Limiting Upstream Rates For Web In Ubuntu 12.10
Jan 14, 2013
Network settings. What I want to do is limit the rate that people can download files from my webserver remotely. LAN connections should still be able to transfer at full speed, but anything outside of the local network should be limited to 200Kbps per connection. Is that even possible? Can I limit the number of connections per client (probably by IP)?
If this can't be done at the OS level, is there any way I could script it using PHP? Maybe read X bytes into a file and then sleep...
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 19, 2011
I'm using an RFC 1483 Bridged adsl connection on a WAG54GS router. Downstream rate says 2043 Kbps, and upstream rate only 35 Kbps. In the router setup page I have not found any place to change downstream/upstream rates. How can I increase \the upstream rate?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2012
I have a 3560 switch where I have 4 ports connected, one is to our WAN provider - 10Mbps and the other three are connected to different customers who I want to get an equal share of the 10Mbps bandwidth.I'm fairly clued up about configuring modular QoS but I'm being thrown by the fact that you can't apply a service-policy outbound on the ethernet ports.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2012
here is my setup:
Router: DIR-655 B1 2.00NA
Desktop1: DWA-160 A1 1.80 [IP: x.x.x.104]
Desktop2: DWA-160 A1 1.80 [IP: x.x.x.103]
Laptop: Intel WiFi 5300 AGN [IP: x.x.x.100]
iPad 2 (1): [IP: x.x.x.101]
iPad 2 (2):
Router Config, Status, and Inssider Report:
[URL]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2012
I want to determine if i completely understand the meaning of forwarding rates on a switch. From my understanding, if The port density on my switch is 48, each at a 1G speed i have a total of 48Gbs. however, if a switch, for example the 2960 has a forwarding rate is 40Gbs, I take it to mean that i cannot get 48Gbs of through put but only 40Gbs,is this correct ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 25, 2012
I am using an old Asus netbook as a file server in home network which I connect through Ipad over ftp. It works for the most of daily tasks fine though but the connection is with rates under 1 Mbps still slow for data intensive tasks. My question is: if I buy a new hard drive with wireless access capability could I hope for significantly better transfer rates? If not, then I can't see any point why someone would buy this devices which in some cases can only be accessed over the network. what is wrong with my configuration that I get significantly slower rates? I run SuSE Linux on the netbook, the ftp deamon is vsftp and have a 54 Mbps wireless router which I think can still be considered standard. Is there anything I can do to increase the ftp transfer rates? I think it should be possible since even downloads over http on the same machine often exceed it.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2012
im experiencing very slow transfer rates averaging 600 kb/s when transfering files. my PC has a compatible dwa-552 card and both the router and card have latest drivers / firmware. i have various changes on the router and to no avail. all devices PC / laptops running N @ 20 mhz / channel 11. i can see 2 other networks but very low signal using diff channels.what setting might i be overlooking in the router that might cause this slow trans rate? incidentally, when i transfer .jpg or .pdf files the transfer improves to 2.5 mb/s. however, when i transfer a folder containing subfolders with diff file types the trans rate drops sharply to 600 kb/s.
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2011
E4200 with an external hard drive WD My Book (1TB) connected to the router via USB.Desktop PC (Windows 7) connected to router via Ethernet cable.Laptop PC (Windows 7) connected to router via wireless connection.I wanted to create a central media (videos/pictures) file on the external hard drive connected to the router. However, the transfer rate is terribly slow. Interestingly, it is 50KB/second when copying from the Desktop (via Ethernet) and 1.6Mbps when copying from the Laptop via wireless.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2011
I'm attempting to configure qos on our ASA 5505 and I'm not sure how to determine what our average and burst rates should be.The applications being used will be RDP over a ipsec tunnel, so it is somewhat sensitive to latency.The final setup will be a 1.54Mb T1 line, but in testing I have a DSL connection with .70Mb U/L speed.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2011
How important is the upstream to a VPN? We are getting terribly sluggish results from our VPN at the moment and looking to upgrade to a 16/2 line, the host only needs to handle about 3-5 client computers, would this be adequate? How important is upstream?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 26, 2011
Is it possible to use Cisco Band Select on a Cisco 5508 WLAN controller and still disable the 802.11b data rates?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2011
Hardware Software profile;
Laptop - Windows 7
Desktop - Vista Ultimate SP2
Router - Cisco Linksys E3200
Cables - CAT6
I am a sales engineer, so I use my desktop and laptop all the time. When on road, I sync my desktop with my laptop using a program called ViceVersa. This a very good, reliable syncing program that I have been using for over 10 years ( with upgrades ).
The program allows me to sync my desktop and laptop. The program also shows the data transfer rate during the syncing process. The typical data transfer speed is between 5MB/s and 10MB/s with sometimes up to 12MB/s. A typical sync between the computers will take about 3 - 5 minutes at the ~ 10 MB/s transfer rate using ethernet CAT6 cable inteface. At about 11pm last Tuesday,there was a Windows update on both my Vist and Win7 computers. On wednesday, I went to do a typical sync. The system has dramatically slowed to 59KB/s max. This is about 150 times slower than 5-10MB/s that I was used to for so many years. My typical sync was now taking about 2 hours....unacceptable ! I have tried everything to figure out what is going on and how to fix it but nothing has worked.
Then I tried to see what would happen if I disconnected my ethernet cable ( between the router and the laptop only ) and just sync using the wireless network. With that configuration, the transfer rate is ~ 2.5 MB/s which is not great but is much, much better than 59KB/s. I actually do not know what a reasonable wireless transfer rate should be since I never really did it before due to the faster speed of the wired configuration.
This is just a LAN. Only connecting my Desktop to my Laptop via the Cisco router.
How I can get my wired configuration back up to the 5-10MB/s transfer rate that it once was?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2012
We recently did a forklift upgrade on our campus and installed 3502i's, 3502e's, and 11 5508 WLC's. Our students are complaining about slow connections in several areas of the campus.In our testing and basic trouble shooting our Apple laptops have no problems but our windows laptops are showing a very slow connection rates 264kbps downloand and 366kbps upload. The window device has current drivers installed.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2012
Region : Russia
Model : TL-WR1043ND
Hardware Version : v1
Firmware Version :
ISP :
Region : Russia
Model : TL-WR1043ND
Hardware Version : v1
Firmware Version : wr1043nv1_ru_3_13_10_up(120614)
ISP : netbynet
Connection to a router on a cable speed of dowstream-50MBit/s, upstream-3Kbit(!) wifi-dowstream-50MBit/s, upstream-3KbitA cable directly in the personal computer to 70 Mbps there and back.Measured speedtest.net, and as [URL] The matter is that even elementary with an investment it is impossible to send mail - I am connected by different devices-2 of the laptop and 2 smartphones - the same. Technical support of provider already talk sense only in a router. Insertions updated, changed - the same( Firewalls are disconnected, any more don't know what to do and where proceeding speed and all digs-is killed. Russian forum TP-Link is idle.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2012
Since I've bought my RV042 CISCO (v3 hardware, firmware v4.1.1.01-sp Dec 6 2011 20:03:18) i wasn't able to let it work properly with my two DSL network lines. I explain. I got 2 DSL network:
1- PPPoE with authentication (MTU setted as auto) with upstream speed 4Mbit/S and downstream speed 5Mbit/s
2- Direct line with static IP with upstream speed 7Mbit/S and downstream speed 1Mbit/s
I was never able to SUM the two WAN using the LOAD BALANCE set. I tried all combinations:
DSL 1 in WAN 1 or in WAN 2
DSL 2 in WAN 2 or in WAN 1
I've tested all type of speeds in WAN SPEED in Web Management
it seems that for some kind of reason it takes the upstream speed i can set in web management as the default value on which it decides to use the other WAN. When i set low upstream bandwidth for DSL 2 it's able to sum the down streams of both WANs but not the up streams.
I wasn't ever able to sum the up streams? How does it work?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2011
using task manager in XP it is clear that while browsing data is being uploaded mirroring the data downloaded..ie in a given period if 18mB comes downstream (just surfing) then 11mB goes upstream. The graph in task manager shows that the peaks and troughs of the data upstream and downstream exactly correspond and watching the bytes tick over confirms that data goes out for every data coming in.I assume that this should not happen? I realise ip protocols have some kind of error detection that may require uploading data, but the amount sent seems excessive! From my limited understanding of networking and running wireshark it looks like that when packets come from an ip on the web ( i use the terms web/internet interchangeably ) then packets are sent out to the same ip ... using TCP and HTTP ( I don't really understand them ). The info for one such packet going out is "Continuation or non-HTTP traffic" using the HTTP protocol, which sounds a bit contradictory. I regularly run virus scans and rarely find anything. The cpu regularly maxes out and its usually something to do with firefox ( I've heard of buffer overflows but i assume the problem is a relatively old processor and hardware).The browser is firefox. OS is XP.Coincidentally, the pc was recently rebooting after crashing until I disabled "restart on system failure" which prevented the crashes ( if they were crashes and not just the system reacting to an error ). Again, that is a bit suspicious but maybe not. Spybot, bit defender quickscan,avira, zone alarm, malwarebytes etc haven't flagged anything up.Maybe the router is not configured properly. As with all these things, there will be some simpler things to start with to diagnose this issue (if there is one ) but I don't know what they are.The pc uses wifi to connect. The isp is not the best and the speed is pretty bad for adsl. Every couple of days the router needs rebooting because it stops giving out ip's.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2013
Region : Malaysia
Model : TD-W8968
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 0.6.0 0.4 v0005.0 Build 130217 Rel.62075n
ISP : TM Streamyx
I have internet speed : 8Mbps.
The status of Internet in the modem config as foloows:
UpstreamDownstream
Current Rate (Kbps)636 10240
Max Rate (Kbps) 900 23412
SNR Margin (dB) 12.8 23.5
Line Attenuation (dB) 8.1 1.1
Errors (Pkts) 0 0
from the above informations the upstream is 636 Kbps but when I did the speed test it show me that the upload not more than 300 Kbps.
I used another modem D-link modem and the upload is more than 550 kbps when I used speed test.
Actually the upload is very slow by using TP-link modem and when I used another modem the upload is double speed.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2011
Is it possible, through a QoS profile, to control how much bandwidth a user gets to use for upstream traffic? I can easily set limits for downstream traffic, via the per user bandwidth contracts, but it is not obvious to me on how to control upstream traffic.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
I am imagining a smallish networking (AS1234) with say three full BGP table peers that provide transit to the network (just to keep the maths simple here); Lets say AS100 and AS200 are preferred transit providers with AS300 as a backup/least prefered (AS prepends or similar stop us from using this network by default). So in this scenario our little network gets two different paths across the Internet, as not to rely solely on one provided, with a backup provider to hand also.
How do you mange issues like packet loss somewhere in AS100's or AS200's network? So lets say a host on our AS1234 network is talking to host in AS888 and the preferred route is through AS100 but somewhere deep in AS100 a link is flapping (for example) and I can't get to AS888 reliably through there anymore, but I can through to other peers of AS100 OK. We can postulate that AS100 is the best path for 50% of the Internet and AS200 for the other 50% (this is a best case fictional scenario). I can't ping 50% of the internet via AS100 and then in the event a ping fails (or some other more reliable test) tear down the BGP session to use AS100 until it's fixed again, nor vice versa with AS200.
First of all, I asume you don't know about the issue between AS100 and AS888 until someome moans about it to you? Secondly, do you then some how modify the route(s) to AS888 that come from AS100 (route map for example to change the weight or preference) so AS200 is now preferred for AS888? Do you infact shut down the AS100 peering and now use AS200 & AS300? How do you rectify these situations that are beyond you control using what is in your control?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2011
2 routers in series, is one more secure. I recently asked about setting up two routers in series as routers, one wireless one not. It was my understanding that the computers on the second router would not be visible to computers on the first router, the wireless one. My assumption was that this would make it more difficult for someone who got access to the wireless router to also access those computers on the second router.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2012
I discovered on a pair of SG300-28P.
On a second switch (ver 1.2.7.76) when I unplugged the power cord, to my amazement the switch turned right back on (about 1 second later), with the power cord removed. To verify that the power is indeed coming from POE, the upstream switch (ver 1.1.2.0) that is the same model (sg-300-28p), shows all 7 Ethernet ports connecting the two drawing from 2700mW, to 3000mW.
While the second switch is powered from the first over POE, the POE does not work on the second switch to power anything, and the system summary mentions something about "PoE Power Information on Master Unit".
Is this a stacking operation, and is POE on the second switch NOT supposed to work when powered over Ethernet from an upstream switch?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2012
We are connected to 2 different providers (PROV01 and PROV02) with eBGP full internet tables. PROV01 routes have higher local preference over PROV02.
We are having problems with our provider and would like your expertise. PROV01, higher preference has been having trouble with their router. The BGP remains up but the router stops forwarding traffic. as a resulta we lose connection to the internet but our traffic never goes to PROV02 since PROV01 BGP remains up announcing the 400K routes to us.
Is there a way to test internet connection though PROV01 and as the "internet is DOWN" automatically change traffic to PROV02? Can BGP parameters changes be triggered by IP SLA? Our router is an ASR1006 RP2.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2012
We have got a pair of N5K and 4 N2k. So far, we have configured VPC Keepalive (2x10G) & VPN Peer (1x1G) between N5K. Also we have configured one N2K with Dual Hommed VPC with both N5K.Now I am having some difficulties with desining/configuring EIGRP with Upstream routers/L3 65xxVSS switch.
Here are the queries.
1) Do I have to create another 1GE link between these 2 N5K to enable routing in between.
2) For these 2xN5K should I enable Eigrp on physical Interface or should I create VLAN & VRF to enable routing in between.
3) For N5K to Upstream L3 device should I have to configure EIGRP on physical Interface or should I create VLAN & VRF to proceed. We have 2 uplink each to connect to 2 DC and we are not planning to aggregate 2 links (VPC or L3 Ether Channel) for each site.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2013
I have inherited a custome with a bunch of SG300's in their LAN room and one out in the warehouse.I need to setup a VLAN and the genius before me did not label which LAN room switch the warehouse unit plugs into. Is there a tool/method I can use to find which switch, and port this warehouse switch is connected to?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2012
I have an RV042 router and I'm looking to monitor the total upstream and downstream traffic from within the router. I know there is tons of software that I can put on a netowrk computer to monitor traffic, but is there any software that I can put on the router itself that will monitor the traffic from within the router?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2011
Yesterday, I changed my old belkin n1 router with Linksys WRT54GL router. Ever since them my upstream speed is really slow. I did the speedtest its like .5mbit. My downstream speed is just fine. This issue is only on wired computers, upstream speed on wireless computers is just fine.I retested router & modem several times, my upstream speed is normal when I connect cable directly from modem to my computer.Current Firmware Version is 4.30.14 build 5.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2012
we finally got my Cisco refurbished E2500 configured and working downstream from a UVerse 3801HGV box. We had to change the default IP address of the 3801 because it conflicted with the E2500's default. The E2500 is set up to get its Internet IP address using DHCP from the 3801. This is working fine for normal web browsing, etc. However, anything that requires extended connections (downloads, streaming, etc) freezes after a couple of minutes, forcing me to refresh the action to get it started again. Extremely annoying to say the least.
I'm pretty sure that I've tracked it down to the E2500's configuration of the 3801's DHCP allocation. For some reason, the E2500 wants to set the DHCP Lease Time for the 3801's assigned IP address to 10 minutes regardless of the upstream settings from the 3801. The 3801's default is 24 Hours which I've changed to 168Hours (7 days), but the E2500 stays stuck at 10 Minutes. Specifically, I'm referring to the setting displayed on the E2500 under Status>Router>Internet Connection IPV4>DHCP Lease Time.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2012
Having a design where an IBM bladecenter has two Nexus 4001i switches and each switch is connected to a Nexus 5k vPC pair, is it possible to configure active-active nic teaming on the hosts (blades) considering that the Nexus 4k switches are unaware of each other and blade has one connection to each 4k over either emulex or qlogic 10G CNA?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2012
I have an issue with a Cisco 3750 switch stack which is connected to two seperate upstream Cisco 3750's which are administered by an ISP. The ISP is experiencing MAC address flapping from one of my VLAN SVI's i am using to route traffic upstream
[code]...
As you can see I utilise a VLAN SVI to route traffic to the upstream 1.1.1.2 (illustration only) IP. As per the diagram of the topology attached, the ISP is receiving a MAC address flapping error confirming the SVI MAC address from my switch stack is being learnt on the trunk port connecting switch 1 and switch 2, and also the port (Gi1/0/48) directly connected to my switch stack. As these are all Layer 2 links essentially being passed upstream and then connected between the two ISP switches, we have a 3 way triangular loop formed.
If I was to remove the port channel configuration from the two ports associated with the VLAN SVI, am i right in suggesting this would still form a layer 2 loop? The two ports would still be a member of the SVI VLAN, and it is the VLAN MAC address which is being learnt by the two ISP switches on different interfaces.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2012
show logging
May 1 16:00:30: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/12, changed state to down
May 1 16:00:39: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/12, changed state to up
May 1 16:17:28: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/12, changed state to down
May 1 16:17:36: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/12, changed state to up
May 1 16:25:28: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/11, changed state to down
May 1 16:25:37: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/11, changed state to up
May 1 17:19:25: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/11, changed state to down
Configuration as below:
macro name vmware
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
no switchport access vlan
[code].....
Note:Both active blade switch and standby one are connecting to same aggregate switch 3750. Yet the active one, with same config as standby one, has not occurred this issue.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2011
I live in rural Alaska and use satellite internet with 1.5mbps rate and 4gb rolling weekly download limit. I was wondering if there are any wireless routers I can buy that I can set a bandwidth limit for the specific router. Due to teenage girls in the house we hit the weekly limit in a day or two because of all the music videos and such that they watch on you tube, it is annoying getting limited to the 256kbps download rate so often.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2012
I am a gamer living in my apartment with a room mate who loves to download music 24/7 and a girlfriend who loves to watch netflix. Needless to say, every time I go to play a video game I get shitty ping and lots of lag. From what I've gathered, DD-WRT's QOS is ****, and Tomato is the way to go in 3rd party firmware.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2011
I have a 3825 with a 16 port etherswitch card installed that I'm trying to setup rate-limits on. Interface G0/0 is the connection to the outside world and int g0/1 has a couple of 2950 switches attached to it.
The etherswitch card, f1/0, f1,1 etc has corresponding vlans, 902, 903 etc each with an IP 10.110.1.x, 10.110.2.x and all part of access-group 111. The switches connect on sub-interfaces g0/1.101, g0/1.102 etc and have IP's 10.55.1.x, 10.55.2.x and part of access-group 101.
What i'm trying to achieve is that every port / IP that is on access-group 111 shares 3Mb of bandwidth in/out and access-group 101 shares a separate 3Mb of bandwidth in/out.
I've created two access-lists as follows;
access-list 101 permit ip 10.55.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
access-list 111 permit ip 10.110.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
And on int g0/0 I've created the following rate-limits;
rate-limit input access-group 101 3072000 64000 64000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
rate-limit input access-group 111 3072000 64000 64000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
rate-limit output access-group 101 3072000 64000 64000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
rate-limit output access-group 111 3072000 64000 64000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
Now instead of both access-groups having 3Mb each they all seem to be sharing 3Mb! I've tried class-maps and policy-maps but to no avail..
View 3 Replies
View Related
