Cisco Application :: L7CLASSSrv2 / ACE Loadbalance Ssl Match Header?
Mar 27, 2012
I created several rules to balance on a specific server somes apps. Everythings works great in http but no in https.In my example, i would like [URL] to be redirected to my server2 but it's always using the default rules instead of the L7CLASSSrv2. Today [URL] is well redirected. All other apps are correctly loadbalance with the stickyness effect but I can't handle the https connections.
class-map match-all L4-WEB-IP
2 match virtual-address xxxx tcp eq www
class-map match-all L4-WEBHTTPS-IP
2 match virtual-address xxxx tcp eq https
class-map type http loadbalance match-any L7CLASSSrv1
We are using Cisco ACE 4710 to load balance servers. We have created VIP under the interface vlan using nat-pool command. Also, we have changed the gateway of the server to point to the ACE vlan ip address which is created using alias 10.x.x.x 255.x.x.x command under the interface vlan. In short ACE is in inline mode for the servers which needs to be load balanced.
But still I am not able to view the original client IP. Just to add more, the site is a HTTPS site & we have not doing any kind of SSL offloading on the ACE, it is taken care by server itself
I just want to do the HTTP & HTTPS load balancing without SSL offloading & should be able to see the original client IP in the server logs
We are migrating from ACE 20 module to an ACE 4710 appliance. [code] When pasting in the config on the ACE 4710 running A4(2.1) code, I get the subject error message when trying to enter in the highlighted sticky-serverfarm command above. Again, this config works on the older hardware and older code.
is it possible to construct the L7 HTTP class-map expression to match all URLs except one? I have 1 correct url, for example: /correcturl.* and want to redirect requests to all other possible URLs to this one, without the need to list them all in "possitive match" statements.
I managed to narrow down my question to this.SOCKS5 proxy is able to handle both TCP and UDP transport protocols.If I have IPinIP encapsulated tunnel, will this work? in other words, does SOCKS5 expect Layer 4 header immediately after Layer 3 header or not?
We have an ASA Version 8.0(5)19 as our firewall.We are trying an cloud service on the internet and found that the ASA is removing the X-Forwarded-For on the header on the surf traffic.Is it possible to not remove the X-Forwarded-For in ASA?
One of my customer has raised a new requirement for implementation of short sequence number format support in PPP multilink header for Cisco MWR 2941 E1/T1 serial interface, whereas router is supporting long sequence number format.here is the output of "debug ppp negotiation" command:-Currently in the MWR debugging logs we can see that by default MWR is sending long sequence header format as below
My 2811 sip gateway send invite to my ITSP server with incorrect IP address in Contact section. It uses the internal ip address instead of using the public ip. As results, the re-invite sent back from ITSP sip server cannot be recieve. Could some tell how to change the ip address in Contact section of the invite message.
We have pair of Cisco Nexus 7018 with four eight port 10gig modules.I have created two VDC's with mixing 10gig ports from diffrent modules.Now we requied some one gig SFP ports and we are planning to buy 48 port 1gig sfp+ card.My question is can
1- Can I still mix and match 1gig and 10 gig ports in two different VDC's? (1-24 for VDC1 and 25-48 for VDC2)
2- All 48 port module hve to allocate to one VDC which alreday have all 10gig ports.
I have a problem with latest Anyconnect Mobile clients, on any device(iPhone,PC..) I have this error message.Anyconnect cannot verify the VPN serverAll certificates(rootCA,userCER) - installed on client side, all of them are trusted.
I'm getting an "ACL does not match proxy IDs" error that I'm not able to troubleshoot, googled this with a lot of results, tried some; but nothing applied.I have setup 2 tunnels, 1/one from a pix 515e (office) to an ASA 5505 (hosted server) for my guys to access the hosted server2/A second one from the ASA 5505 to my client's firewall so that its equipments can reach the hosted server and from the hosted server reach the equipments.Both tunnels are working fine, my issue comes when I'm trying to join my clients equipments from my office, ie cascading the tunnels.
This is the first time I'm trying to cascade some tunnels, no issues with other vpns I have been building.I'm joining the configuration of the pix and the asa and an extract of the syslogs showing the error, any obvious error I haven't seen!
I am currently using a Cisco 1751 w/ 1-WIC-DUS-T1 to connect our branch locations via Frame Relay. I will be adding 2 new locations in about 2 months. What is the 1800 series match for the router I currently use and is there and performance advantages?
This is happening to me to multiple computers on my domain. When it happens i can only log in as a local user or if I unplug the network cable, log in and then re-connect the networkThe time on all these machines is correct within at least 1 minute but still it's throwing off this error. When reading about this problem I see many fixes that all relate to how to sych the time on the PC.
On the laptop, the info bar is on the left side, the website tabs on the top, this shifts the other computers screenview down and to the right, it also cuts off the right side and bottom, with still leaving space on the right side and bottom. The pointer on the lap top does not line up with the desktop, because the screen is shifted, but only a portion of the screen is visible anyway. I used the same password and log in on both computers, don't know if they have to be different.There is full a screen option at the top right, but this causes the top tabs and info buttons on the left side to go black.
I live in a shared house, and I am the only one who has been experiencing issues connecting to the internet. I have to ask a housemate to reset the server, as this is the only thing that works.
When I am unable to connect, and I use command ipconfig, the following appears: Autoconfiguration IPv4 169.254.23.29 On the occasions when I am connected, the following appears in its place: IPv4 IP Address: 192.168.0.2
One tip that I came across was to check the box (Wireless Network properties, Connection tab) for "Connect even if the network is not broadcasting". I had hoped this simple solution would assist, but to no avail.
We have an HQ site with a 2811 (w/ADVSECURITYK9-M) acting as the firewall. We currently have 1 ASA5505 that has an established ipsec l2l VPN. I'm trying to connect a 2nd ASA, but I've noticed I can only add 1 cryptomap to the outside interface. A show ver shows 1 Virtual Private Network Module... Surely that doesn't mean only 1 VPN?Do I use one crypto map, and add a second 'set peer' & 'match address' inside the crypto map itself?
I've Cisco7609-S with IOS 12.2(33)SRC2 met an issue is that "show ip route x.x.x.x" and "show ip cef x.x.x.x" shown next-hop is not actual switched next-hop.
For example, "show ip route 192.168.1.1" and "show ip cef 192.168.1.1" shown correct next-hop is 10.1.1.1, but the traffic destine to 192.168.1.1 actually not through 10.1.1.1, but always through the default route next-hop. Everything works normal after rebooted the router. Suppose it should caused by a bug? BTW, my Cisco7609 is runing BGP with ISP which received about 10K routes.
I have a 10Mbps connection link which I will like to reduce to 5Mbps on a 6509 switch as indicated in the config below. [code] After applying the service policy on the vlan interface, i got this "match vlan is not supported for this interface". I actually tried the rate limit command but I cant see the effect using the speedtest.
I am running ASR1002 with latest XE IOS version asr1000rp1-adventerprisek9.03.02.01.S.151-1.S1.bin configuration bellow
router bgp 65000 bgp router-id 18.104.22.168 bgp log-neighbor-changes timers bgp 5 15 ! address-family ipv4 vrf LABR01-VRF bgp router-id 22.214.171.124 neighbor bgprrclient peer-group neighbor bgprrclient remote-as 65001 neighbor bgprrclient password 7 1234 neighbor bgprrclient update-source Loopback0 neighbor bgprrclient version 4 neighbor bgprrclient route-reflector-client neighbor bgprrclient route-map set_weight in I then tried to create new route-map and get error that match next-hop can not be used on inbound
route-map set_weight permit 10 match ip next-hop prefix-list thirdparty match as-path 1 set weight 1000
LAB-ASR1002(config)#route-map set_weight permit 10LAB-ASR1002(config-route-map)# match ip next-hop prefix-list thirdparty% "set_weight" used as BGP inbound route-map, nexthop match not supported% not supported match will behave as route-map with no match% "set_weight" used as BGP inbound route-map, nexthop match not supported% not supported match will behave as route-map with no match% "set_weight" used as BGP inbound route-map, nexthop match not supported% not supported match will behave as route-map with no match% "set_weight" used as BGP inbound route-map, nexthop match not supported% not supported match will behave as route-map with no match% "set_weight" used as BGP inbound route-map, nexthop match not supported% not supported match will behave as route-map with no match Not sure why Cisco is not supporting a pretty basic feature for BGP route maps.I tried looking into matching other variables but I am unable to get same result as I have same routes on bgp table from multible inbound peers.
I also get this message when configuring tacacs. I looked for "new" cli but no luck:LAB-ASR1002(config)#tacacs-server host 126.96.36.199 This cli will be deprecated soon. Use new server cli
I am setting up officeexten. I have placed the officeextend wlc in the dmz with an mgmt ip of 192.168.10.2. in the process of anchoring this to the internal wlc. Also the ip on the firewall for this interface is 192.168.10.1
1. does the mobility group need to match the same on the internal wlc ?
2. Now do i need a NAT transnational on the firewall for the external WAN ip (AP primed address say 188.8.131.52) to NAT back to 192.168.10.2 ?
3. The 5508 WLC is running on ver184.108.40.206 (license level base) - will this support office extend?
While on facebook I search a friend and in the search bar it says we have say 10 mutual friends however when I click this person to and view their profile it suddenly says we only have 8 mutual friends.An even stranger thing is I have a friend on facebook (she has her friend's list hidden) who will appear on MOST mutual friends lists of others I am also friends with. However she won't appear on two of my friend's mutual list when I am CERTAIN she is friends with them and also she will appear on mutual lists of some I am not friends with but also fail to appear on mutual lists of people I'm not friends with but I know she is. TO SUMMARIZE:1.) why doesn't the mutual friends number match up. it will say 10 mutual friends but show 8.2.) why does she not appear on some lists but does on others when I KNOW she should be on the others know of any scripts to just see hidden friend lists?
I'm trying to get an HP laptop running Win7 to see a desktop running WinXP on my network (both wired and wireless) When I run the troubleshooter in Win7, it tells me "system clock does not match local time" as the reason. I have a Belkin wireless router attached to my cable router. I have updated the system clock via the internet on the desktop and checked the time setting in BIOS. These seem to match. I have googled around on this and can't find any accounts similar. My son's Vista laptop and the Win7 laptop have seen each other since day one. The laptop and desktop did see each other at one time, but the connection was lost after I went to a hotel and changed public network settings temporarily. I can ping the desktop from the laptop, but it times out when pinging the laptop from the desktop. I'm running an avast firewall on both, but can't see a problem there.
we have bought 2911 router recently has to set up VOIP line seperately for the network we have two two broadband service provider:
1. how can i use 1 line as an active and other line as a failover(when 1 line is down other line should automatically bear the traffic).clear config will be useful. NATTING using MAtch address objects( roughly )
broadband service provider 1: 97.89.X.X 255.255.252.0 broadband service provider 2: 10.0.x.x 255.255.240.0
2. there are only 20 users to set up a voip line now. here we have telecom provider where they should route the traffic to make any international calls( say telecom public ip 220.127.116.11)from lan - wan everything is allowed from wan -lan we have to allow only telcom provider IP(18.104.22.168)
we're using openldap for authorising our user to connect to the webvpn via our ASA.We'd like to rely on operational attributes to do some DAP matching. This is an example of how a user record looks in our LDAP tree:
# extended LDIF # # LDAPv3
Are LDAP operational attributes supported at all by the Cisco ASA?