Different Levels Of Security In Networks
Jul 7, 2011different levels of security in networks
View 2 Repliesdifferent levels of security in networks
View 2 Replies*By default, the interface with higher security level can access "interfaces" with lower security level*By default , lower security level interface has no access to higher security level interface (access list needed to permit access
View 9 Replies View RelatedHow can I set up a network with different security levels to different groups?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a DMZ (50) from where I need to allow some protocols to inside zone (level 0). I am doing that with ACL, but after having done that the implicit security level rule to lower level (outsite level 0) is not working anymore, I guess by the implicity deny after the acl. I'd need allow traffic to the outside zone from DMZ, as well as the inspect traffic from the inside one. Is there anyway to have both ACL and Security levels?
If not, what do I need to do to just allow some protocols going to higher level and leave the higher-to-lower traffic inspected allowed, same schema as we have with security levels.
I have a laptop but not the internet.But my neighbor has an internet router. I need to connect to that connection without the consent of him.
View 1 Replies View RelatedA couple hours ago I installed AVG free antivirus and pc-cleanup and decided to uninstall them after seeing poor results. When I rebooted my computer, I was unable to, and still am, to find any wireless networks. I've tried disabling Microsoft firewall and restoring but everything has failed.
View 15 Replies View RelatedWe have a private network, multiple vlans etc. for our domain users/employees across several amenities. We also have a Public network, that we have managed by a 3rd party for guests/conference rooms/attendees.Private network is all static ips, mac restricted port security, as strict as possible from a security and PCI Compliance standpoint. The public network is all DHCP with hundreds of users. Having them physically separate has always been the best option. Separate switches, server, and I even have the uplinks separated on a 3825 router. However, unfortunately it seems as though that luxury is coming to an end.One of the meetings that is taking place is going to be at one of our outer amenities so I've got to push that "public" network through my network, over my backhaul to the other side.
My suggestion was to create a new vlan on the switches with the shortest path possible to get where it needs to go. This way the traffic never goes through our ASA, and it has a small footprint on our network, it plugs into the switch access port with the dedicated vlan at the entry point into our network, and leaves from an access port on the other end. To me that seems to be the best/most secure way to handle it. We're also in the process of rolling out Public Wifi through the entire property and since we'll want to push both Public and Private vlans over it....merging the two networks to a point is only inevitable. Especially since it will be going through a controller and the property covers a good 7000 acres.
A good IDS/IPS...other than already having port security on every port, I'd definitely like to know if somebody inadvertently cross connects the two networks and it starts flooding whatever vlan access port it's plugged in to with dhcp...especially since a lot of the laptop users on the domain are set to DHCP first with a static in the alternate for working at the office and remote.
Any pointers on configuring security on a Cisco 3750X switch that sits on a public (WAN) network. It will distribute connectivity to individual ASA firewalls as there are only two main links from upstream. Obviously I'll be disabling the http server, SSH (besides the management interface), etc.I know I can create ACL's, but worried about performance? I'm looking at blocking Netbios and other protocols that are not nessesery on our network. I've been told to disable the default VLAN... is that a good idea? And instead use the management port? I've looked around but there doesn't seem to be much information about what you should enable or disable on public switches.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a customer with an ASA5510. We have an SSL VPN (tunnel-based, or "SVC") that we use for remote access. That works great.They want to be able to use this same functionality, but add users who will not have the full access that the current SSL VPN users have. So in other words we currently have a small group of users who get full access to the LAN. Then they want to have a second group of users who will only have access to certain nodes.I'm wondering if there's some way to do this using LDAP between the firewall and the Radius server? The user gets put in a different tunnel group depending on what the FW learns from the server?We only have the Anyconnect Essentials license, so unfortunately we can't do a clientless SSL VPN, which otherwise might work well here.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've got tons of fibre in my network. However, tbh, my knowledge about correct light levels isn't great. I generally wait until my router complains about a light level before I do anything. I would like to set up SNMP monitoring for light levels, but I need some kind of baseline.Anyone with extensive fibre experience? What light levels should I be looking at for both multimode and singlemode fibre?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI purchased a Epson Artisan 835, which I am runnung wireless. When I try to check the ink levels from my laptop they are all greyed out. Epson tech said the Dir-655 was the problem and that I needed to get the router to give permission for the ink levels to go through.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI recently upgraded our WLC 4404 to release 7.0.98.0. The process was very smooth with no issues. The controller manages access points in two buildings. Prior to the upgrade the access points were maintaining high TX power levels...typically between 1 and 3. After the upgrade the power levels all droped to 6 and 8. I have confirmed that the correct external antenas have been set for each access point. I have not done a site survey to see if the lower power levels are acceptable. But the environment has been very consistent for the past year with regards to TX power levels. For the time being I have manually set a power level of 2 to prevent any service outages. Is there any explanation as to why the power levels have changed so drastically?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to make a setup on my Cisco 881 router, but I'm having some trouble.I've managed to configure logging in with a Public-Private key pair over SSH, but it's also still possible to log in over SSH with just a username and password. I'd like to prevent this, if possible. I imagine I might have manually configured this to be allowed at some point, but I can't quite figure out how I did this, as no matter what I've tried to remove, it keeps allowing this option. I still need to be able to log in with a username, because I want users to have different privileges.
Once I've logged in using the Public-Private key, I don't automatically go into privilege mode, even though the user is configured with a privilege level. I'd like to configure that users that I've configured to use a certain privilege mode, automatically go into privilege mode without a password prompt. I know it did this before I started using the Public-Private key (or before I used AAA, which was configured around the same time), so I wondered if it's possible to do this still.
Is it possible to configure the ASA to:
log syslog informational to one host
and
log syslog critical to a different host
It seems that the ASA allows you to only specify 1 logging severity level for all syslog hosts..
In CLI we have users log in at priv 1 and use "enable" to increase privilege and do configurations. This allows "accounting" of command history. On the AIR-AP1121G-A-K9 (12.3(8)JED1) I cannot duplicate this for http login.
I can log in as a user at priv 1. When I try to go to a privileged link like "Security" I get prompted for a second login/pw. Nothing works here unless I have a second user defined at priv 15 and enter that login/pw. The problem is - that login/pw can be used to log in via http in the first place which bypasses accounting of the actual user. It also allows login to the CLI at priv 15 which I cannot permit.
username test1 secret 5 abcdxxx
username test2 privilege 15 secret 5 efghxxx
enable secret 5 ijklxxx(code)
I have FWSM's in Cat 6513's. I have a need to be able to session from the switch to the FWSM by using default account (not local user), at privilege level 15 I further have a need to allow a user read only access by ssh'n into the FWSM...
I believe I need to setup a local user, at, say privilege level 5, assign the show command only to privilege level 5, then set the authorization command for that user. So, i think my command sets are as follows to accomplish this:
username <username> password <pw> priv 5
priv command level 5 mode exec command show
aaa auth ssh console LOCAL
aaa auth enable console LOCAL
aaa authorization command LOCAL
I think, that this will allow the user at privilege 5 to run only the show command and only by SSH to the FWSM while allow the priv 15 level default login to continue to function properly.
We had a core switch(4503) in our environment and recently we tried to enable syslog in the switch. But the syslog server doesnt receives all the configured level messages from the switch. Following is the only message getting in syslog server after the configuration change in switch.
%SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by CWLMS onvty1
(No Traffic related messages like acl deny traffic, spanning tree events etc are getting to syslog server as well as log buffer of the switch)
Following are the logging configuration for the core switch
logging monitor informational
logging facility syslog
logging source-interface Vlan44
[Code]....
1) Is there any more configurations required for getting all traffic related messages, (i mean all possible messages - upto level 7 - debugging)?
I want to create a user who only has access to "router>" prompt on the CLI. this user should not be able to do enable command and by no other means be able to go to global configuration mode. I know the command router(conf t)# username ABC privilege 1 password ABCPASS, but even with this command, this user gets privilege 15 access.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a Linksys WRT610N wireless system with WPA-PSK security and this works fine with several computers but now one computer detects the wireless security as WEP and can thus not connect to the router. I have tried to manually connect to the router with correct security WPA-Personal (TKIP) and correct password but then the computer says "settings saved on this computer for the network do not match the requirements of the network".How can I get the computer to detect the correct security? The computer is running Windows 7 home premium.
View 7 Replies View RelatedIs it true that the FCC is investigating the Pogo game site because of poor security? Is Java the cause of this problem?I'm very leery of getting on the Pogo site because I've been told that my computer could get a virus and crash.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm studying for CCNA Sec exam and looking for any security labs for GNS3 or Packet Tracer.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm new to IT, and have been put in charge of managing our servers hile my boss is on vacation.We currently have a Sonicwall Network Security Appliance that handles our Firewall/VPN and have web content filtering set in place.I have a user who belongs to 2 CFS policy groups that we have set up. I've double checked with Active Directory, and he is a member of both groups.
This person SHOULD have access to Job searches/ and Restaurants,but receives a "content blocked" message on his browser.It appears to me that the settings in Sonicwall are correct, as well with AD member groups.
My company ordered NAC and ACS 1120 My question is Can i configure 802.1X security through ACS server and NAC in layer 2 Inband Virtual Gateway.for campus switches.Is it the good design to have double security for switch ports. 1st is 802.1X and 2nd is NAC in layer 2 INBAND VG?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to connect to a Security-enabled wireless netowork. I have the key. My problem is that I can't seem to figure out how to enter it. When I try to connect I open the "view available networks"window. I see the network name and it shows a strong signal (all 5 green bars).
View 3 Replies View RelatedASA 5510 security plus edition will it support active/active failover. and does it support context with securiyt plsu edition. and how many default context do we get with asa 5510 security plus edition.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI want to install Microsoft Security Essential on my PC, but I am not sure which download I need. One says amd64 and the other is x86. I am using windows xp 32bit.
View 2 Replies View RelatedSome security tools and techniques for wireless LAN??
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow can I get the security key password for my iPad?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have windows xp home and the last few days a security installation has kept trying to install ie: "Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Service Pack 1 Redistributable Package (KB2538242) (update 1 of 1)..."
View 3 Replies View Relatedmy router has a WPA security system and I want it to be a WEP security system, what must i do?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI was informed by a co-worker that there is a security vulnerability with the local certificate authority in the ASA running 8.3 code. I've looked through the security advisories and haven't been able to find anything about this. Was this just misquote or am I missing the security advisory release?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a ASA 5505 that I test with which originally came with the Security Plus license. I recently erased flash and loaded the latest asa841-k8.bin version of IOS along with asdm-642.bin. Everything booted fine and came up as it does when freshly wiped however I noticed that i was now only running a base license. If I issue the sh activiation-key command, I noticed the following messages (full output is at the bottom):
The Running Activation Key is not valid, using default setting
......
This platform has a Base license.
......
Failed to retrieve flash permanent activation key
Did I somehow kill my Security Plus licensing when I did the erase flash? If so how do I recover it?
ciscoasa# sh activation-key
Serial Number: JMXXXXXXHU
Running Permanent Activation Key: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
The Running Activation Key is not valid, using default settings:
Licensed features for this platform:
Maximum Physical Interfaces : 8 perpetual
VLANs : 3 DMZ Restricted
Dual ISPs : Disabled perpetual
VLAN Trunk Ports : 0 perpetual
[code]...
This platform has a Base license.Failed to retrieve flash permanent activation key.The flash permanent activation key is the SAME as the running permanent key.
My dad has a business he runs on our network that everyone in the house uses for general needs. I am a gamer and often want to host servers for my friends. This requires that I have ports opened on the router, which I cannot do as I don't have access to change the network. Is it possible to create 2 networks on the same ISP, and if so how would you do it?,I have my current network running on an Apple Time Capsule with AirPorts around my house acting as extenders.
View 5 Replies View Related