On a small office setup we have many computers connected to one another using wireless LAN. One of the PCs on the WLAN also has a LAN connection with a few other equipment connected to it. The WLAN IP Addresses are 192. 168. 1.XXX and the LAN addresses are 192.168.0.XXX. How can I get to communicate the WLAN computers with the equipment on LAN.
View 7 RepliesHow do I set up to computers to contaminate with each other in the same room
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two groups of students I wish to seperate by subnetting. Students are nine in each group, and there's one Cisco router (or W-server set as a router). After giving group A an IP of 192.168.200.1, and group B an IP of 192.168.200.129 and connecting each interface to it's own seperate switch, what else does each PC user need to do to establish communication with members not in his/her own subgroup?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSonicwall TZ 180 router/firewall LAN and WLAN is configured on different subnets (just the way it is setup) and any devices on either network can not see shares/printers etc on the other network through the same device.from what i can tell, i have all the necessary port forwards/AccessRules setup for WLAN and LAN to communicate together but, it is just not working properly. What the exact settings are to ensure the LAN and WLAN devices communicate to each other.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhen I was using my Linksys router, I had no difficulties setting up Windows File Sharing on my computers but since I upgraded to the DIR-655, file sharing have hardly worked. Sometimes I could get one of the computers access files on another, but not the other away around. Most of the time, none of the computers have access to the files on any of the other computers. Two of the computers run Windows XP and another one runs Windows Vista. All computers are on the same workgroup and able to connect to the internet through the router. When calling D-Link tech support, I am told that they dont support file sharing and that I had to contact each computer's manufacture's tech support on the instructions on setting up the file sharing (each computer is from a different manufacture). One of the tech supports did drop the slight hint that I needed to recreate the home network, but when I tried to do that, all I could find is the settings to connect to the router (which I had set up when I installed the new router) and to enable file sharing (which is already done) and to assign the workgroup, which they were all are already assigned to the same group.
View 8 Replies View Relatedjust replaced a WRT54G with E4200. Most functions work well. 4 wireless computers (1 Macbook, 3 Win 7), 1 wireless android, 1 wired Win7 computer, 1 ethernet connected hard drive, 1 ethernet connected printer. All computers can ping router, access hard drive, access internet, ping android and ping Macbook.However, router, nor any computer, can't ping Win7 computers. Apparently IP based connections between WinX computers is blocked. My real applications are to Remote Desktop Connect from 1 Win7 computer to another, or to run a DLNA music server on 1 Win7 computer, accessed by another. (the LAN connected computer is the server, accessed by a wLAN client. All worked fine on WRT54G router, but can't connect thru E4200. When these apps failed, I tried PING, and that failed as well.All computer's IP addresses are properly served from E4200 via DHCP, and are visible thru the router's DHCP Reservation panel.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhat it looks like after it was cleaned up and my switches added in:That is a 3750, 48 port switch that it came with. I added in my 3750's and a 3550. The PC is for GNS3 and will have additional ports added for router interfaces soon.
I have a terminal server in the mail to round it out.
I want to set up a wireless video security system around my farm. I have been having a lot of predator problems this year and I am tired of getting up in the middle of the night and running outside in my underwear to check on my livestock (especially now that it is winter) because my wife thought she heard something attacking the animals. I have been looking around at wireless wifi security cameras to use with my home wifi network and all of them ( like the Foscam FI8918W) use IEEE 802.11g standards. I have done a lot of research on this and there is just no consistent data about to do this. I know that are a lot of smart people here because I have posted here before and got some great answers. So, I am just going to tell you what I would like to achieve and you can tell me how (if possible) I can do it. I am willing to buy all new equipment if necessary. I need a omni-directional wifi G network with a minimum range of 400 feet. I have several buildings to cover so it has to be omni-directional. My house is located 350 feet from the furthest building, so I figure a 400 foot range should give me good consistent results. I already have an old Linksys WRT54GS router with Firmware Version: v1.52.8. It is located in my bedroom against an outside wall and even now I get some signal from it out at my farthest building (350 feet) and even browse the web with my laptop. But the signal is spotty and seems to come and go for no reason. What is really funny is that I have less signal in the second bathroom on the other side of the house, but I guess that is because of all the walls in between.
Now I have read that you can increase a routers broadcast strength by modifying the router settings. But you need special firmware like, Tomato, to do that and I have already tried to install , Tomato, to my router with no success. So if modifying the router software is necessary, I will need another router I guess.
1. A good strong router capable of IEEE 802.11g.
2. A good strong outdoor antenna that will connect to the router.
My problem is that I can find good routers and good antennas, but nothing that say they will work with each other. And another thing is that it appears to me from what I have read so far, that the stronger the antenna is, the more narrow the vertical broadcast field is. So, if I understand this right, with a strong antenna, the antenna and the receiving device have to be about the same height horizontally speaking. So if I put the antenna on the top of my house, it will basically shoot right over all my cameras. But if I put the antenna lower along an outside wall, then the cameras on the opposite side of the house won't receive signal. But again, this is just my understanding of what I read so far. You can see now why I am so confused about this. The more I read, the more I get confused. It seem like this should be simple, like, "Buy this router, Buy that antenna". Surly, I am not the first person who wants to extend their home network to a reasonable outdoor range. It's not like I want it to reach miles (that would be nice except for all the hackers trying hack my network).
I am currently deploying Cisco ASR9K BNG solution and it needs to be integrated with a Cisco ACS 3.3 (yes that old .. going to migrate to new product in the future) equipment. There are several specific attributes need that are not on the base config of the ACS 3.3 but it seems that i can configure them manually:In addition to supporting a set of predefined RADIUS vendors and vendor-specific attributes (VSAs), Cisco Secure ACS supports RADIUS vendors and VSAs that you define. Vendors you add must be IETF-compliant; therefore, all VSAs that you add must be sub-attributes of IETF RADIUS attribute number 26..This is from the ACS 3.3 configuration manual.I have never done this user defined VSAs.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI would like to connect my 1841 to the equipment that has RS-422 interface in order to transmit data. I have to buy one WIC-1T to support it. However, I am not sure that this module will be able to support RS-422 or not (As I can see there is DB25 which is the interface of RS-422, but I realize that RS-232 also has 25 pins.)
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have to do a policy route on my cat6500. basically, I want to redirect all traffic from 10.1.1.100 to internet address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx to another machine 10.1.1.101. however, the 10.1.1.100 and 10.1.1.101 are in save subnet. not directed to cat6500, but both connecte to same switch which is linked to cat6500. However the 10.1.1.101 is not a cisco router. but some sort of equipment which change traffic and pass them to another subnet.
that means can I do below:
access-list 101 permit ip host 10.1.1.100 host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
route-map reroute permit 10
march ip address 101
[Code].....
I just got a server cabinet from a friend and i am going to put all my networking stuff in there i want to put my router inside it too but im not sure if it will affect the signal the cabinet is made out of metal but not thick.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have an telemetry equipment which have one ethernet RJ45 port, so I have an internet connection and I can connect to this device remotely using a browser on my PC for security reason I want to feed this device with a second internet connection that is coming from a cellular line , can I just put the two different Internet cables into a switch and from that switch connect my device?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi am trying to monitor some UPS equipment,for that i am using a cisco 2960 switch and when the UPS is down it sends a L1 loop.when the switch detects the loop the int in which the UPS is conected to will get a link and go up.now my problem is this, as you probeblly know the switch has a protocol which protects it from getting loops and cuasing all kinds of problems.i need to remove this protocol and allow the switch to get L1 loops?
P.si have tryed to use UDLD, KEEPALIVE, BPDU guard, down-when-looped and errdisable commands with no success?
I would like to setup a 2504 to have one Guest WLAN and one Staff WLAN with a controller port for each WLAN connected to different devices.
I would prefer to connect the WLC Guest port to an ASA 5510 and the WLC Staff port to an internal 2960S switch. Will this work? I haven't setup a 2500 series controller previously.
I have a 1.25 mbps download and .2 upload speed. I have a netgear n600 router and have wireless and cannot change to wired. I have around a 120 ping all most always. My current speed is the best in my area too. Is there any kind of equipment that will give me a lower ping for online gaming? Is there any router settings for this?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 1751 that I wanted to use to create another network behind my Actiontec m1424wr Verizon router. My plan was to connect a linksys wrt54gs to the Cisco router for device connectivity. And I wanted everyone else in the house to still be able to use the Verizon router as expected. I know this is probably not the best way to create an internal network. But I am studying for the CCNA & CEH and just wanted to use the Outdated Cisco IOS on the 1751.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a WRT160n that I am trying to forward some ports on for some DVR equipment. When I use the single port forwarding and enter each port separately it works fine. But I have 2 DVR's and they use a bunch of ports each so I want to use the port range forwarding because there are not enough spots in the single port forwarding section. The ports I am trying to forward are 8000-8004 for one IP address and 8005-8009 for a second IP address. I have entered it into the port range forwarding section but I can not connect from outside my network. As I said if I enter them in the single port section seperately as 8000,8001,8002,8003,8004 then I can connect fine outside my network.
View 7 Replies View RelatedA client I have just taken on wishes to provide internet data and VoIP for multiple tenants in their new office they move to in a few weeks.
they currently have a Cisco 2811 router with a 24 port Catalyst 2960 PoE managed switch serving just their staff and one tenant company who is plugged into a single port on the switch. I dont know what the tenant has the other side of that at this time.
when they move they currently will provide single port access points on the switch for each tenant, so the tenant can deal with their own network LAN. The client will provide phones to all the tenants using VoIP phones on a single subnet and hosted on an external PBX the phones all plug into the Catalyst and use the PoE. the WAN is a 20mbps fibre connection.
The client has 16 staff, the tenants are 3 companies with 3,6 and 9 staff. They may all increase or decrease in size to a total size of about 30 or 40 people.
I have a few questions
1. should I look at Vlan setup for this instead of the current basic routing setup or is that overkill since they only use one port access point per tenant as gateway.
2. can the cisco 2811 handle this or is it a bit old.
3. what router replacement would be recommended for this task given the above info especially if I went with Vlan solution.
4. any thoughts on the current switch's capability for this task.
5. managing bandwidth solutions? is there any router designed with this in mind. the ASA maybe or something like it with nice visual webgui management capabilities for monitoring and controlling bandwidth use of tenants?
Mark
i'm triyng to establish a vpn ipsec tunnel between my cisco2801 and a cyberoam equipment, at the end point.Debugging isakmp, i have this output, where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the remote peer address, and yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy is mine.What can i try?
Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0): SA request profile is (NULL)Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: Created a peer struct for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, peer port 500Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: New peer created peer = 0x661C2D4C peer_handle = 0x80000003Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: Locking peer struct 0x661C2D4C, refcount 1 for isakmp_initiatorApr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: local port 500, remote port 500Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE Apr 1 14:48:12.542: insert sa successfully sa = 66DF4F5CApr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0):Can not start Aggressive mode, trying Main mode.Apr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0):found peer pre-shared key matching xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxApr 1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-07 IDApr
[URL]
I have two ethernet cards (from same equipment) that arent acquiring IP Address after instalation of WLC 2504.I dont want (yet) to disable DHCP proxy on WLC.
*DHCP Socket Task: Apr 15 18:49:04.219: 00:0a:95:XX DHCP received op BOOTREQUEST (1) (len 556,vlan 0, port 1, encap 0xec00)
*DHCP Socket Task: Apr 15 18:49:04.219: 00:0a:95:XX DHCP dropping packet (no mscb) found - (giaddr 0.0.0.0, pktInfo->srcPort 68, op: 'BOOTREQUEST')
*DHCP Socket Task: Apr 15 18:49:07.218: 00:0a:95:XX DHCP received op BOOTREQUEST (1) (len 556,vlan 0, port 1, encap 0xec00)
*DHCP Socket Task: Apr 15 18:49:07.218: 00:0a:95:XX DHCP dropping packet (no mscb) found - (giaddr 0.0.0.0, pktInfo->srcPort 68, op: 'BOOTREQUEST')
[code].....
I just installed a 10 port Cisco SG300-10MP in my office, 9 of the ports are already in use. Connected to it are
PC
Laptop
Notebook
WIFI AP
B&W laser printer
Color inkjet printer
IP camera
Squeezebox SB3
Cat5e connection to basement HP 1810G-24 switch All of these devices are connected via a single Cat5e cable that was installed when the house was built. I had to re-terminate both ends of it when I moved in because the existing terminations were done very poorly. I have no idea how or where the cable is routed, nor what the quality of this Cat5e cable is. It did pass a test using my cable tester.
This single Cat5e is connected to my main HP switch in the basement equipment rack. Both of these switches have mini-GBIC ports that can utilize SFP transceivers and fiber. I priced out 2 MGBSX1 compatible modules along with a 30M multimode fiber patch 'cable' online at under $150. Although it would require at least a couple hours of work (including digging around in the attic and crawl space and drilling some holes), but running the fiber to the basement is very doable.
My question to my far more experienced forum members is if the performance gains would be worth the effort?My server is in the basement, and despite having an Intel GB NIC in my PC I am seeing read speeds of ~23MBs and writes of ~49MBs to/from my it. My server has teamed GB NICs (802.3ad LACP Layer 2) connected to trunked (LACP) ports on my HP switch.
I have some questions in regards to network equipment I want re-utilize for my distribution layer in one of my buildings.The choices at the moment are:
OPTION 1.) 2x WS-3550-12G's (HSRP)
OPTION 2.) 1x WS-6509 with cards:
What option would be better from a performance aspect? We want to have network, voice, and wireless data go through this distribution layer switch(es).This is exisiting equipment I already have and can not buy anything else at the moment.
I have a requirement to connect two 3750 switch with 10G speed between two sites with 150km distance. We will lay-out our own fiber (48 core) between two sites. I just want to consult the following:
1. Could i use two core switch 6500 with single mode fiber as a transport equipment?
2. Or i need to use SDH equipment because of the distance concern? If so do i need a repeater?Could i use Cisco Metro Core ONS, which one?
3. Any other option to achieve this requirement?
We have a problem with a Cisco 1400 Bridge. This equipment can not bridge to the other root or not root mode. I can see a message "Interface Dot11Radio0 Radio transmit power out of range" and the MAC Address of Dot11Radio0 appears with 0000.0000.0000.I set the local power to 18 but the MAC Address is still in 0000.0000.0000.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am preparing for CCNA exam and for that I have been working with OSPF in packet tracer.In the scenario below I have made configuration with three routers and everything seems to be working well. However, following ping commands cannot be reached.PC0 cannot communicate with other two PCs. Others can.(can ping from PC1 to PC0 and PC2. Can ping from PC2 to PC0 and PC1 BUT CANNOT PING FROM PC0 TO PC1 and PC2) [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy friend and I bought Acer Aspire 5741's about 9 months ago and neither of us has had any problems until now. My friend went to connect to the internet via wireless router yesterday to find that there was limited connectivity (no internet access). We assumed it was a router issue and I gave her a number of things to check but all seemed ok with it. I went to her house to look at it today and when I ran the connection troubleshooter got "windows can't communicate with.......... (DNS server)". I connected my laptop via her router and everything was fine. I brought her laptop back to my house and tried to connect to the internet via my router and got exactly the same 'DNS' message - my laptop again connected without any problem.
I have re-booted the routers, laptops, network adapters etc and also checked the wireless adapter settings on both laptops, which appear to be the same. I have re-set the TCP/IP stack and have also tried ipconfig /release and /renew - none of which seems to have made any difference. the results of the tests are as follows (linksys is the SSID in use):
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : Debbie-PC
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . :
[Code].....
I've been having a problem with my browser lately, Its really slow and it turns out I have 1000 ping average ...the ping does up and down some times its 1 or 2 sometimes 500 . any way I get this msg when I use the diagnose option " Cannot communicate with DNS server(196.40.3.9) .
View 14 Replies View RelatedRIP works on which layer and how it works.how two routers communicate to each other.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHaven't been able to connect to the internet for the whole day,This is what I get when I run ipconfig in the cmd, tried doing the two resets but it won't work!
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6002]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:UsersFelicia>ipconfig/all
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : Michelle-PC
[code]....
I need to get a dir 615 router in one room to comunicate wirelessly to a dir 655 in another room that is connected to my internet modem. I can't connect them with an ethernet cable. I need the extra ports on the dir 615 because the signal strength from the 655 is too weak
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an skill exercise with 4 Routing Protocols Default Route,Static Route,Eigrp, Ospf. I have about 6-7 routers, and each of them has an routing protocol. But the problem is the Main router INTERNET, which it has to use Static in a direction, and default in the opposite path. This is the scheme of routers and how the r.protocol have to be configured.
View 19 Replies View RelatedI tested ospf multi-areas in packet tracer as shown in attached file.(Sorry I don't know how to upload the lab image.)There I got a problem that router 0 in area 1 and router 6 in area 3 cannot communicate.Except this, router 0 can communicate with other routers and the same to router 6. I have made a virtual link between backbone,area 1 and 2 ABR router 1 and area 2,3 ABR router 4.I use process id 123 for every area. But when I type "show ip route" in router 0, it is shown [code] when it is typed in router 6, it is shown [code] So, router 6 cannot communicate with router 0.I don't wanna make a static route to 1.0.0.0 network in router 6.
View 1 Replies View Related