used to use Ethernet connection on this pc for 2/3 years, i recently ran wireless for like 2months. every time i try and use Ethernet i get limited or no connectivity warning, I looked in my ipconfig, i notice theres no physical address or default gateway for my realtek rtl8139/810x family fast Ethernet.
StartSSL offers free SSL certificates, so I'm guessing that means no Warning messages from browsers IE,Chrome,firefox atleast? Has anybody used this StartSSL certificate lvl1 is free..I'd tryed this myself but my hosting company is charging twice more for having ssl(just having it not even buying) than for hosting my website.
Using Windows 7 Pro. I get a yellow triangle with ! on the LAN icon. The message is : 'no internet access' but the internet works.On Network and sharing center, using work network, everything is ok.It doesn't happen all the time.
i am able to connect to unsecured wireless networks but when i connect alll of them say no internet access i only notice a yellow warning sign beside those signal strength bars also and not on secured one !
On connecting VPN, i am getting this warning: Enabling VPN connection will block all traffic that doesn't get sent to this peer. After Yes, it stops all browsing. I want to access internet plus vpn connection.
I'm configuring the nat on a ASA5525 running on 9.1.2 and got 2 questions, 1. Is the below overlap warning message normal and will not cause any issue? 2. Is there a simple way on 8.3 and later to fulfill the same functionality like 8.2 and earlier?
old config on 8.2 and earlier nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 nat (dmz) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 global (outside) 1 216.19.84.5
We are using ACS 5.1 and from time to time we are getting a warning saying that the active sessions are over the limit (250000). It is just a warning, so my assumption is that its not a big deal, but how do we keep from getting the event, or prevent the event?
I just deployed two stacked SG500X switches. I noticed these messages in the log (see below). Despite these messages everything appears to be functioning.
21474818342013-Jan-25 11:41:17Warning%Stack-W-LINK DOWN: link 0 on unit-2, aggregated (369) 21474818352013-Jan-25 11:41:17Informational%Stack-I-LINK UP: link 0 on unit-2, aggregated (369) 21474818362013-Jan-25 11:37:25Warning%STCK SYSL-W-UNITMSG: UNIT ID 2,Msg:%Stack-W-LINK DOWN: link 0 on unit-2, aggregated (1) 21474818372013-Jan-25 11:37:25Warning%Stack-W-LINK DOWN: link 0 on unit-2 21474818382013-Jan-25 11:37:25Informational%Stack-I-LINK UP: link 0 on unit-2 [Code]....
I've been getting warning messages from the event log of a 1300 series bridge, which is set as an Access Point in the network, states: 'Packet to client (mac address) reached max retries, removing the client'; I'm not sure why the client is removed. Does 'reached max retries' mean that the client has tried to many times to connect to the AP/Bridge?
i configured a new ASR1002 router yesterday,i powerd on the ASR1002 to check the device include some SPA moduler,but i found my console screen display like this""Warning: filesystem is not clean"and "%IOSXEBOOT-4-FILESYS_ERRORS_CORRECTED: (rp/0): bootflash contained errors which were auto-corrected."while ASR1002 power on.
The reason is i want to know the difference between the leased line and the DSL line. The whole thing behind the confusion is, We plan to have a high speed internet connection in our office. We will don't have a branch office or some thing like that. I preffered to have high speed internet in our office. I found in some website that Lease line will have high speed connectivity(Upto 10Gbps). Can i use the lease line or DSL is enough for our office. Our office contains of 82 user who will use internet.
I'm seeing a TON of traffic in my ASA logs (via ASDM) indicating the following:"Duplicate TCP SYN from inside: (valid internal address of one of our laptops)/50164 to inside: (address on our other subnet, still trying to trace it)/9100 with different initial sequence number"This looks like an attack to me, likely someone's downloaded something they shouldn't have and got an infected laptop. Why it's trying to "call home" to something inside our network is what puzzles me, though.Is there any VALID reason I would see these sort of messages in my log?
Everyday a few of the computer will error with "A duplicate name exists on the network:" A quick Google search shows the same answer EVERYWHERE on the internet. So I changed the names of a few of the computers too something I knew was unique. Still though the problem persists/ it afters the two XP bases computers the most, but my main workstations (windows 7 sp1) has had this error a few times, although it appears to have left for a while. I have a feenas server but Active directory is not turned on.My router is a e4200. I was using DHCP server on there (and would very much still like to) although I have turning it off, rebooted both the router and the computers but to no avail.
In case I configure duplicate IP addresses to the same VLAN(two interfaces in VLAN 1100 have IP address 192.168.2.2) I see following ARP messages rapidly(those six messages were received in less than 2ms time-frame)
We have LMS 4.2 installed and added devices;Now if for example a device is not reachable we get two messages with same failure ;only the component name is different
- one event with "dns" in component name - one with "dns(ip)" in component name dns == hostname
My customer is seeing these Errors coming up on one of his 2504 WLC's (ver7.3) The MAC's and IP addresses Mentioned seem to be completely fictitious as the customers IP plan is way off these subnets and the vendor lookup tool cant resolve the MAC addresses.I can confirm that there is no conflict.I've seen them appear on other 2504's across his network on seperate occasions.
I am having peculiar issue in my setup. I recently replaced my ASA 5505 (8.2.1) with ASA 5510 (8.4.3). Everything works fine for a while suddenly I see some of the servers will not be reachable from the LAN all the servers gateway is my switch. If I check on my Dell switch the particular server's arp entry on the connected port is same as ASA physicall MAC. If im reverting to 5505 ASA everything goes smooth without any issue.
I got some issues with my CISCO ASA, the thing is that when I add a new rule on the device this rule duplicate and goes to the bottom. We already tried to delete the duplicate rule but it always show an error.
I have set up LogMeIn Hamachi with my Linux server and a few clients. I have also created a simple shared folder on the server which shares with a Windows 7 machine.
I'm a bit confused though as to where the data is actually stored - presumably, because I have created the folder ON the server, and then shared it with the client Windows - the data is written on the server, and then accessed by the client if opened.
What I want is to create 2 copies, and automatically create a local copy of anything I put into this shared 'network' folder as well - so essentially there will be a folder when I can throw things into that will instantly duplicate (I run backup protocols separately of this).
I am using 2 anchor controllers 5508 as DHCP server. Anchor controller A is primary and anchor controller B is secondary. From time to time, client will complain "duplicate IP address error" when they try to connect guest wireless.First question: both anchor controller should have a recorder of IP address which is assigned to each PC, right?Second question: is there any way this type of issue can be avoided?
I have just moved to the 3750X switch and have connected it to a 6509E. From the beginning I was having OSPF encryption errors, followed by flood warnings, LSA issue's, duplicate IP's which is baffling me.
There are no IP's which match on either switch however the 3750X was continually power recycling causing the interfaces drop continually.Even after disconnecting from the 6509 the 3750X continue to behave in the same manner. Could there be some issue with this switch?
I am getting the following error messge on Cat4500:
Feb 18 23:37:53.098: %IP-4-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 10.237.66.3 on Vlan601, sourced by 001d.096b.4858 Feb 18 23:38:58.092: %IP-4-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 10.237.66.3 on Vlan601, sourced by 001d.096b.47ed
8 Windows 2008 Servers - UN effected 5 Windows 2003 Servers - effected with dupe IP's
We have AP - A, B and C all configured static and outside of our DHCP scope
A - 104.240 B - 104.241 C - 104.242
WAP A is setup to allow the Mac's of A and B to repeat its signal. The issue starts about 1-2 minutes after I set B and C to client/repeater and select A in site survey then save the settings. Obviously its weird that only our 2003 servers are getting this error.
The system detected an address conflict for IP address 192.168.105.201 with the system having network hardware address *MAC ADDRESS OF ROUTER A*. Network operations on this system may be disrupted as a result.
I have a duplicate router ID problem that is confusing to me. A 6509 and 4510 swich both show the same router ID, but only the 6500 has the router ID IP address configured in it. We are running EIGPR. The 6509 has L0 as 164.72.239.1 configured, which is it's router ID. The 4510 doesn't have 164.72.239.1 configured on it, yet that's what it's router ID is. Below are a few show commands displaying this - and as you can see from the 'show run | include 239' from the 4510 there is no 164.72.239.1 configured on it:
6509 chassis
interface Loopback0ip address 164.72.239.1 255.255.255.255end RS6509-Core-A#sh ip eigrp topIP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(164.72.239.1) Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply, r - reply Status, s -
[Code].....
why the 4510 has that router ID?
I know I can configure a different router ID on the 4510, but I'm curious as to why it is the way it is.
I have two 2960's in this new environment that I am administering. I am receiving a message on one unit (Designate it 2960-2) of %IP-4-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 192.168.168.8 on Vlan1, sourced by 3037.a63e.540. The "sourced by" address is the 2960-1. I do not know how these units were originally set up. How can I determine where the duplicate address is originating from.When I perform an ARP -a the address that corresponds to the 192.168.168.8 is the mac address of the ethersvi interface on the 2960-1. I