, and after got the ack for first packet, then only it will send second packet or without getting the ack for the first packet it will send second packet.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Packet Loss Only Across The VPN?

Apr 18, 2012

My workplace has a UC-540 attached to a cable modem, attached to the world wide web.

When we make VOIP outbound calls through the standard ISP, there is no auditory packet loss sympton; however, when we make calls to out sister branch through our VPN, we experience auditory packet loss symptoms.

I would think the VPN should only be affecting the encapsulation of the data. To my understanding the VPN packets and non-vpn packets all hit the router at the same time, and transport over the web in the same manner. Why would there be packet loss over only the VPN??

--Regarding QoS, if a standard layer 3 device receives a VOIP packet encapsulated in a VPN, do the QoS bits in the VOIP packet get acknowledged, or are they hidden by the VPN encapsulation?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Switch Blade Shows Power Down

Apr 16, 2012

i have one of my switch modules that shows PwrDown when i issue the command show mod.
 
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
1    9  Supervisor Engine 32 8GE (Active)      WS-SUP32-GE-3B     SAD09120263
2   48  48 port 10/100/1000mb EtherModule      WS-X6148-GE-TX     SAL1029VWZ5

[Code]....
 
i tried disabling the diagnostic monitor for the module, did a power enable module command and then reset it but it still fails. this is the third blade that i am replacing in a few weeks and i still get the same error. i am persuded that it is not a hardware since it is the third blade in a matter of weeks. after the module reset, i receive this error % module 3 is operationally off (FRU-power failed)
 
could an ios upgrade solve this issue? are there any ios related bugs?

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Power Inline From PoE Blade (4548 / 4648)

May 3, 2010

I have a LAP-1142 connected to one of our PoE blade in our 4506 switch, it used to work fine with the following power consumption:
 
Interface Admin  Oper            Power(Watts)     Device              Class                            From PS    To Device                    --------- ------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------- -----
Gi4/3     auto   on         21.5       20.0       AIR-AP1252AG-A-K9   3
 
However, we had power issue on Apr 28, so it failed and we saw from the log below:
 
Apr 28 13:57:38.990: %C4K_ETHPORTMAN-3-INLINEPOWEROVERDRAWN: Inline powered device connected on port Gi4/3 exceeded its hardware protection threshold.Apr 28 13:57:39.694: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: inline-power error detected on Gi4/3, putting Gi4/3 in err-disable state After the power restored later, the other LAP connecting with the same blade restored without any problem, except this one:
 
Interface Admin  Oper            Power(Watts)     Device              Class                            From PS    To Device                    --------- ------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------- -----
Gi4/3     auto   on         16.6       15.4       Ieee PD             3

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3120X - Blade Mac-addresses In Wrong VLAN

Feb 12, 2013

- Incoming frames on three of a blade's four switchports are being put into VLAN 1 even though the ports are either in other access VLANs, or are configured as trunks with different VLAN IDs being tagged by the server. - When the ports go down the access VLAN is removed from the port.
 
Switch stack: 4x WS-CBS3120X-S, 12.2(58)SE1
HP blade: HP BL460c Gen8
 
This combination has been used successfully elsewhere.
 
Switchport configuration:
 
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/13 -------> THIS PORT IS OK
switchport mode trunk

[Code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Get VFC Up In B22-FEX Blade In Dell Connecting To Nexus 5596UP?

May 11, 2013

I'm trying to get the VFC up in B22-FEX blade in Dell which is connecting to Nexus 5596UP.
 
The message I get is
 
# sh int vfc1033
vfc1033 is down (Error Disabled - VLAN L2 down on Eth interface)
Bound interface is port-channel3
Hardware is Ethernet
Port WWN is 24:08:00:2a:6a:0d:db:3f
Admin port mode is F, trunk mode is on

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Broadband :: Packet Loss Between 58 And 98%?

Mar 29, 2012

My ping is 35ms my DLS at 45.6 Mbps and my Upload is 4.51 Mbps. My Problem is that i am losing about 60 to 90 percent of the packets on a pingtest.net.

View 1 Replies View Related

Outbound Packet Loss

Aug 10, 2011

For about the past 2 or 3 months, I have been experiencing outbound packet loss at about the same time every evening. That timeframe is about 7 PM - 10 PM. This is most noticeable on Teamspeak 3 because of the voice disruption that other users report to me.

View 1 Replies View Related

Random Packet Loss 100%?

Feb 19, 2013

I have recently switch internet to Time Warner. Since the day I got it, i have experienced random packet losses of 100%. I have called time warner and they are going to send a tech out. But i would like to know more about this before he comes. I have replaced the modem with a brand new one. Surfboard SB5101N from the one i was leasing from them. They both do the same thing. I have made sure all my Drivers are up to date. I have replaced the coax cable and Ethernet cable and ran my Anti Virus and Spyware program. It does it more during online game, I have reinstalled the game and was having no problems with the ATT Dsl i had before this.

View 14 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved