I have a named aggregate policer configured on a 4948 switch running IOS 12.2(53)SG2 but can't seem to be able to monitor it using SNMP as I can't locate the OIDs (using OIDView) - I'm okay with CB and PB QoS.
View 1 Replies
I am trying to find some background information regarding this error:
Cisco 6500 [SUP720-3B] %QM-4-AGG_POL_EXCEEDED QoS Hardware Resources Exceeded
Out of Aggregate policers.
What triggers this error? In this case, there are QoS policies configured at the interface level. The 'show platform hardware capacity' command shows that there are1024 policers supported. What counts as a policer? Is a policer each instance of a class using the police command? I see where there have been some suggestions to use VLAN based policies instead of interface policies and others suggesting to turn off 'qos marking statistics' but I would really like to understand the details of what causes policers to be used up and how to approach fixing this.
I am trying to understand how this works under the covers but can't seem to find any documentation anywhere defining the details.
I am testing rogue on wire using 5508 WLC and , I have a dedicated AP configured as rogue detector and configured the switch port where the Rogue detector is connected as trunk. I have plugged in an autonomous AP with open authentication to the same switch so that it can act as a rogue. On the WLC, I can see that Autonomous AP as rogue on Wire. But along with that I am seeing another AP as rogue on wire, even though i have plugged in only one Autonomous AP to the switch.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to enable IP SLA on a Cisco 4948 switch (running 'cat4500-ipbasek9-mz.122-46.SG.bin') to test CiscoWorks IPM using this swtich as a source device. But I can't run the command "ip sla monitor" on this switch. It just has "ip sla responder". Is it possible to configura IP SLA on this source switch? Or can I do it only on routers?
View 6 Replies View Relatedhow to configure QoS on Cisco 4948. I have three VLans in my network. First is video traffic second is the voice traffic and third is the data traffic . I need to set the priority in QoS in the following way
i.e. Video traffic - 1st pref
Voice traffic - 2nd pref
Data traffic - 3rd pref
how to configure for this requirement.
I just picked up some second hand 4948 switches and wanted to install the embeded managment software. I can't find it anywhere in the downloads section?
is there a better FREE solution for managing these? I tried config profesional, but it only shows the routing config. There seems to be so many options.
I cannot boot IOS, when i reload this switch it go to ROMMON. I try to uploand IOS but it still has problem. i think i may wrong some point during i did uploand.
This is problem
Switch#sh bootvar
BOOT variable = cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.150-2.SG3.bin,1;bootflash:cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.150-2.SG3.bin,1;bootflash:cat4500-entservicesk9-
[Code].....
I'm trying to apply the following policy route in my switch 4948, but it suddenly crash. Is anything wrong in my commands? The switch is rebooting with an error:
System returned to ROM by abort at PC 0x0
My commands are:
access-lists 7 permit 10.140.22.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 177 permit ip 10.140.22.0 0.0.0.255 100.220.24.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 177 permit ip 10.140.22.0 0.0.0.255 100.216.36.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 177 permit ip 10.140.22.0 0.0.0.255 100.216.38.0 0.0.0.255
[Code]......
My cisco 4948 switch is generating the below error,how do i troubleshoot this error.
*Mar 13 00:09:33.451: %C4K_L2MAN-6-INVALIDSOURCEADDRESSPACKET: (Suppressed 14 times)Packet received with invalid source MAC addre ss (00:00:00:00:00:00) on port Gi1/37 in vlan 1Gi1/37- to this port another 2950 switch is connected by trunk link.and to this switch end host is connected i.e.thin client
In my setup , i have one core switch 4506, 3750 access switches and 4948 server switch.i have created the mngmt VLAN in every switch.the problem is i can ping the every device mngmt ip from any internal network,but my server switch mngmt ip i am not able to ping.trunk link is configure between the core and server,access switches.What is the problem with 4948 switch?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have got a new 48port Cisco catalyst 4948 switch, which I configured as a VTP client and connected to Cisco 3750 which is a VTP Server (this switch is on production network). I connected port g1/0/48 from 3750 to port g1/48 on 4948 through a straight cable and made both ports as trunk port (I also tried through cross cable). The problem is these two switches are not detecting. For testing I connected a PC directly to one of the port on 4948 (making that a switch port) still the LED on switch didn’t glow up. Is there any special command needs to be run on 4948 switches to activate its physical ports?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI need to connect a 6500 switch with a 4948 switch using 10G optics. On 6500, line card used is WS-X6704-10GE and I am aware that WS-X6704-10GE is a xenpak and 4948 ports are X2. What is the way to make the connection between xenpak and X2 work?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI performed an upgraded on a 4948 switch and for some reason the switch kept booting with the old IOS. I was not sure if I needed to change the boot sequence but I performed this upgrade on some of our other 4948's and no issues.I eventually deleted the older IOS version and left the latest version on and reloaded switch and now switch only boots in rommon.I managed to configure the ip info and tftp server ip etc and using the following command as suggested in the rommon help, but it keeps coming back saying 'file not found', when I have checked the file does exist in the tftp server and in the tftpboot folder.
See error message below:
[URL]
Tftp Session details are ....
Filename : /tftpboot/cat4500-ipbase-mz.122-54.SG1
IP Address : 10.250.100.39
Loading from TftpServer: 10.250.150.40
Tftp session failed: File not found
I'm having issues with SSH on my 3750G-12S. I'm not able to SSH to another switch when VRFs are configured.I've tried ip ssh source-interface, ssh -vrf doesn't exsist and I've upgraded the IOS to the latest version.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have an old Dlink DI-604 that I'd like to configure to work as a switch. I think this is possible but not sure how to do it. Switches are cheap but if I could save a few bucks with some tweaking I'd prefer that. Plus I figure I'd learn a bit about networking.Dlinks site on the DI[URL]Uverse and I'm out of wired ports on the Residential Gateway. I would like 2 more ports to network my PC and NAS, so my laptop and Xbox can access their files.
View 4 Replies View Relatedsuch as the SLM2048T can be configured as an managed switch. Our schools have laptop carts and we want to put switches in the carts so that the laptops will be plugged into the network when not in use and software installs, updates, etc. can be pushed to the laptops while they're in the cart instead of waiting for them to be taken out, powered on and pushed over wireless. I can find a 10/100 48-port unmanaged switch, but I really want a gigabit unmanaged switch, but they don't seem to exist so I was wondering if a managed switch can be configured and used as an unmanaged switch. I don't want to have to assign a static IP address to the switch.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've been tasked with finding all switch ports that are configured as Trunks. We plan to use LMS 4.2 to push (via Netconfig) new interface level commands to all user (non-trunked) ports. From my experience, this poses a problem because we do not know which ports are configured as trunks -vs- user ports.
Using Netconfig is not going to be easy since there is no way to script this. It would be great if I could run a show command on a switch and then have CWSI peform a change based upon the output.In other words, we need a way to run a job based upon the output of a command.
We have a 3560 switch behind a ASA 5510 at a site that we are trying to access via telnet over the internet, we find out the switch does not have a default gateway configured. So I configure the following rule on the 5510: [code] Try accessing the switch, and all is good. One of our change control steps is to identify any others are connected to the device via: [code] I see the connection and show users command return 172.16.30.15, as expected. How is it possible that address can connect to that switch.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI currently have a Cisco 2621 powering a network at our co-location facility... It's a simple setup and is working well. The colo provides a redundant HSRP uplink, so I have their two uplinks going into a Dell switch. From that Dell switch I have a uplink into FastEthernet0/0 on the 2621, configured with my routing network, and then FastEthernet0/1 gets an address from my block of routable IP. FastEthernet0/1 then plugs into another Dell switch where I have all my servers connected. The servers get public routable IP addresses and use the address on FastEthernet0/1 as their default gateway.
It's time to upgrade off the 2621, so I aquired a Cisco 2811 which has two FE interfaces, as well as a modular HWIC-4ESW switch. My question is, can I get rid of the Dell Switch A in the setup above and just use the internal switch on the 2811 to accomplish the same thing? And I if I did this, would my two uplinks from the colo plug into ports 1 and 2 of that HWIC, and then port 3 would physically connect into FE 0/0? Or can I logically do that via configuration in the Cisco? I'm not sure how all this works and haven't received the new router yet, so I thought I'd get a head start and reach out to the experts.
My second question is unrelated, but each port on the HWIC switch cannot be configured as a network interface right? I'm pretty sure they can't as they aren't considered network interfaces but just thought I'd ask.
how my switches are configured, a cisco 3750 and a cisco 4506.[code] i can ping the gateway from the 3750 however cannot get anything past that or enything to it.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI would like to know how many port channel can i configured in the switch 3750 X ? and if there is a limitation by IOS ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedThere are 5 VLAN's and all can communicate through all the different subnets, but VLAN5 can not communicate to the RVS 4000.
VLAN Smart Port set to switch and router - this is not working What Smart Port configuration should be set up to talk to the LAN port on a RVS4000?
VPN is set up and connected, but when trying to connect to the client can not connect to remote networks.
we have cisco 6500 series switch and configured port channel on both switches with 2 gig interfaces on both switches.
When we enable the port channel mode to as desirable to the interfaces on both side and applied the port channel to physical interfaces switch will go down and if we remove on any one side switch will come up. we have enabled globally the following commands. [code]
We have a DHCP SERVER implemented in a cisco router 2610.This router is connected to a switch cisco 2960 configured as DHCP SNOOPING. At the switch appear the next log message: [code] The ip address: 10.100.200.1 belongs to DHCP SERVER configured at router cisco 2610. What to do so these log messages does not appear any more? Do I need to do some configuration changes at some switch or router?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have one windows machine in which I have 2 internet connections one wired n one wireless, how I can combine both connection to provide more speed for my home network
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe Cisco 2911's have aggregate 1.6 Gbps towards route processor - I am trying the same specs for Cisco 3845 router? from url...The EHWIC slot provides enhancements to the prior generation's high-speed WAN interface card (HWIC) slots while provide maximum investment protection by natively supporting HWICs, WAN interface cards (WICs), voice interface cards (VICs), and voice/WAN interface cards (VWICs).
• Four integrated EHWIC slots on the Cisco 2901, 2911, 2921, and 2951 allow for more flexible configurations.
• Each HWIC slot offers high-data-throughput capability
• Up to 1.6 Gbps aggregate toward the route processor
• Up to 2 Gbps aggregate to other module slots over the MGF
I have 2811 Cisco ISR and two ISP links - one is 8 Mbps and the second is 4 Mbps. The question is - is it possible to aggregate link speed up to 12 Mbps?
View 4 Replies View RelatedHow to calculate aggregate bandwidth of MPLS link. Is there any tool available for the same.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a layer 3 switch with a bunch of SVIs all in the 192.168.x.0/24 range. I just want to advertise a 192.168.0.0/16 summary to the BGP neighbors. I can do this either by:
1) Redistributing connected into BGP and then using the 'aggregate-address' command to advertise the summary.
2) Specifying a network statement in the BGP config for every single SVI, then using the 'aggregate-address' command.
3) Create a static route to null0 (ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 null0) and put 'network 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0' command in the BGP config.All three fulfill the same purpose of summarizing all the SVIs, but creating the static route is much cleaner in this case. It seems like the aggregate-address command is mostly intended for routers that are aggregating connections coming from other routers and all of them share a common prefix.
I have a 6509 running s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M version 12.2(33)SXH5. Four incorrect bgp aggregate-address statements were entered in which overlap. Attempted to remove the statements but they won't come out.
aggregate address 16.37.31.0 255.255.224.0 summary-only
aggregate address 16.37.30.0 255.255.224.0 summary-only
aggregate address 16.37.29.0 255.255.224.0 summary-only
aggregate address 16.37.26.0 255.255.224.0 summary only
I have entered in the correct statements and have no problem getting those in, removing them, and reentering them.
I have two stacks 3750X on two different sites with two links L_2_L, and I want to configure the port channel to aggregate the two links.
Site A Site B
3750X -A1 --------------------------------------( )--------------------------------------- 3750X -B1
( L-2-L )
3750X -A2 --------------------------------------( )--------------------------------------- 3750X -B2
Below the configuration that I have put the two stacks.
site A
interface Port-channel5
description Etherchannel group entre le stack 3750X-A et Switch Lan_2_Lan
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 11,12,999
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
speed 100
But the problem is only one link is Bundeled in channel group, see below
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
5 Po5(SU) LACP Gi1/0/15(I) Gi2/0/15(P)
I have faced a problem regarding AAA line:
aaa authorization exec default group tacacs+ local
if i add this line in my cisco 4948 switch running on 122-46.SG.. The next time i telnet to the switch i get an automatic restart of the switch and all configs are lost.
IOS used:
cat4500-ipbase-mz.122-46.SG.bin
WS-C4948-10GE
i have a requirement to enable pbr in vrf interface of a 4948 switch. but as i browse the internet, it is quite impossible to do that. is there any alternative way / feature to get the same result as pbr does? which is to reroute the specific vrf traffic to another interface based on source and destination ip address?
View 1 Replies View Related
