I have 4 ADSL lines from the same ISP going into one Cisco 887VA router. How can I do load sharing between the 4 lines without getting the ISP involved?
View 7 RepliesI've 6 ADSL lines that provided by the same ISP and i've Cisco router 2600, so, how can I connect the six lines to the cisco router and running load balancing between them ??
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have the requirement to provide a Cisco Router with 3 x ADSL lines (768k) to increase the internet speed.PPP multilink is not supported from the ISP.
Is it possbile to distribute the traffic between this three ADSL lines?How can I configure this?
I have the following hardware configuration:
1 x CISCO1921-SEC/K9
2 x EHWIC-VA-DSL-B
The third ADSL line is connected over an ADSL modem at one fixed Router Gigabit interface.
We have a cisco 1941 with line t1 Symmetric, (Also have Cisco 1841 unused, but works) I would like to connect the Cisco 1841 to four Adsl Backup lines in case the T1 or the Main cisco 1941 go down I know a BGP is needed on our ISP site,
How can i connect four Adsl lines to The cisco 1841 (Backup) and make them work in a Load Balancing way.
I need some/any information on Network Migration. In particular:
- What are the steps involved for WAN migration.
- What are risks involved before the new network comes into operation etc.
I have two ASA 5520 units, both running version 8.3(2) code. Among many other uses, they have an IPSec tunnel between them to link office 1 and office 3 together. Office 2 does exist, and is connected to a different port on the ASA in office 3; there is no IPSec involved with office 3.
View 6 Replies View RelatedDoes Cisco 6500 with Sup 720 3BXL sipports per-packet load sharing amogn interfaces? CLI shows only per-destination is supported.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to activate "per-packet load sharing" on a 7606S with RSP720-3CXL engine and 7600-ES+20G3CXL module. The IOS version is : 7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRD4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
I tried the two (2) following commands but they are not supported :-
hw-module slot1 ip load-sharing per-packet
- ip load-sharing per-packet (on interface)
difference of CISCO887VA-K9 and CISCO887VA-SEC-K9.I thought it because of the Advanced Security and Advanced IP Licenses, but it isn't, I've got the -SEC- Version now just with the Advanced Security license. So I asking myself why I bought the more expensive CISCO887VA-SEC-K9 if I have to buy the additional Advanced IP Services licenses extra..
View 14 Replies View Relatedi have 2 x T1 terminating on border router cisco 3640 route. (configured using multilink interface). Our IP block is routed on this bundled T1 circuits by At&T. I want more internet bandwidth.
1. Can i connect my DSL (on ethernet interface and using static DSL IP) on the same router and confgure two static routes to internet - one to multilink interface and other to ethernet interface (connected to DSL) ?
2. I have many servers using static NAT to external IPs which are routed on T1 circuits. Will it get into issues when communicating to outside? [for example my exchange server, websites etc?
A customer has an ASA5520 and 2 ISP routers with one WAN link each, and wants to split the load over both routers based on source IP ("natted" IP on ASA). I found this excellent doc on the topic: {URL}. Using PBR to achieve this is an option I was looking at, but I have come across a possible loop doing this with 2 routers. Setup:
-----------CE-1---------ISP-1
| |
| |
ASA55020---- HSRP |
| |
| |
-----------CE-2---------ISP-2
Both Routers receive default routes via BGP, and customer networks are propagated via BGP as well (i.e. the customer can specify the return path for the traffic). The ASA5520 forwards traffic to a HSRP virtual IP for redundancy purposes. If one router or ISP fails, all the traffic should use the other router/ISP. The customer wants to specify which traffic is sent over which link, by defining nat rules on the ASA. e.g. traffic sourced from the network 10.10.1.0/24 will always use ISP 1, and traffic sourced from the network 10.10.2.0/24 will always use ISP 2.
My problem: if I use route-maps on both routers (CE-1 and CE-2), sending part of the traffic to the other, and one ISP link fails, in my opinion I have a loop, since part of the traffic will get sent back to the router it came from. Is there any other was to achieve my goal without using PBR? I have looked at CEF and GLBP, but I cannot seem to find a way to load share via source IP.
Can an ACE 4710 have , in the same context - servers which are
a. just being routed to
b. a set of load-shared servers
I have been told you may not be able to do this on this version?
Cisco Router 2851 connected with one ISP using 2 serials. the case is :
1)s0/0/1.1 is the only utilized and s0/0/0.1 utilization is zero. 2)when shutting down s0/0/1.1 : the other ,not utalized, link work perfect and forward all the traffic.
Attached the configuration file with output of show interfaces command.
We have our network setup as displayed in the attached. We have 2 HQ offices and 1 branch office. The branch office needs to connect to resources located at both HQs but taking the most effecient path. We have ethernet circuits connecting from each HQ to 2 x Cisco 3560 switches in the branch. HSRP has been configured on the 3560 switches with SW1 as active and SW2 as standby. OSFP has been configured in a single area 0 and the path cost on the link between HQs has been increase to allow 3560 SW1 to route to HQ1 directly and HQ2 via 3560 SW2.The 3560s are connected with a trunk with a L3 SVI for OSPF. This seems to work ok but I have noticed that the branch could become transit if the HQ1 to HQ2 link breaks. How can this be avoided? I realise that if we configure the branch subnets and SW1 to SW2 link in a stub area (area1) then all traffic will route from SW1 to HQ1 and will never share over SW2. I'm assuming that this is because OSPF chooses inter-area routes over intra-area.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a internet router 2921 .my isp is providing 100 mbps internet link with static public ip network .I am using a default static route to the isp wan ip .I am planning to upgrade 100 mbps to 114 mbps .Unfortunately my isp doesnt have gig port in their side .So they are ready to provide two 57 mbps line .Isp agreed they will route my public ip networks in both the links .
As a result i have two 54 mbps link with same network with two wan networks .My question is whether two default static route to both wan ip will carry out the load sharing correctly ?
Eg :
172.24.66.0 255.255.255.252 -first link my fa0/1 172.24.66.1
172.24.66.4 255.255.255.252 -second link my fa0/2 172.24.66.5
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.24.66.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.24.66.6
I have 2 x Redundant Guest Anchor Controllers (5508) located in 2 separate Data Centers with all the management and guest user VLAN spanned between two. Everything is working fine with the Guest WiFi access except the DHCP functionality as the Controllers are acting themselves as the internal DHCP Servers.
This is how I tried to distribute :
network. 10.1.0.0/23
gateway: 10.1.1.254
Controller 1, DHCP Server pool: 10.1.0.2 - 10.1.0.254 Gw: 10.1.1.254
Controller 2, DHCP Server pool: 10.1.1.2 - 10.1.1.254 Gw: 10.1.1.254
As the user load balancing between the Anchor Controllers cannot be controlled (i.e. they are active/active), the same client sometime getting 2 different IP addresses from both the Controllers (as they do not talk to each other in terms of DHCP) hence depleting the pool addresses.
I guess one way of solving this is to just run 1 DHCP server in one of the controllers but that defeats the purpose of having N+1 Controllers. Is there a better way of doing the DHCP load balancing and having full redundancy at the same time?
We have a quad port NIC on our Dell server.I want to take all 4 ports and plug it into our switch and have it all go to the same IP of the server and just have to share the data load in/out.Do I need to configure anything to do this?
View 6 Replies View RelatedToday I was playing the ps3 (call of duty MW3)... normally I would connect via wireless but I'm getting a ton of lag and it's becoming frustrating. Later on I moved the ps3 downstairs and connected it via Ethernet and it worked so good.I want to look into buying those Ethernet power lines but not sure how good they are compared to running a Ethernet cable from the ps3 to the router or how good they will be vs wireless? I just don't want to waste money on these. If all else fails we will probs run a Ethernet cable through the ceiling
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have setup a site to site VPN with an ASA 5510 (8.4) and a Cisco 2811. The tunnel is working fine, however both sites have 5 different contiguous networks. The crypto ACL between sites states only one subnet.Is it possible to state a summary address in an ACL rather than having five lines for the ACL?The tunnel works when the router uses an ACL of 10.2.200.0 0.0.7.255, however if a summary address of all the subnets on the inside network of the ASA are stated in an ACL - 10.1.200.0 255.255.248.0 - then the tunnel does not come up.Is it possible to state a summary address on a crypto ACL on the ASA?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are bonding two LLU DSL lines using MLP. Our LLU provider supports MLP bonding and we have a few other customers working well on Cisco 1841s, although not such high sync speed lines as this problem site.
So the lines work well with no interface errors and sync speeds are very good and evenly matched between the two lines (approx 14Mbps downstream). It's all good - it's great in fact except that it just doesn't work properly! By that I mean we're not seeing the downstream throughput we'd expect. We actually get the downstream throughput of less than a single DSL line, so about 12Mbps. Upstream bonded throughput is fine and in line with the sync speeds.
Both circuits are 'active' in the PPP multilink bundle and I see 3 sessions on our core LNS Cisco 7301 (c7301-boot-mz.124-2.T.bin) - i.e. 2x circuits + 1x bundle. We've checked the circuits individually and 'actual' throughput (using NetPerf software) is similar for both lines and in line with the sync speeds.
We are seeing quite high CPU (50%) on the Cisco 1841 (c1841-ipbasek9-mz.124-24.T1.bin) at the customer premesis, but having tested a Cisco 2951 on the customer premesis with two new HWIC-1ADSL-M cards, this is not the cause. The 2951 ran at 5% CPU whilst we experienced the same problem.
We've checked the setup of both Cisco CPE and LNS with our LLU provider and they are happy with the MLP config. They themselves have been able to bond two similarly sync'd Annex-M DSL lines and get 25Mbps throughput on a 1841.
I work for an ISP and we are currently bonding 5x 6Mb ADSL connections for use as a wireless backhaul. We are currently using a Cisco 3725 and bonding the links via MLPPP. This set up is working fine except that we are not getting the full 30Mb on the download side. We are seeing more like 18 to 20. I am wondering if we can acheive the full speed with our current set up or will we need something different to get the job done.
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy remote office staff are stating it takes "forever" to open simple work/excel files.I think forever really means more than 5 seconds.My main office has a 5510. I have a brand new server in place here that my remote offices vpn into.
Those remote offices have 5505.
Each office has a dsl connection. Their download speeds range from 7mb to 10 mb and their upload speed are 0.5 mb to 0.8 mb.My first thought was to add a second dsl line to my main office. Then have dsl line #1 serve my main office and office 2.Then have dsl line #2 serve offices 3, 4 and 5.
Would this speed up the opening speeds of my remote offices?If so how challenging is adding the second dsl line into my 5510?
I want to use two seperate ISP's internet connection in single nic card. How to do this?
One ip is 203.76.112.106
subnet 255.255.255.248
gate way 203.76.112.106
DNs 1 203.76.96.4
dns2 203.76.127.4
Another
ip 122.144.9.24
Subnet 255.244.244.224
Gate way 122.144.9.1
dns 1 202.84.32.22
dns2 202.84.32.23
I have 3 internet line. How to connect it to a single network.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI was recently tasked at work to reinstall phone lines after a remodel. We have 2 phone lines with two phones and a credit card machine. I ran into a piece of equipment and I have no idea what it is so my research into the subject has been halted.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a small call center and we are struggling with adequate dsl bandwidth for our voip. The providers cannot give us more upload bandwidth. Any way to combine the bandwidth of two or more lines so that the server/switch sees increased bandwidth for upload?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an ARRIS modem supplied by Comcast cable. I have an hp pavilion x1958 and want to run internet service to a secondary computer from the same modem. And I don't have money to buy a router. How can I do this the cheapest way?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIm planning to do a LAN for internet/file sharing and of course LAN game There are people that living far from each another like 1 mile away.... thats a problem.Cat5 Ethernet cables are not made for long distance connectivity ( 100 meters of length max, otherwise bad connection).So because i need a connectivity between pc's for long distance I can use Wireless, expensive, and because I prefer wired and I heard that there is a way to convert CAT5 cable into phone line, because phone lines can be used for long distance connectivity without problems.So I wonder if there is a way to do that LAN connectivity using phone lines.RJ45 to phone line, do they exist these adapters? if yes, will this work for me
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm going to combine 2 512 kbps ADSL line in my PC. i know that it would be much better to get a 1 MB ADSL connection...but the problem is where i live now there is not better speed than this! Well i have a PC with 2 LANs - 2 phone lines - 2 ADSL modems - as far as i learned from Google , by no means it is possible to combine them to have 1 MB data rate but it is possible for example IDM would works with one 512 and another program with another 512..!! And load balancing is the only solution for this which it needs a special routers ! it is somehow difficult for me to provide one ..!! so my question is :
1- Is there any other solution for combining this 2 lines?! I heard something about teaming.
2- Is it possible to use load balancing by software?
3- How about the efficiency and ping time?
My linksys router all of a sudden stopped recognizing the 3 LAN lines that are hooked up to it, we are only able to access the internet via wireless. any suggestions on why the router would all of a sudden stop recognizing the LAN lines?
View 7 Replies View RelatedOur work building currently has 2 separate DSL lines feeding into it, one on each end of the building. The reason for two lines was so each one would have its own bandwidth, thereby supporting more simultaneous users. There is a router connected to the DSL jack at each end of the building, broadcasting its own wireless network: let's call them Work 1 and Work 2.Is there any way for me to connect the Work 1 and Work 2 wireless networks, so that they appear to the end user as one contiguous network?
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe WRP-400 router has two phone ports - does it support direct calls between them?
View 1 Replies View Related#sh run | inc user
!
username USER0 secret 5 $1$passwordusername USER1 privilege 15 secret 5 $1$passwordusername USER2 privilege 15 secret 5 $1$password
!
#sh run | inc aaa
!
aaa new-modelaaa authentication login local_authen localaaa authentication login radius_authen group radius localaaa authorization consoleaaa authorization exec local_author localaaa authorization exec radius_author group radius localaaa session-id common
!
#sh run | begin line vty
!
line vty 0 4access-class 3 inexec-timeout 15 0authorization exec radius_authorlogging synchronouslogin authentication radius_authentransport input sshline vty 5 15!sh verCisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
the intent of the above is that management connections will only be accepted via SSH, and all of those will be authenticated via RADIUS, unless it's down, then it will use the local username/pw combinations, most of which are given Privledge level 15. Telnet should never work.SSH works as expected (authenticates via RADIUS), but the problem is that Telnet also works, will ONLY use the local database (never RADIUS), and, for some reason, leaves the users at Privledge level 1, instead of the configured 15.Essentially, it seems that at every point I have told it to do something that isn't the default with regards to telnet, it ignores me.Prior to a recent IOS upgrade, the switch didn't support SSH, so the previous config was Telnet with RADIUS, and that worked fine.