I have 3 4400 WLC's that implemented at 1 main site within a mobility group. I am looking at implementing wired guest authentication with a splash page for username and password access. I have followed the documents and suggestions about how to configure it. I created a layer 2 vlan (700) and then created a VLAN (151) that wired guests will get an IP address from. I then configured a WLAN with the ingress interface being VLAN 700 and the egress interface being VLAN 151.
All of my controllers are running code 7.0.116.0. When I go to do a test scenario with a wired client, I have the switchport setup for VLAN 151, which they get an IP address from, but when they try to go to the Internet, they don't get the splash page. Why I am not getting a splash page or even if this scenario is possible?
Managed to guest LWA working with ISE for wireless guest portal access? I have Cisco 4400 WLCs running latest 7.0 code and ISE 1.1.2.All guest portal examples seem to be CWA which only works on 7.2 code.Am I without hope getting this working on 7.0 code?
I've got a client with a WLC 4400 series and WCS that wants to setup a public guest wireless access network. They want to have the users put in their email address to authenticate and they want to capture the email addresses to use for marketing campaigns. I know you can setup the login page to have them put in their email address, but i can't remember if you have to use an external web server to actually capture and record the email addresses.
I have my wlc 4400 configured with a secure wlan and a guest wlan. The guest wlan is switching traffic at the wlc to a separate guest-wlan interface. When a guest is associated and authenticated, they can access the management console of the wlc which is in a different subnet. As I understand, the wlc does not route traffic. So how could this be happening? the guest subnet and the subnet the wlc management interface is in are different and separated by a firewall. I have also tried applying access lists in the wlc to each interface without luck. How can i stop the wlc from providing access to guest wlan users?
on WLC 4400 Guest vlan is configured with local authentication, the users get disconnected after 10mins were should i disable the option of 10mins restriction
(WLC 4400) which enables employees to browse to a custom made webpage, where they can create an account for company vistors to access the internet. It's important for the employees not use any login credentials, they arrive on a webpage where they specify the login & password which the vistor will enter to browse the internet. Is there any good link to documention about this topic?
We’d like to extend our current Guest LAN from a 4400 WLC in our data center to a 2100 WLC located at a remote facility. However, we cannot get the foreign controller to pass traffic to the anchor controller – or so it seems. The catch is that we’re not actually trying to extend the SSID itself to provide wireless access, but instead flub it so that we can provide local wired access tunneled to the Guest LAN on the anchor WLC. I’m not entirely sure if this is possible, because I’ve read that before the EoIP tunnel will come up a guest client must associate to the foreign WLC.
We’ve followed the instructions we could find that go over setting up this type of scenario, but unfortunately they only cover setting up back-to-back 4400 controllers and as such, some functions described (notably being able to create a Guest LAN) are not possible on the 2100. We haven’t been able to find a clear and concise guide on the scenario we want to set up.
Here’s some detail:
Mobility group is up/up between both WLCs. Both WLCs are running 6.0.x code.
Anchor WLC – 3750G-24WS-S25 (a 4400 WLC w/ integrated 3750G-24)
Guest LAN WLAN “wired-guest” created; Ingress is “none” and Egress is our existing “dirtnet” – i.e. outside access. The “dirtnet” interface is *not* a Guest LAN interface. Mobility anchor is set as local.
Remote WLC – WLC2106
WLAN “wired-guest” created; Interface is “wired” w/ an IP address on the same subnet as the anchor “dirtnet” and associated with port 2. Mobility anchor is set to the anchor WLC and is up/up. I have a laptop connected to port 2 with a statically assigned IP address on the same subnet as “dirtnet.” I am able to ping the local port 2 address, but I can’t ping across the tunnel to the anchor WLC. I also cannot ping the anchor WLC "dirtnet" interface from the foreign WLC’s Ping tool.
I've download a login.html into the controller successfully, but when I preview the page there isn't an accept button. Do I need to create the accept button with the html file or is there some place I need to enable on the controller itself. After download the .tar file I reboot the controller but no luck. I also create a java script button redirect but it didn't redirect to where I needed to go. It just stuck on the splash page.
We have a Cisco 4400 series wireless controller deployed as a Guest Anchor in a private DMZ. We have 13 foreign controllers anchored to this for Guest Wireless. We recently anchored 17 additional controllers to this Anchor controller. Since we have done that, periodically on just 3 of the foreign controllers, the control path shows down on the mobility peer, then comes back up. We have had this issue in the past, but it resolved itself. However, now we are seeing this issue again. Are we reaching a limit on EoIP tunnels? I have read that there is a max of 71, and that is per controller, not SSID. We do have a firewall in the middle but all necessary ports are open.
We have had this issue for quite sometime, it just does not happen frequently. Since we have added the additional controllers, it is now happpening very often, but only with 3 controllers. There is not much in common with these 3 controllers. 2 are 4400 series, and 1 is a 5508. All 3 are local on a campus LAN, different networks. Could it have anything to do with memory or utilization?
We are facing an issue with a customer where a Cisco 4400 Series controller is blocking the 802.11a/n Radio Interface of a 1250 AP. The radio shows as down on the controller GUI. The error message on the GUI is that the 'Regulatory Domain' is not supported. This can be seen from the attached screenshot. Also relevant parts of the WLC configs are attached. WLC: Cisco 4402 WirelessWLC Country: SADevice: Cisco Lightweight Access Point 1250 (LAP) is controlled through the 4402 Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC)The operating system version of the LAP: c1250-k9w8-mx.124-18a.JA version of the WLC: Software Version 5.2.178.0 The problem is that the controller shows that the 802.11a/n Radio Interface in Radio Slot # 1 is always down , the customer tried to manually 'no shut' the AP interface from the console and it worked , but obviously this solution would not work as the configuration cannot be saved (LW AP).
I recently upgraded our controllers to the latest version 7 software, as I read this was one of the requirements to get them to connect. But I am not having any luck getting into a controller. Normally I plug them in to the network, they pop into the controller listed as something like AP5057.a844.xxxx and then I can finish configuring them, but a static IP on them, etc. This is the first of this model AP I have tried to deploy, so I am wondering what is different with these. or what I might be missing in the default config in the WLAN controllers. Niether of which are set to "Master" either.
My company has chosen to allow our employees to bring in and use their own personal electronic devices such as i Pads, i Phones, tablet PC's, etc... We intend to allow them to access our network with these devices. My question is if an employee decides to enable a WiFi hotspot on an iPhone, i Pad or other device and then share out that network connection we have provided to them to allow other devices to tether to it, how do we prevent or mitigate this issue with our W LAN environment?
Our current environment consists of 4400 series WLC's and 1131, 1231 and 1242 series AP's using version 7.098.218 code. We plan on migrating to 5500 series WLC's and 3500 series AP's but this will not happen overnight.
I have an e2000 wireless router and have several devices connected by ethernet cable including private data on an external hard drive. I am planning to allow a tenant in another building connect via an ethernet cable connected to my router. Can I limit that computer (tenant's computer) from accessing all other devices connected by ethernet cable to my router? I know can password protect wireless access and limit access to the internet that way -- but my question is specifically to connections by ethernet cable.
Could I setup wired guest Internet connection without layer 3 web authentication and how?I want guest users access Internet without going through web authentication.
I reformatted using an old XP disc, Got the Ethernet Driver set up fine, but now I can not connect to the Internet, because the card refuses to fetch the DNS Addie, and default gateway, it's the only computer in the house having issues, the computer I am having problems on is an old Hp Dv 9317cl series, with a nivida chipset Ether card.
I setup a guest wired network on the WLC 5508 with 7.2.110. A postage machine can only be setup for static IP address over guest wired network. Is any one how to get it configure on the WLC 5508?
We have an RV042 as main router.We have a netgear WNR2000v2 as WIFI router.We would like to offer our drop-in customers an internet access. But without letting them into our network.
I would like to put an E2000 in an office where clients are coming and going throughout the day. When the documentation says that there is a maximum of 10 guest network users allowed (with a default setting of 5) what exactly does that mean ? I don't want the first 10 guest-clients who come in, connect to the guest network, then leave the office to consume all 10 slots for the day.If I have 50 people that come and go from the office throughout the day who connect to the guest 192.168.33.X network and attempt to enter the password (but no more than 10 guests authenticated at any given time) will all 50 be successful in connecting ? Or do I have to reduce the Client Lease Time to something less than the default setting of one day ?
We'll be implementing Cisco NAC guest server for Guest Wireless users, ( Model #3310), the question is do we need to configure separate physical interface for User authentication requests( from Wireless ) and a separate Interface for Guest server to talk to AD for SSO?
Is it possible to establish a tunnel (LAN-to-LAN) from a VPN 3000 series Concentrator with a static IP address to another VPN 3000 series concentrator (or an IOS router) with a dynamic IP address.
Our requirement with that appliance is to do URL blocking and filtering.Are there any other options we can consider or is it SaaS only. Would have preferred Trend Micro, but don't this is possible with this appliance.Will content security be offered on the Cisco ASA 5500-X Series?At this time, content security services are not supported on the Cisco ASA 5500-X Series appliances. However, the ASA 5500-X Series Cisco Cloud Web Security ready. Cisco Cloud Web Security provides content security as a cloud-based software as a service (SaaS).
Cisco Catalyst 2960 series,i want do a SNMP request over OID. When the output should be like this: Portnumber and VlanID. Is there a OID for this output?
Is there any way to configure a wired guest network with a combination of 5508 and 2504 wireless controllers? I am aware that the 2504 does not have wired guest functionality, however is it possible to set up a wired guest on the 5508 and using mobility anchors, transmit the l2 information through eoip to communicate with the remote vlan?Home built NAC solution, using 802.1x authentication on switchports for public areas. If user is an employee, communicates with the supplicant on their machine, and places them on an internal vlan.If user is a guest, user fails 802.1x check and is placed on a "guest" vlan with an ACL and external DNS.If placed on the guest vlan, the user has to accept a terms of use form.This is working currently with our 5508s without any issue, however we have some remote offices we'd like to roll this out to that are using 2504 controllers. I'm hoping there's a way that I can use the 5508 as an anchor or vice versa to make this work.
Having an issue with a Cisco Linksys E1500 on a home network. The device has a feature to provide a guest wireless network but the guest network can't get to the internet. A wired connection is fine, as is the normal wireless network but not the guest. The cheesy thing is, that it doesn't list an option for what type of wireless security protocol you want on the guest network. I'm assuming that it uses the same security protocol that the normal wireless network uses, but who knowsEspecially weird is that it asks you what password you want on the guest network but then the guest network show to be insecure when you try to connectthought maybe it was something funky with some of my configurations so I went ahead and factory defaulted it and just set it up with an insecure network for both the normal and guest networks. This didn't solve it. The guest network still couldn't get to the internet. In fact, the guest network can't even ping the router.
I have enabled DHCP but want to set static table IP's for my security camera DVR and one computer, the others can remain dynamic. I know in other routers I can attach a LAN IP to a mac address to keep it static but I can't see where I can do that with this router.
Any problems with the guest network on the ea4500 with the cloud firmware? I am losing guest clients after about 24 hours and the re-authentication fails. you enter the guest password and nothing happens until you reboot the router.
why I can't use cisco ehwic-3g-hspa-u card in cisco 2800 series and 1841 series router?documentation said that it should work with that devices but when I installed it, it doesn't work even as device i can't see I am using cisco latest ios advance ent. 15.1(4)M4?
