I want to use two seperate ISP's internet connection in single nic card. How to do this?
One ip is 203.76.112.106
subnet 255.255.255.248
gate way 203.76.112.106
DNs 1 203.76.96.4
dns2 203.76.127.4
Another
ip 122.144.9.24
Subnet 255.244.244.224
Gate way 122.144.9.1
dns 1 202.84.32.22
dns2 202.84.32.23
I want to configure my router to use 2 ADSL lines each with a dialer and a modem in RFC2684 mode. I have a 2821 (IOS 12.4) with an HWIC-4ESW.
My network topology is like this :
ADSL Modem 1 (RFC2684) --
(Fa0/0/0)
Router -- (Gi0/1) MyLAN
(Fa0/0/1)
ADSL Modem 2 (RFC2684) --/
1. I configure my DSL Modem in RFC 2684. The first use 172.16.0.2/29 and the second 172.16.0.3/29. I connect this devices to Fa0/0/0 and Fa0/0/1.
2. I configure Vlan1 to use the network configured on my modem :
interface Vlan1
ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.248
3. I try to ping my devices :
#ping 172.16.0.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.0.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
[code]....
We have 1841 router with HWIC-4ESW we need to config point to point data Dual leased lines failover concept please find attached diagram.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 3 internet line. How to connect it to a single network.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an ARRIS modem supplied by Comcast cable. I have an hp pavilion x1958 and want to run internet service to a secondary computer from the same modem. And I don't have money to buy a router. How can I do this the cheapest way?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm going to combine 2 512 kbps ADSL line in my PC. i know that it would be much better to get a 1 MB ADSL connection...but the problem is where i live now there is not better speed than this! Well i have a PC with 2 LANs - 2 phone lines - 2 ADSL modems - as far as i learned from Google , by no means it is possible to combine them to have 1 MB data rate but it is possible for example IDM would works with one 512 and another program with another 512..!! And load balancing is the only solution for this which it needs a special routers ! it is somehow difficult for me to provide one ..!! so my question is :
1- Is there any other solution for combining this 2 lines?! I heard something about teaming.
2- Is it possible to use load balancing by software?
3- How about the efficiency and ping time?
I have inserted a SIP-800 card into my CRS-8. I inserted the SPA into the SIP. I cannot find how I configure the SIP or the SPA. I have spent the day reading the manual but no where do I see the commands to activate or get the SIP up and running. I am at a lost
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have one problem regarding a configuration (or setting up) of 3G SIM card for 887G router backup. That SIM card had a PIN code, so I disabled it, and now I can see that 3G light flashes Blue, so it detects 3G network. Also I can see that modem tries to dial up to connect to network, but with no luck. It has CHAP APN. Also in configuration I've found that there is PPP CHAP username and password, but I don't have any of those. I've tried to configure my SIM card with Username and Password, but it doesn't save. At the moment I have: Cellular 0 is down, line protocol is down. Dialer 2 is up (spoofing), line protocol is up (spoofing).
SIM card status is OK. Network detects O2 - IRL - yes.
It detects the network, but cannot connect to it. I'm not sure how to setup the SIM card or how to unlock it.
Region : India
Model : TL-MR3020
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version :
ISP : BSNL
I'm unable to configure my Data Card (ZTE-AC8700). I tried with manual settings but it keeps on showing the message "connecting" but doesn't connects although my datacard is shown as identified by the device MR-3020. I'm using BSNL EVDO connection and my datacard is ZTE-AC8700. It doesn't uses any APN, only a username and password and dial number "#777" is required to connect. configuring my datacard with MR3020 ???
Is there a way to configure a 28xx series router with a HWIC-AP card as a wireless client instead of a wireless access point? There isn't a network drop in the location that I need to place a router, but there is an active Access Point that reaches the area.
View 1 Replies View RelatedToday I was playing the ps3 (call of duty MW3)... normally I would connect via wireless but I'm getting a ton of lag and it's becoming frustrating. Later on I moved the ps3 downstairs and connected it via Ethernet and it worked so good.I want to look into buying those Ethernet power lines but not sure how good they are compared to running a Ethernet cable from the ps3 to the router or how good they will be vs wireless? I just don't want to waste money on these. If all else fails we will probs run a Ethernet cable through the ceiling
View 1 Replies View RelatedI was recently tasked at work to reinstall phone lines after a remodel. We have 2 phone lines with two phones and a credit card machine. I ran into a piece of equipment and I have no idea what it is so my research into the subject has been halted.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a small call center and we are struggling with adequate dsl bandwidth for our voip. The providers cannot give us more upload bandwidth. Any way to combine the bandwidth of two or more lines so that the server/switch sees increased bandwidth for upload?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIm planning to do a LAN for internet/file sharing and of course LAN game There are people that living far from each another like 1 mile away.... thats a problem.Cat5 Ethernet cables are not made for long distance connectivity ( 100 meters of length max, otherwise bad connection).So because i need a connectivity between pc's for long distance I can use Wireless, expensive, and because I prefer wired and I heard that there is a way to convert CAT5 cable into phone line, because phone lines can be used for long distance connectivity without problems.So I wonder if there is a way to do that LAN connectivity using phone lines.RJ45 to phone line, do they exist these adapters? if yes, will this work for me
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy linksys router all of a sudden stopped recognizing the 3 LAN lines that are hooked up to it, we are only able to access the internet via wireless. any suggestions on why the router would all of a sudden stop recognizing the LAN lines?
View 7 Replies View RelatedOur work building currently has 2 separate DSL lines feeding into it, one on each end of the building. The reason for two lines was so each one would have its own bandwidth, thereby supporting more simultaneous users. There is a router connected to the DSL jack at each end of the building, broadcasting its own wireless network: let's call them Work 1 and Work 2.Is there any way for me to connect the Work 1 and Work 2 wireless networks, so that they appear to the end user as one contiguous network?
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe WRP-400 router has two phone ports - does it support direct calls between them?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have setup a site to site VPN with an ASA 5510 (8.4) and a Cisco 2811. The tunnel is working fine, however both sites have 5 different contiguous networks. The crypto ACL between sites states only one subnet.Is it possible to state a summary address in an ACL rather than having five lines for the ACL?The tunnel works when the router uses an ACL of 10.2.200.0 0.0.7.255, however if a summary address of all the subnets on the inside network of the ASA are stated in an ACL - 10.1.200.0 255.255.248.0 - then the tunnel does not come up.Is it possible to state a summary address on a crypto ACL on the ASA?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are bonding two LLU DSL lines using MLP. Our LLU provider supports MLP bonding and we have a few other customers working well on Cisco 1841s, although not such high sync speed lines as this problem site.
So the lines work well with no interface errors and sync speeds are very good and evenly matched between the two lines (approx 14Mbps downstream). It's all good - it's great in fact except that it just doesn't work properly! By that I mean we're not seeing the downstream throughput we'd expect. We actually get the downstream throughput of less than a single DSL line, so about 12Mbps. Upstream bonded throughput is fine and in line with the sync speeds.
Both circuits are 'active' in the PPP multilink bundle and I see 3 sessions on our core LNS Cisco 7301 (c7301-boot-mz.124-2.T.bin) - i.e. 2x circuits + 1x bundle. We've checked the circuits individually and 'actual' throughput (using NetPerf software) is similar for both lines and in line with the sync speeds.
We are seeing quite high CPU (50%) on the Cisco 1841 (c1841-ipbasek9-mz.124-24.T1.bin) at the customer premesis, but having tested a Cisco 2951 on the customer premesis with two new HWIC-1ADSL-M cards, this is not the cause. The 2951 ran at 5% CPU whilst we experienced the same problem.
We've checked the setup of both Cisco CPE and LNS with our LLU provider and they are happy with the MLP config. They themselves have been able to bond two similarly sync'd Annex-M DSL lines and get 25Mbps throughput on a 1841.
I work for an ISP and we are currently bonding 5x 6Mb ADSL connections for use as a wireless backhaul. We are currently using a Cisco 3725 and bonding the links via MLPPP. This set up is working fine except that we are not getting the full 30Mb on the download side. We are seeing more like 18 to 20. I am wondering if we can acheive the full speed with our current set up or will we need something different to get the job done.
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy remote office staff are stating it takes "forever" to open simple work/excel files.I think forever really means more than 5 seconds.My main office has a 5510. I have a brand new server in place here that my remote offices vpn into.
Those remote offices have 5505.
Each office has a dsl connection. Their download speeds range from 7mb to 10 mb and their upload speed are 0.5 mb to 0.8 mb.My first thought was to add a second dsl line to my main office. Then have dsl line #1 serve my main office and office 2.Then have dsl line #2 serve offices 3, 4 and 5.
Would this speed up the opening speeds of my remote offices?If so how challenging is adding the second dsl line into my 5510?
I have 4 ADSL lines from the same ISP going into one Cisco 887VA router. How can I do load sharing between the 4 lines without getting the ISP involved?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI've 6 ADSL lines that provided by the same ISP and i've Cisco router 2600, so, how can I connect the six lines to the cisco router and running load balancing between them ??
View 3 Replies View RelatedObviously you do not want your cat6 lines running too close to your power lines especially when in parallel. The question though is how close can it be without causing interference?In my situation the wall I want to connect my main router to has a power outlet in the middle of it which honestly is where I would have preferred my network ports. Will I be OK if I run my cat6 in the wall channel directly next to the channel that contains the power line? It would be a standard U.S. interior wall residential power line. I should be able to get from 12 to 24 inches of distance between my cat6 and power line while still keeping my network outlet in a semi-central location.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an application, a solar power plant, where communication cables (Cat.6 UTP) are run close to power cables. We've had a lot of failures in the past due to multiple reasons, electrical noise, surge, etc so we decided to change to Cat.6 SFTP. The problem is that now , even with proper termination of the shielding at either one or both ends, the noise is so bad that packet loss is above 90%.
View 8 Replies View Related#sh run | inc user
!
username USER0 secret 5 $1$passwordusername USER1 privilege 15 secret 5 $1$passwordusername USER2 privilege 15 secret 5 $1$password
!
#sh run | inc aaa
!
aaa new-modelaaa authentication login local_authen localaaa authentication login radius_authen group radius localaaa authorization consoleaaa authorization exec local_author localaaa authorization exec radius_author group radius localaaa session-id common
!
#sh run | begin line vty
!
line vty 0 4access-class 3 inexec-timeout 15 0authorization exec radius_authorlogging synchronouslogin authentication radius_authentransport input sshline vty 5 15!sh verCisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
the intent of the above is that management connections will only be accepted via SSH, and all of those will be authenticated via RADIUS, unless it's down, then it will use the local username/pw combinations, most of which are given Privledge level 15. Telnet should never work.SSH works as expected (authenticates via RADIUS), but the problem is that Telnet also works, will ONLY use the local database (never RADIUS), and, for some reason, leaves the users at Privledge level 1, instead of the configured 15.Essentially, it seems that at every point I have told it to do something that isn't the default with regards to telnet, it ignores me.Prior to a recent IOS upgrade, the switch didn't support SSH, so the previous config was Telnet with RADIUS, and that worked fine.
I have a route-map on a 6500 thats is very definitely no longer required. 2 attempts to remove it have been a disaster.
[Code]...
The route-map and access-list ae not being used at all. Anyny tips for how I can get this removed - for info the process is mush easier on 7206 VXRs.
My current setup.
Layout:
Line01 Line02
| |
Cisco 2951 Cisco 2951
---------------------
|
Cisco 3750G - Server #1 & #2 for domain controller, sharepoint, etc
|
---------------------
| |
Cisco 2960 Cisco 2960
| | | | | | | ... | | | | |
workstation #1, #2, .... #70
And I would like to ask some opinion on the best configuration for the above layout:
1. Configuration #1 - Using load sharing and automatic failover So I want to ask whether there's any link/url that provides details/guides on how to setup the load sharing and failover?
2. Configuration #2 - Workstations 1 - 35 will be routed through Line01 gateway and workstations 36 - 70 will be routed through Line02 As for this configuration, it's done now. However, I want to know whether there's any software (preferred web based application which allows me to change the gateway from line #1 to line #2 for all 70 computers instead of having to go to each workstation to update the gateway).
I'm currently in the process of doing a bandwidth analysis on 2 WAN links at my current HQ / remote sites. The topology is pretty straightforward, two 3845 routers at HQ, and two 3845 routers at my remote site, both with P2P DS3 interfaces between them. From each router we then connect directly into a 6509 at the HQ, and a 4506 at my remote site where we are using equal cost load sharing (EIGRP) to split the load / give us redundancy between the sites.
I'm just looking for a good test for how well the circuits are performing. I've done some basic file transfer tests, but they're only showing about 4MBPS, which seems quite slow. I also know that this isn't a true measurement because there are amny different factors involved, like hard drive write speeds, network congestion, etc, that may influence the test.
Is it possible to bond two T1 lines for increased throughput and for possible failover situations? I currently have the second T1 as just a fail over.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure policing and/or shaping on a setup of 2 x ASA 5505 Sec Plus. The units are placed in office A and office B and each have a ISP connection to the internet and a leased line with a capacity of 4/4 Mbit/s for interoffice communication.
On each ASA there's four subnets. VLAN 200 is used to connect the offices through the leased line.
Subnets:
Outside = 2
Data = 10
Voice = 100
Linknet = 200
I've read a lot of articles and posts about shaping and policing on the ASA but still can't get it to work like I wan't to. I'm trying to limit all traffic besides IP-telephony traffic to 3 Mbit/s and thus reserving 900 Kbit/s for voice traffic. I tried setting a service-policy on the linknet interface on each ASA and set Traffic match to Any traffic and QoS settings for both input and output.
I can see traffic passing the policy when I run the "show service-policy police" command but it never seems to be high enough to be policed which is strange since the ASDM monitoring shows that I'm pushing 3900 kbit/s. I file transfers verifies that policing does'nt work.
I have the requirement to provide a Cisco Router with 3 x ADSL lines (768k) to increase the internet speed.PPP multilink is not supported from the ISP.
Is it possbile to distribute the traffic between this three ADSL lines?How can I configure this?
I have the following hardware configuration:
1 x CISCO1921-SEC/K9
2 x EHWIC-VA-DSL-B
The third ADSL line is connected over an ADSL modem at one fixed Router Gigabit interface.
What is the purpose of these default configuration lines? What do they mean? I can't find an explanation of them anywhere. I believe some are written to the config when FCoE is enabled..
I would like to know exactly what they are doing.
class-map type qos class-fcoe
class-map type queuing class-fcoe
match qos-group 1
[Code].....