Login Multiple Facebook Accounts With A Single Skype ID Or A Unique Web-based?
Aug 22, 2012
I have a facebook account for work and another one personal, and another one for my family, sometimes it's distrubing to log in into the 3 accounts at once, is there any solution how to log into the 3 accounts using a single Skype ID? or a chat webpage such as meebo before instant chat which acquired by google on the 11 of july 2012, I used to log in meebo using my 2 MSN accounts an 1 yahoo account at once, it was a great one indeed?
I currently have mutiple computers at my place. Once the computer turned on i want the option of which login for the current computer to use, it can login it current computer or the mutiples computer with their content/data all inside. So more like an computer linked. Example, it can only to A or B, A is the current computer data, while B have all the data of the different computer monitor datas, and if i login B it will show that current computer info. And same goes to the B computer, i can login to A or B on the B computer. What makes this very good is that, both the computer logins are sort of connected, for example if im on actual computer A, but logined to computer B and downloaded/changed some files/data on the B login, once i login on computer B to login B, the changes will apply even tho the changes are done in computer A.
I can�t seem to login to any accounts on the internet (e.g. mail accounts and such). Other than that I don�t have any real problems, except that my internet connection is considerably slower as well. But I can browse the web as usual�
The problem is that whenever I try to log into any place the screen just freezes and gets �non responding� and so I have to close it down. It doesn�t matter which browser I use, I have the same problem anyhow.
How do I setup remote login that would allow 3 or 4 people to login to the same computer.Each person would have their own Windows User Account name, with different privileges.I don't know what software could do this. The computer being connected to would be Windows 7, and there is no special network equipment besides a consumer router.
I was looking at an XP system that has 4 user accounts. Two are limited accounts and two are admin accounts. The adapter is a DLINK DWA-125 USB adapter.When logged into one of the admin accounts, internet works fine. When logged into one of the limited accounts, internet works fine.If I switch to either of the other accounts, the adapter can't get an IP address. If I switch back to one of the accounts that works, I get an IP right away.
I have been researching this for some time now and I can't find a solution to fit my needsI'm deployed in Afghanistan and on the base the local company they brought in has a hard wired network setup which makes you log in for internet. I want to setup wireless off of that with my own router and charge a smaller price. I know this sounds bad but they charge a pretty absurd amount. I would like to lessen that amount for the guys in my unit by splitting the price between everyone. I would like to make it look good though.
The login for the existing internet is a web based login. So, what I have come across so far is I need a router that will support logging into a web based login and support a landing page that will charge/ accept Paypal payments for new accounts and will expiredaily/weekly/monthly based on what they choose. I would like to set this up like you as a customer were loging in at a regular hot spot if that makes sense.
I have two sets of local users who access internal networks vai the Anyconnect application on a Cisco ASA 5505.One user needs to access 1 ip address while about 7 users access abotu 4 addresses.
I have a group called xyz1 which currently has the one user in the connection profile. I guess to reaffirm my thought, If I create another connection entry called xyz2, can I assign the other 7 or 8 users to it?
If I can do this, how can I ensure that each connection entry only has access to specific IP addresses on the internal network?
Am trying to understand how we can have multiple IP addresses on a single NIC and what are the restrictions on the same. If i can have two IPs from two different networks present on a single NIC, then why would i ever get a new NIC?
Also, i want to understand the concept of virtual IP and how it fits into this picture.
I have an older DELL power edge 2800. Currently we have 2 NIC's one for the WAN one for the LAN. I wish to increase my users access speed. Can I team and or bond up to Four NIC's on the LAN side and leave the single NIC for the WAN? I am having trouble finding any info on the net for pulling this off. I have 67 users and throughput is getting a little rough.
Is it possible to assign a single ssid to multiple interface groups by assigning the ssid to multiple AP groups?
I have buildings geographically dispersed that are configured with multiple vlans in interface groups so that I can maintain an addressing scheme of dhcp assigned addresses per building. Each building is also further grouped as AP groups. I'd like to know if by assigning the same wlan ssid to each of the AP groups, will I maintain addressing integrity for each building? I'm thinking it will work.
Do the buildings have to be outside AP range of each other to avoid problems?
I need to put a few cameras, without a server, on a static WAN ip address. Do I just assign them a static LAN ip address(for example 192.168.1.200), make sure the port they use is open, then type the WAN static ip address then colon and the last address? Like this.....I'm making up the WAN address....45.34.55.334:200
some of the servers are not pinging from one switch but they are pingable from other redundant distribution switch. So I took the IP addresses from the redundant switch, with that I found MAC addresses from the access switch.But when I tried to see to which ports these MAC are addresses are connected to, multiple MAC addresses are resolving to the same switchport. like 5 MAC's are showing to 1 port and other 3 MAC's are showing to other port, like this there are many. All these MAC's belong to virtual servers.
I just want to keep one PC as a server and one switch connect to it (For LAN). I want to connect multiple client/screen to that server, so I can use single servers for multiple screen/client.(Client machine will not have any CPU, they will utilize servers memory.)
I have 2 gateway over my network provider to connect to internet.like Gateway1="1.1.1.2" and Gateway2 = "1.1.1.3".but i have only one network adapter with one wire.now i want program to create "Virtual Network adapter" assigned to my real network adapter to set secondary Gateway to it, and use it by "ForceBindip".
I have a i-ball 150M wireless-N ADSL2+ Router device in that , in the NAT tab, i have activated DMZ at my static ip with a private address 192.168.1.224 , so that that ip enabled device can be access to anywhere in public network.I want that using this single static ip , How to configure two private address devices in DMZ, so that both of ip enabled devices can be access in public network.
Our work building currently has 2 separate DSL lines feeding into it, one on each end of the building. The reason for two lines was so each one would have its own bandwidth, thereby supporting more simultaneous users. There is a router connected to the DSL jack at each end of the building, broadcasting its own wireless network: let's call them Work 1 and Work 2.Is there any way for me to connect the Work 1 and Work 2 wireless networks, so that they appear to the end user as one contiguous network?
I have multiple campuses and a Central Admin...I've created Groups for all, except I need a few devices within Central to be available to the Campus Admins... (ie..a Cisco WCS System) How do I allow a device to be put into multiple NDG groups?
I currently have mutiple computers at my place. Once the computer turned on i want the option of which login for the current computer to use, it can login it current computer or the mutiples computer with their content/data all inside. So more like an computer linked. Example, it can only to A or B, A is the current computer data, while B have all the data of the different computer monitor datas, and if i login B it will show that current computer info. And same goes to the B computer, i can login to A or B on the B computer. What makes this very good is that, both the computer logins are sort of connected, for example if im on actual computer A, but logined to computer B and downloaded/changed some files/data on the B login, once i login on computer B to login B, the changes will apply even tho the changes are done in computer A.
We are in the process of installing time clocks at some of our sites around the USA. Our security department has asked that the time clocks be completely isolated from the rest of the network. The time clocks will be administered by ADP via a centralized firewall utilizing NAT. We have multiple subnets available at each site. Let me give an example to calrify what I would like to do. Example: Site A has 10.168.19.0 /24 user subnet and is configured for VLAN1 using 10.168.19.1 on the router as the default gateway. I would like to use subnet 10.168.20.0 /24 for the time clocks, configure it for VLAN2 and use 10.168.20.1 as the router gateway address for VLAN2. This should allow me to NAT one of our additional public IP addresses to the 10.168.20.1 gateway address thus completely isolating the time clocks from the remainder of the network. Problem is I have not done this before so I'm a little confused about how to configure it in the Cisco 3750 switches.
I have Cisco L3 3560G switch which directly connected with router . i have configured Vlan 2,3 on the switch and assign port 2 & 3 respectably. I want to management both vlan 2 & 3 from from L3 port g0/10 .
I am Implementing Cisco IP Routing (CCNP ROUTE FLG) book and right now I am reviewing IPv6 chapter. This part of OSPFv3 multiple instances over a single physical interface caught my attention
setting up a simple internet plan for a place, but a LAN center needs crazy fast internet, faster than most large enterprise class offices that take up an entire floor or two. Otherwise there is too much lag in games like first person shooters. We are expecting to have 60 computers, plus people bringing their own gaming rigs from home and laptops as well, xbox, ps3 and other consoles, all accessing the internet at the same time to varying degrees, with no room for lag. There is a LAN center in california that has 200 or more computers and they pay for 9 t3 lines, which is thousands and thousands of dollars per month. Plus the initial equipment to set that up from what I can find on cdw is many thousands of dollars also. Something like 10,000 for a router with 4 expansion bays, and 4000-6000 dollars for a t3 expansion card, bringing the total to around 22-28,000 for equipment to do just 4 t3's. Plus the monthly cost. Since we don't need all of the traffic to be secured like a high end business class line like a t3, I was considering what it would be like, and how one would set up, having multiple cable internet lines coming in. They make cable wic cards for cisco routers. 4, 50meg cable lines would give us 200 down and 40 up but I don't know how to make that work without having multiple public ip's. I was thinking that if I did have multiple public ip's on the network I could just divide the computers up so that they are in groups, using all of the public ip addresses for gateways, so that the load is split pretty evenly, but still, there should be a more seamless way to do this, I just don't know what it is. At the rate for business cable internet, 4 lines would probably only cost around 700 dollars a month, which is much better than probably 5 grand a month for several t3 lines.
We having ACS version 5.2 0.26 with Active/Standby. We need to integrate active directory with ACS. Domain name given by Server team was as xyzcompy.local. When I tried to resolve the same domain name I got five servers ip address against the same domain name. however we given the ip reachability to only for two servers. We we try to save we get error saying that "Can not resolve the network address".
So my questions are;
- does ACS should have ip reachaibility to all five servers
- does the username/password we entered in the ACS should have domain admin rights?.
- the given AD is configured with windows NTP [URL] but when we configured ACS as windows NTP it was taking local server as active NTP..?
When we check the ACS logs, we saw the following error;
in acsLocalStore: AdminName=acsadmin, DomainName=qatarconvention.local, ADOperationResult=unable to create secured connection against AD server, switching to non-secured connection. javax.naming.CommunicationException: simple bind failed: qnccad02.xxxxconvention.local:636 [Root exception is java.net.SocketException: Connection reset], in ACSADAgent; 32484]: INFO dns.findsrv FindSrvFromDns failed: res_query failed _ldap._tcp.xxxxconvention.local Sep 4 12:43:20 acs01-cc4 adjoin[32484]: INFO cli.adjoin Join to domain 'xxxxconvention.local', zone 'null' failed.
I attached some screen print which saw the error and output of nslookup for the domain name.
I just bought a Linksys EA6500 (AC 1750). Now after a week, seems to stop rresponding at times and I am get 5+ MAC Addresses from 1 IP address. I have only one NIC installed and it is configured to have a static IP.
See attached screen capture. ( Server-PC, IP: 192.168.1.130)
I have a Failover pair of ASA5550's running ASDM 6.2(5) and ASA 8.2(2). Originally they were setup with 2 context's and an admin context but one of the contexts has now been removed. I would like to now migrate to single mode before I go about patching them to the latest software.
I have a FTP server at my local network and i have natted the private IP with my Public IP using default FTP Port ( 21) , now i have created Diffrent FTP Account in my server using port 2121 and i am able to login using the private IP with port 2121 , now i want to nat with my public IP with port 2121 and i failed,
1) 125.x.x.x --------- 10.10.1.x : 21 ( Able to access from external network)
2) 125.x.x.x ---------- 10.10.1.x : 2121 ( not able to login from external network and able to login internally )
We are migrating from a nother brand to an ASA Cluster running 8.4.5
We have a web-server on an inside interface listening on a non standard port - 20111. We have created a static NAT translating the public ip to the private, so If I do http://public-ip:20111 it works. (we are using a seperate public IP for this service only).
Now I need to create a NAT rule that will forward requests on BOTH port 80 and 443 to the same private ip and the same port number (20111)
The Private address is 10.99.250.20 and the "public" (I've replaced it in this example) is 172.16.16.16 I have managed to create a NAT that will translate 443 to 20111:
I have a Fail over pair of ASA5550's running ASDM 6.2(5) and ASA 8.2(2). Originally they were setup with 2 context's and an admin context but one of the contexts has now been removed. I would like to now migrate to single mode before I go about patching them to the latest software.
I have two 1142n LWP ap converted into standalone, as client doesn't have any controller there. They just want to extend their network via wireless.
L3 switch (trunk port gig 1/48) -----> connected to AP1 L3 switch (trunk port 2/48) -----------> connected to AP2
client is looking for 3 vlans on the floor ( users might multiple vlans might associated same AP ). They have a dedicated DHCP/DNS server and he will be configuring 3 vlans on L3 switch with correct ip helper address on SVI interfaces.
I'm i allowed to created 3 SSID's on 1142n standalone AP ?
What would the various optiosn to achieve this requirement ? Is there any simplest way to achieve this ? Do i need to go for 802.1x ? I remember client told their users are authenticating by using AD for wired network. This is their first request for wireless environment
